The Lead Tungstate Calorimeter for CMS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INFN Milano, Universita` degli Studi Milano Bicocca Siena IPRD May Testbeam results of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter Alessio Ghezzi.
Advertisements

PPRP September 2002 UK CMS 1 CMS Endcap Electromagnetic Calorimeter and Global Calorimeter Trigger, Physics & Computing Presented by Peter Hobson, Brunel.
US CMS Collaboration Meeting, May 19, Ren-yuan Zhu, Caltech PWO Crystal ECAL Ren-yuan Zhu California Institute of Technology May 19 th 2001.
Experimental Particle Physics
LCFI Collaboration Status Report LCWS 2004 Paris Joel Goldstein for the LCFI Collaboration Bristol, Lancaster, Liverpool, Oxford, RAL.
2002 LHC Days at Split, Split, October 2002 D J A Cockerill - RAL 1 The ECAL Endcap Calorimeter for CMS D J A Cockerill RAL - UK 2002 LHC Days at Split.
Vacuum Phototriodes for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Endcap
CMS ECAL Annual Review - CERN Sept 2001 R M Brown - RAL 1 Test results from 500 preproduction VPTs R M Brown RAL - UK CERN 19 September 2001.
STFC RAL EE at SLHC CERN 15/04/08 R M Brown - RAL 1 EE at SLHC What do we expect at SLHC? EE Layout VPT vulnerability to radiation - Faceplate darkening.
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
TIME 2005: TPC for the ILC 6 th Oct 2005 Matthias Enno Janssen, DESY 1 A Time Projection Chamber for the International Linear Collider R&D Studies Matthias.
Scintillator Tile Hadronic Calorimeter Prototype (analog or semidigital) M.Danilov ITEP(Moscow) CALICE Collaboration LCWS04, Paris.
Prototype sPHENIX Calorimeters
The CALICE test beam activities Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London (for the CALICE collaboration) ALCPG07, FNAL, Chicago, 22 nd October.
Ioan Dafinei Regional Centre ECAL-CMS Rome ITALY Villa Olmo, Como October 2001 Advanced Technology and Particle Physics Lead Tungstate Crystals for.
The CALICE test beam at CERN Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London (on behalf of the Calice Collaboration) SPSC meeting, CERN, Geneva,
CMS-UK Oversight Committee 17/5/04 D.J.A. Cockerill - RAL 1 The CMS ECAL Endcaps Crystal ECAL Endcap Calorimeter (EE) Preshower EE EE crystals.
CMS-UK Oversight Committee 18/11/03 D.J.A. Cockerill - RAL 1 The CMS ECAL Endcaps Crystal ECAL Endcap Calorimeter (EE) Preshower EE.
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Fractions Simplify: 36/48 = 36/48 = ¾ 125/225 = 125/225 = 25/45 = 5/9
STFC RAL Graduate lectures 2007/8 R M Brown - RAL 1 An introduction to calorimeters for particle physics Bob Brown STFC/PPD.
1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
B W Kennedy, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory VPTs for the CMS experiment B W Kennedy CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory St Petersburg, 26 April.
US CMS Collaboration Meeting, May 19, PWO Crystal ECAL Ren-yuan Zhu California Institute of Technology May 19 th 2001.
PPARC forum on developments in scintillator technology R M Brown - RAL 1 Scintillating Crystals for Particle Physics Outline  Performance considerations.
INSTR-08, BINP, Novosibirsk 1 Belle calorimeter upgrade B.Shwartz, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk on behalf of BELLE calorimeter.
CMS Week, CERN, 2002 R M Brown - RAL 1 Performance Characteristics of Production VPTs R M Brown, B W Kennedy, P R Hobson (with crucial input from D J A.
PSD8 September 2008, Glasgow.P R Hobson, Brunel University 1 Avalanche Photodiodes and Vacuum Phototriodes for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER at CMS EVANGELOS XAXIRIS June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory CMS ECAL Split 08/09/04 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS.
