Communication & Information Technology Telecommunications Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender Perspectives in Introduction to Competition Policy Gender Module #6 ITU Workshops on Sustainability in Telecommunication Through Gender & Social.
Advertisements

Da State. Da State and Economic Functions Enforces law Provides services Arbitration (outside courts) Coordination Policy as Innovation.
The Old Rules Just Don’t Fit Anymore: A Panel Discussion on the Proposed Revision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 John Windhausen, Jr., Past President,
Regulation of Media Industries Regulation Generally speaking, why does the government regulate businesses and industries? Ensure free markets.
Recap of market forms Copyright© 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Richard T. Shin Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. John S. Ying University of Delaware and University of California, Irvine. Lecturer Chaowei Fan Illinois.
ECO 436 Industry Seminar Dr. David G. Loomis Illinois State University
Perfect Competition: 9.1. Market Structure: -In this chapter, you will learn that businesses are categorized by market structure. -Market Structure: amount.
Wireline Regulation I TC 310 May 19, Wireline Infrastructure CPE Loops Circuit Switches Transport lines.
1 Access: From Interconnection to Convergence Yale M. Braunstein School of Information University of California Berkeley, CA (U.S.A.) March 2008.
Development of the Telecommunications Industry. Early History initial telephone service Alexander Graham Bell.
Regulation of Media Industries Regulation Generally speaking, why does the government regulate businesses and industries? Ensure free markets.
Competing visions of the NII and the 1996 Act. Visions for a National Information Infrastructure –Who will build it? –Who will pay for it? –What role.
Network neutrality is the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It does not matter who is downloading and what is being downloaded.
Chp. 3 – Industry Overview Traditional Telephone Companies & Cable TV Providers Mobile Providers Smaller Competitors Internet Based Competitors Why Governments.
Press, Public & Politics Ownership, Regulation, and Guidance of Media.
The General Rationale for Government Intervention: Deadweight Loss from Monopoly.
The Third Screen: From Bell's Phone to iPhone By Adam Ganser.
Business Data Communications, Fourth Edition Chapter 1: Introduction to Communications.
© x8 Inc. (Nasdaq: EGHT) 1 The Next Generation of IP Communication Applications Bryan R. Martin January 24, 2007 Internet Telephony Conference &
1 C H A P T E R 14 1 © 2001 Prentice Hall Business PublishingEconomics: Principles and Tools, 2/eO’Sullivan & Sheffrin Market Power and Public Policy:
Business Data Communications Standards and Laws. What are Standards? Documented agreements Technical specifications or other precise criteria to be used.
Carriers Carriers carry traffic for a fee Must have rights of way to lay wire Given some monopoly protection Regulated but being deregulated.
How Do Legislation and Regulations Affect Telecommunications? Chapter 11 The Management of Telecommunications: Business solutions to Business Problems.
CS4550: Computer Networks II public telecommunication networks.
CIT 307 Online Data Communications History of Telephony Module 9 Kevin Siminski, Instructor.
For use only with Perreault and McCarthy texts. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999 Irwin/McGraw-Hill Chapter 4: Evaluating Opportunities in the Changing.
Bruce Kushnick New Networks Institute Reverse AT&T-ALEC.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC is a United States government agency and was established by the Communications Act of The FCC is.
ITS 302 Purposes of the course –Review the history of US telecommunications as a case study –Examine the basics of regulation, especially as they apply.
Communication & Information Technology Telecommunications Policy.
Telephony & Satellite Technologies. Telecommunications Act of 1996 Removed entry barriers between local, long distance, and cable service providers Designed.
Antitrust Policy and Regulation Chapter 19 Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior.
Some questions to consider Do we need regulation? Does history matter? Why is one-stop shopping important? Why didn’t the U.S. Telecom Act of 1996 work?
FROM TRADITIONAL LANDLINE TO IP TELEPHONY: A POSSIBLE ANOTHER WAY Bill Levis Colorado Consumer Counsel June 10, 2013.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.13-1 Natural Monopolies And Regulation.
Chapter 12 Imperfectly Competitive Markets.  There are three categories of imperfect competition among sellers Monopoly Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly.
Internet Policy Day 3 - Workshop Session No. 5 The impact of telecomms regulation Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
COMT 2201 Regulation This Material may be found in: Cole, Chapter 1. Also in: Datapro Reports on Communications Networking Services, Report #3002, A History.
III. 1960s : Deregulation Three areas: –Terminals –Transmission and Long Distance –Computer Inquiries.
Market Structures Regulation and Deregulation. How firms increase Market Power  Controlling prices - leading firms can form a cartel, merge, or practice:
Lecture 5 Network Service Providers. Telecommunication Industry In a state of flux due to: –increased competition –growth of the Internet –globalization.
(c) 2003 Charles G. Gray1 Telecommunications Regulation: Domestic and International US Regulatory History MSIS 5600 Charles G. Gray.
Chapter 1 The Data Communication Industry The best way to approach data communication The data communication industry Challenge & solution to business-oriented.
1/6/2008Lesson 11 Telephony is not a pure science like chemistry or physics. It is not even computer science. Telephony has evolved from the first successful.
Industry Overview AT&T and the Bell System Post Divestiture Factors in the Emergence of Competition to the Bells The Vision of the Telecommunications Act.
Comparative Telecomunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 7: : Wireline Telephony POTS: Plain Old Telephone Service Copyright © 2007.
Federal Communications Commission TC 310 May 14, 2008.
What’s So Bad About Monopolies? & What Can We Do About It?
Gints Zeltiņš Commissioner of the Public Utilities Commission of Latvia Multi-sectoral regulator: Public Utilities Commission of Latvia.
1 Telecom in the US in 1960 AT&T had Operated as an Integrated Monopoly for Over 50 Years New Technologies – Large and Small – Now Provided Competitive.
Unit-4 Telephone system
Market Structures Chapter 7. PERFECT COMPETITION Section One.
Market Structures Chapter 7. Get a Sheet of paper out ► List the following on a half sheet of paper:  Three favorite cereals  Three favorite brands.
Market Structures Regulation & Deregulation Chapter 7 Section 4.
What’s So Bad About Monopolies? & What Can We Do About It?
Chapter 10 Monopoly (Part V) © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
18. Antitrust Policy and Regulation McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
ITS 602 Purposes of the course
Regulation v. Deregulation Chapter 15 EF5.b.
Daniel F. Spulber Northwestern University
Development of the Telecommunications Industry
Da State.
Regulation & Deregulation Chapter 7 Section 4
Monopolies and Anti-Trust Regulation
Government Regulation and Competition
Wireline Post 1996 TC 310 May 20, 2008.
The Use and Abuse of the Carterfone Principle
Telecom History.
Presentation transcript:

Communication & Information Technology Telecommunications Policy

The Answers 1 The Communications ACT of 1934 provided people with UNIVERSAL phone service. 2 What does FCC stand for? Federal COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. 3 The CARTERFONE decision allowed other manufacturers communication DEVICES to be connected to AT&T equipment. 4 On January 8, 1982 AT&T agreed to an out-of- court settlement with the US Justice department to DIVEST. 5 “BOC” stands for Bell OPERATING COMPANY.

Preview Telecommunications Act of 1934 Change in Telecommunications Regulations Telecommunications Act of 1996 Future Change in Telecommunications Regulations Radio & TV Regulation Cable Regulation Trends in Telecommunication Policy

Telecommunications Act of 1934 Regulated Monopoly Universal Service Interstate – FCC Intrastate – PUC Separations and Settlements Rate of Return

Telecommunications Act of 1934 “ Regulated Monopoly” More than one company in telecommunications not permitted. AT&T Not Everyone Had Phone Service…

Telecommunications Act of 1934 “ Universal Service” “Service to all…” Major theme of the Communications Act of Was the goal of Universal Service realized?

Telecommunications Act of 1934 “ Interstate Communications” Definition: – Communications services that take place between states. Regulated by… – FCC (Federal Communications Commission)

Telecommunications Act of 1934 “ Intrastate Communications” Definition: – Communication services that take place within a state. Regulated by… – PUC’s (Public Utility Commissions)

Telecommunications Act of 1934 “ Separation and Settlements” Definition: – A joint federal/state board where PUC and FCC representatives meet to discuss local and long distance interconnect issues. – The board also regulates the process by which long distance companies pay local phone companies for the right to connect into their local loops.

Telecommunications Act of 1934 “ Rate of Return” Definition: – “Method by which the FCC could determine how much profit was reasonable for a telecommunications service provider to earn.

Change in Telecommunications Regulations After World War II 1956 – AT&T prevented from any business except regulated telecommunications. 1960’s – Carterphone – MCI

Change in Telecommunications Regulations 1974 (Justice Department Suit) – The suit asked AT&T to divest itself of Western Electric & Local Operating Companies.

