Overview of GMPLS interworking trials in Japan and NICT Kei-han-na GMPLS E-NNI trials Prof. Naoaki.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intra-Carrier Solutions Enabled by the OIF NNI Erning Ye Nortel Networks.
Advertisements

Achieving Seamless IP Optical Network Integration OIF Interoperability Update Amy Wang, Avici Systems.
MPLS and GMPLS Li Yin CS294 presentation.
APNOMS03 1 A Resilient Path Management for BGP/MPLS VPN Jong T. Park School of Electrical Eng. And Computer Science Kyungpook National University
G : DCM Signaling Mechanism Using GMPLS RSVP-TE ITU-T Workshop on IP-Optical, Chitose, Japan 7/11/2002 Dimitrios Pendarakis, Tellium, Inc. ITU-T.
Optical Control Plane Activities in IETF and OIF L. Ong 9 July 2002 L. Ong 9 July 2002
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching: An Overview of Signaling Enhancements and Recovery Techniques IEEE Communications Magazine July 2001.
Deployment of MPLS VPN in Large ISP Networks
Application of GMPLS technology to traffic engineering Shinya Tanaka, Hirokazu Ishimatsu, Takeshi Hashimoto, Shiro Ryu (1), and Shoichiro Asano (2) 1:
MPLS/GMPLS Migration and Interworking CCAMP, IETF 64 Kohei Shiomoto,
1 EL736 Communications Networks II: Design and Algorithms Class3: Network Design Modeling Yong Liu 09/19/2007.
DWDM GMPLS Deployment Experience Joint Tech Workshop July 2007 George Frank, Ph.D. Infinera.
GMPLS interoperability test in Super SINET Shoichiro Asano The National Institute of Informatics Hirokazu Ishimatsu Japan Telecom Co., Ltd.
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
1 Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Konstantinos Lizos PhD Student – Spring 2015 University of Oslo (UiO) The Faculty of Mathematics.
Presented by: Dmitri Perelman Nadav Chachmon. Agenda Overview MPLS evolution to GMPLS Switching issues –GMPLS label and its distribution –LSP creation.
Metropolitan Ethernet Networks Estella Kang Matt Powers SC441 Computer Networks – Independent Study Boston University.
Lappeenranta University of Technology Valery Naumov Telecommunications Laboratory Tel: “Why Do We Need WDM Networks?”
Control and Traffic Management Paper: Banerjee et al.: ” Generalized multiprotocol label switching: an overview of signaling enhancements and recovery.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) presented by: chitralekha tamrakar (B.S.E.) divya krit tamrakar (B.S.E.) Rashmi shrivastava(B.S.E.) prakriti.
1 Introduction to Optical Networks. 2 Telecommunications Network Architecture.
69th IETF Chicago, July 2007 CCAMP Working Group Charter and Liaisons.
Workshop IP/Optical; Chitose, Japan; 9-11 July 2002 OTN Equipment and Deployment in Today’s Transport Networks Session 5 Dr. Ghani AbbasQ9/15 Rapporteur.
Should I Migrate My MPLS-TE Network to GMPLS. And if so, how
May TNC-2006 Optical Networking Research in China Jian Wu Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications.
Standardisation Activities on Felxigrid – ECOC 2013 – London, September Standardisation Activities on Flexigrid Adrian Farrel - Old Dog Consulting.
GMPLS Interoperability Test Event Results and Recommendations
C O R P O R A T E T E C H N O L O G Y Information & Communications Networks & Multimedia Communications NOBEL WP4 – Siemens implementation activities contact:
Application of All-Optical Signal Regeneration Technology to Next-Generation Network (NGN) Mikio Yagi, Shiro Ryu (1), and Shoichiro Asano (2) 1: Laboratories,
Integrated Dynamic IP and Wavelength Routing in IP over WDM Networks Murali Kodialam and T. V. Lakshman Bell Laboratories Lucent Technologies IEEE INFOCOM.
M P L S. MPLS Overview MPLS or Multiprotocol label switching is a new network protocol that defined a mechanism for packet forwarding in network router.
Interoperable Intelligent Optical Networking: Key to future network services and applications OIF Carrier Group Interoperability: Key issue for carriers.
64th IETF Vancouver November 2005 CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at:
IST Project LION 2 Outline IST-project LION –Layers Interworking in Optical Networks –Overview – objectives –Testbed Progress: 2 examples –Recovery experiments.
Draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming-00 74th IETF San Francisco March Advice on When It is Safe to Start Sending Data on Label Switched Paths.
Core Network Technology Prof. Hamid Aghvami Centre for Telecommunications Research - King’s College London Wireless Multimedia Communications Ltd.
Routing in Optical Networks Markus Isomäki IP and MPLS in Optical Domain.
Optical Control Plane - The realization of distributed control for optical switches Siva Sankaranarayanan ITU-T Workshop on IP/Optical Chitose, Japan July.
1 광인터넷 망관리를 위한 주요 이슈 Jun Kyun Choi Tel) (042)
Page 1 OIF worldwide interoperability demonstrations on ASON inter-domain interfaces A carrier’s point of view Hans-Martin Foisel Deutsche Telekom OIF.
A Framework for Internetworking Heterogeneous High-Performance Networks via GMPLS and Web Services Xi Yang, Tom Lehman Information Sciences Institute (ISI)
Brief Introduction to Juniper and its TE features Huang Jie [CSD-Team19]
JEM for 3GPP2 Vision, San Diego, July 12-13, Long-term All IP Conference and IP 2 Ad-Hoc group ARIB/TTC IP 2 Ad-hoc Group Joint Experts Meeting for.
WORLDWIDE INTEROPERABILITY DEMONSTRATION Carlo Cavazzoni Alessandro D’Alessandro.
Optical Control Plane, Optical/IP integration Concepts and Issues Greg Bernstein Greg Bernstein
OIF NNI: The Roadmap to Non- Disruptive Control Plane Interoperability Dimitrios Pendarakis
June 4, 2003Carleton University & EIONGMPLS - 1 GMPLS Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Vijay Mahendran Sumita Ponnuchamy Christy Gnanapragasam.
A PRESENTATION “SEMINAR REPORT” ON “ GENERALIZED MULTIPROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING“
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
© 2006 National Institute of Informatics 1 Jun Matsukata National Institute of Informatics SINET3: The Next Generation SINET July 19, 2006.
Contribution Number: oif Working Group: Architecture & Signaling Title: Project proposal for interworking of G RFC 3473 network domains.
Two-layer Restoration Scheme for IP over Optical Networks with MPLS Jia Ke, L. Mason, Q. Yang ICIS, School of EEE, Nanyang Technological University
Page 1 Recent Progress in ASON Technologies in the OIF Joe Berthold President – Optical Internetworking Forum.
June 4, 2003Carleton University & EIONGMPLS - 1 GMPLS Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Vijay Mahendran Sumita Ponnuchamy Christy Gnanapragasam.
(Slide set by Norvald Stol/Steinar Bjørnstad
Tom Afferton Member of OIF Board of Directors Division Manager – AT&T Labs OIF Website:
APS-based MPLS-TP linear protection draft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching-07.txt IETF 87th,July 28 – July 28 - August 2, 2013 Presenter : Hui.
Hideki OTSUKI NiCT GMPLS inter-carriers E-NNI working and testbed on JGN2.
70th IETF Vancouver, December 2007 CCAMP Working Group Status Chairs: Deborah Brungard : Adrian Farrel :
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
APAN Backbone Committee Meeting 2004 Intra-Continental Update of APII IPv6 R & D Testbed Project Kiyoshi IGARASHI Communications Research Laboratory, Incooporated.
Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Page 1 © The.
MEF Protection Work Pascal Menezes Technical Contributor June 3 rd 2003.
Zagreb Optical Packet Switching the technology and its potential role in future communication networks Results from.
MPLS Introduction How MPLS Works ?? MPLS - The Motivation MPLS Application MPLS Advantages Conclusion.
Survivability in IP-over-WDM Networks. Introduction Multilayer network architecture is moving into IP-optimized two-layer architecture. ․ They have same.
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
A Scalable Multipath Algorithm in Hierarchical MPLS Networks
Akari Project an Initiative on Designing a New Generation Network
MPLS and GMPLS Li Yin CS294 presentation.
Presentation transcript:

Overview of GMPLS interworking trials in Japan and NICT Kei-han-na GMPLS E-NNI trials Prof. Naoaki Yamanaka Photonic Internet Lab. and Keio University

Outline Introduction Introduction GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan PIL: Photonic Internet Labs. Multi-layer, Multi-route & Multi-vender experiment MPLS / GMPLS Interworking Protection and restoration iPOP2005 GMPLS showcase and workshop Largest open interworking testing event in ASIA NICT KEI-HAN-NA open lab activities GMPLS E-NNI interworking Conclusion

Domestic backbone traffic demand 10k users Traffic Volume (Gb/s) ISDN ADSL 8M ADSL 12M (Year) Broad band 1.5 ADSL Traffic Volume Broad band users FTTH 100M ADSL 24M ADSL 40M

Trend on Optical Switching network Wavelength control Semi-permanent Dynamic Switching … … p-to-p WDM Transport OADM: Optical Add/Drop Multiplexer OXC: Optical Cross-connect WDM ring network OADM Photonic router OXC WDM Research Target Optical packet switch network 1 22 11 (Add / Drop) WDM Transport WDM mesh network Flexibility Dynamic & cost reduction Reliability Throughput (Year) Optical Burst Switch Network GMPLS

Kei-han-na is located over three prefectures in Japan Kansai area. Kyoto, Osaka, and Nara PIL is research consortium by 9 members What and Where is PIL and Kei-han-na ? Tokyo 1964 Sapporo 1972 Nagano 1998 Kei-han-na area PIL (Photonic Internet Lab) (NICT KDDI NTT 7 venders etc.)

Outline Introduction Introduction GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan PIL: Photonic Internet Labs. Multi-layer, Multi-route & Multi-vender experiment MPLS / GMPLS Interworking Protection and restoration iPOP2005 GMPLS showcase and workshop Largest open interworking testing event in ASIA NICT KEI-HAN-NA open lab activities GMPLS E-NNI interworking Conclusion

Photonic-GMPLS Leading Edge Code Research Consortium : Photonic Internet Lab. (PIL) : Member Companies Keio University N ippon T elegraph and T elephone Corporation NEC Corporation Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Electric Company Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Hitachi, Ltd. IP infusion

PIL Organization PIL member Companies Photonic Internet Lab. Technical testing of the leading-edge protocol codes developed in each company Technical arguments on the investigation and discussion of members' standardization proposals and the exploration of technical themes. Standardization Strategy WG Technical Test WG PIL governance Steering Committee Oki Furukawa Electric Mitsubishi Electric NECHitachi Fujitsu NTT Keio Univ. IP infusion

PIL activity framework PIL Proposing leading edge technology Leading-edge code Implemented ITU-T Implementation agreement by PIL Standard (RFC, IA) Contribution from PIL Testing leading edge code OIF IETF Member A Running Code by A Contribution from A Merging A, B and C Contribution from B Contribution from C Member B Running Code by B Member C Running Code by C

Topics 1: Multi-layer (Multi-region), Multi-vender, and Multi-route GMPLS operation trial (2003) Interoperability test of GMPLS control systems. 5 members, 8 types of equipment controllers. NTT NEC Mitsubishi NEC Packet TDM Wavelength Fiber Fujitsu Furukawa Route A Route B Mitsubishi

