+ Third Party Evaluation 2012-13 – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to the Environment Rating Scales
Advertisements

Judith J. Carta, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas with help from Elaine Carlson, WESTAT.
Massachusetts Early Care and Education and School Readiness Study
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
What is ECFE? Early Childhood Family Education (ECFE) is a program for all Minnesota families with children between the ages of birth to kindergarten.
Project BEST (Bridging for Effective School Transitions) FSSA Ready to Learn Grant 2 years, Awarded $223, Project Directors: Dr. Karen Liu & Dr.
The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework A Focus on School Readiness for Infant and Toddler Children August 19, 2014 RGV Pre-Service.
Kindergarten Readiness:
By Vicki Lopes. Purpose Vicki Lopes is in her first year of her Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology at Queen’s University Investigate the role of child characteristics,
And the children in the apple tree Further poetic findings from the Union County Longitudinal Study
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
CURRICULUM. Definition #1  An organized framework  Identifies the content children are to learn  Identifies processes through which children achieve.
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
V v Do Older Parents have More Self-Regulated Children? Kevin G. Harper, Megan M. McClelland, Ph.D. Oregon State University COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND.
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
UNDERSTANDING THE CLASS
GEORGIA’S PRE-K PROGRAM Bright from the Start: Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning Marsha H. Moore, Commissioner.
But What Does It All Mean? Key Concepts for Getting the Most Out of Your Assessments Emily Moiduddin.
The Long Reach of Early Math Skills Greg J. Duncan University of California, Irvine Robert Siegler Carnegie Mellon University.
LOOKING AT QUALITY PROGRAMS AND CHILDREN KATHY R. THORNBURG ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER EARLY AND EXTENDED LEARNING Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary.
Community Input Discussions: Measuring the Progress of Young Children in Massachusetts August 2009.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
March 2010 what the school readiness data mean for Harford County’s children ©
ELIZABETH BURKE BRYANT MAY 9, 2012 Building a Solid Foundation for Governors’ Education Reform Agendas through Strong Birth-to-3 rd Grade Policies.
1 Preschoolers Identified as Having Autism: Characteristics, Services, and Achievement Elaine Carlson and Amy Shimshak, Westat OSEP National Early Childhood.
Introducing The Work Sampling System. What is Work Sampling? Authentic Performance Assessment Curriculum Embedded Instructional Assessment Authentic Performance.
1 Evaluating the NYC Core Knowledge Early Literacy Pilot: Year 1 Report September 22, 2009 HIGHLIGHTS Research and Policy Support Group FOR PRESS OFFICE.
Early Childhood Education The Research Evidence Deborah Lowe Vandell December 11, 2003.
“Makin’ a List, Checkin’ it Twice, Gonna Find Out Who’s... Using Observation and Assessment to Inform Instruction in Early Childhood Education.
Slide 1. slide 2 slide 3 Risk to Ready begins with the Early Development Instrument Developed in Canada in 1998 and expanding across US since 2009 through.
Makin’ a List, Checkin’ it Twice, Gonna Find Out Who’s... Using Observation and Assessment to Inform Instruction in Early Childhood Education
THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL EMOTIONAL LEARNING Team Tennessee-Project B.A.S.I.C. Partnership September 2013.
Performance and Progress 2005/2006. Introduction  Data collected during 2005/2006 fiscal year.  Who did our programs serve?  Did programs reach the.
Frances Blue. “Today’s young people are living in an exciting time, with an increasingly diverse society, new technologies and expanding opportunities.
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
Class and Student Body Size  Schools vary widely in the number of students in each class and in the school as a whole.  Being in small classes from.
What can we learn from 5+ years of ISTAR-KR? Michael Conn-Powers Early Childhood Center IIDC/Indiana University.
Performance and Progress 2006/2007. Introduction Data collected during 2006/2007 fiscal year. Who did our programs serve? Did programs reach the intended.
V v References 1. Ladd, G. W., Birch, H. S., & Buhs, E. S. (1999). Children's Social and Scholastic Lives in Kindergarten: Related Spheres of Influence?
Susan K. Urahn Director of Education The Pew Charitable Trusts Governors Forum on Quality Preschool December 15, 2003 Orlando, Florida TheRole of State.
Understanding Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care Programs in Massachusetts Findings from the Preschool Program Quality Study and Highlights.
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
Presented at State Kindergarten Entry Assessment (KEA) Conference San Antonio, Texas February, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment in Early Childhood: How Assessments.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
OKLAHOMA EARLY READING FIRST What We Are Learning Priscilla Griffith University of Oklahoma Go Sooners!
ECERS-R; SACERS; & CLASS What You Can Do!. What about you?  How are you doing with incorporating what you’ve learned from the ECERS-R or SACERS?  Refer.
Minnesota's Approach to Comprehensive Assessment Megan E. Cox, Ph.D. Principal Leadership Academy January 11, 2016 Minnesota’s Approach to Comprehensive.
Considerations Related to Setting Targets for Child Outcomes.
Weddington Primary School Assessing without levels.
State Board of Education February 10, Update on EOC Reports: Assessment Survey Results Full-Day 4K, CDEP.
Developing Effective Statewide Kindergarten Assessments with the Work Sampling System Developing Effective Statewide Kindergarten Assessments with the.
KCPS Office of Early Learning Universal Pre-K Program All children entering Kindergarten prepared to succeed!
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
Prepared for the Office of Head Start by ICF International School Readiness Goals: Using Data to Support Child Outcomes.
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
By: Hannah B. Samantha J. Britney M. Michelle A..
THE ECERS DEFINITION OF QUALITY AND ITS INTERNATIONAL USE DEBBY CRYER, PH.D. ENVIRONMENT RATING SCALES INSTITUTE, CHAPEL HILL, NC, USA.
Evaluation of Indiana's Pilot Public Pre-Kindergarten Program: First Year Results James Elicker, Katrina Schmerold, David Purpura, Sara Schmitt, Amy Napoli,
Indiana Paths to QUALITY™ Child Care Quality Rating and Improvement System: Outcomes for Children and Child Care Providers James Elicker, Zachary Gold,
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, NECTAC and ECO at FPG
Georgia’s Pre-K Summer Transition Program
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Travis Wright, Ed.D April 26, 2018
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International AUCD Meeting Washington, DC
Community Input Discussions:
UNDERSTANDING THE CLASS
Presentation transcript:

