What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Research Findings and Issues for Implementation, Policy and Scaling Up: Training & Supporting Personnel and Program Wide Implementation
Campus Improvement Plans
Strengthening Institutions Programs Title III
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Identifying Promising Practices Promising Practices for Community College Student Success A FIRST LOOK.
Developmental Education: Program Components A Presentation Based on Hunter Boylan’s Work Marilyn Mays and Ruth Dalrymple June 12 – 13, 2003.
Mathematics Developmental Education in Texas Institutions of Higher Education Survey of Best Practices Adoption January 2003 Texas Higher Education Coordinating.
History Problem Opportunity Plan. History Started with State Academic Senate’s quest to increase English and math graduation competencies Academic Senate,
IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
Foundation Fundraising Update June Goal seek external, foundation funding for consortial, collaborative project(s) which will advance the organization’s.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.
Poetry Collaboration between Reading and English.
Clara Fowler University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Group C ( AE State Leadership) Group Report to General Session.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
DEV. ED. IN TRANSITION Academic Support Center. What We Have: ASC Vision and Mission Vision Statement  The Academic Support Center will engage and empower.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Accelerating Achievement Designing a State-Level Response to the Developmental Education Challenge Presentation for Southern Regional Education Board June.
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees integrated their two assessment processes.
ACADEMIC SUCCESS STARTS WITH INFORMATION LITERACY A Pilot Program.
Megan Healy Virginia Community College System. VIRGINIA’S COMMUNITY COLLEGES 23 colleges on 40 campuses 287,000+ Annual Headcount Students 128,000+ Annual.
Linked Courses: General Education with Developmental Education Redesign Alliance Conference Orlando, FL March 28-30, 2010 Dr. Leslie Kimberling Jones University.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
Bringing Developmental Students (and Faculty) into the Mainstream.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
EPortfolio Task Group (ePTG) Chair: Ellen Murphy, Director of Online Curriculum,
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Leading Beyond the Institution: Graduates as Learners, Leaders, and Scholarly Practitioners Drs. Ron Zambo, Debby Zambo, Ray R. Buss.
Intro to Outcomes. What is “Outcomes”? A. a statewide initiative aimed at improving learning and accountability in education B. a standing SFCC committee.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Better Writers Statement of Purpose I am investigating techniques used in teaching writing skills as it relates to variations among teachers so that.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas Dr. Larry R. Faulkner Vice-Chair, Higher Education Strategic Planning Committee Presentation to Texas Higher Education.
3A – The organization’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible 3B --
Remediation In Community Colleges Community Colleges are unique institutions that operate under an “Open Door” policy.
SAS CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY Professional SAS Strand Rubrics December 14, 2009 DRAFT 1.0 Curriculum Design PAGE 0.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
What’s Happening and What Do We Do Now?
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Presentation transcript:

What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work Texas Collaborative for Teaching Excellence, June 12 – 13, 2003

Organizational, Administrative, and Institutional Practices Centralization of Program Activities Coordination of Dev Ed Courses and Services Management of Faculty&Student Expectations of Dev Ed Collaboration with Other Academic Units Establishment of Mission, Goals, and Objectives

Organizational, Administrative, and Institutional Practices Identification of Dev Ed as an Institutional Policy Provision of Comprehensive Support Services Funding for Innovative Program Development Integration of Dev Ed and Community Outreach

Program Components Assessment/Placement Systematic Program Evaluation Formative Evaluation for Program Improvement Professional Development Tutoring Professional Associations

Program Components Adjunct Faculty Student Performance Monitoring by Faculty and Advisors Developmental Philosophy as a guide to program activities Classroom/Lab Integration

Instructional Practices Learning Communities Varied Instructional Methods Supplemental Instruction Testing Opportunities Technology (moderation) Feedback Mastery Learning

Instructional Practices Linking Dev to Academic Courses Share Instructional Strategies Critical Thinking Learning Strategies Active Learning Classroom Assessment Techniques

Best Practices Study from NCDE for THECB “An Evaluation of Developmental Education at Texas Colleges and Universities” Boylan and Saxon Institutions identified as most successful in using dev ed to prepare students for TASP and college-level courses Called “Best Practices”

Level One Strongly supported by the survey Research and literature available Many experts available