Topics 2: MPLS/GMPLS interworking Migration from conventional MPLS NW to GMPLS NW Advertising GMPLS resources to conventional MPLS path Routing … FA-LSP (GMPLS) >> Opaque or Router LSA (MPLS) Signaling … Tunneling and Switching method draft-oki-ccamp-gmpls-ip-interworking-06.txt (July 2005) G8 G7(adv) G3(adv) G1(adv) G5(adv) G6(adv) R3 R1 R2 G9 G2 G4 GMPLS topology view IP topology view G3 G1G2 G7 G6 G5 G9G8 G4 R3 R1 R2 G1G3 G7 G6 G5 GMPLS Network

MPLS2003 PIL - MPLS/GMPLS interworking demonstration LSC TDM NTT NEC GMPLS PSC TDM LSC Node 1 MPLS MPLS Nod e 7 Node MPLS FurukawaMitsubishiFurukawa PSC Node 2 Nod e 3 LSC Node 4 NTT MPLS Nod e 5 Node 6 LSC PSC MPLS

Topics 3 : GMPLS Restoration 1+1 Protection Hot standby for Fast restoration 1:1 Shared restoration Pre-determined backup route but resources are shared with other route …High-network utilization. draft-pil-ccamp-extra-lsp-0x.txt by NTT NEC Mitsubishi Fujitsu Furukawa Extra class LSP service using protecting resources in GMPLS networks Path1 Ingress1Egress1 Backup2 Path2 Ingress2 Egress2 Backup1 Shared resource Extra-traffic

HDTV Video on GMPLS JGN Symposium 2004 Multi-vender Gbit/sec GMPLS network GMPLS signaling and routing (OSPF, RSVP-TE) Super High-definition (SHD) digital cinema transfer Automatic restoration MPLS/GMPLS interworking Video Conference Video Conference MPLS router IP/MPLS NW 1 ( Metro ) MPLS router IP/MPLS NW 2 ( Metro ) GMPLS NW ( Backbone ) OC48 GbE TDM Cross connect TDM Cross connect GbE SHD Lambda Cross connect Lambda Cross connect OC192 OC48 Signal Control HIKARI Wavelength NW Large capacity IP TDM NW High-definition digital cinema OC192 Lambda Cross connect Broadband application OC48 /GbE GMPLS router Lambda Cross connect Lambda Cross connect HIKARI router OC48 /GbE GbE HIKARI router GMPLS router

