Real Options Dealing with Dividends Prof. Luiz Brandão 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chap 3 Net Present Value.  Net present value is the single most widely used tool for large investments made by corporations.  Klammer reported a survey.
Advertisements

The cost of capital (aka hurdle rate) and NPV analysis.
CAPITAL BUDGETING WITH LEVERAGE. Introduction  Discuss three approaches to valuing a risky project that uses debt and equity financing.  Initial Assumptions.
CORPORATE FINANCIAL THEORY Lecture 3. Interest Rate Cash Flow Interest Rate and Cash Flow - REALITY Is not guaranteed Has many different sources.
Real Options: The Via Dutra Case Luiz Brandao The University of Texas at Austin Class Web Site
Common Stock Valuation
Common Stock Valuation
Valuation and Rates of Return
 3M is expected to pay paid dividends of $1.92 per share in the coming year.  You expect the stock price to be $85 per share at the end of the year.
Basic Numerical Procedures Chapter 19 1 資管所 柯婷瑱 2009/07/17.
Chapter 8: Strategy and Analysis Using NPV
Real Options The Right to do Something Real. Introduction The classical DCF valuation method involves a comparison between the cost of an investment project.
Chap 5 Numerical Methods for Simple Options.  NPV is forced to treat future courses of action as mutually exclusive, ROA can combine them into a single.
INVESTMENTS: Analysis and Management Second Canadian Edition INVESTMENTS: Analysis and Management Second Canadian Edition W. Sean Cleary Charles P. Jones.
Chapter 13 Common Stock Valuation Name two approaches to the valuation of common stocks used in fundamental security analysis. Explain the present value.
Chapter 20 Basic Numerical Procedures
Pricing Fixed-Income Securities. The Mathematics of Interest Rates Future Value & Present Value: Single Payment Terms Present Value = PV  The value today.
Common Stock Valuation
Bonds with embedded options
Drake DRAKE UNIVERSITY Fin 288 Valuing Options Using Binomial Trees.
Warm-up Problems Consider the oil well example. P(rich)=0.5. Now assume the test is not perfect: P(test - | rich) = 0.1 and P(test + | poor) = 0.3. What.
Review Bond Yields and Prices.
Financial Statement Modeling MGT 4850 Spring 2008 University of Lethbridge.
Théorie Financière Valeur actuelle Professeur André Farber.
V OLATILITY E STIMATION FOR S TOCHASTIC P ROJECT V ALUE M ODELS Luiz E. Brandão IAG Business School, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.
Drake DRAKE UNIVERSITY Fin 284 Bonds with embedded options.
INVESTMENTS: Analysis and Management Second Canadian Edition INVESTMENTS: Analysis and Management Second Canadian Edition W. Sean Cleary Charles P. Jones.
1 Real Options Analysis Office Tower Building Portfolio Presentation Fall 2008 ESD.71 Professor: Richard de Neufville Presented by: Charbel Rizk.
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Time Value of Money by Binam Ghimire
Profitability Ratios.
Real Options Introduction to Real Options Prof. Luiz Brandão 2009.
Professor Thomas Chemmanur
FIN 819: lecture 2'1 Review of the Valuation of Common Stocks How to apply the PV concept.
Zheng Zhenlong, Dept of Finance,XMU Basic Numerical Procedures Chapter 19.
Real Options Modeling Options Prof. Luiz Brandão 2009.
18.1 Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 5th edition © 2002 by John C. Hull Numerical Procedures Chapter 18.
Real Options Discrete Pricing Methods Prof. Luiz Brandão 2009.
Advanced Project Evaluation
Fixed Income Analysis Week 9 Bonds with Options
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Valuation and Rates of Return 10.
1 Valuing the Enterprise: Free Cash Flow Valuation Discount estimates of free cash flow that the firm will generate in the future. WACC: after-tax weighted.
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Valuation and Rates of Return 10.
Real Option Valuation Marking to Market Prof. Luiz Brandão 2009.
Basic Numerical Procedures Chapter 19 1 Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 7th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2008.
A Cursory Introduction to Real Options Andrew Brown 5/2/02.
Real Options Chapter 8 A 4-Step Process for Valuing Real Options.
Chap 4 Comparing Net Present Value, Decision Trees, and Real Options.
© Copyright 2004, Alan Marshall1 Real Options in Capital Budgeting.
Amity School Of Business 1 Amity School Of Business BBA Semister four Financial Management-II Ashish Samarpit Noel.
Common Stock Valuation
Real Options Stochastic Processes Prof. Luiz Brandão 2009.
1 Dividend Policy - Basics by Binam Ghimire. Learning Objectives  Forms of Dividend  Dividend Payment Chronology  Factors affecting Dividend Payment.
Decision Tree Analysis Introduction to DPL Prof. Luiz Brandão 2009.
Real Options Estimating Volatility Prof. Luiz Brandão
Lecture 11 WACC, K p & Valuation Methods Investment Analysis.
Real Options: The Via Dutra Case Luiz Brandao Via Dutra Case.
Stock & Bond Valuation Professor XXXXX Course Name / Number.
7 CHAPTER CASH FLOW ANALYSIS 1. What you will learn from this chapter 2  Relevance of Cash Flows  What cash flow statements tell you  What is free.
Real Options Valuation of a Power Generation Project: A Monte Carlo Approach Bruno Merven ( 1 ), Ronald Becker (2) ( 1 )Energy Research Centre-University.
Chapter 9 Principles of Corporate Finance Eighth Edition Capital Budgeting and Risk Slides by Matthew Will, adopted by Craig Mayberry Copyright © 2006.
Common Stock Valuation
Amity Business School Amity School Of Business BBA Semister four Financial Management-II Ashish Samarpit Noel.
Chapter 13 Learning Objectives
Decisions Under Risk and Uncertainty
Project risk management
Financial Risk Management of Insurance Enterprises
Valuing Stocks -- Summary of Formula
Capital Structure Decisions: Modigliani and Miller 1958 JF
Investments: Analysis and Management Common Stock Valuation
Presentation transcript:

Real Options Dealing with Dividends Prof. Luiz Brandão 2009

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 2 Projects that generate Cash Flows  The examples we have seen up to now envolve assets or projects that do not pay out dividends.  In practice, the main incentive a firm has to invest in a project are the cash flows the project is expected to generate for the firm and its shareholders.  As these cash flows are distributed out to the shareholders or investors, or otherwise withdrawn from the project, the value of the project decreases instantly by this amount.  The project value is then influenced and affected by the distribution of its cash flows, or dividends, which reduce its value at each period.  Note that the underlying asset is the project value, not the project cash flows.

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 3 Projects that generate Cash Flows  If we plot the evolution of the project value in time, we shall see that the value of the project changes instantaneously each time the cash flows are distributed.  As times passes, the value of the project increases as the expected cash flows get closer.  At each dividend payout instant, the project value suffers an instantaneous decrease  At the end of the project life, after all the dividends have been distributed, the value of the project will be zero.  Next, we will se an example of a project which is subject to dividend/cash flow distribuition

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 4 Projects that generate Cash Flows  A project requires an investment of $1,000 and generates a cash flow of $500 per year for five years. The WACC is 10%.  There is no residual value after the fifth year.  The evolution of the project value i: ,2431,585Ex-Dividend PV ,3681,7432,0851,895Pre Dividend PV Cash Flows

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 5 Projects that generate Cash Flows Evolution of Project value in Time 2,085 1,743 1, ,243 1,585 1,

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 6 Incorporating Uncertainty  In the previous example, we did not consider uncertainty in the cash flows.  We will now assume that these cash flows are uncertain, and that the project value follows a GBM, with volatility of 18.23%. (u =1.20, d = 0.83)  We also assume that the project cash flows are a constant proportion of the project value in each period. This assures that the nodes of the binomial tree will recombine, and that the value of the project at the end of its life will be zero.  This fraction is called Dividend Rate. The Dividend Rate may be different in each period, but will be constant for all states of a particular time period.