Level Two Supported by study Some literature and expert opinions

Level Three Little or no support from literature Still may be used to characterize successful dev programs in Texas

Survey and Texas Over 4000 faculty/administrators targeted 13% responded 94% of institutions represented Concerns (low participation, access to web) Biggest Concern:overstating adoption of best practices

Preliminary Results Common Weaknesses Lack of integration with campus outreach services Lack of grant funds Lack of centralized organization for dev ed Professional Development for faculty Tutor training

Preliminary Results Dev Ed faculty not professionals in area/not trained Infrequent testing Lack of forums to share ideas Failure to implement strategies

Preliminary Results Strengths Assessment/Placement Adoption is proceeding (slowly)

Mathematics Developmental Education in Texas Institutions of Higher Education Survey of Best Practices Adoption January 2003 Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Organization and Administration 1. We have a centralized developmental education program. 13.7%17.7%28.4%40.1% 2. We have a highly coordinated developmental education program 5.7%19.4%38.0%37.0% 3. Expectations for developmental education are well-managed 5.2%13.9%43.0%38.0% 4. There is collaboration between developmental education and other campus units. 6.2%18.6%44.0%31.3%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Organization and Administration 5. Our developmental program has a clearly defined statement of mission, goals, and objectives. 4.5%10.7%35.1%49.7% 6. Developmental education is an institutional priority. 6.7%13.5%38.6%41.1% 7. The institution provides comprehensive services in support of developmental education. 4.2%11.0%40.6%44.1% 8. Grant funds are used to support innovation in developmental education. 9.4%25.6%41.5%23.6% 9. Developmental education is integrated with campus outreach services in the community. 11.0%36.1%38.6%14.2%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Program Components 10. Assessment is mandatory for all entering students. 1.5%3.3%25.4%69.7% 11. Placement in courses is mandatory based on assessment. 2.5%5.2%30.3%62.0% 12. A systematic plan is in place for the evaluation of developmental education courses and services. 4.3%19.2%37.6%38.8% 13. Formative evaluation is used by developmental educators to refine and improve courses and services. 5.9%16.1%48.3%29.8% 14. Professional development for developmental educators is consistently supported. 7.0%16.7%38.0%38.3%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Program Components 15. Tutoring is provided to developmental students in all basic skills subjects. 2.3%5.9%28.9%62.9% 16. Tutors working with developmental students are required to participate in training activities. 10.0%28.3%38.8%22.9% 17. Developmental educators are regularly involved in their professional associations. 6.0%24.2%44.1%25.6% 18. Adjunct faculty are treated as an important resource for developmental education. 5.9%11.4%37.6%45.2% 19. Student performance is systematically monitored by faculty and advisors. 3.0%12.0%41.8%43.1%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Program Components 20. A written philosophy statement guides the provision of developmental education courses and services. 4.7%19.4%39.3%36.6% 21. Classrooms and laboratories are well integrated. 6.5%15.6%41.1%36.8%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Instructional Practices 22. Learning communities are provided for developmental students. 8.2%35.1%39.0%17.7% 23. A wide variety of different instructional methods are used in developmental courses. 3.5%13.9%43.1%39.5% 24. Students are tested at least 10 times a semester in developmental courses. 12.4%36.3%29.4%21.9% 25. Technology is used primarily as a supplement for instruction in developmental courses. 3.8%11.4%52.7%32.1% 26. Feedback is frequently provided on a regular basis in developmental courses. 2.3%9.4%43.5%44.8%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Instructional Practices 27. Mastery learning is a common characteristic of developmental courses. 5.0%21.7%42.8%30.4% 28. Systematic efforts are made to link the content of developmental courses to the rest of the curriculum. 4.0%15.4%45.3%35.3% 29. Instructional strategies are regularly shared among developmental instructors in some systematic way. 9.4%29.3%40.6%20.7% 30. Critical thinking is taught in all developmental courses. 5.0%18.7%46.5%29.8%

# Statement Strongly Disagree AgreeStrongly Agree Instructional Practices 31. Learning strategies are either embedded in developmental courses or taught as a separate course. 4.0%11.9%50.3%33.8% 32. All developmental instructors regularly use active learning techniques in their courses. 4.3%26.3%43.3%26.1% 33. All developmental instructors regularly utilize Classroom Assessment Techniques in their courses. 7.0%29.3%44.5%19.2%