Www.symmetricom.com QoE Division Yves Cognet CTO Quality of Experience metrics for IPTV.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ensuring High-quality
Advertisements

1 Quality of Service Issues Network design and security Lecture 12.
IPTV Technology Team 3 – Christopher Monclova, Rafael Leefoon, Nick Adasi, Robb Zucker & Oscar Ucedo.
Media: Voice and Video in your SIP Environment Jitendra Shekhawat.
ITU Regional Standardization Forum For Africa Dakar, Senegal, March 2015 QoE & QoS of Multimedia Services Joachim Pomy OPTICOM GmbH Germany
ITU Regional Standardization Forum For Africa Dakar, Senegal, March 2015 QoS/QoE Assessment Methodologies (Subjective and Objective Evaluation Methods)
Streaming Video over the Internet: Approaches and Directions Dapeng Wu, Yiwei Thomas Hou et al. Presented by: Abhishek Gupta
Spring 2003CS 4611 Multimedia Outline Compression RTP Scheduling.
Internet Traffic Patterns Learning outcomes –Be aware of how information is transmitted on the Internet –Understand the concept of Internet traffic –Identify.
Internet Protocol Television
Real-time traffic Dr. Abdulaziz Almulhem. Almulhem©20012 Agenda RT traffic characteristic RT traffic profiles RT traffic requirements RT Architecture.
CS335 Principles of Multimedia Systems Multimedia Over IP Networks -- II Hao Jiang Computer Science Department Boston College Nov. 8, 2007.
A Study on Quality of Service Issues in Internet Telephony  IP Telephony – Applications and Services  Advantages and benefits of Voice over IP  Technical.
K. Salah 1 Chapter 28 VoIP or IP Telephony. K. Salah 2 VoIP Architecture and Protocols Uses one of the two multimedia protocols SIP (Session Initiation.
Error-Resilient Coding and Decoding Strategies for Video Communication Thomas Stockhammer and Waqar Zia Presented by Li Ma.
Measuring Quality of Experience for Successful IPTV Deployments Dr. Stefan Winkler.
MPEG-2 Transport streams tMyn1 MPEG-2 Transport streams The MPEG-2 Systems Standard specifies two methods for multiplexing the audio, video and other data.
Delivering More Video Content at Half the Cost Using MPEG-4 AVC Bob Wilson Chairman & CEO
RTP/RTCP – Real Time Transport Protocol/ Real Time Control Protocol Presented by Manoj Sivakumar.
RTP/RTCP(RFC 1889) Real-time transport protocol (RTP) is the de facto standard media transport protocol in the Internet Media transport: audio, vedio,
Copyright Telchemy Inc 2001 Embedded Passive Monitoring of Voice over IP Service Quality Alan Clark Telchemy, Inc Atlanta, GA
HPA Roundtable Presentation February 2, 2007 Laszlo Zoltan, VP Sales & Marketing © 2007 Computer Modules, Inc West Bernardo Court San Diego, CA.
Doc.: IEEE /0717r0 Submission June 2008 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide Packets and MPEG Frames Background to Graceful degradation of audio.
QoE Assurance Division Solutions for ToIP – VoIP service assurance and service performance.
Packet and Circuit Switching
Safe Video Contribution & Distribution over IP Networks Philippe LEMONNIER.
Doc.: IEEE /0787r0 Submission July 2013 Wu TianyuSlide 1 Follow-up Discussions on HEW Functional Requirements Date: Authors:
VoIP Packets In the Air and Over the Wire J. Scott Haugdahl CTO
 Coding efficiency/Compression ratio:  The loss of information or distortion measure:
Establishing and Maintaining Broadcast Quality Video over IP Yannick LE DREAU 4 September 2010.
Computer Networks: Multimedia Applications Ivan Marsic Rutgers University Chapter 3 – Multimedia & Real-time Applications.
AIMS’99 Workshop Heidelberg, May 1999 Linking User Acceptance and Network Performance Miles Wilkins (BT) P807 (JUPITER2)
Assuring Performance of Carrier-Class Networks and Enterprise Contact Centers SP-11: Ensuring Service Quality While Increasing Revenue February 4, 2009.
1 Lecture 17 – March 21, 2002 Content-delivery services. Multimedia services Reminder  next week individual meetings and project status report are due.
V-Factor QoE Platform Q-1000 Solution Overview. PAGE 2© COPYRIGHT SYMMETRICOM ( ) V-Factor Components Headend AnalyzerNetwork Probes Software.
Network Instruments VoIP Analysis. VoIP Basics  What is VoIP?  Packetized voice traffic sent over an IP network  Competes with other traffic on the.
Image Processing and Computer Vision: 91. Image and Video Coding Compressing data to a smaller volume without losing (too much) information.
Real Time Protocol (RTP) 김 준
1 Presented by Jari Korhonen Centre for Quantifiable Quality of Service in Communication Systems (Q2S) Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
ﺑﺴﻢﺍﷲﺍﻠﺭﺣﻣﻥﺍﻠﺭﺣﻳﻡ. Group Members Nadia Malik01 Malik Fawad03.
AGH and Lancaster University. Assess based on visibility of individual packet loss –Frame level: Frame dependency, GoP –MB level: Number of affected MBs/slices.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
V-Factor Competitive Advantage October End-to-End Solution  Headend to CPE monitoring is a great value proposition  Control the delivery chain.
Changing the Dynamics of Network Analysis J. Scott Haugdahl CTO, WildPackets, Inc.
Spring 2001CS Multimedia, QoS Multimedia (7.2, 9.3) Compression RTP Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services Quality.
03/11/2015 Michael Chai; Behrouz Forouzan Staffordshire University School of Computing Streaming 1.
Chapter 28. Network Management Chapter 29. Multimedia
Doc.: IEEE /0717r1 Submission July 2008 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide Packets and MPEG Frames Background to Graceful degradation of audio.
LOG Objectives  Describe some of the VoIP implementation challenges such as Delay/Latency, Jitter, Echo, and Packet Loss  Describe the voice encoding.
Selective Retransmission of MPEG Video Streams over IP Networks Árpád Huszák, Sándor Imre Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ 2005 Multicast Admission Control in DiffServ Networks Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskylä.
Technologies, products, services and advantages vs competitors November 2013.
AIMS’99 Workshop Heidelberg, May 1999 Assessing Audio Visual Quality P905 - AQUAVIT Assessment of Quality for audio-visual signals over Internet.
Ch 6. Multimedia Networking Myungchul Kim
CSE5803 Advanced Internet Protocols and Applications (14) Introduction Developed in recent years, for low cost phone calls (long distance in particular).
Ch 6. Multimedia Networking Myungchul Kim
3GPP2 Evolution Workshop Multimedia Codecs and Protocols 3GPP2 TSG-C SWG1.2.
Alan Clark Telchemy Modeling the effects of Burst Packet Loss and Recency on Subjective Voice Quality Alan Clark Telchemy
2/07/03 Telchemy QoS for VoIP: Measuring its Effectiveness Bob Massad Telchemy ®, Inc
Quality of Service for Real-Time Network Management Debbie Greenstreet Product Management Director Texas Instruments.
1 Multimedia Outline Compression RTP Scheduling. 2 Compression Overview Encoding and Compression –Huffman codes Lossless –data received = data sent –used.
Multimedia Communication Systems Techniques, Standards, and Networks Chapter 6 Multimedia Communication Across Networks.
ITU Workshop on QoS and QoE of Multimedia Applications and Services Haarlem, The Netherlands 9-11 May 2016 Standards for video QoE assessment Paul Coverdale.
Introduction to H.264 / AVC Video Coding Standard Multimedia Systems Sharif University of Technology November 2008.
Media Compression.
July 2008 doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2008
Networking Applications
Video Compression - MPEG
Networking Applications
Achieving, Monitoring and Maintaining A High Quality of Experience
Presentation transcript:

