Missoula Plan Plan reflects themes that always seem to appear – Different treatment for different ILECs by size and by type of regulation (price cap versus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender Perspectives in Introduction to Tariffs Gender Module #5 ITU Workshops on Sustainability in Telecommunication Through Gender & Social Equality.
Advertisements

1 The Next Step for Next Generation Technology: Interconnecting Managed Packet Networks to Preserve Voice Service Quality and Competition Joe Gillan
Telephone Network Hierarchy Analog Sounds
FCC to keep in mind... In determining what UNEs to make available, must consider whether –Access to proprietary elements is necessary –Failure to provide.
Universal Service Funding An Overview of the Connect America Fund Marsha Spellman, JD Oregon Connections Conference October 25,
Telecommunications and Natural Gas Industry. Telecommunications Voice (landline, wireless) Video (cable, satellite) Data (cable, wireless) Convergence.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
SBT Spring 2003 March 11, 2003 Page 1.
FCC – RESELLER ORDER CALL FLOW DIAGRAM EXAMPLES GLOSSARY SCP – Service Control Point, also called Signal Control Point. A remote database within.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.
An analysis of the FCC’s USF and ICC Broadband Reform Proposals.
February 19, 2008 How Should We Think About IP-PSTN Interconnection? NARUC Committee on Telecommunications.
Telecommunications Act of 1996 Signed into law, February 8, 1996 “ An Act to promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices.
Intercarrier Compensation. Nextel calls to BellSouth BellSouth pays to terminate Nextel calls In aggregate, it may cause BellSouth to increase capacity.
ECO 436 Industry Seminar Dr. David G. Loomis Illinois State University
Intercarrier Compensation TC 310 June 3, Basic Concepts Originating Terminating Calling-Party's-Network-Pays (CPNP)‏ Bill-and-Keep Reciprocal Compensation.
1 Keeping Consumers Connected Washington State and Universal Service WUTC Workshop May 5, 2010 John F. Jones CenturyLink Vice President State Government.
3/99©GVNW Consulting Inc. Separations 101 Rural Task Force Meeting March 3, 1999 Bob Schoonmaker.
Interconnection in a Liberalized Network: California’s ISPs View Reciprocal Compensation Yale M. Braunstein School of Information Management & Systems.
A Probe into Basic Telephony and Telecommunications Jon F. Johnson Extension Area Specialist Virginia Cooperative Extension.
Unified Intercarrier Compensation – An Old Problem 1980 FCC Tentative Access Plan (pre- divestiture) Found the wide variety of existing access compensation.
Carriers of Last Resort: Updating an Old Doctrine Presented to Mid-America Regulator’s Conference June 16, 2008 Peter Bluhm, Principal, Telecommunications.
1 Intercarrier Compensation: A Rural Perspective 2006 Annual Meeting August 8, 2006.
NMECG PRESENTATION TO THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION APRIL 3, 2012 THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION’S ORDERS TO IMPLEMENT REFORM AND.
Myles Vosberg Office of State Tax Commissioner. Taxes imposed on telecommunication services  North Dakota and local Sales and Use Taxes  N.D.C.C. Chapters.
Carriers Carriers carry traffic for a fee Must have rights of way to lay wire Given some monopoly protection Regulated but being deregulated.
1 The Rural Alliance January 25, – A Critical Year 2006 will be a critical year for the RLEC industry Multiple events with significant impact.
Issue 3.2 (1 st June 2012)Author: Zack Thompson1 NCC Carrier Price List (CPL) Guidance Slides CONVEYANCE TELEPHONY These slides are provided as a ‘rough.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
Better Thinking. Better Results. Where does my Recovery Come from? Presented by: Bob Schoonmaker MTIA/ATA Annual Meeting August 9,
Telecommunications Act of 1996 Signed into law, February 8, 1996 “ An Act to promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices.
NASUCA 2012 mid-year meeting
Universal Service Roy Lathrop NCTA NARUC Telecom Committee 54 th MARC Convention 2008 Grand Traverse Resort, Michigan Funds.
Access Charges The major questions –What services did IXC’s require in order to provide their interLATA toll and private line services? –What to do about.
Proposal for Reforming the Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Systems CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005.
Financial Considerations in the New World!! GTA Annual Meeting Hilton Head, SC June 19, 2012 Leo Staurulakis – Executive Vice President.
Comptel/ASCENT February 17, Tom Sugrue Vice President Government Affairs T-Mobile.
International Protocol George Vinall April 1, 1998 Economics of Internet Telephony.
McGraw-Hill©2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter 8 Telephone and Cable TV Networks: Residential Connection to the Internet.
The Nation Broadband Plan & Its Effects on USF and ICC Reform Krista K. Tanner Iowa Utilities Board June 7, 2010.
How Telephone Companies Make Money Doug Kitch Vince Wiemer Vince Wiemer.
Summary and State Implications FCC Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CenturyLink February 28, 2012.
USF Reform NARUC Panel Presentation Dale Lehman Director, Executive MBA in Information and Communication Technology Alaska Pacific University
1 Intercarrier Compensation May 27, 2004 Glenn Brown
Better Thinking. Better Results. Beyond “The Order” – The New Regulatory Horizon for Rural Carriers Bob Schoonmaker, President GVNW Consulting,
Cost Recovery Mechanisms MATI Tribal Telecommunications Conference June 7-9, 2004 Presented by Doug Kitch & Vince Wiemer Alexicon, Inc.
The Regulation of Network Industries Simon Wilkie. Caltech Lecture for May 7, 2004.
Intercarrier Compensation: Rate of Return Carrier Impacts Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission – Workshop February 28, 2012 Jeff Dupree NECA.
Level 3 Petition for Forbearance from Interstate and Intrastate Switched Access Charges Victoria R. Mandell Regulatory Counsel Level 3 Communications,
Per-Minute Access Charges Per-Minute Access Charges to long distance companies Rates for 1996 through 1998 from Telecommunications Industry Revenue: 1998,
Union Tandem Qwest Tandem Union Wireless Switch Legend Existing Connections Union ILEC Switch Meet Point PSTN CURRENT NETWORK CONFIGURATION TRAFFIC FLOW.
Industry Overview AT&T and the Bell System Post Divestiture Factors in the Emergence of Competition to the Bells The Vision of the Telecommunications Act.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Structural Separation and Universal Service Conference on “The Enduring Lessons of the Breakup of AT&T: A Twenty-Five Year Retrospective” University of.
Disparity in Operations: Comparative Analysis of Small ILEC CHCF-A Carriers to Non-CHCF-A Carriers Communications DivisionJanuary 2010* * Revised as of.
The Potential Effects of the National Broadband Plan
Development of the Telecommunications Industry
Line Sharing on Home Run Copper - Figure 1
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act
Discussion of Operating Expense Caps and Other Expense Considerations Resulting From the FCC’s Universal Service Fund Reform Order Prepared by Doug Kitch,
Telecommunications Act of 1996
Lecture 5: TELEPHONE NETWORK
Reciprocal Compensation
CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005
Lecture 5: TELEPHONE NETWORK.
NCC Carrier Price List (CPL) Guidance Slides
Lecture 3: TELEPHONE NETWORK.
Telecom History.
PSTN- Making a Call (Public Switched Telephone Network)
The New Mexico Rural Universal Service Fund
Presentation transcript:

