Descartes. Descartes - b.1596 d.1650 ❑ Not a skeptic – “there really is a world, that men have bodies, and the like (things which no one of sound mind.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy Through the Centuries
Advertisements

The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ Meditations. Four bulldozers of doubt: –I can’t trust my senses –I could be crazy –I could be dreaming –A malicious demon could be out to fool.
Meditations on First Philosophy
What is the issue? SubjectObject IdeaEvent MindWorld Experiencer Experienced Inner Outer MeIt SubjectObject IdeaEvent MindWorld Experiencer Experienced.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
Descartes on scepticism
The Evil Demon Argument
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Skepticism: doubt that knowledge is possible Taoism: the differentiation.
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum. Cogito #1 Cogito as Inference □ (Ti→Ei). Not: □ (Ei)
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ Epistemology
Philosophy of Mind Week 3: Objections to Dualism Logical Behaviorism
Descartes’ First Meditation
Knowledge, Skepticism, and Descartes. Knowing In normal life, we distinguish between knowing and just believing. “I think the keys are in my pocket.”
Finding our way back  The initial result of Descartes’ use of hyperbolic doubt is the recognition that at least one thing cannot be doubted, at least.
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
PHL105Y November 1, 2004 For Wednesday, read Descartes’s Third Meditation. Brace yourself: it is very hard. The final version of your first essay is due.
BERKELEY’S CASE FOR IDEALISM (Part 1 of 2) Text source: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, sectns. 1-21,
Lecture 2 (Think, pp. 14 – 34) Descartes and the Problem of Knowledge: I. Some historical and intellectual background II. What is knowledge? III. Descartes’
Descartes’ Meditations
Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Theories of Knowledge.
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
Meditation 6. Trusting the Senses The senses certainly appear real. Rejects God or himself as the source of sense impression & concludes they are real.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
 Doubt- to be uncertain about something, to hesitate to believe  Dualism- the belief that the mind and body are separate (but interact). Mind is a kind.
Descartes and Buddies “To be or not to be, that is the question”
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
Descartes' Evil Demon Hypothesis:
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
Chapter 7 The Problem of Skepticism and Knowledge
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Can you trust your senses?. WHAT DO YOU KNOW? AN INTRODUCTION TO SCEPTICISM.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
 The value of certainty.  Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 10 Epistemology #3 (Berkeley)
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
1 Prolegomena: Knowledge versus Opinion ~ Adapted from Mortimer J. Adler’s How to Think About The Great Ideas Caravaggio, “Doubting Thomas"
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
Rene Descartes: March – February Father of Modern Philosophy Attempts to reconcile the new scientific method with traditional metaphysics.
DESCARTES: MEDITATION 3 OR: THE WORLD REGAINED — WITH CERTAINTY(?)
This week’s aims  To test your understanding of substance dualism through an initial assessment task  To explain and analyse the philosophical zombies.
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Skepticism.
The Trademark Argument and Cogito Criticisms
Descartes’ Meditations
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
Meditations on First Philosophy
Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Presentation transcript:

Descartes

Descartes - b.1596 d.1650 ❑ Not a skeptic – “there really is a world, that men have bodies, and the like (things which no one of sound mind has ever seriously doubted)” ❑ Is he a dualist? ❑ Most people would say so, because of his discussion the mind and the body, yet God is neither mind nor body, so Descartes is something more.

Epistemological vs Metaphysical ❑ Epistemology – study of knowledge. What it is, how we come about acquiring it. ❑ Metaphysics – study of the kinds of things there are in the world.

Epistemological vs Metaphysical ❑ Epistemology – study of knowledge. What it is, how we come about acquiring it. ❑ Metaphysics – study of the kinds of things there are in the world. ❑ Be careful of saying "if we can't know then there is no fact of the matter". That is confusing epistemology and metaphysics. ❑ For instance, depending on what you are saying, you can talk about beliefs and be doing epistemology such as how you acquire them, or you can be doing metaphysics, such as talking about what beliefs are.

Descartes ❑ Foundationalism – pyramid of beliefs ❑ beliefs upon which other beliefs are based ❑ example – the belief that punching people is wrong may depend on beliefs regarding pain and what causes pain. ❑ Descartes sought a firm foundation upon which to base our system of knowledge.

Descartes ❑ Wax example

Descartes ❑ Doubt test – doubt every belief that can be doubted, only then can we be sure that what we are left with is true.

Descartes ❑ Doubt test – doubt every belief that can be doubted, only then can we be sure that what we are left with is true. ❑ Descartes' Application of the Test - systematic, testing each belief individually would take forever, but by examining whole groups of beliefs it becomes possible.

Descartes ❑ Descartes applies the Doubt Test to types of knowledge, testing ones likely to be used as foundations: ❑ Senses ❑ Dream Argument - We could be dreaming right now ❑ Science - if our perceptions do not pass the test, then isn't most of science then necessarily discarded. ❑ Math - could also be wrong if we are being deceived constantly. ❑ Not Dreams ❑ Demon/ Devil / Genius / Genie

Descartes ❑ Why the doubt test? ❑ What better way to ensure that you toss out false beliefs? ❑ You not only toss those you know are false, but ❑ also those which you could be doubted as true.

Descartes ❑ Does the doubt test give certainty? How? ❑ What do we want to say about 'beliefs that can't be doubted'? ❑ are such beliefs necessarily true, meaning that they couldn't be false, or ❑ are we just psychologically unable to doubt them?

Descartes ❏ Passing the Doubt Test ❏ Can I doubt that I think? ❏ Seeming to see, feel, hear - "This cannot be false"

Descartes ❏ Passing the Doubt Test ❏ Can I doubt that I think? ❏ Seeming to see, feel, hear - "This cannot be false" ❏ You are a creature capable of doubt and of thought. In trying to doubt that you prove it to be true that you can doubt. ❏ Could a person doubt that he doubts? No. ❏ Anything else passes? Nope. ❏ In short, having the ability to doubt implies that you have a mind because doubting is a type of thinking.

Descartes ❏ The next task is to begin building from our existence, since the project is to develop a system of knowledge. ❏ What exactly do we have, even given that you know you exist?

Descartes ❏ The next task is to begin building from our existence, since the project is to develop a system of knowledge. ❏ What exactly do we have, even given that you know you exist? ❏ No physical bodies (Might exist, but we can't say if they do)

Descartes ❏ The next task is to begin building from our existence, since the project is to develop a system of knowledge. ❏ What exactly do we have, even given that you know you exist? ❏ No physical bodies (Might exist, but we can't say if they do) ❏ No memory

Descartes ❏ The next task is to begin building from our existence, since the project is to develop a system of knowledge. ❏ What exactly do we have, even given that you know you exist? ❏ No physical bodies (Might exist, but we can't say if they do) ❏ No memory ❏ No time

Descartes ❏ What can we infer from existence as a thinking thing? ❏ Nothing. ❏ We need more. ❏ More = God ❏ A non-deceptive God gives us knowledge of some things. What?

Descartes ❏ What can we infer from existence as a thinking thing? ❏ Nothing. ❏ We need more. ❏ More = God ❏ A non-deceptive God gives us knowledge of some things. What? ❏ God + existence give us un-doubtable useful foundations ❏ What does it take for a foundation to be un-doubtable ❏ God is not un-doubtable ❏ Where do we end up?

Descartes ❏ Questions ❏ Is Descartes’ project of tearing down everything to the foundations a good strategy? ❏ How do we know we aren't dreaming right now? ❏ How do we know we aren't being dreamt? ❏ Would we want to know if we were dreaming? ❏ some deny we could know