4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono1 Earth Observing System: Measuring the Benefit of Internet2 for Science Data Distribution Jeff Smith Joe Loiacono.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #24 October 19, 2007 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
Advertisements

During spacecraft-level environmental testing, after all instruments were integrated, the government assembled a data clerk team to support test data collection.
Corporation For National Research Initiatives The MAGIC Project Final Demonstration and Briefing Ira Richer 29 July 1999.
ESTO Advanced Component Technology 11/17/03 Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations GSFC CO 2 Science and Sounder.
CCNA2 Module 4. Discovering and Connecting to Neighbors Enable and disable CDP Use the show cdp neighbors command Determine which neighboring devices.
Earth System Science Teachers of the Deaf Workshop, August 2004 S.O.A.R. High Earth Observing Satellites.
Metrics and Monitoring Capabilities for Earth Science Data Systems ESDSWG Wilmington, Delaware October 20-22, 2009.
High Performance Networking Update for the University of Maryland, the MAX GigaPoP and Partners CANS 2002 Mark Alan Matties, Ph. D. The University of Maryland,
02/07/2001 EOSDIS Core System (ECS) COTS Lessons Learned Steve Fox
National Aeronautics and Space Administration nai.nasa.gov NASA Astrobiology Institute1 NAI Website: Statistics and Content Management Marco Boldt Sr.
NASA PKI for PKI FORUM Presenters: Paul Ma, NASA-Ames Research Center
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite Chapter 4. Multilayer communication. A series of layers, each built upon the one below it. The purpose of each layer is.
Reading Report 14 Yin Chen 14 Apr 2004 Reference: Internet Service Performance: Data Analysis and Visualization, Cross-Industry Working Team, July, 2000.
Performance Monitoring Report - Testing Internet and EBnet networks between NASDA and various sites - Network Task Team - September, 2003 Osamu Ochiai.
JPL Campus Advanced ServicesCdL Claudia de Luna (818) December 4, 2000 JPL Campus Network Advanced.
NOAA Satellite Conference April 8-12, 2013 Mary Kicza Assistant Administrator for Satellite & Information Services.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Long-Term Upper Air Temperature.
Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) provides access to more than 3,000 types of Earth science data products and specialized services.
, Increasing Discoverability and Accessibility of NASA Atmospheric Science Data Center (ASDC) Data Products with GIS Technology ASDC Introduction The Atmospheric.
, Implementing GIS for Expanded Data Accessibility and Discoverability ASDC Introduction The Atmospheric Science Data Center (ASDC) at NASA Langley Research.
Al Cooper Jeff Stith Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL) HIAPER Debrief 9 November 2005 Ongoing Development and Support: EOL Plans for Deployment of HIAPER.
Aquarius Project Status 7 th Aquarius/SAC-D Science Team Meeting 11 April 2012.
Page 1 Informatics Pilot Project EDRN Knowledge System Working Group San Antonio, Texas January 21, 2001 Steve Hughes Thuy Tran Dan Crichton Jet Propulsion.
The Ocean Color MEASURES Project S. Maritorena 1, J. Frew 2, N.B. Nelson 1, D.A. Siegel 1,3, M. Behrenfeld 4 1. Institute for Computational Earth System.
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
1 Interoperability Among EOS Data Gateway, ECHO and CEOS’ INFEO Systems CEOS WGISS Subgroup Meeting May 9, 2002 Frascati Italy Chao-Hsi Chang NASA/EDG.
June 2004 SIW-4 - IP in Space Implementation Guide 1 Handbook for Using IP Protocols for Space Missions James Rash - NASA/GSFC Keith Hogie, Ed Criscuolo,
1 ASTER DATA Transfer System Earth Remote Sensing Data Analysis Center Kunjuro Omagari ERSDAC 23th APAN Meeting.
MODIS Workshop An Introduction to NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS), Terra, and the MODIS Instrument Michele Thornton
1 CERES Results Norman Loeb and the CERES Science Team NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Reception NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD.
EOSDIS Status 9/29/2010 Dan Marinelli, NASA GSFC
MOWG 2 Sept 15-16,1999 David Hancock1 KEY PERSONNEL Dr. Bob Schutz, GLAS Science Team Leader Dr. Jay Zwally, ICESat Project Scientist, GLAS Team Member.
