Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Economic implications of global patent backlogs Presentation by London Economics 10 March
Advertisements

Copyright©2004 South-Western 15 Monopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western What’s Important in Chapter 15 Sources of Monopolies (= Price Makers = Market.
Market Regulation1 MARKET REGULATION Economics 2023 Principles of Microeconomics Dr. McCaleb.
Innovation and Technology. 2 R&D and market structure Technological development contributes decisively to economic growth. Modern economic growth relies.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Monopoly, Cartels, and Price Discrimination.
Competition Policy and Consumer Protection Dr. Patrick Krauskopf Swiss Competition Commission (COMCO) National Training Workshop on Competition Policy.
IP rights and competition law: Friends or foes? Etienne Wéry Attorney at the bars of Paris and Brussels Lecturer at Robert Schuman University (Strasbourg)
Patent Portfolio Management By: Michael A. Leonard II.
Owning Ideas Social Implications of Computers. Who is Elisha Gray?
Patents Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman. Pittman - Cyberlaw & E- Commerce 2 Legal Framework of Patents The U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8:
Monopoly A monopoly is the sole supplier of a product with no close substitutes The most important characteristic of a monopolized market is barriers.
Software patents Monopolies for Ideas and Algorithms By Eric Driggs.
Intellectual Property An intangible asset, considered to have value in a market, based on unique or original human knowledge and intellect. Intellectual.
12 MONOPOLY CHAPTER.
Intellectual Property Patent Primer Michael Pratt Executive Director, Business Development November 1, 2011.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Framework for business.
Economics: Principles in Action
Marketing Essentials Section 3.1 Capitalism
Patents and trade secrets 6 6 Chapter. Patents  Grant of property rights to inventors  Issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)  Permits.
The Importance and Role of Patent Information Jerusalem 21 June 2010 Andrew Czajkowski Head, Innovation and Technology Support Section.
1 Deregulation and the Hong Kong Banking Sector David Carse Hong Kong Monetary Authority 31 August 2001.
Part B - INNOVATION AS (3.1): Demonstrate understanding of how internal factors interact within a business that operates in a global context.
Innovation, Growth and Patents on CIIs in the EU Federico Etro June 2005.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 12 Economic Efficiency and Public Policy.
HOW DO INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT THE MAJOR BUSINESS FUNCTION?
Monopoly. Monopoly A monopoly is one business firm that produces the entire market supply of a particular good or service. A monopoly is one business.
Rail Freight: Issues and Policy Challenges “Trouble Ahead – Trouble Behind”
Copyright©2004 South-Western Monopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price maker.
Intellectual Property and S&T Policy. Outline Economic perspective on S&T policy –Science, technology, information as economic resources –Market failure.
Eco 6351 Economics for Managers Chapter 7. Monopoly Prof. Vera Adamchik.
Evaluating Monopoly Comparison with Perfect Competition.
1 ANTITRUST AND INTERCHANGE Lacey Plache LECG. 2 Three Main Points 1.Default interchange fees are necessary for the functioning of the Visa and MasterCard.
A Monopoly’s Marginal Revenue
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 22, 2009 Class 6 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (Paris Convention); Economics of International Patent.
1 Tutorial Chapter 10 International Trade International trade leads to greater economies of scale. True The market enlarges with international trade,
The New Science of Food: Facing Up to Our Biotechnology Choices Prepared by Mark Edelman, Iowa State University David Patton, Ohio State University A Farm.
10-1 Business, Government, and Regulation 10-2 Chapter Ten Objectives Discuss the government’s role in its relationship with business Explore the interactions.
Unit 4, Lesson 10 Competition AOF Business Economics Copyright © 2008–2011 National Academy Foundation. All rights reserved.
Promotion of Innovation: Usefulness and value of Patent Information Andrew Czajkowski Head, Innovation and Technology Support Section Ulaanbaatar March.
Monopoly CHAPTER 12. After studying this chapter you will be able to Explain how monopoly arises and distinguish between single-price monopoly and price-discriminating.
DIS 605 BY DOROBIN AGOTI REG NO: D61/71443/2008 ICT INNOVATION, LEGAL AND PIRACY ISSUES.
Session 6: Summary of Discussion A. Institutional Barriers and Potential Solutions 1. Natural environment does not have national or institutional boundaries,
‘Linkage’ & other TRIPS+ provisions: a public health perspective Karin Timmermans World Health Organization Seminar “Data exclusivity and patent Bangkok.
Prentice Hall © PowerPoint Slides to accompany The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce 4E, by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 8 Intellectual.
15-1 Economics: Theory Through Applications This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported.
Copyright©2004 South-Western 15 Monopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western Monopoly While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price.
IBM Food Traceability Marketing Plan
Patents Presented by Cutting Edge Homework Development.
Command Economy The government creates a central economic plan for all sectors and regions of the country. The government allocates all resources according.
Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002.
Evaluating Monopoly Comparison with Perfect Competition.
The Nature of Business McGraw-Hill  The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2001.
Sales Law September 29, 2009 Winn. Sales Law September 29 Reading estimate for Thursday 10/1 – Chapter 2, p. 40 and problems 2-1 to 2-4 Gallagher Law.
Chapter 10: Monopoly, Cartels, and Price Discrimination Copyright © 2014 Pearson Canada Inc.
International Business Management (unit-1) Dr. A. Mohamed Riyazh Khan, Assistant Professor (Se.G) department of management studies,
Intellectual Property - Patents, Copyrights, and Other Protectionist Barriers CEPR Basic Economics Seminar Dean Baker November 17, 2005.
INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
United States - Software
Chapter 10: Monopoly, Cartels, and Price Discrimination
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
Pure Competition in the Long Run
Intellectual Property Rights in Global Markets
Competition Policy and Consumer Protection
7-1: What is Perfect Competition?
Monopoly.
Economics: Principles in Action
Presentation transcript:

Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

2 Business Method Patents Background –Patents authorized by Constitution to “promote the progress of science and the useful arts.” –Limited term monopoly granted to the inventor of new, useful, and non-obvious innovations.

3 Business Method Patents Business Method Patents are a Recent Development –Until the 1998 State Street decision, business methods were deemed too abstract to be patentable. –Business method innovation occurred prior to 1998 despite the lack of patent protection. –What if we always had them? Ford assembly line

4 What changed? *Source: USPTO Website

5 Business Method Patents Why business method patents are flawed –Business methods are unsuitable for patents. –Patents are not needed as incentives to innovation in business methods. –Business method patents create technological and economic inefficiencies. –As a result, business method patents hamper innovation and economic development.

6 Business Method Patents Business methods are unsuitable for patent –Business methods are too vague and broad to patent. –Business methods are too difficult and expensive to validate. –As the foundation of commerce, business methods should not be subject to monopoly.

7 Business Method Patents Business methods are too vague and broad for patent. –Business processes are often conceptual and abstract. –Business process patents can apply to multiple markets and industries, creating overbroad protection that forecloses efficient innovation. –In the brief period since State Street, the Patent Office has issued overbroad patents.

8 Business Method Patents Business methods are difficult to validate. –Patent Office lacks the expertise and resources –USPTO limited by the lack of comprehensive, searchable databases of prior art –Determining non-obviousness is difficult in the fast-changing business environment –Examiner incentive system is skewed toward issuance –Substantial continuing risk of issuing overly broad or otherwise defective patents

9 Business Method Patents As the foundation of commerce, business methods should not be subject to monopoly. –Business processes are the foundation of modern commerce. –Monopolies on the business innovations are therefore particularly damaging economically, preventing the rapid spread of efficient innovations. –Business method patents can (and have been) used as anticompetitive weapons against competitors. Amazon “One Click”

10 Business Method Patents Patents are not needed as incentives to innovation in business methods. –Business methods carry their own rewards. –Past history indicates that business process innovations flourish without patent protection. –No evidence that newly available patent protection has encouraged greater innovation in business processes.

11 Business Method Patents Business method patents create technological and economic inefficiencies. –Business method patents cause economic inefficiencies by preventing the adoption of efficient practices, inflicting additional costs, and may cause price distortions –Business method patents cause technological inefficiencies by restricting the spread and enhancement of the innovation

12 Business Method Patents Business method patents create economic inefficiencies. –Limit the spread of the most efficient business processes –Impose costs on small and large competitors alike “Patent ‘thicket’ can be difficult and expensive to navigate” -David Messerschmitt –Monopoly pricing per component will create inefficiency for both producers and consumers

13 Business Method Patents Business method patents create technological inefficiencies. –Limit the spread of the new technologies –Force the adoption of less effective alternative technologies –Prevent the development of enhancements to the new process except by patent owner –Market leader can hijack new technology in favor of more profitable existing technology Airlines – find lowest price online

14 Business Method Patents Conclusion: As a result of the foregoing factors, business method patents hamper innovation and economic development.