Change in Telecommunications Regulations 1980 (FCC Computer Inquiry II) – FCC decision about the markets AT&T could enter. – AT&T could enter any market. – Deregulated all competitive services of AT&T. Competition would drive rates for services.

Change in Telecommunications Regulations January 8, 1982 (AT&T Vs. The Justice Department Out-Of-Court Settlement) “Modified Final Judgment” – Broke off the 22 Bell Operating Companies (BOC’s). – Turned control of the Yellow Pages to the BOC’s. – Kept: Long Lines Division Western Electric Bell Labs – Equal Access required of the BOC’s

Change in Telecommunications Regulations Seven Regional Operating Companies (ROC’s) Formed from the 22 Bell Operating Companies (BOC’s). Names (ROC’s)? – NYNEX – Bell Atlantic – Bell South – Ameritech – Southwestern Bell – US West – Pacific Telesis

Just After the “Break-up”

Change in Telecommunications Regulations Local Access Transport Areas (LATA) – “A set of geographic boundaries within each state that defines what will be considered local and long distance service.” Extra on LATA’s (Not in Text…) – LATA are generally handled by one Telco, not every call within every LATA is considered a local call. – Rural, and very large LATAs often have multiple calling areas.

Telecommunications Act of 1996 The Aim of the Act is… – “…to promote competition in every telecommunications market.” Previous mindset… – “…protection of the incumbent utility from entrants.” – “…protection of consumers from monopoly power.”

Telecommunications Act of 1996 The Act's provisions fall into five major areas: – Telephone Service – Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing – Cable Television – Radio and Television Broadcasting – The Internet and Online Computer Services

Telecommunications Act of 1996 Telecommunications Act of 1996 Provision Specifics include: – Remove legal and regulatory barriers to entry. – BOC’s can provide Long Distance. – BOC’s can own and manage companies that provide equipment. – Infrastructure sharing. – Allows the FCC to control licenses for advanced television systems. – Deregulates cable rates.

Telecommunications Act of 1996 Projected Benefits of of Telecommunications Act of 1996 – Lower phone and data rates. – New competitors offering innovative services. – Rapid implementation of new technologies such as high-speed Internet access. – Generally, better services for consumers

Telecommunications Act of 1996 How effective has the Act been? – Varied "Communications Decency Act of 1996“ – Rough Going… Long Distance Telephone – Pretty Good.. Local Telephone Service – Slow to Develop…

Future Change in Telecommunications Regulations Remember the “Seven Regional Operating Companies? The Seven ROC’s are now… – Ameritech + Southwestern Bell + Pacific Telesis = SBC Corporation. – Bell Atlantic + Nynex = Bell Atlantic. – Bell South – US West

Bell Atlantic Southwestern Bell Corporation 1) US West Inc. 2) BellSouth 3) Bell Atlantic 4) Southwest Bell

Radio & TV Regulation Radio Act of 1912 – Allowed Secretary of Commerce to license radio stations – In 1922, 830 kHz was set aside for important news, etc. Radio Act of 1927 – Created the Federal Radio Commission Assign Bandwidth Control Station Power Issue Licenses

Radio & TV Regulation Communications Act of 1934 – FCC now controls radio – Forbids the FCC from censoring programs.

Cable Regulation Cable Communication Policy Act of 1984 – Incorporated the cable television industry into the C.A of 1934 – Must Carry…(Courts struck down) (1992) Cable Television Consumer Protection & Competition Act. – “Must Carry” reinstated… – Greater Control of Pricing… Communications Act of 1996 (De-regulated again…) – March 30, 1999 (FCC Stepped aside from Cable Rate disputes...)

Trends in Telecommunication Policy Diminishing Federal Role – Congress leans toward deregulation – Courts have played a big role. (Judge Harold Greene) Emerging State Role – Deregulation to drive growth National Information Infrastructure – Computers, networks and databases accessible to all people in the USA – Standardization – “New Super Information Highway” – Internet2

Trends in Telecommunication Policy Repricing Services – Recovering costs directly from the service that generates the cost. – CALC (Customer Access Line Charge) Pay for the connection – Local Measured Service Similar to Long Distance Billing Integration & Mergers

Trends in Telecommunication Policy Regulating Intellectual Property – Copyright issues. – Enforcement problems. – Congress & Courts will have to play a role.