EOS Terra MODIS Land Processing and Distribution Overview Joseph M Glassy, Director, MODIS Software Development at NTSG School of Forestry, Numerical Terradynamics.
September 4, 2003MODIS Ocean Data Products Workshop, Oregon State University1 Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC) MODIS.
ESIP Federation 2004 : L.B.Pham S. Berrick, L. Pham, G. Leptoukh, Z. Liu, H. Rui, S. Shen, W. Teng, T. Zhu NASA Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data & Information.
High Data Volume Transfer Issues at NOAA Christopher D. Elvidge Earth Observation Group National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Geophysical.
1CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, Frascati. Performance Monitoring Report - Testing Internet and EBnet networks between NASDA and various sites -
Ames Research CenterDivision 1 Information Power Grid (IPG) Overview Anthony Lisotta Computer Sciences Corporation NASA Ames May 2,
EOSDIS Status 10/16/2008 Dan Marinelli, Science Systems Development Office.
Diane E. Wickland NPP Program Scientist NPP Science: HQ Perspective on VIIRS May 18, 2011.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
NPOESS Science Advisory Team Gregory W. Withee Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services July 16,2003 A Proposal to the NOAA Science.
Control & Data Handling, Operator Control, Aircraft Interface to C&DH Steve Musko Space Physics Research Laboratory University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI.
MODIS/AIRS/AMSU/HSB Direct Broadcast & Processing Package at the Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Study Space Science and Engineering.
7/13/04 Shaida Johnston MODIS Science Team Meeting 1 Current MODIS Data System: Processing, Archiving and Distribution Shaida Johnston July 13, 2004.
1 Earth Science Technology Office The Earth Science (ES) Vision: An intelligent Web of Sensors IGARSS 2002 Paper 02_06_08:20 Eduardo Torres-Martinez –
KEY PERSONNEL Dr. Bob Schutz, GLAS Science Team Leader Dr. Jay Zwally, ICESat Project Scientist, GLAS Team Member Mr. David Hancock, Science Software Development.
Science of the Aqua Mission By: Michael Banta ESS 5 th class Ms. Jakubowyc December 7, 2006.
Vision of an Integrated Global Observing System Gregory W. Withee Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
Trials and Tribulations of a Small Archive Presented at the THIC Conference, NCAR, Boulder CO June 30, 2004 Presented at the THIC Meeting at the National.
Phillip Alexander Spence 2 nd period ESS Satellite “Air” Meteor 3M Mission.
Evolution of the JPSS Ground Project Calibration and Validation System Patrick Purcell, Gyanesh Chander and Peyush Jain JPSS Ground Project NASA, GSFC.
MODIS SDST, STTG and SDDT MODIS Science Team Meeting (Land Discipline Breakout Session) July 13, 2004 Robert Wolfe Raytheon NASA GSFC Code 922.
March 2004 At A Glance ITPS is a flexible and complete trending and plotting solution which provides user access to an entire mission full-resolution spacecraft.
Review of the 2012 Suomi NPP Applications Workshop: Outcomes, Results, Progress Forrest Melton November 18, 2014 Suomi NPP Applications.
Figure 3. Overview of system architecture for RCMES. A Regional Climate Model Evaluation System based on Satellite and other Observations Peter Lean 1.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
Overview of Climate Observational Requirements for GOES-R Herbert Jacobowitz Short & Associates, Inc.
Spatial & Temporal Distribution of Cloud Properties observed by MODIS: Preliminary Level-3 Results from the Collection 5 Reprocessing Michael D. King,
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS SURFACE PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS FROM THE ORBITING CARBON OBSERVATORY-2.
Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS) Project Update Jeanne Behnke, Deputy Project Manager for Operations NASA Earth Science Data & Information.
NOAA Council on Long-Term Climate Monitoring (CLTCM) Presentation to NOAA Science Advisory Board November 5 – 7, 2002 Chair: Tom Karl Executive Secretary:
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR Enterprise Synthesis.
LESSON Networking Fundamentals Understand TCP/IP.
Instructor Materials Chapter 1 Ever Wonder How It Works?
ExaO: Software Defined Data Distribution for Exascale Sciences
Technology for a NASA Space-based Science Operations Grid Internet2 Members Meeting Advanced Applications Track Session April, 2003 Robert N. Bradford.
Presentation transcript:

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono1 Earth Observing System: Measuring the Benefit of Internet2 for Science Data Distribution Jeff Smith Joe Loiacono Andy Germain NASA EOS - GSFC

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono2 Outline EOS Overview –EOS Program –EOS Data and Information System Network Measurements –Data Collection Abilene Traffic Loads Abilene Utilization Server Statistics –Active Testing Future Plans

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono3 The Earth Observing System (EOS) is the centerpiece of NASA's Earth Science Enterprise (ESE). It consists of a science component and a data system supporting a coordinated series of polar-orbiting and low inclination satellites for long-term global observations of the land surface, biosphere, solid Earth, atmosphere, and oceans. By enabling improved understanding of the Earth as an integrated system, the EOS program has benefits for us all. The EOS Project Science Office (EOSPSO) is committed to helping bring program information and resources to program scientists and the general public alike. EOS Overview

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono4 Terra Mission - launched December 1999 The Terra (formerly AM-1) satellite is the flagship of NASA's ESE (Earth Science Enterprise). Terra is the first EOS platform and provides global data on the state of the atmosphere, land, and oceans, as well as their interactions with solar radiation and with one another. Aqua Mission - rescheduled: early 2002 Aqua will collect climate-related data. Its on-board sensors will measure clouds, precipitation, atmospheric temperature/moisture content, terrestrial snow, sea ice, and sea surface temperature during its six-year mission. Flying in low-earth orbit, Aqua will pass over the equator at the same time each afternoon, allowing the comprehensive measurements needed to assess long-term change. Aura ICEsat Mission - scheduled: July, 2003 The EOS - Chemistry satellite hosts a suite of scientific instruments designed to make the most comprehensive measurements ever undertaken of atmospheric trace gases. Its objective is to study the chemistry and dynamics of the Earth's atmosphere with emphasis on the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (0-30km). The mission will measure ozone, aerosols, and several key atmospheric constituents that play an important role in atmospheric chemistry, air quality, and climate. Current and Upcoming EOS Missions

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono5 EOS Missions

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono6 EOS Platforms, Instruments, and Science Objectives

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono7 The EOS Data and Information System (EOSDIS) is designed to operate the satellites and instruments, capture the satellite data, generate useful Earth science data products, and make the products available to users in the U.S. and throughout the world. The two major parts of EOSDIS are Mission System and Science System. The Mission System commands and controls EOS spacecraft and instruments, monitors their health and safety, and performs mission planning and scheduling, initial data capture, and initial data processing. The Science System generates higher level data products suitable for analysis by NASA principal investigators and the general scientific community. EOSDIS - EOS Data Infrastructure

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono8 NASA EOS Satellites and Instruments Other NASA Satellites with EOS Instruments ESA Satellites with EOS Instruments NASDA Satellites with EOS Instruments EOSDISCommuicationsEOSDISCommuications NSIDC ASF EDC GSFC JPL LaRC ORNL ExternalCommunicationsExternalCommunications Value Added Providers Investigators Instrument Support Terminals Science Computing Facilities External Data Users Science Computing Facilities Distributed Active Archive Centers EMSnet ESSnet EDOSEDOS EBnet EOSDIS Enterprise

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono9 Mid-Atlantic Crossroads EOSDIS Network Architecture vBNS+ Chi NISN

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono10 Data Product Levels Raw Telemetry - as transmitted from spacecraft –Instruments multiplexed, CCSDS frames Level 0: Instrument telemetry –Time stamped, Reed-Solomon decoded, fill data, etc. Level 1: Instrument Measurements –Calibrated, georeferenced Level 2: Scientific Parameter Retrieval –Inferred geophysical properties –Corresponding to individual instrument measurements Level 3: Gridded –Interpolated / extrapolated to useful space/time coordinates Level 4: Integrated –E.g., Multiple instruments, movie loops

NET DAAC QA SCF EOS LaRC

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono12 Data Collection Overview Data Collected –Traffic loads on key interfaces –Traffic volumes overall –Traffic volumes to sites –Traffic per host (sender & receivers - not included) –Traffic characteristics (ports, types - not included) Purposes –Historical data and trends vs. requirements –Planning –Troubleshooting –Security –Who’s doing what to whom on the EOS network

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono13 GSFC DAAC Router interface to Abilene - Science data product transfers from GSFC to Principal investigator sites located at Abilene member universities continues to grow. - Note: Traffic loading on other key interfaces is not included in presentation Abilene Traffic Loads

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono14 EROS Data Center Sioux Falls, SD NSIDC Colorado Springs, CO LARC Langley, VA GSFC Greenbelt, MD NetFlow Collector: cflowd ARTS reports and Custom Scripts EOS Performance Web-site - Cisco NetFlow data is sent from EOS routers at above locations to ‘cflowd’ collector at GSFC every few seconds throughout the day. ARTS and custom scripts are run automatically every night producing web-based reports. Data is compressed and archived every week. * ‘cflowd’ and ARTS software is maintained by CAIDA. Utilization Data Collection Process

