TNSMP – Event information (location) ISC and AFAD based information is used to compile the location of earthquakes. Preference Order Epicenter Coordinates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ERROR DISTRIBUTIONS Ground Motion Prediction Equations derived from the Italian Accelerometric Archive (ITACA) Bindi + D., Pacor* F., Luzi* L., Puglia*
Advertisements

Review of Catalogs and Rate Determination in UCERF2 and Plans for UCERF3 Andy Michael.
THE NATIONAL STRONG MOTION NETWORK OF TURKEY EARTHQUAKE DEPARTMENT REPUBLIC OF TUKEY PRIME MINISTRY DISASTER AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PRESIDENCY EARTHQUAKE.
For any given time series, g(t), the Fourier spectrum is: FOURIER SPECTRUM: Time Domain (TD)-Frequency-Domain (FD) and vice- versa Dr. Sinan Akkar Strong.
用近震波形分析2013 年6 月2 日南投地震的震源過程 謝銘哲1, 趙里2, 馬國鳳1 1國立中央大學地球物理研究所
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing. Identify the Population Assume the population mean TV sets is 3. (Null Hypothesis) REJECT Compute the Sample Mean.
Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Gail M. Atkinson, UWO David M. Boore, USGS (BSSA, 2006)
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Overview of NGA Database, Model Development to Date, and Next Steps PEER-NGA Workshop April 12, 2005.
Recall the momentum equation:  ∂ 2 u i /∂t 2 = ∂ j  ij +f i, where f i is the body force term An earthquake source is usually considered slip on a surface.
Database of Ground Motions For NGA East A Presentation by Chris Cramer at the Stakeholder NGA East Workshop NIST Gaithersburg, MD March 7, 2008.
UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment Department of Geophysics and Geothermics A. Agalos (1), P. Papadimitriou (1), K. Makropoulos.
Average properties of Southern California earthquake ground motions envelopes… G. Cua, T. Heaton Caltech.
Roberto PAOLUCCI Department of Structural Engineering
Efforts to improve accelerometric data quality and archiving in Europe Sinan Akkar Earthquake Engineering Research Center Middle East Technical University.
Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2 Immediately after the mainshock, a reconnaissance team from METU Geotechnical Engineering Division visited Van, Erciş.
1 10. Joint Moments and Joint Characteristic Functions Following section 6, in this section we shall introduce various parameters to compactly represent.
L Braile, 1/26/2006 (revised, Sept., 2009) What is Moment Magnitude?
Earthquakes Susan Bilek Associate Professor of Geophysics New Mexico Tech How to figure out the who, what, where, why… (or the location, size, type)
1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson Carleton University.
Strong Motion Data Processing and Metadata Compilation
1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson.
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 19 Digital Filtering (plus some seismology)
1 Fault Dynamics of the April 6, 2009 L'Aquila, Italy Earthquake Sequence Robert B. Herrmann Saint Louis University Luca Malagnini INGV, Roma.
Data Processing and Recording at University of Southern California M.I. Todorovska and V.W. Lee Civil Engineering Department, University of Southern California.
Magnitude and Completeness Assessment of the ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue ( ) D. Di Giacomo, I. Bondár, E.R. Engdahl, D.A.
IIR Filter design (cf. Shenoi, 2006) The transfer function of the IIR filter is given by Its frequency responses are (where w is the normalized frequency.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
NE Caribbean and Hispaniola = major plate boundary, 2 cm/yr relative motion Strike-slip + convergence partitioned between 3 major fault systems Apparent.
CENA GMPEs from Stochastic Method Simulations: Review, Issues, Recent Work David M. Boore Blue Castle Licensing Project (BCLP) Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis.
Spatial Variations in Microseismic Focal Mechanisms, Yibal Field, Oman A. AL-Anboori 1, M. Kendall 2, D. Raymer 3, R. Jones 3 and Q. Fisher 1 1 University.
Differential wave equation and seismic events Sean Ford & Holly Brown Berkeley Seismological Laboratory.
Quick fault-plane identification by a geometrical method: The M w 6.2 Leonidio earthquake, 6 January 2008, Greece and some other recent applications J.
GEOSS- Washington 2005 The International Seismological centre An Earth Observation System of Systems Avi Shapira – International seismological Centre,
Disputable non-DC components of several strong earthquakes Petra Adamová Jan Šílený.
ANSS/NSMP STRONG- MOTION RECORD PROCESSING AND PROCEDURES Christopher D. Stephens and David M. Boore US Geological Survey Menlo Park, CA COSMOS/NSF International.
The January 2010 Efpalio earthquake sequence in Western Corinth Gulf: epicenter relocations, focal mechanisms, slip models The January 2010 Efpalio earthquake.
Status of ENA Database of Ground Motions for NGA East A Presentation by Chris Cramer At the NGA East Workshop on Database Development September 29, 2009.
ITACA: The New Italian Strong-Motion Database Pacor* F., Paolucci^ R., and Working Groups ITACA of S4 Project *Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia.
Epistemic Uncertainty on the Median Ground Motion of Next-Generation Attenuation (NGA) Models Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs The Next Generation of Research.
An Assessment of the High-Gain Streckheisen STS2 Seismometer for Routine Earthquake Monitoring in the US ISSUE: Is the high-gain STS2 too sensitive to.
GROUND MOTION VARIABILITY: COMPARISON OF SURFACE AND DOWNHOLE GROUND MOTIONS Adrian Rodriguez-Marek, Washington State University, USA Fabrice Cotton, LGIT,
Ground motion simulations in the Pollino region (Southern Italy) for Mw 6.4 scenario events.
Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD) Update March 25, 2013 CISN Advisory & Steering Committees Meeting.
The seismogram U = Source * Propagation * Site.
Surface-wave Derived Focal Mechanisms in Mid-America R. B. Herrmann 1, C. J. Ammon 2 and H. M. Benz 3 1 Saint Louis University, 2 Pennsylvania State University,
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
Near Fault Ground Motions and Fault Rupture Directivity Pulse Norm Abrahamson Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
Earthquake source modelling by second degree moment tensors Petra Adamová Jan Šílený Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Repeatable Path Effects on The Standard Deviation for Empirical Ground Motion Models Po-Shen Lin (Institute of geophysics, NCU) Chyi-Tyi Lee (Institute.
NGA Project Review and Status Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March, 2004.
Need for an Objective Goodness-of-Fit Measure for: Broadband synthetic time histories from different methodologies Broadband synthetic time histories versus.
Alexandra Moshou, Panayotis Papadimitriou and Kostas Makropoulos MOMENT TENSOR DETERMINATION USING A NEW WAVEFORM INVERSION TECHNIQUE Department of Geophysics.
A brief introduction to NERA – NA3 work package ‘Networking accelerometric networks and strong- motion data users’ Sinan Akkar On behalf of entire NERA-NA3.
Novel Approach to Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Modeling Vladimir Graizer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Erol Kalkan California Geological Survey.
Introduction to seismology Mathilde B. Sørensen and Jens Havskov.
NGA Dataset Brian Chiou NGA Workshop #5 March 24, 2004.
John G. Anderson Professor of Geophysics
PRISM: PROCESSING AND REVIEW INTERFACE FOR STRONG MOTION DATA SOFTWARE
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
Brazilian “Strong-Motion” Data Stéphane Drouet, ON, Rio de Janeiro Marlon Pirchiner, IAG/USP, São Paulo Marcelo Assumpção, IAG/USP, São Paulo Luis Carlos.
Principal Stress rotates to EW direction
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008
Los mecanismos focales de los terremotos
Two M5 earthquakes in Corinth Gulf, January 2010
Presentation transcript:

