Stock Issues of Proposition of Policy. Stock issues: are hunting grounds for arguments. They provide the general phrasing of potential issues that correspond.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Part II: Developing Your Debate
Advertisements

A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I) A N INTRODUCTION TO P OLICY D EBATE - The Minnesota Urban Debate League -
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Cross Examination (CX) Debate
Argument Constructs Presumption: Lies in existing beliefs, values, or actions, which are taken for granted. Burden of proof: The responsibility to prove.
The world is too big for us. Too much is going on, too many crimes, too much violence and excitement. Try as you will, you get behind in the race in spite.
Outlining Principles Begin with statement of proposition. I. Use a consistent indented pattern of ideas. A. Write all points as complete sentences. B.
Australian Council of Social Service Charity Law and the NFP Reforms ACOSS Charity Law Briefing Sydney, 10 August 2012 Supported by NAB Dr Tessa Boyd-Caine,
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
+ Debate Basics. + DEBATE A debate is a formal argument in which two opposing teams propose or attack a given proposition or motion in a series of speeches.
What is Debate? A debater’s guide to the argumentative universe…
Your 2 nd Debate. The Debate Unit Part II  Define terms and recognize ways to do so.  Investigate your proposition.  Define the controversy.  Ask.
Stock issues I LL B LAME C URE C OSTS B ENEFITS. Stock issues ILL: What is the current problem? – Significant (quantitative) – Harmful (qualitative)
Building Government Cases. Preliminary Steps Follow critical decision making. –Analyze the proposition. Look at all alternatives with as much knowledge.
Single Payer 101 Kao-Ping Chua Jack Rutledge Fellow, American Medical Student Association.
POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.
Constructing a Case for a Proposition International Debate Education Association.
Debate I: Basics & Formats
Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University Constructing a Case for the Proposition 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and.
Kris Stroup, Longview Community College Constructing Opposition Arguments 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
Toulmin Model of Argument and Case Building
Debate Notes: Arguments Building the Affirmative and the Negative Constructive Arguments.
A rgument, Counter-argument, Refutation Drills Doris L. W. Chang Debate III:
G1 © Family Economics & Financial Education – Revised April 2011 – Receiving Unit – Receiving Income from Government Programs – Slide 1 Funded by.
Basis for Compensation fixation
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for the Prime Minister.
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
Government Finances Chapter 25. The Federal Government Section 1.
Propositions A proposition is the declarative statement that an advocate intends to support in the argument. Some propositions are stated formally, some.
Today’s Agenda n Credibility n How to Give an Argumentative Speech n Conflict.
Chapter 5: The U.S. Economy Both the private (household & businesses) sector and the public (government) sector participate in the market economy. Households,
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
Basic Nursing: Foundations of Skills & Concepts Chapter 7 ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES.
Building Opposition Cases In Parliamentary Debate
The Stock Issues of Debate 5 Things Every Debater Needs, and Needs to Know!
Debate A contest of argumentation.. Argument A reason to support your side of the debate.
11/12/2015 Aim: To determine qualities of a good argument Topic: The Stuff of Good Argument.
The Affirmative And Stock Issues By: Matt Miller.
The Disadvantage Provides an added measure to vote against the affirmative plan and vote for the present system.
Chapter 3 Analysis of the Issue. Definition of Terms Define unfamiliar words Define unfamiliar words Define words with multiple meanings Define words.
POLITICS, DEFICITS, AND DEBT The social security debate It’s the demography stupid!
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
Debate Ch. 18 Group One.
-Business organization: an establishment formed to carry on commercial enterprise. Sole proprietorships are the most common forms of business organizations.
Unit 3 Seminar.  Used to predict acceptable or unacceptable behavior  Helps to assess level of skills/knowledge/ characteristics applicants have  Reduce.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Receiving from Government Programs Advanced Level.
Constructing Opposition Arguments International Debate Education Association Prepared for IDEA Youth Forum Summer, 2010 Prepared by Robert Trapp Willamette.
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Speaking to Persuade.
4-H Ghana Youth Development Program
II. Structuring Strong Arguments
THE AFF – BURDEN AND STRUCTURE
Involuntary Treatment of Persons with Mental Health Disorders for the Elder Law Practice: A legal discussion By Jonathan Culwell.
Hegemony (Heg) Economic, military, and political influence a nation has. It’s America’s street cred Soft Power + Hard Power= Heg Amount of Soft + Amount.
Debate: The Basics.
Negative Strategies.
The Affirmative Adapted from:.
Policy Analysis in Cross-ex Debate
Intro to Debate.
Chapter 16 Persuasive Speaking.
Writing about Problems & Their Solutions
Constructing a Case for a Proposition
Constructing a Case for a Proposition
Plans in LD No Limits Debate Camp.
Negative Attacks.
Stock Issues.
Introduction to the Neg
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I)
Getting To Know Debate:
Presentation transcript:

Stock Issues of Proposition of Policy

Stock issues: are hunting grounds for arguments. They provide the general phrasing of potential issues that correspond to the inherent obligations of the advocate of change. Categories –Jurisdiction: derives from the obligation of the advocates of change to provide proposals consistent with the scope of the proposition. –Ill: the obligation of advocates to show a significant past, present, or future problem or harm. –Blame: the obligation of advocates to relate a particular ill causally to the basic structure or philosophy of present policy. –Cure: the obligation of advocates to outline a specific plan of action and demonstrate how it will solve the problem of ill. –Cost: the obligation of the advocate to respond to disadvantages in terms of material cost or social burden. Building Government Cases

Basic Stock Issues in a Government Case Is there a need for a change in the status quo? –Does a significant problem exist sufficient to warrant a change? –Does the problem exist as an inherent part of the status quo? Does the affirmative proposition offer a solution to the problem presented? Does the plan meet the need? Is the proposition practical and workable? Is the proposition the best available solution to the problem? What are the implications of adopting the proposition? –Does the proposition itself have inherent faults which would create greater problems (disadvantages) than the proposal seeks to alleviate? –Does the proposition have any benefits (advantages)?

Identifying the Stock Issue Each of the following statements emphasizes a particular stock issue. For each statement, identify whether the issue involves jurisdiction, ill, blame, cure, or cost. Federal funding and management of nursing homes would improve the quality of life for institutionalized elderly citizens. Private nursing homes are profit motivated. The profit motivation leads them to cut corners and to get by with minimum care, supplies, and personnel. The care the elderly receive in nursing homes is substandard. Many elderly people suffer and die because of the horrible conditions found in many privately owned nursing homes. If the federal government were to take over nursing homes, there would need to be cuts in other federal programs. The federal government just doesn’t have the money to run nursing homes in addition to maintaining a strong national defense. Nursing homes are defined as “institutions that provide, on a long- term basis, specialized medical and custodial care to individuals unable to provide for their own needs.”