QoE Division Yves Cognet CTO Quality of Experience metrics for IPTV

 QoS as perceived by an end-user is called QoE (Quality of Experience)  QoE can be measured and benchmarked QoE relates how an application is perceived by an end-user. QoE metrics are content dependant and are impacted by network impairments as well as content impairments QoS versus QoE (highlight) Quality of ExperienceQuality of Service  Describes how IP can be used for offering Differentiated Services  Describes how Differentiated Services can improve Quality of Services (aka for offering Class Of Services) QoS describes how a network is performing for a specific Class Of Service. QoS metrics are network centric metrics. “Operators want to know the video performance as perceived by the customer through the IP TV network….”.

Key Challenges to solve  Assure service delivery (end2end monitoring)  Monitor service quality (Quality of Experience)  Reduce time to fix (identify the problem and diagnose the source)  Speed up deployment  Deliver what the customer is paying for  Reduce customer churns  Reduce cost of support  Secure revenue streams (competition)

What was missing  QoS for IPTV is well known but QoE for IPTV is in its infancy. The V-Factor™ patented technology is recognized as the “critical missing link” between IPTV QoE and IPTV QoS.  V-Factor technology takes into account  Network impairments (delay, jitter, loss, miss ordering,..) as defined by ITU Y1540/41and IETF RFC2330  Transport impairments (MPEG2 TS streamer jitter) as defined by ETSI TR  Content impairments (is codec dependant and measure the quantization, size of macroblocks, …), The V-Factor provides a score that measures the impact of losses/jitter on I, B or P frames/slices by simulating the Human Vision System.