+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013

+ Research Goals Determine children’s progress toward key indicators of school readiness across program type (ie., Licensed 3/4 STARS rated programs; Head Start and; public preschool programs that have been through the Preschool Program Review Process (P2R). Determine quality of classrooms across program types. Determine if children’s progress maintains longitudinally and if there are differential effects in progress depending on program type. Determine the interaction effects between developmentally appropriate practices and teacher- child interactions on child outcomes/progress.

+ Methodology Classroom observations using Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) Survey data Administrators Teachers Families Child assessment data Woodcock-Johnson III NU Tests of Achievement (WJ III NU Preschool (reading, oral language, math, written language, and academic knowledge) Basic self-knowledge: Social Awareness Task Social Skills Improvement System, (SSIS ) (Social Skills and Problem Behavior) BMI

CHARACTERISTICS OF CENTERS

+ Results: Families’ Perceptions of Kindergarten Readiness Across center types, families have generally the same perceptions of what skills support successful transition to kindergarten for their children 1. “sits still and pays attention” 2. “follows simple rules”, and 3. “is motivated and curious”

+ Results: Classroom Quality Scores CLASS scores across center types were similar across program types Emotional Support (avg = 5.33) Classroom Organization (avg = 4.74) Instructional Support (avg = 2.43) Teacher education level was positively correlated with CLASS scores in all areas. Specifically, teachers with Masters degrees had higher CLASS scores than teachers with Bachelors degree.

+ Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) Scores

+ WJ III - Majority of children in sample scored in the average range on the WJ III at both testing points on all subscales Children made progress on all subscales of the WJ III from time 1 to time 2 Significant gains: 3/4 STARS: Understanding Directions, Spelling, and Sound Awareness Head Start: Sound Awareness PreK; Understanding Directions, Spelling, and Sound Awareness Results: Children’s Outcome Scores

+ Results: Children’s Outcome Scores (Cont.) SSIS – Majority of children in sample scored in average range on social skills and problem behaviors BMI - Boys and girls, in all age groups, have BMI that falls in the overweight or obese range

+ Child outcome gains and teacher, family, and classroom characteristics Children who scored lower on these tests at Time 1 made greater growth than their peers who scored higher at Time 1. Mother’s education level was found to be predictive of children’s gain scores on Spelling and Applied Problems. Program type: Children in Head Start and PreK programs had lower gain scores than their peers in 3/4 STARS centers on Understanding Directions Children in Head Start had lower gain scores on sound awareness than their peers in 3/4 STARS centers.

+ Limitations Incomplete data sets Percentage of families of children in 3 and 4 STARS centers making above state salary average

+ Conclusions Parents of children who participated in the study perceive the development of social skills as key to children’s successful transition to kindergarten. Across all three program types, the highest score on the CLASS was in the emotional support subdomain, followed by classroom organization, with the lowest score being in the instructional support domain.

+ Conclusions (Cont.) Results of the BMI data collected on children who participated in the study show that sample children were overweight or obese at the time 2 testing period. Child outcome scores showed that children in all three program types made significant growth in one or more subtests of the WJ III. Growth on these subtests indicates that children progressed at a greater rate than would be expected developmentally during this period of time.