TNSMP – Event information (location) ISC and AFAD based information is used to compile the location of earthquakes. Preference Order Epicenter Coordinates Depth 1ISC 2AFAD 3ISK 4ANSS 5USGS 6SEDHRV 7RCMTSED 8ESMDRCMT 9EMMA

TNSMP – Event information (magnitude and faulting mechanism) HRV, SED and RCMT are main sources to compile both Mw and fault solution information. True plane of each double- couple solutions are determined with an expert. Deleuis et al. (2002) study is used to define source parameters of Kocaeli (1999) main shock. Preference Order MwFault solution 1HRV 2SED 3ANSSRCMT 4 ESMD 5USGS 6ESMD Kiratzi and Louvari (2002) 7EMMA Özalaybey et al. (2002) 8CSEMErgin et al. (2004) 9ISK Bohnhoff et al. (2006)

TNSMP – Event information (style-of-faulting) The style of faulting information is determined by definitions of faulting style based on plunges of P-, T-, and B-axes by Frohlich and Apperson (1992) definitions of faulting style by Boore et al. (1997), Campbell (1997), and Sadigh et al. (1997), where λ is the rake angle (in degrees) and δ is the dip angle (in degrees).

TNSMP – Station information As of 2010, standard penetration tests are applied to 153 sites 241 sites have shear-wave velocity profiles that are determined via MASW method.

