Model parameter inversion against Eddy Covariance Data using a Monte Carlo Technique Jens Kattge Wolfgang Knorr Christian Wirth MPI for Biogeochemistry,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PCC-SU-010 Identify some key business issues you need to consider before setting up Product Change Control in MFG/PRO PCC Set up Product Change Control.
Advertisements

1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 58.
Labour quality and ICT capital skill complementarity: International comparisons Mary OMahony NIESR.
Chapter 3: Utilization and Volume. 26 Chartbook 2000 Community hospital acute care admissions declined 15 percent between 1980 and 1994 and then began.
Process-based modelling of vegetations and uncertainty quantification Marcel van Oijen (CEH-Edinburgh) Statistics for Environmental Evaluation Glasgow,
Bayesian calibration and uncertainty analysis of dynamic forest models Marcel van Oijen CEH-Edinburgh.
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 01 / 05 / 2009.
Widening Participation in Higher Education: Analysis using Linked Admin Data Institute of Education Institute for Fiscal Studies Centre for Economic Performance.
Regional trends in the land carbon cycle and the underlying mechanisms over the period, S. Sitch, P. Friedlingstein, G. Bonan, P. Canadell, P.
Amospheric inversions: Investigating the recent inter-annual flux variations ! P. Peylin, C. Rödenbeck, P. Rayner, experimentalists, … Inverse models Data.
Worker turnover: quits and separations Is worker turnover desirable? Is worker turnover desirable? Why do workers quit? Why do they separate? Why do workers.
Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia: for presentation at: Science and Engineering Workforce Project at NBER October 20, 2005 Donna.
Times Up0:010:020:03 0:040:050:060:070:080:09 0:101:002:003:004:005:00 Warm Up What is the difference between a scalar and a vector?
Teds Big Boy Restaurant 5000 People were surveyed to determine if there is enough demand for a new Teds Big Boy Restaurant in the west side of town.
This Weeks Topics Review Class Concepts -Simple Pricing -Price Customization by Customer Type -Two-Part Tariff -Simple -With Two Demand Curves Review Homework.
CHAPTER 19 An Introduction to Data Structures. CHAPTER GOALS To learn how to use linked lists provided in the standard library To be able to use iterators.
J. Ogée – N. Viovy – P. Friedlingstein – P. Ciais G. Krinner – N. deNoblet J. Polcher (IPSL) Evaluation of the global biospheric model ORCHIDEE against.
Changes in the seasonal activity of temperate and boreal vegetation The critical role of Autumn temperatures. Shilong Piao, Philippe Ciais, Pierre Friedlingstein,
1 Uncertainty in rainfall-runoff simulations An introduction and review of different techniques M. Shafii, Dept. Of Hydrology, Feb
Fishing Market Sector Meeting February 3 rd, 2009 Tourism Vancouver Island.
Making your point: debating Voting All school assemblies must be delivered as a rap. NOYES.
Week 2 Computer Programming Gray , Calibri 24
© 2007 Pearson Education   AQL LTPD Acceptance Sampling Plans Supplement I.
$100,000 Pyramid A Fun Vocabulary Game! CAN YOU GUESS ALL SIX WORDS IN 1 MINUTE? Player 1: Sees the word and defines/describes it without saying the word.
Why gap filling isn’t always easy Andrew Richardson University of New Hampshire Jena Gap Filling Workshop September 2006.
Characterizing Web Content, User Interests, and Search Behavior by Reading Level and Topic Jin Young Kim*, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Paul Bennett and Susan.
Parameter identifiability, constraints, and equifinality in data assimilation with ecosystem models Dr. Yiqi Luo Botany and microbiology department University.
Showcase of a Biome-BGC workflow presentation Zoltán BARCZA Training Workshop for Ecosystem Modelling studies Budapest, May 2014.
Uncertainty in eddy covariance datasets Dario Papale, Markus Reichstein, Antje Moffat, Ankur Desai, many others..
6/2/2015 A GAP-FILLING MODEL (GFM) FOR TOWER-BASED NET ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY MEASUREMENTS Zisheng Xing a, Charles P.-A. Bourque a, Fanrui Meng a, Roger.
Data Assimilation in the NCEO (National Centre for Earth Observation) Peter Jan van Leeuwen Data-Assimilation Research Centre DARC University of Reading.
A global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) to infer atmosphere- biosphere CO 2 exchanges and their uncertainties Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner.
FEW RESULTS LINKED TO INVERSE MODELING at LSCE - IAV comparison from 3 inversions - Impact of Obs. error correlations - How to define flux error correlations.
Raw data Hz HH data submitted for synthesis Flux calculation, raw data filtering Additional filtering for footprint or instrument malfunctioning.