Contribution example to international sanitation Oct 2004 IP/MPLS - GMPLS interworking in support of IP/MPLS to GMPLS migration draft-oki-ccamp-gmpls-ip-interworking-04.txt | 03.txt | 02.txt | 01.txt | 00.txt draft-oki-ccamp-gmpls-ip-interworking-04.txt03.txt02.txt01.txt 00.txt Requirements for GMPLS-based multi-region and multi-layer networks draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-00.txt draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-00.txt Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Protocol Extensions for Multi-Region Networks (MRN) draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-extensions-00.txt draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-extensions-00.txt July 2004 Requirements for Path Computation Element in GMPLS and IP/MPLS Networks draft-oki-pce-gmpls-req-00.txt draft-oki-pce-gmpls-req-00.txt June 2004 Analysis of Misconnection Scenarios in GMPLS Networks draft-shiomoto-ccamp-misconnection-analysis-00.txt draft-shiomoto-ccamp-misconnection-analysis-00.txt April 2004 Generalized Traffic Engineering Protocol draft-oki-ccamp-gtep-00.txt draft-oki-ccamp-gtep-00.txt Feb Generalized MPLS Architecture for Multi-Region Networks draft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-04.txt | 03.txt | 02.txt | 00.txt draft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-04.txt03.txt02.txt 00.txt Extra class LSP service using protecting resources in GMPLS networks draft-pil-ccamp-extra-lsp-02.txt 01.txt | 00.txt draft-pil-ccamp-extra-lsp-02.txt01.txt00.txt Generalized MPLS Architecture for Multi-Region Networks draft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-04.txt | 03.txt | 02.txt | 00.txt draft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-04.txt03.txt02.txt 00.txt Oct Control plane architecture in GMPLS networks draft-shiomoto-ccamp-cplane-architecture-00.txt draft-shiomoto-ccamp-cplane-architecture-00.txt Feb Extensions to LMP for Flooding-based Fault Notification draft-soumiya-lmp-fault-notification-ext-00.txt draft-soumiya-lmp-fault-notification-ext-00.txt RSVP extensions for gmpls restoration signaling draft-shimano-imajuku-gmpls-restoration-00.txt draft-shimano-imajuku-gmpls-restoration-00.txt Fault Notification Protocol for GMPLS-Based Recovery draft-rabbat-fault-notification-protocol-02.txt | draft-rabbat-fault-notification-protocol-02.txt Signaling reverse-directional LSP in generalized MPLS draft-matsuura-reverse-lsp-02.txt | 01.txt | 00.txt draft-matsuura-reverse-lsp-02.txt01.txt00.txt Optical Network Failure Recovery Requirements draft-czezowski-optical-recovery-reqs-01.txt | 00.txt draft-czezowski-optical-recovery-reqs-01.txt00.txt Nov Requirements for adding optical support to GSMPv3 draft-ietf-gsmp-reqs-04.txt | draft-ietf-gsmp-reqs-04.txt Oct draft-vigoureux-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-hpn-00.txt Path Quality Verification over an All-Optical Network draft-seno-path-quality-verification-00.txt draft-seno-path-quality-verification-00.txt June 2002 Generalized MPLS architecture for multi-region networks Multi-area multi-layer traffic engineering using hierarchical LSPs in GMPLS networks draft-shiomoto-ccamp-multiarea-te-01.txt | draft-shiomoto-ccamp-multiarea-te-01.txt Upstream label set support in RSVT-TE extensions draft-oki-ccamp-upstream-labelset-00.txt draft-oki-ccamp-upstream-labelset-00.txt Requirements for using RSVP-TE in GMPLS signaling draft-matsuura-gmpls-rsvp-requirements-01.txt | 00.txt draft-matsuura-gmpls-rsvp-requirements-01.txt00.txt Multilayer routing using multilayer switch capable LSRs draft-imajuku-ml-routing-02.txt | 00.txt draft-imajuku-ml-routing-02.txt00.txt May 2002 Extensions to OSPF-TE for supporting shared mesh restoration draft-yagyu-gmpls-shared-restoration-routing-00.txt draft-yagyu-gmpls-shared-restoration-routing-00.txt Apr OSPF Extensions in Support of Transport Plane Sub-networks draft-maeno-ospf-optical-subnet-00.txt draft-maeno-ospf-optical-subnet-00.tx Feb Extensions to RSVP-TE for Supporting Multiple Protection and Restoration Types draft-suemura-gmpls-restoration-signaling-00.txt draft-suemura-gmpls-restoration-signaling-00.txt Requirements of optical link-state information for traffic engineering draft-oki-ipo-optlink-req-00.txt draft-oki-ipo-optlink-req-00.txt Dec Protection of Hierarchical LSPs draft-suemura-protection-hierarchy-00.txt draft-suemura-protection-hierarchy-00.txt [Reference] Generalized MPLS Recovery Functional Specification draft-bala-gmpls-recovery-functional-01.txt draft-bala-gmpls-recovery-functional-01.txt Analysis of Generalized MPLS-based Recovery Mechanisms (including Protection and Restoration) draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-analysis-03.txt draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-analysis-03.txt Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for GMPLS draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-terminology-01.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-terminology-01.txt

Overview of iPOP2005 Sponsored by ISOCORE and PIL Feb. 21 ・ 22, 2005 iPOP2005 General Chair Tomonori Aoyama, University of Tokyo Bijan Jabbari, ISOCORE

iPOP2005 ( )