TNSMP – Finite-fault distance information Except for Kocaeli earthquake, the finite-fault distance metrics are computed from double couple solutions. True plane information is provided by an expert. The assumptions are given below: Nucleation point is assumed to be at the center of the fault. Fault dimensions are computed from equations proposed by Wells and Coppersmith (1994).

TNSMP – Record information The non-standard errors are cleared by visual inspection of time series (Douglas, 2003a). Band-pass filtering is applied to remove both low- and high-frequency noise in the Fourier acceleration spectrum (e.g., Boore and Akkar, 2003; Boore and Bommer, 2005; Akkar and Bommer, 2006).

RESORCE – Reference databases SourceTimespan Internet site for European strong-motion data (ISESD; Ambraseys et al., 2004a) Italian accelerometric archive (ITACA, Luzi et al., 2008) Turkish national strong-motion project (TNSMP, Akkar et al., 2010) The Swiss Seismological Service (ARKLINK, Hellenic Accelerogram Database (HEAD, Theodulidis et al., 2004) French Accelerometric Data (RAP;

Hierarchy applied ISESD and ESMD: major sources for pre-2004 events Earthquake specific studies: used to update event information Italian data: if exists in ISESD, update all the information provided by ITACA Turkish data: For pre-2004 events, update their waveforms but keep the metadata information from ISESD. Include the post events in RESORCE. Other data: if they exist in ISESD, keep their event information  as is  unless new studies exist. If they do not exist (post-2004), include them in RESORCE. In any case, update station and site information, if new information exists The above hierarchy is evolved during annual internal review meetings

Additional explanation for magnitude When reported moment magnitude (M w ) is unavailable, we searched seismological agencies (e.g. GCMT, RCMT, SED, etc.) we used local studies to obtain M w from other magnitude scales. – Turkish earthquakes: Akkar et al. (2010) conversion equations – Italian earthquakes: Castello et al. 2007) conversion equations – Greek earthquakes: Papazachos et al. (2009) conversion equations

Additional explanation for SoF To provide uniform information on SoF, we used the Boore and Atkinson (2007) criteria (SoF based on plunge angle). -Whenever plunge angle is not available, compute it using the strike, dip and rake angle information (Snoke’s program). -If event has no plunge angle, use the existing information provided by the reference database SoFP-axis PlungeT-axis Plunge NormalP-pl>40T-pl<40 ReverseP-pl<40T-pl>40 Strike-slipP-pl<40T-pl<40 SoF - ProvidedSoF - Used Normal Normal-Oblique Normal Reverse Reverse-Oblique Reverse Strike-slip Oblique

Additional explanation for site classification National databases are apriori for SM station information. This is followed by the regional (ESMD and ISESD) and global databases. Shear-wave profiles and in-situ measurement info are collected from the reference databases. Measured V S30 is apriori for site classification. References from literature are also studied for site classification of some SM stations. If shear-wave velocity profile does not reach to 30m, the last layer of the profile is extended to 30m for computing V S30.

o If the source of distances is ITACA and ISESD, they are taken as they are (unless recent specific studies exist) o For events with known true fault planes: When specific studies exist, use the provided information If only the true fault plane is known Nucleation point is assumed to be at the center Ruptured fault dimensions are computed from Wells and Coppersmith (1994). [Leonard (2010) also gives similar results] o For events with with known double-couple fault plane solutions but unknown true fault plane: Use the assumptions in the previous slide and take the  arithmetic average  of the distances computed from the two planes (suggested – RESORCE provides the distances from both planes as well) Distance Calculations

Strong-motion data processing of RESORCE is based on both pre- and post-processing schemes (Boore et al., 2012). Non-standard errors are removed by visual inspection of time series Band-pass acausal filtering is applied to remove low- and high-frequency noises Filter cut-offs are selected from a set of alternatives by inspecting the frequency and time-domain behavior of acceleration, velocity and displacement traces Data Processing

Read uncorrected acceleration time series Remove pre-event portion of digital records (So that tapering does not affect the data) Remove mean from the data Taper the beginning and end of data (Do not taper the beginning of S-wave triggered recordings) Apply 4-pole acausal Butterworth filter in frequency domain after identifying low- and high-cut filter frequencies from FAS of mean removed data Double integrate the filtered acceleration to obtain displacement Fit a polynomial of order 6 to the displacement trace (With the coefficients for the zeroth and first order terms constrained to be 0.0) Subtract the second derivative of polynomial from acceleration Apply some zero pads to the end of record