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono15 - EOS use of Abilene for science data product transfers from GSFC to Abilene partner institutions is significant Daily Quantities of EOS Science Data to Abilene Partners Abilene Science Data Utilization

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono16 Top EOS Partner Institutions using Abilene - Custom scripts that interpret Cisco’s NetFlow data keep track of major EOS Partners using Abilene to efficiently retrieve data from GSFC Top Users of Traffic to Abilene

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono17 EOS Science data products delivered to U. Miami over Abilene - University researchers use Abilene for efficient retrieval of large science data sets. U Miami is largest single EOS partner institution using Abilene to retrieve science data products from GSFC, often extracting over 50 Gigabytes daily Utilization for Single Abilene Site

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono18 Abilene Statistics for router: GSFC This Abilene Flow Distribution Report was generated at 09/04/ :15:00 for Router: gsfc Total Bytes to Abilene : 173,127,413,068 Pct.: 99 Total Bytes to NSI Router: 670,153,399 Pct.: 0 Organization Name Network Science Bytes Pct. Test Bytes PI Total University of Miami ,163,427, ,098,222, ,261,649,879 University of Wisconsin ,543,093, ,598,416 2,730,692,409 Oregon State University ,157,704, ,779,053,008 3,936,757,009 NCAR ,818, ,936,226,700 5,068,044,868 ECS (2) ,145, ,145,462 University of Alaska ,497, ,497,758 NASDA ,447, ,447,226 University of Maryland (2) ,783, ,000 1,789,506 ECS ,667, ,880 1,673,675 University of Arizona ,627, ,208,195,612 4,209,823,241 JPL ,121, ,604,571,172 2,605,692,507 UC Santa Barbara (2) ,071, ,782, ,853,837 University of Montana ,070, ,665, ,736,366 University College (SCF) , ,299, ,238,160 Ohio State University , ,255, ,061,432 Boston University , ,031,575,652 7,032,322,036 ECS (3) , ,139 University of Alabama (UAH) , ,336 UMBC , ,441 University of Colorado , ,123 UC Berkeley University of Hawaii University of Delaware Total PI data flows (see above) 127,018,694, ,136,457, ,155,152,166 Non-PI data flows (various) 13,363,794, ,608,466,556 20,972,260,902 Total Abilene bytes 140,382,488, ,744,924, ,127,413,068 PI Bytes as pct. of total (Abilene and NSI) 127,018,694, Abilene Daily Report

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono19 Customized ARTS Network Report Network Statistics for router: GSFC router: ifIndex: User Network (Fddi1/0/0 198.xxx.yyy.65) period: 09/25/ :58: /26/ :58:41 EDT Src Network Pkts Bytes Destination xxx.yyy.64/ /24 -- NSI Netblock 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /19 -- University of Miami (NET-MIAMI) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- NASA Headquarters (NET-JPL-NET) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /32 -- miracle.rsmas.miami.edu -- University of Miami (NET-MIAMI) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /24 -- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NETBLK-NASA-CN 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (NET-GSFC) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- University of Texas (NET-CHPCHYPERHOSE) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- University of California, San Diego (NET-UCSD-SUBNETS) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- Boston University (NET-BU-NET) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NET-JPL-NET2) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- National Center for Atmospheric Research (NET-UCAR) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- University of Arizona (NET-UNIV-ARIZ) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /32 -- taichi.icess.ucsb.edu -- University of California, Santa ) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- MACC (NET-UWMSN-NET) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- CSIRO IT Services (NET-CSIRO-CLAYTON) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- Naval Ocean Systems Center (NET-NOSC-ETHER) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- University of Utah (NET-UTAH-NET) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- Oregon State University (NET-ORST) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- University of California, Santa Barbara (NET-UCSB) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /32 -- matrix4.nsstc.uah.edu -- National Aeronautics and Space 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /24 -- NASA Ames Research Center (NET-EOS-DAAC-NET2) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /24 -- NSI Netblock 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- University of Colorado (NET-COLORADO) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- University College London (NET-UCL-NET-A) 198.xxx.yyy.64/ / Front Range Internet, Inc. (NETBLK-NET-RII- 198.xxx.yyy.64/ /16 -- Ohio State University (NET-OHIO-STATE)

