ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
SCIENCE & TESTING. CMT-SCIENCE Given for the first time in Spring 2008 in grades 5 & 8 Consists of multiple choice and open ended questions Based on student.
Year Two Year Three Year One Research methods teaching in the social sciences: An integrated approach to inquiry- based learning.
ScWk 242: Course Wrap-Up and Summary Session 16 Slides.
Frameworks for Assessment of Student Learning: Questions of Concept, Practice, and Detail Christine Siegel, Ph.D. Associate Professor of School Psychology.
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
Qualitative Social Work Research
CS1203 SCCC/ATS COURSE SYLLABUS Introduction to Computer Concepts and Applications Revised 8/16/2014 Online 7/14 revision Ed Hall Instructor.
SWRK 292 Thesis/Project Seminar. Expectations for Course Apply research concepts from SWRK 291. Write first three chapters of your project or thesis.
1 The Special Project & Thesis School of Health and Human Services Southern Connecticut State University Department of Public Health Master of Public Health.
Department of Computer Science City College of New York City College of New York Spring 2006 Copyright © 2006 by Abbe Mowshowitz CSc 375 SOCIAL ISSUES.
Formative and Summative Evaluations
Research Methods for Business Students
Problem Identification
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Teaching Science with Case Studies: A National Survey of Faculty Perceptions Mary Lundeberg Professor, Teacher Education Michigan State University Aman.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Research & Statistics Student Learning Assessment comparing Online vs. Live (Face to Face) Instruction.
An On-line Statistics Course in a Bioethics Curriculum Jane E. Oppenlander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor The Bioethics Program Union Graduate College-Mt.
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Assessment Report Department of Psychology School of Science & Mathematics D. Abwender, Chair J. Witnauer, Assessment Coordinator Spring, 2013.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Principles of Assessment
Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.
Doctor of Education (EdD). Programme Objectives March EdD Program 1  The Doctor of Education (Ed.D) is designed to produce high quality academics.
Assessment Tools. Contents Overview Objectives What makes for good assessment? Assessment methods/Tools Conclusions.
McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Nature of Research Chapter One.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition, or past practice. The importance.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
ISE 482 Moody1 Instructional Design ISE 482: ISE Senior Capstone Design.
Learning Unit Documents and Examples. Learning Units - basic building block of a course For iGETT a Learning Unit consists of –Three parts Instructor.
Education 793 Class Notes Welcome! 3 September 2003.
Semester 2: Lecture 9 Analyzing Qualitative Data: Evaluation Research Prepared by: Dr. Lloyd Waller ©
An Introduction to Measurement and Evaluation Emily H. Wughalter, Ed.D. Summer 2008 Department of Kinesiology.
Faustino Jerome G. Babate Nursing Research I Brokenshire College SOCSKSARGEN.
What is design? Blueprints of the instructional experience Outlining how to reach the instructional goals determined during the Analysis phase The outputs.
Assessment Tools.
Introduction & Overview Prepared by: TGK First Prepared on: Last Modified on: Quality checked by: Copyright 2009 Asia Pacific Institute of Information.
Facilitate Group Learning
Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition,
Instructional Plan Template | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan Template Jami Anderson.
Subject to change. Advanced Placement Psychology Course Goal  To learn about the field of psychology through in- depth study, discussion and hands-on.
Research refers to a search for knowledge Research means a scientific and systematic search for pertinent information on a specific topic In fact, research.
ASK STANDARDS Assessment and Accountability CNS 610 Written & Narrated by: Kelcie Dixon Western Kentucky University.
MU Core Revision Proposal The Atom Visual Structure Please read information provided in each slide as well as the notes under each slide.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
PSY 325 AID Education Expert/psy325aid.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Research And Evaluation Differences Between Research and Evaluation  Research and evaluation are closely related but differ in four ways: –The purpose.
Road To Success Kathleen Bolland, PhD Javonda Williams, PhD, LCSW SUCCESS Next Exit Aligning curricular planning, teaching, and program evaluation to facilitate.
Fifth Edition Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill 2009 Research Methods for Business Students.
Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010.
Field instructor orientation
Criteria Rollout Meeting October 30, 2016
Critically Appraising a Medical Journal Article
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
Accounting (Foundation)
Research Methods for Business Students
Field instructor orientation
Assessing Students' Understanding of the Scientific Process Amy Marion, Department of Biology, New Mexico State University Abstract The primary goal of.
The General Education Core in CLAS
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Field instructor orientation
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
Field instructor orientation
Presentation transcript:

ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides

Course Description  This course provides students with the opportunity to apply concepts and skills for conducting research that were introduced last semester in ScWk 240. The course also emphasizes content designed to prepare students to build knowledge in the profession of social work, using both qualitative and quantitative methods.  The course builds on the first semester by engaging students in the selection and implementation of appropriate methodology and analysis tools for the evaluation of social work practice and policy.  These concepts and skills are applied to the further development of a research proposal, for which students laid the conceptual foundations in the ScWk 240 course.  Students also apply these concepts and skills to the critical assessment of social work research on Latinos, African Americans, Asian Americans, and other diverse and oppressed populations. ScWk 242 concludes the first-year core research curriculum, which provides the conceptual knowledge and skills for the Master of Social Work Special Project (ScWk 298).  ScWk 242 presupposes a foundational knowledge of quantitative and qualitative research methods, basic research design concepts, sampling methodology, models for group comparisons, single-system methodology, as well as basic computer literacy. 2

Overview - Major Research Issues  Importance of scientific inquiry in social work  Strategies for measuring social work effectiveness  Need to carefully analyze and critique research quality  Importance of compassion and professional ethics  Understanding the principles of the scientific method  Recognizing flaws in unscientific and untested sources  Reliability and Validity  Realizing that all researchers faces challenges & choices 3

Important Research Concepts  Quantitative, Qualitative, Single Subject, and Evaluation  Types of Measures – Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, & Ratio  Sampling Options and Challenges  Research Designs, including Pre-, Quasi-, & Experimental  Internal and External Validity  Needs Assessment and Use of Logic Models  Process and Outcome Program Evaluation  Accountability and Politics in Research 4

Competencies Covered in this Course  Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.  Engage in research informed practice and practice informed research).  Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment  Evaluation: Critically analyze, monitor and evaluate interventions 5

Assignments Assignment 1: Qualitative Labs 1 and 2: Assignment 1 includes two qualitative analysis labs. Each lab will include a 3 page written report (double-spaced, total that includes an analysis of qualitative data generated from: 1) interviews, 2) focus groups, and 3) observations. Data will be obtained through in-class exercises. Specific assignment directions will be provided in class. This assignment is worth 10 points. Qualitative Lab #1 (Interviewing) is due on 2/13/13 and Qualitative Lab #2 (the Focus Groups) assignment is due on 2/20/13. Assignment 2: Quantitative Labs 1-3: Quantitative labs will use the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) computer program and will involve hands-on exercises with the computer, utilizing SPSS for Windows for data analysis. Students will complete formal lab exercises involving the analysis of data provided by the instructor. Skills and examples necessary to complete these exercises will be taught and can be completed in class or on your own time. This information will be directly applicable to material covered in the course examinations. The main analysis topics are as follows: descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and t-test. Write-ups for the 3 labs are worth 10 points and are due 3/6/13, 3/13/13, and 3/20/13. 6

Assignments (Continued) Assignment 3: Program Evaluation Design The purpose of the Program Evaluation Design assignment is to: apply program evaluation concepts to a social work field of practice, and apply quantitative and qualitative analysis concepts. Consider one program within the agency where you are currently working, or plan to be placed for your internship. Develop a logic model for the program using the logic model template and then write a 3 to 4 page paper describing the logic model and evaluation design. Additional directions will be provided in class. Assignment is worth 20 points and is due on 4/17/13. Assignment 4: Revised literature review, methods & analysis plan for ScWK 240 proposal This is an extension of your research proposal begun in ScWk 240. It is the application of both the methodological and analysis skills learned during the first year of the MSW research sequence. In particular, you will be asked to 1) revise your literature review, 2) develop the research methods for your proposed study and 3) add an analysis section which outlines which analysis procedures and statistical tests you will employ. Additional assignment directions will be provided. Assignment 4 is worth 30 points and is due on 5/8/13. 7

Exam and Participation Exam: The exam will cover all course materials, i.e., readings, lecture notes, class examples, and lab materials. The format of this exam may consist of multiple choice, short answer or essay questions that will ask you to synthesize what you have learned and apply it to an area of social work practice. The exam is worth 20 points and will take place on 5/1/13 Class Participation: Class participation will be assessed according to engagement in class discussions and involvement during group exercises. This component is worth 10 points. 8