CMS SLHC workshop, D.J.A. Cockerill (RAL)1 CMS SLHC Workshop The CMS ECAL Detector at SLHC D Cockerill RAL
Valery Dormenev Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk
Panic 05, 27 th Oct 2005Q. Ingram, PSI1 The Lead Tungstate Electromagnetic Calorimeter of CMS Q. Ingram on behalf of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter.
Photodetection EDIT Internal photoelectric effect in Si Band gap (T=300K) = 1.12 eV (~1100 nm) More than 1 photoelectron can be created by light in silicon.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota On behalf of the CMS ECAL collaboration.
CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS ECAL Group.
CMS ECAL performance and upgrade Anton Karneyeu (INR, Moscow) CMS Collaboration INSTR14, Novosibirsk, Russia, 27 February 2014.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter US CMS JTERM III 12 January 2009 Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter at the LHC
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
B W Kennedy, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Vacuum Phototriodes for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Endcaps K.W.Bell, R.M.Brown, D.J.A.Cockerill,
1 US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, WBS 4.0 The Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota US-CMS L2 ECAL Manager.
LHC The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is an accelerator with 27 km circumference. Being built on the France- Switzerland border west of Geneva. It will start.
RESMDD02 July , Florence, A.Singovski, University of Minnesota1 Radiation hardness of the Avalanche Photodiodes for ECAL CMS detector at CERN.
R.S. Orr 2009 TRIUMF Summer Institute
Photon Detector with PbWO 4 Crystals and APD Readout APS “April” Meeting in Denver, CO on May 4, 2004 presented by Kenta Shigaki (Hiroshima University,
The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter
Concept of NA62 IRC based on PWO scintillation crystals A.Fedorov, M. Korjik, A. Lobko Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk, Belarus A. Kourilin JINR,
Test Beam Results on the ATLAS Electromagnetic Calorimeters Lucia Di Ciaccio – LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group) OUTLINE Description of the.
SLHC Working Group - Nadia Pastrone1 CMS ECAL Detector at SLHC SLHC high radiation environment  consequences on ECAL Bunch crossing period:
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
LHC Symposium 2003 Fermilab 01/05/2003 Ph. Schwemling, LPNHE-Paris for the ATLAS collaboration Electromagnetic Calorimetry and Electron/Photon performance.
CMS-UK Oversight Committee 17/11/06 D.J.A. Cockerill - RAL 1 The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter UK Responsibilities Procurement and testing of VPTs Design.
CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER Jean-Pierre Ernenwein OVERVIEW 6th international conference on advanced technology and particle physics Villa Olmo, Como,
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
HEP2001, Budapest, July 2001 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Vacuum Phototriodes for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter P R Hobson, D C Imrie, O Sharif Brunel University,
Electromangetic calorimeter of CMS: status and performances
Ilhan TAPAN* and Fatma KOCAK
The Electromagnetic Calorimetry of the PANDA Detector at FAIR
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
Overview Detector details Crystals Photo-detectors
The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
A study on stochastic term of calorimetric energy resolution
CMS ECAL Endcaps: Fluence/Dose (500 fb-1)
SoLID EC photonsensor.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER
Presentation transcript:

The Lead Tungstate Calorimeter for CMS R M Brown RAL - UK CALOR 2000 Annecy - France October 2000 CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 1

Outline of Talk Overview of CMS Parameters of the ECAL Properties of Lead Tungstate Radiation levels Crystal production Photodetectors: APD, VPT Mechanical design Preshower detector Prototype performance Monitoring system Electronic readout system Status summary CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 2

The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector for LHC Physics goals: SUSY, Higgs, Heavy flavours, heavy ions ECAL 1880 Scientists 150 Institutes 32 Countries Total mass : 12,500t Overall Diameter: 15.0m Overall Length: 21.6m Magnetic field: 4T CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 3

ECAL design objectives High resolution electromagnetic calorimetry is a basic design objective of CMS Benchmark physics process: Sensitivity to a low mass Higgs via H    m / m = 0.5 [E1/ E1  E2/ E2  / tan( / 2 )] Where E / E = a /  E  b  c/ E Aim: Barrel End cap Stochastic term: a = 2.7% 5.7% (photoelectron statistics/shower fluctuations) Constant term: b = 0.55% 0.55% (non-uniformities, shower leakage) Noise term: Low L c = 155 MeV 205 MeV High L 210 MeV 245 MeV (Angular resolution limited by uncertainty in position of interaction vertex) L = 1034 cm2s-1 Vertex by track finding mH = 100 GeV CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 4

ECAL design choices  ECAL (and HCAL) within magnetic vol  Homogenous active medium (PbWO4)  Magnetic field-tolerant photodetectors with gain: - Avalanche photodiode (APD) for barrel - Vacuum phototriode (VPT) for end caps  Pb/Si Preshower detector in end caps Properties of dense inorganic scintillators CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 5

ECAL Parameters CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 6

Radiation levels in ECAL 225 HB Relative light yield vs dose Absorbed dose after 10 years EB cm HE EE 400 cm 1.4x106 105 104 103 102 101 Gy Dose and neutron fluence Effect of radiation on PbWO4 (after intense R&D) No change in scintillation properties Small loss in transmission through formation of colour centres Damage saturates Slow self-annealing occurs Loss in light yield of a few percent corrected with monitoring system No damage observed with neutrons Neutron fluence (1013cm-2) Dose (kGy)  = 1.48 CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 7

Crystal production Russia (Czochralski) Preproduction (6 000): 5000 delivered so far Production (30 000): Order placed Delivery starts this year China (modified Bridgman-Stockbarger) R&D phase advanced Preproduction: Planned start at end of 2000 Production: Planned start in 2001 Preproduction order (Russia) Rejection rate (%) 1998 1999 2000 CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 8

Distributions of Crystal properties Light Yield (p.e./MeV) 500 Xtals Spec: > 8 p.e. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 p.e. Decay Time (% LY in 100ns) 3500 Xtals Spec: >90% 90 92 94 96 98 100% 500 Barrel 150 Transmission 420 nm (%) 30 40 50 60 70 80% 3500 Xtals Spec: >55% Barrel 800 Light Yield (p.e./MeV) 100 Xtals 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 p.e. 40 End cap CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 9

Photodetectors: barrel Avalanche photodiodes (APD) Operated at a gain of 50 Active area of 2 x 25mm2/crystal Q.E.  80% for PbWO4 emission Excess noise factor is F = 2.2 Insensitive to shower leakage particles (deff  6 m) Irradiation causes bulk leakage current to increase  electronic noise doubles after 10 yrs - acceptable Delivery from Hamamatsu starts this year CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 10

Photodetectors: end caps Vacuum Phototriodes (VPT) B-field orientation in end caps favourable for VPTs (Tube axes 8.5o < || < 25.5o with respect to field) Vacuum devices offer greater radiation hardness than Si diodes Gain 8 - 10 at B = 4 T Active area of ~ 280 mm2/crystal Q.E. ~ 20% at 420 nm Excess noise factor is F ~ 3 Insensitive to shower leakage particles UV glass window - less expensive than ‘quartz’ - more radiation resistant than borosilicate glass Irradiation causes darkening of window  Loss in response < 20% after 10 yrs - acceptable  = 26.5 mm MESH ANODE Pilot order placed with RIE (St Petersburg): 100 devices delivered so far and under test CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 11

VPT Characteristics Response vs Angle 12 10 8 6 4 2 Gain vs Bias Gain Gain vs Bias Gain VA = 1000V VA = 800V 0 200 400 600 800 1000 VD (Volts) Response vs B-Field 100 90 80 60 40 20 Window transmission vs Dose % 300 400 500 600 700 nm CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 12

