Genomics. Finding True Genetic Merit 2 Dam EPD Sire EPD Pedigree Estimate EPD TRUE Progeny Difference Mendelian Sampling Effect Adapted from Dr. Bob Weaber.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phenotypes for training and validation of genome wide selection methods K G DoddsAgResearch, Invermay B AuvrayAgResearch, Invermay P R AmerAbacusBio, Dunedin.
Advertisements

Genetics and Genetic Disorders In Beef Cattle Discussion.
Understanding Conventional and Genomic EPDs
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Matt Spangler University of Nebraska- Lincoln DEVELOPMENT OF GENOMIC EPD: EXPANDING TO MULTIPLE BREEDS IN MULTIPLE WAYS.
Imputation Matt Spangler University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Assistant Professor Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry
BrownBagger October National Program for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle
Genetic Selection Tools in the Genomics Era Curt Van Tassell, PhD Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory & Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville,
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Training, Validation, and Target Populations Training, Validation, and Target Populations Mark Thallman, Kristina Weber, Larry Kuehn, Warren Snelling,
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Associate Professor Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
Introduction to Animal Breeding & Genomics Sinead McParland Teagasc, Moorepark, Ireland.
Matt Spangler Beef Genetics Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
Donor / Embryo Genomics Patrick Blondin L’Alliance Boviteq AABP Embryo Transfer Seminar Montréal, 2012 Sept 19 th.
Wiggans, 2013Japanese Genomics Tour (1) Dr. George R. WiggansDr. H. Duane Norman Acting Research LeaderInterim Administrator Animal Improvement Programs.
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
Wiggans, 2013SRUC Imputation (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD ,
1 Application of Molecular Technologies in Beef Production Dan W. Moser, Ph.D Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How Do I Decide What Traits are Important? Carcass/Ultrasound EPDs Bob Weaber GRA-Cornell.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Breeding Jersey cattle for Africa in the era of genomics Prof Norman Maiwashe 1,2 (PhD, Pri. Sci. Nat) 1 ARC-Animal Production Institute Private Bag X2.
Bovine Genomics The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by.
2007 Paul VanRaden and Mel Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Commercial Ranch Project and DNA testing John Pollak Cornell University.
NBCEC BROWN BAGGER OCTOBER 8, 2014 Jack Ward AHA, Director of Breed Improvement.
Use of DNA information in Genetic Programs.. Next Four Seminars John Pollak – DNA Tests and genetic Evaluations and sorting on genotypes. John Pollak.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
The Many Measures of Accuracy: How Are They Related? Matt Spangler, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2008 G.R. WiggansDHI-Provo.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansGenomics:
T. A. Cooper and G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Council.
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Nuts and Bolts of Genetic Improvement Genetic Model Predicting Genetic Levels Increase Commercial Profitability Lauren Hyde Jackie Atkins Wade Shafer Fall.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
April 2010 (1) Prediction of Breed Composition & Multibreed Genomic Evaluations K. M. Olson and P. M. VanRaden.
Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding April 27, 2010 Interpretation of genomic breeding values from a unified, one-step national evaluation Research project.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansADSA 18.
Whole genome selection and the 2000 bull project at USMARC Larry Kuehn Research Geneticist.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 New.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
Jack Ward American Hereford Association October 31, 2012.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 G.R. Wiggans DNA.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
T. A. Cooper Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD NAAB meeting April 2010.
My vision for dairy genomics
DNA Sire Identification Meat Animal Research Center Clay Center, NE
Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Use of DNA information in Genetic Programs.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
Using EPDs in Selection
DNA Technology.
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Using EPDs in Selection
Genomic Evaluations.
DSEC October 2009.
Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle
Using Haplotypes in Breeding Programs
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
American Simmental Association
Presentation transcript:

Genomics

Finding True Genetic Merit 2 Dam EPD Sire EPD Pedigree Estimate EPD TRUE Progeny Difference Mendelian Sampling Effect Adapted from Dr. Bob Weaber

Consider 3 Bulls EPD= 5 EPD= -3 EPD= 1 Below-average bulls will have some above-average alleles and vice versa! Slide courtesy of Dr. Dorian Garrick

Full Sibling Simmental Example Four flush mates from 1976 Abricot, x CKR Miss Cezon 044F, Planned Mating gives the following expected EPDs CEWWYWADGMCEMilkStayCWYGMrbAPITI PM Eagle Mr Clean Polled Preference Northstar It took time and lots of data to achieve high accuracy EPDs

DNA Testing What is it? Why do it? Who to test? How to test? When to test?