IPTV QoE methodologies Subjective QoE testing Average opinion of many people concerning quality of Video Not scalable Objective QoE testing Score delivered by a system that rate the quality of the video as perceived by a user Human Vision System Model

Video Quality Measurement Full Reference (FR) Full Reference Processor Original Video Received Video Original Video Transmitted Video Signal ITU-T J.144

Video Quality Measurement Reduced Reference (RR) Reduced-Reference Spatial (Pixel) and Temporal (Motion) Information Reduced-Reference Signal Processor Transmitted Video Received Video ITU-T J.143

Video Quality Measurement No-Reference (NR) Processor Transmitted Video Received Video V-Factor™ No-Reference V-Factor – Moving Picture Quality Metrics (MPQM) based on the Human Vision System

What is V-Factor? Based on MPQM (Moving Picture Quality Metrics) Considers both Network based metrics and Content based metrics Measures Perceived Video and Audio Quality over time

What the V-Factor does 1/2 Transmitted Video Received Video Multiplexer/streamerSTB MPEG PES packet analysis I,B,P frames and slices analysis Audio PES Video PES : Slices, Macro block, Block, Quantizer V-Factor analyses all PES video and audio packets in real time and collect statistics about I,B,P frames and slices. PES packets analysis is codec dependant (MPEG2, H264,..).

What the V-Factor does 2/2 Transmitted Video Received Video IP/RTP/Transport Stream header inspection PCR (jitter) Packet loss Bandwidth Multiplexer/streamerSTB V-Factor collects network statistics from IP header or RTP MPEG2TS header, Network packets analysis is transport dependant (RTP only, MPEG2TS over UDP, MPEG2TS over RTP over UDP,..). IP packets (6 to 7 PES)

The MPQM model is fed from network impairments at the IP level (as defined by ITU U1540/41 and RFC2330) and also information collected from the content of the compressed video layer (GOP, Quantizer,..) The PLR is computed from network impairments, the Program Clock Reference (PCR) Jitter and Network Jitter. Loss model Markov models Bursty Loss Episode Single Loss MPQM model Packet Loss Rate (PLR) probability Codec type, I/B/P/S, Quantizer information, bandwidth V-Factor Human Vision System (HVS) Entropy Γ Patented Audio Sound MOS TR Content Impairments PLC (FEC) De Jitter Buffer Network Jitter Buffer size Network impairments Codec impairments MPQM V-Factor Measurements Transport Stream analysis (PCR, Out of sequence)

V-Factor Parameters All parameters are “per sample” counters unless otherwise noted Please see MPEG-2 System Specifications and ETSI TR for more detailed explanations of these parameters  Network related parameters  Jitter Discards – Number of frames discarded due to jitter  Network Loss Probability – Statistically accurate predictive calculation of frame loss at the PES level  Out of Sequence – Number of miss-ordered frames delivered  Max Loss Episode Length – Maximum number of lost frames per episode  Max Loss Episodes – Cumulative count of loss episodes since first observation  In Sequence – Number of properly ordered frames delivered  PLC – packet loss concealment (such as FEC or other mechanisms)  ETSI TR group 1 and 2 – standard DVB parameters for MPEG2 TS  Content related parameters  Program Rate – Transport stream rate in kilobits per second as observed  Program Clock Rate Overall Jitter – Jitter of synchronization stream in microseconds (from the streamer)  I frame Count – Number of “I” (Intra) frames/slices for this sample period  P frame Count – Number of “P” (Predictive) frames/slices for this sample period  B frame Count – Number of “B” (Bi-directional) frames/slices for this sample period  Compression Ratio – Ratio of I frames to I+P+B frames  QUANT_SCALE – Worst case value of the QUANT_SCALE per reporting period  V-Factor – QoSmetrics specific calculation of user perceived video quality, details elsewhere  Sound codec  Video codec (H264/CABAC – MPEG2,…)  Multicast Join Time – Actual time the stream was joined in “epoch” seconds  Multicast First Time – Actual time the first data arrived in “epoch” seconds

IP TV – QoE metric Test 1 - 0% packet loss / 0% jitter / 0% dupTest 3 - 1% packet loss / higher jitter / 1% dup Test 2 - 0,1% packet loss / some jitter / 0,1% dup Test 1 Test 2Test 3

Deploying the V-Factor  Secure revenues by keeping customer satisfaction  Integrate with NOC & customer support workflows        Accelerate and secure IPTV deployment during rollout  Keep customer support costs under control By deploying probes before and after encryption, the solution overcomes most situation when encryption is used for DRM purpose.

IPTV in Service Monitoring  Measure Performance by Channel and by Geographic Region

"One of the major demands in the emerging IP video market was the need for a video scoring metric suitable for the IPTV market. With the announcement of V-Factor™, which is the first product suitable for large-scale deployment of IPTV, QoSmetrics eliminated one of the major stumbling blocks for successful deployment." “QoSmetrics’ V-Factor™ is a sophisticated service analysis portfolio that maximizes video quality, giving service providers what they need to avoid network performance impairments – setting the company apart from its competitors,” said Brian Dolan, editor of Fierce-IPTV. “The company’s customer list is very impressive, and will only get better as U.S. deployments continue, making them a Fierce15 winner.” Awards & Recognition The NetAgent product has been named a Best of Interop Finalist for this week’s Networld+Interop exhibition held annually in Las Vegas.

Who is using V-Factor ITPV Customers/TrialsOEM/Distribution Partners

Other alternatives