Construction: barrel Submodule: 2x5 Xtals with APD and FE electronics in 200m glass fibre alveola Module: 10x4 or 10x5 submodules mounted on a ‘Grid’, inside a ‘basket’ Supermodule: 4 Modules (1700 Xtals) Barrel = 36 Supermodules Assembled Submodules CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 13

Construction: end caps ‘Supercrystal’: carbon-fibre alveola containing 5x5 tapered crystals + VPTs + HV filter 160 Supercrystals per Dee All crystals have identical dimensions All Supercrystals are identical (apart from inner and outer circumference) CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 14

Preshower detector Rapidity coverage: 1.65 < || < 2.6 (End caps) Motivation: Improved 0/ discrimination 2 orthogonal planes of Si strip detectors behind 2 X0 and 1 X0 Pb respectively Strip pitch: 1.9 mm (60 mm long) Area: 16.5 m2 (4300 detectors, 1.4 x105 channels) Incident Direction High radiation levels - Dose after 10 years: ~ 2 x1014 n/cm2 ~ 60 kGy  Operate at -10o C CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 15

 0/ Discrimination ( - jet) is potentially the most serious background to H    Track isolation cut reduces ( - jet) to  50% of the intrinsic ( - ) background (pT cut = 2GeV/c) Use 0/ discrimination in the ECAL to gain an extra margin of safety Barrel: Lateral shower shape in crystals (limited by crystal size at high E0) End cap: Cluster separation in preshower (limited by shower fluctuations at 3X0) CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 16

Test beam:Energy Resolution No preshower detector CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 17

Energy resolution with preshower Energy resolution degraded by Pb absorber - partially restored using Si p.h. information Excellent agreement between MC and data TDR performance achieved for E > 80 GeV (ET > 30 GeV - OK for H  ) (even though Pb 10% too thick in this test!) CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 18

Laser Monitoring System 440 nm/500 nm 1 mJ (2x1015 g) ~1.3 TeV DATA LINK ADC & OPTO PREAMP APD CRYSTAL (1700/SM) LEVEL-1 LEVEL-2 SWITCH LASER FANOUT FANOUT (select SM/2) MEM (200 Channels) CTRL SERIALISER ADC (x12) PN FE CMS-ECAL MONITORING SYTEM CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 19

Laser Correction for Effect of Radiation Damage 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.0 1.02 Beam Response 1.02 1.0 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.92 Laser Resp Laser-Beam Correlation 0 20 40 60 80 100 Time (Hours) Rel. Relative Response vs Time  Laser  Electrons (laser corrected)  Electrons (laser and temp corrected) CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 20

Upper-level VME readout Readout architecture Upper-level VME readout (in Counting Room) Trigger PbWO4 APD Preamp Gain ADC Serialiser Optical Crystal VPT select + VCSEL link Pipeline control Interface  DAQ Interface  Trigger On-detector light-to-light readout 40 MHz Clock 12 bit precision 4 different gains  >17 bit dynamic range CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 21

Status summary Crystals Russia: Preproduction of 6 000 Xtals on schedule Order for placed 30 000 Xtals placed, delivery starts in 2001 China: Preproduction in 2000/1, full production in 2002 Photodetectors APD: Preproduction completed, main production imminent VPT: Pilot order placed, delivery started Mechanics Barrel: Submodule parts in production Module: some design changes to achieve cost/performance target End cap: Procurement of supercrystal parts starts after EDR in November Electronics Full readout chain tested in beam in 2000 - performance OK Some problems with manufacturing yields Monitoring Components ordered and delivery on schedule Preshower Preproduction of Si detectors started Preamplifier prototype tested: radiation harness + performance OK Mechanics progressing well. Summary Some delays in mechanics/electronics/APD  Absorb by rescheduling Critical path defined by crystal delivery and precalibration in an electron beam CALOR 2000, Annecy, October 2000 R M Brown - RAL 22