DNA in Cattle 30 pairs of chromosomes in the nucleus of the cell. Nucleotide = Building block Adenine (A), Guanine (G), Thymine (T), Cytosine (C) 3 Billion Nucleotides (DNA) Sequence of these nucleotides key to genetic variation Bull A…ATTGACGTCGATAGAGTC... Bull B…ATTGACTTCGATAGAGTC… SNP, “snip”

Genome Structure – SNPs everywhere! Arias et al., BMC Genet. (2009) Bovine Chromosome Marker Position (cM) Horizontal bars are marker locations Affymetrix 9,713 SNP We use the 30K, 50K, 80K, and now 150K chips Slide courtesy of Dr. Dorian Garrick

Translating SNPs into Molecular Breeding Value (MBV) Training - Acquire 50K SNP genotypes on discovery population –High accuracy, actively used animals Look for SNPs that affecting traits of interest –EPDs or phenotypes, independently for each trait Final result: Equation that translates SNPs into MBVs MBVs blended with EPDs to have Genomically- Enhanced EPDs (GE) Validated

DNA Testing What is it? Why do it? Who to test? How to test? When to test?

What can genomics do for you? Make better selection decisions with higher accuracy EPDs (in unproven animals) Faster genetic change (progress)

Benefits of Genotyping 1.Increase accuracy of EPDs for young (unproven) animals. Trait Progeny Equivalents CE5 BW7 WW8 YW9 Mlk8 MCE3 Stay28 Sh Force6 Mrb8 REA4 BF1

Accuracy in Predicting Genetic Merit

ACC = 0.23

Accuracy in Predicting Genetic Merit ACC = 0.40

Accuracy in Predicting Genetic Merit ACC = 0.40

Accuracy in Predicting Genetic Merit ACC = 0.46

Accuracy in Predicting Genetic Merit ACC = 0.99

Benefits of Genotyping 1.Increase accuracy of EPDs for young (unproven) animals. 2.Parentage (5 to 10% of reported parents are wrong)! –DNA on parents must be on file in order to confirm the parentage

DNA Testing What is it? Why do it? Who to test? How to test? When to test?

Who should you test? AI sires and donor dams: Required –GGP-HD (High Density: 50K, 80K, 150K) –Maintain training population with high impact animals Replacement heifers/cows, bull calves (not considered for AI prospects) –GGP-LD (Low Density: 30K) –Nearly equivalent improvement in the accuracy of EPDs –What would you pay to progeny test these animals?

DNA Testing What is it? Why do it? Who to test? How to test? When to test?

Ordering a Kit Call or Supply ASA with the following information:  ASA registration/on file number *animal must be in the database to request GGP-HD or GGP-LD  Tattoo, sex, sire and dam's registration numbers Indicate whether a blood blotter or hair collector card needs to be sent. Hair cards are billed an additional $3.00/sample.

Tips: Make collecting DNA samples SOP Double check the ID/Tattoo with animal when collecting Remove dirt/manure before collection Blood cards Let cards dry completely Do not stack cards until dry Hair cards Must contain root bulbs(nucleus) Pencil thickness of hair

DNA Testing What is it? Why do it? Who to test? How to test? When to test?

When Prior to making your selection decisions Takes 3 to 4 weeks for results If any problems with parentage, this will take even longer DO NOT WAIT UNTIL LAST MINUTE!

Take Home Points Buys you time Improve the accuracy of the EPDs –Time testing so you use these higher accuracy EPDs in your selection decisions! Confirm parentage Does not replace the need to collect actual measurements Future methods of using the DNA will be even better at predicting breeding value IGS has the largest total number of cattle (16 million) in beef genetic evaluation. BUT, we are still well under AAA in numbers of genotyped animals and carcass records.

Questions? American Simmental Assoc. DNA Department Reach me directly –

When is DNA Testing Required? GGP-HD  AI Sires, includes in herd use.  Donor Dams, even if you're not selling embryos. Parent Verification(PV)  Purchased embryos, owner of ET calf not associated with the owner of the donor dam. Genetic Defect Testing  All sires and donor dams where TraitTrac shows Population Risk(PR), Carrier in Lineage(CL) or Documented Carrier in Lineage(DL) for any defects ASA currently tracks.

How do we know if MBV are reliable? Validation Acquire 50K SNP genotypes on a population of animals independent of discovery population Evaluate how well the MBV predicts genetic merit from traditional EPDs or phenotypes –Genetic correlation between MBV and the trait

GGP-HD/GGP-LD Report CEBWWWYWMCEMilkMWWSTAYDocCWYGMarbBFREAShr Increase

Impact on Accuracy--%GV=50% Genetic correlation=0.7 Genomics will not improve the EPD accuracy of a high accuracy bull Pedigree only Pedigree and genomic Slide courtesy of Dr. Dorian Garrick