Overview of iPOP 2005 Presentation sessions 1 Opening session 3 Special sessions (Invited) 4 Technical sessions (Refereed) Showcase Next Generation networking technologies for IP and Optical networks Trans-Pacific demonstration between ISOCORE site (VA, USA) and iPOP site (Tokyo, JPN) Multiple carriers/vendors ’ equipments Exhibition 20 exhibitors

iPOP 2005 Sponsors Sponsored by founded by 6 vendors and 1 service provider in 2002, is promoting R&D on next-generation photonic network control protocols based on photonic technologies for managed networks. is the leading technology validation lab in the next generation IP and optical networking. Its goal is to advance internetworking through technology validation and product verification and to promote development and rapid deployment of innovative networking technologies. Cooperate with is a non-profit organization contributing to the progress of info-communication technology to realize all optical ultra-high-speed networks. Private Line Provided by

Exhibitors Gold (11) Silver (8) Bronze

iPOP Showcase Network GMPLS network in Japan MPLS network MPLS network Furukawa NTT Fujitsu Juniper KDDI FurukawaFujitsu NEC Hitachi NTT Mitsubishi Electric NTT TOYO Cisco Juniper Avici GMPLS network in USA NTT-AT Juniper Sycamore Furukawa KDDI Cisco Avici NEC NTT Fujitsu PC E GTEP Sycamore Ethernet SONET/SDH Virtual data link Protocol viewer

Participants of iPOP2005 (Pre-registration base) Government, Institute, 17 Academia, 22 Carrier, 113 Vendor, 223 Press, Consultant, 4 Others, 19 Total, 398

iPOP2005 at Tokyo

CFP iPOP2006 Presentation, Exhibition, and Interop Showcase Dead Line: Feb. 01, 2007 June (tentative), 2006, at Tokyo JAPAN Sponsored by PIL, ISOCORE, PIF Details will be appeared at

Future Target of PIL Plan 2 Contribution with major overseas vendors * Consideration of the plans -Individual test with major overseas vendors (2003) -PIL joined in ISOCORE as group member (2004-) - Sister site of PIL with ISOCORE (2004-) Service test phase (2005-) Overseas company 7 Domestic companies Plan 1 Field network test *Consideration of the field tests - NTT Musashino - Yokosuka -NICT Keihannna - Koganei - ISOCORE D.C.—PIL Tokyo Lab test phaseField test phase (2004) Activity of PIL 2003 Extension of Testing protocol Confirmation of the running and reliability on equipment Confirmation of the running and reliability on NW PIF Asia ISOCORE USA NICT Kei-han-na

Outline Introduction Introduction GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan PIL: Photonic Internet Labs. Multi-layer, Multi-route & Multi-vender experiment MPLS / GMPLS Interworking Protection and restoration iPOP2005 GMPLS showcase and workshop Largest open interworking testing event in ASIA NICT KEI-HAN-NA open lab activities GMPLS E-NNI interworking Conclusion

Where is Kei-han-na ? Kei-han-na is located over three prefectures in Japan Kansai area. Kyoto, Osaka, and Nara Tokyo 1964 Sapporo 1972 Nagano 1998 Kei-han-na area

Kei-han-na Info-Communication Open Laboratory Overview The open laboratory was established at 2003 with the objective of carrying out research and development based studies. Equipped with research facilities including the high-performance network technology. Facilities are available to universities, manufacturers, research laboratories, venture companies, the local governments, etc. merge research and development and contribute for providing personnel training to specialists. Creating new industries and services Human resource development

Organization of the Research Promotion Council of Kei-han-na Open Laboratory Operation and Research Committee Planning and Public Relation Subcommittee High Performance Network Subcommittee Interoperability Working Group Photonic Working Group Grid and Application Working Group Individual Projects Human Communications Subcommittee Network Robot Subcommittee