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono20 Sample from Custom Flow Report Detailed Flow Data for External Destinations Source Port Bytes Destination xxx.yyy D 2930 memberdir.netscape.com -- Netscape Communications Corp. (NETBLK- 198.xxx.yyy D (web requests out) 198.xxx.yyy D 6012 (secure web in) 198.xxx.yyy D (web requests out) 198.xxx.yyy D (secure web in) 198.xxx.yyy D (web requests out) 198.xxx.yyy D 2382 (ftp control out) 198.xxx.yyy D (ftp sent out) 198.xxx.yyy D (web requests out) 198.xxx.yyy D NASA Ames Research Center (NET-NSN-NET) 198.xxx.yyy D NASA Ames Research Center (NET-NSN-NET) 198.xxx.yyy.153 0D 720 polaris.umuc.edu -- University of Maryland University College 198.xxx.yyy D polaris.umuc.edu -- University of Maryland University College 198.xxx.yyy D 352 polaris.umuc.edu -- University of Maryland University College 198.xxx.yyy D Cisco Systems, Inc. (NET-SWLAB1) 198.xxx.yyy D 1794 u1.abs.net -- ABSnet Internet Services, Inc. (NETBLK-ABS-NET- 198.xxx.yyy D 1931 mail1.abs.net -- ABSnet Internet Services, Inc. (NETBLK-ABS-NET- 198.xxx.yyy D idyle.com -- Cable & Wireless USA (NETBLK-CW-10BLK) CW-10BLK 198.xxx.yyy D 4066 aim1.radiate.com -- Abovenet Communications, Inc. (NETBLK- 198.xxx.yyy D 234 so mp2.Washington1.Level3.net -- Level 3 Communications, 198.xxx.yyy D 5148 p2.my.vip.snv.yahoo.com -- GeoCities (NETBLK-NETBLK-GEO-1) 198.xxx.yyy D ns1.solarwinds.net -- Southwestern Bell Internet Services 198.xxx.yyy D 468 so mp2.SanJose1.Level3.net -- Level 3 Communications, Inc. 198.xxx.yyy D 468 gigabitethernet9-0.ipcolo1.SanJose1.Level3.net -- Level xxx.yyy D (web requests out) 198.xxx.yyy D 176 polaris.umuc.edu -- University of Maryland University College 198.xxx.yyy D 9151 eos.east.hitc.com -- Performance Systems International (NET-

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono21 Server Statistics

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono22 Active Testing Overview End-to-end user level test –“Active” testing –little or no visibility into network internals Purposes –EOS: assess whether networks as implemented meet EOS requirements –CEOS: assess whether networks can support intended applications –Resolve user complaints: Network problems -- or somewhere else?? –Determine bottlenecks -- seek routing alternatives –Provide a basis for allocation of additional resources

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono23 Active Testing - Process Test script runs hourly to each site: Traceroute (1 way) –Number of hops -- route stability --> Hops Chart Pings –100 pings prior to thruput test or 100/300 during –Round Trip Time --> RTT Chart –Packet Loss --> Packet Loss Chart TCP Throughput –TCPwatch, Iperf, or FTP --> Thruput Chart –requires cooperating client at destination –TCPwatch / Iperf keeps send buffer full for 30 Seconds –Netstat -> packets retransmitted (if pings blocked)

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono24 EOS DAAC NASA Nodes SCFs QA Other Key: ORST UCSB Ariz LANL Wisc Miami SUNY-SB BU GSFC LaRC EDC MSFC, NSSTC NCAR Mont JPL Toronto Colo St. Niagara ASF Chicago Other Nodes SLAC NSIDC NMEX CCRS UVA UMD GPN NGDC, NOAA USF RSS US Active Test Sites Texas UCSD Wash Mich NOAA Ohio

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono25 On line results Updated Daily – –"Network Health Statistics" GSFC Sites EOS Sites EMSNet Sites CEOS Sites Other sites –Charts: All sources to specified destination Thruput, RTT, Packet Loss, Hop Count –Weekly: 24 measurements per day from each source –60 day: Daily Average –Yearly (RSN)

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono26 Sample Chart: BU Thruput (current week)

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono27 Sample Chart: BU RTT, Loss (current week)

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono28 Sample Chart: BU Thruput (2 months)

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono29 Sample Chart: UCSD Thruput (current week)

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono30 Sample Chart: UCSD Thruput (2 months)

Mbps Minimum Maximum Median Thruput Range: GSFC to Abilene Sites AZ, Tucson (U of AZ) CA, UCSB CA, UCSD - SIO CO, Colo State Univ CO, NCAR - Boulder FL, Univ. of Miami MA, Boston Univ MD, UMD- College Park MT, Univ of Montana NY, SUNY Stony Brook OH, Ohio State Univ OR, Oregon State Univ. TX, U Texas - Austin VA, UVA

4 October 2001Smith/Germain/Loiacono32 POCs Jeff Smith Joe Loiacono Andy Germain