A global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) and its link to CAMELS Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 3, Thomas Kaminski 4, Ralf.
Optimising ORCHIDEE simulations at tropical sites Hans Verbeeck LSM/FLUXNET meeting June 2008, Edinburgh LSCE, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de.
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement P. Peylin, C. Bacour, P. Ciais, H. Verbeek, P. Rayner Flux data to highlight model deficiencies.
Applications of Bayesian sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to the statistical analysis of computer simulators for carbon dynamics Marc Kennedy Clive.
Christian Beer, CE-IP Crete 2006 Mean annual GPP of Europe derived from its water balance Christian Beer 1, Markus Reichstein 1, Philippe Ciais 2, Graham.
Data assimilation in land surface schemes Mathew Williams University of Edinburgh.
Results from the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) 3 FastOpt 4 2 Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1 Heinrich Widmann 3, Thomas.
Carbon, soil moisture and fAPAR assimilation Wolfgang Knorr Max-Planck Institute of Biogeochemistry Jena, Germany 1 Acknowledgments: Nadine Gobron 2, Marko.
1 Welcome to the Gap Filling Comparison Workshop September 18-20, 2006 Antje Moffat.
A Global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) to Infer Atmosphere- Biosphere CO2 Exchanges and Their Uncertainties Marko Scholze1, Peter Rayner2,
Integration of biosphere and atmosphere observations Yingping Wang 1, Gabriel Abramowitz 1, Rachel Law 1, Bernard Pak 1, Cathy Trudinger 1, Ian Enting.
A parametric and process- oriented view of the carbon system.
Non-Linear Parameter Optimisation of a Terrestrial Biosphere Model Using Atmospheric CO 2 Observation - CCDAS Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang.
Inferring terrestrial CO 2 fluxes from a global-scale Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1,
Quantitative network design for biosphere model process parameters E. Koffi 1, P. Rayner 1, T. Kaminski 2, M. Scholze 3, M. Voßbeck 2, and R. Giering 2.
CAMELS CCDAS A Bayesian approach and Metropolis Monte Carlo method to estimate parameters and uncertainties in ecosystem models from eddy-covariance data.
Investigating Land-Atmosphere CO 2 Exchange with a Coupled Biosphere-Atmosphere Model: SiB3-RAMS K.D. Corbin, A.S. Denning, I. Baker, N. Parazoo, A. Schuh,
Using data assimilation to improve estimates of C cycling Mathew Williams School of GeoScience, University of Edinburgh.
FastOpt Quantitative Design of Observational Networks M. Scholze, R. Giering, T. Kaminski, E. Koffi P. Rayner, and M. Voßbeck Future GHG observation WS,
Biases in land surface models Yingping Wang CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
Model-Data Synthesis of CO 2 Fluxes at Niwot Ridge, Colorado Bill Sacks, Dave Schimel NCAR Climate & Global Dynamics Division Russ Monson CU Boulder Rob.
Edinburgh, June 2008Markus Reichstein Critical issues when using flux data for reducing Land Surfcace Model uncertainties – towards full uncertainty accounting?
Data assimilation in Marko Scholze. Strictly speaking, there are so far no DA activities in QUEST, but CCDAS (as part of core team activities) CPDAS and.
Data assimilation as a tool for C cycle studies Collaborators: P Stoy, J Evans, C Lloyd, A Prieto Blanco, M Disney, L Street, A Fox (Sheffield) M Van Wijk.
Data assimilation as a tool for biogeochemical studies Mathew Williams University of Edinburgh.
Estimating the Reduction in Photosynthesis from Sapflow Data in a Throughfall Exclusion Experiment. Rosie Fisher 1, Mathew Williams 1, Patrick Meir 1,
FastOpt CAMELS A prototype Global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Wolfgang Knorr 1, Marko Scholze 2, Peter Rayner 3,Thomas Kaminski 4, Ralf.
Geogg124: Data assimilation P. Lewis. What is Data Assimilation? Optimal merging of models and data Models Expression of current understanding about process.
Earth Observation Data and Carbon Cycle Modelling Marko Scholze QUEST, Department of Earth Sciences University of Bristol GAIM/AIMES Task Force Meeting,
FastOpt A prototype Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Inferring interannual variations of vegetation- atmosphere CO 2 fluxes Marko Scholze.
The Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS)
Conghe Song Department of Geography University of North Carolina
Marcos Heil Costa Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Ecosystem Demography model version 2 (ED2)
Coherence of parameters governing NEE variability in eastern U. S
Comparing Simulated and Observed Gross Primary Productivity
Presentation transcript:

Model parameter inversion against Eddy Covariance Data using a Monte Carlo Technique Jens Kattge Wolfgang Knorr Christian Wirth MPI for Biogeochemistry, Jena CCDAS Jena, Germany BGC

Overview Intention Terrestrial Ecosystem Model: BETHY Bayesian approach Metropolis Monte-Carlo method Optimisation setup Results: RMS and Bias Conclusions

CCDAS BETHY+TM2 energy balance/ photosynt. atm. CO 2 Optimized Params + uncert. (58) CO 2 and water fluxes + uncert. 2°x2° Background CO 2 fluxes eddy flux CO 2 & H 2 O Monte Carlo Param. Inversion full BETHY satellite FAPAR CCDAS 1step full BETHY params & uncert. soil water LAI Global Carbon cycle data assimilation system: CCDAS Wolfgang Knorr, Thomas Kaminski, Marko Scholze, Peter Rayner, Ralf Giering, Heinrich Widmann, Christian Roedenbeck, Martin Heimann & Colin Prentice

First attempt: 7 days of hh data Inversion of BETHY model parameters against 7 days of half-hourly Eddy covariance data of NEE and LE at the Loobos site

First Attempt: Loobos BETHY Parameter estimates Relative reduction of uncertainty

Carbon sequestration at the Loobos site during 1997 and 1998 doy

BETHY (Biosphere Energy-Transfer-Hydrology Scheme) NEE = GPP - Raut - Rhet GPP: C3 photosynthesis Farquhar et al. (1980) the Canopy is devided into 3 layers Ecosystem Respiration: autotrophic respiration = f (N leaf, T, frac leaf-plant ) Farquhar, Ryan (1991) heterotrophic respiration = r0*w Q 10 Ta/10 Raich (2002) Stomatal control: stomatal conductance Knorr (1997) Energy and radiation balance: PAR absortion Sellers (1985) diffuse radiation absorption Weiss and Norman (1985) evapotranspiation Penman and Monteith (1965) Timestep: 1/2 hour

23 variable parameters in BETHY assumed a priori uncertainties of parameters: SD = (depending on parameter)

Bayesian approach modelled diagnostics error covariance matrix of observations observations evidence: Likelihood function assumed model parameters a priori error covariance matrix of parameters a priori parameter values prior knowledge: a priori PDF a posteriori probability density function (PDF) normalization constant prior knowledge evidence

Metropolis Monte-Carlo method Monte Carlo sampling of parameter-sets A random walk guided by the metropolis decision Metropolis decision if accept step, if accept step with probability

Figure taken from Tarantola '87 Metropolis Monte-Carlo method

Setup of gap-filling experiment Ecosystem model: BETHY Prior parameter values and uncertainties: Reasonable values and uncertainties (5 -50%) Input data to run BETHY: Latitude, Soil depth, soil type PFFD, Ta, Rh, SWC or Precip FAPAR Observations: 365 days of hh data of NEE and LE 12 days of hh data NEE and LE (represent seasons) Two optimised model run results replicated 50 times to provide data for different gap length scenarios

Results: RMS Antje Moffat, 2006

BIAS per site years Antje Moffat, 2006

BIAS: average over all site years Antje Moffat, 2006

Confidence in half-hourly performance: medium Confidence in daily performance: good Reliability of annual sum: site year bias, most likely due to using 1 set of training data per site and year Conclusions

Optimised model: parameter values Hainich days paraname, parapriori, paramodelmean, paramean, parasdpriori, parasdposteriori, parastep[ipara] aq 3.000e e vcmax 3.500e e ev 5.782e e jmvm 1.740e e gamma 1.830e e kc 4.200e e ec 7.280e e ko 2.700e e eo 3.571e e frd 1.100e e er 3.808e e frl 5.000e e rsoil 2.070e e kw 1.000e e q e e swc 1.000e e fci 8.500e e cw 1.000e e omega 1.600e e av 1.500e e asoil 5.000e e epsa 6.400e e fga 4.000e e lss 1.700e e ls 1.100e e lw 3.000e e