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 7 Incorporating Uncertainty Cash Flows Project Value1,8952,0851,7431, Dividend Rate u = 2,274 Pre Dividend Value (545)Constant Rate 1,8951,729Ex-Dividend Value 1895 d = 1579 (379) 1201

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 8 Incorporating Uncertainty

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 9 Modeling Steps 1. In the Spreadsheet, determine the dividend rate: In the project cash flow spreadsheet, determine the pre dividend value of the project for each year of its life. The dividend rate (D) is determined by the relationship Cash Flow / Project Value in each period. Insert this parameter in the binomial lattice model. Note that for projects with finite life, the dividend rate for the last period are always equal do 1.0 The value of the project will always be the value before the distribution of dividends.

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 10 Modeling Steps 2. Model the dividends in the binomial lattice: Model the project value at the end of the first period and beginning of the second according to the CRR model. In the branch of the tree (Get/Pay) insert the value of the cash flows for the first year. This cash flow is the result of the multiplication of the dividend rate and the end period project value. In the uncertainty node for the following period, deduct the value of the cash flow that was distributed, as determined in (3). Using the ex-dividend value obtained, determine the value of the project at the end of the next period. Repeat the steps above for all periodos till the last one.

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 11 Modeling Steps

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 12 Example: Talion  Talion Inc. owns a project that will be sold in two years and which will generate a cash flow equivalent to 25% of its value only in year 1.  Data: (Values in €1.000) The current value of the project is €1.000 Volatility is 30% per year WACC is 15% per year Risk free rate is 7% per year  Model the evolution of the value of this project and determine that value of an option to expand by 40% at a cost of $200 before the sale of the project in two year.

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 13 Modeling the Underlying Asset  The parameters for the binomial approximation are:  With these parameters we can model the evolution of the project value in time.  The last column shows the value of the project if the expansion takes place With Expansion

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 14 Modeling the Underlying Asset ,9 740,8 750,0 411,6 1366,6 With Expansion 850,0 375,3 1713,2 337,5 1012,4 185,  The parameters for the binomial approximation are:  With these parameters we can model the evolution of the project value in time.  The last column shows the value of the project if the expansion takes place.

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 15 Solution  With Risk Neutral Probabilities we can determine the value of the project with options.  We observe that the option value is €40,8.  Although for a simple problem such as this a manual solution is feasible, for more complex problems we will need a more powerful tool. p 1-p p p

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 16 Solução 1131,8 337,5 185,2 p 1-p 850,0 411,6 1713,2 p p 1-p  With Risk Neutral Probabilities we can determine the value of the project with options.  We add the cash flows in period 1 to the discounted expected values of period 2.  We observe that the option value is €131,8.  Although for a simple problem such as this a manual solution is feasible, for more complex problems we will need a more powerful tool.

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 17 Decision Tree  Step 1: Parameters for the Underlying Asset PV = $1.000 Vol = 30% r = 7% u = d = 1/u = p =

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 18 Decision Tree  Step 2: Model the Binomial Lattice Dividends not yet included Without Dividends, the lattice is:

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 19 Decision Tree  Step 3: Incorporate the Dividends Insert the cash flow to be distributed at the end of year 1. In this example, this cash flow is 25% of the value of the project in year 1. To model the second period, the paid out dividends must be deducted from the value of the project at the end of the first period. At the end of the second year, the project will be sold for its market value. This way, the cash flows received by the shareholders at that time will be equal to the project value at the end of year 2.

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 20 Decision Tree  The model of the project that reflects the payout of the dividends is shown below.  We can see that the current value of the project does not change when we include the dividend payout.  The dividend rates of T1 (0.25) and T2 (1.0) can be added as value nodes D1 and D2.

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 21 Decision Tree  Step 4: Modeling the Option

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 22 Decision Tree  Step 4: Modeling the Option

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 23 Example: Nortak  Nortak Lta. has a project that has a value of $5.000, and generates a cash flow of: 15% of its value in the first year 25% of its value in the second year 100% of its value in the third year  The risk free rate is 8% per year.  Volatility is 25%  Determine the value of an option to expand the project at any moment by 40% at a cost of $ Consider that the project may be expanded more than once. 5.2

IAG PUC – Rio Brandão 24 Example: Adaptel  Adaptel Ltd. Is analyzing a five year project as shown if the Adaptel spreadsheet.  Determine the dividend payouts in each year.  Spreadsheet: Adaptel.xls

Real Options Dealing with Dividends Prof. Luiz Brandão 2009