Interoperability WG (IWG) members NTT, NTT Communications KDDI, KDDI R&D Labs. NEC Furukawa Network Solutions Fujitsu, Fujitsu Lab. Mitsubishi Electric Hitachi, Hitachi Communications Technologies Anritsu Keio University Prof. Naoaki Yamanaka National Institute of Information and Communication Technology (NICT) 14 member organizations

Service Provider A Admin Domain UNI E-NNI (b) Service Provider B Admin Domain Domain A1Domain A2 E-NNI (a) I-NNI Provider A has divided network into multiple control domains (e.g., vendor, geographic, technology, business unit, etc.) Provider B’s network is a single control domain User-Network Interface (UNI): operations between user and service provider control domains External Network-to-Network Interface (E-NNI): inter-control domain operation. (a) multi-domain operation for a single service provider (b) multi-domain operation among different service providers Internal Network-to-Network Interface (I-NNI): intra-control domain operation User Domain firewall L2/L3 Load Balancer Load Balancer Kei-han-na target (Interface between ISPs/Carriers)

Multi-layer network environment PSC UNI, L2SC UNI, TDM UNI, LSC UNI, and FSC UNI are possible. FSC LSC TDM PSC UNI (PSC) (TDM) (LSC) (FSC) UNI (PSC) (TDM) (LSC) (FSC) GMPLS Network for Carrier-A In the photonic network era, which layer becomes a border layer ?

Multi-layer/multi-carrier GMPLS network OXC/PXC is a border node. FSC LSC TDM PSC FSC LSC TDM PSC UNI (PSC) (TDM) (LSC) (FSC) UNI (PSC) (TDM) (LSC) (FSC) GMPLS Network for Carrier-A E-NNI (LSC) GMPLS Network for Carrier-B OXC/PXC

● 20/10 Gbit/s backbone of OXC/wavelength multiplexing network ● 63 access points nationwide ● Connection with overseas ● We have built 2 optical test beds for inspection research NICT Kitakyusyu IT Center Kanazawa Otemachi NICT Keihanna Center NICT Koganei NICT Kashima RC Sendai Sapporo 1G Nagano Kochi Nagoya Fukuoka Dojima Okinawa Okayama NICT Kobe Kanazawa Fukuoka Dojima Okayama Otemachi Kitakyusyu IT Center Tsukuba Kashima Tsukuba RC Otemachi RC NICT Keihanna Center Optical NW test bed possible to testify physically 1G 10G NICT Tsukuba RC Dojima 10G 1G 10G (1Gx8) 1G 10G 1G 10G (1Gx8) 10G (1Gx8) 1G 10G 10Gx2 10G (1Gx8) 10G base Architecture of R&D network: JGN II NW-A : Test bed network for Tb/s class communication NW-A : R&D for network operation and management GMPLS inter-operability technology

OXC Router DojimaOtemachiNICT Koganei IWG XC-B IWG R-1 KDDI R-1 GbE STM-16 STM-64 C-Plane NW on JGN II 14 organizations from industry, university and government GMPLS Global Interoperability Verification Consortium collaboration working in Kei-han-na Open Laboratory IWG XC-C IWG R-2 NTT R-2 KDDI PXC NTT PXC Fujitsu PXC Mitsubishi PXC Furukawa R-1 Hitachi R-2 IWG XC-A KDDI R-2 NTT R-1 Fujitsu R-1 NEC XC Hitachi R-1 NICT Kei-han-na

Conclusions Target for GMPLS, next generation IP backbone protocol. Universal control Scalable service Low-cost universal backbone The Photonic Internet Lab. (PIL) was founded Autumn 2002 by 9 companies (7 venders, 1 service provider and 1 university) for realizing new photonic network control protocols based on photonic technologies for managed networks. The Japanese government is supporting PIL. NICT Kei-han-na Consortium is targeting GMPLS E-NNI protocol. It is demonstrated at MPLS 2005 booth.