Missoula Plan Plan reflects themes that always seem to appear – Different treatment for different ILECs by size and by type of regulation (price cap versus rate of return) – Concern to keep the Rural Ma and Pa carriers whole – Phase-in of changes – Increase of the SLC – Creation of yet another subsidy flow from the USF

Tracks of ILECs Track 1 – RBOCs, CLECs, CMRS carriers: Million ILEC loops Track 2 – Mid-size rural carriers: 12.5 Million ILEC loops Track 3 – Small, rate of return, rural carriers: 7.5 million loops

Proposed reforms for access charges Multi-step plan (4 steps) Track1 – Terminating access rates will be reduced in three equal steps to $ and then in Step 4 will be $ – Originating access charges—intrastate will equal interstate—no higher than $ for tandem switching and common transport and no higher than $0.002 for end office switching

Track 2 – If price cap Terminating access no higher than $ for tandem and common transport and no higher than $ for end office Originating access no higher than $ for tandem and common transport and no higher than $0.002 for end office – If rate of return Terminating no higher than $ and $ Originating no higher than $ and $0.002

Track 3 – Intrastate access charges will be reduced to the level of interstate access charges in four steps and the resulting access charge level will be used as a cap for reciprocal compensation rates if those rates would other wise be higher.

Increases to SLC Track 1 – SLC caps will rise to $10.00 over four step years (increase of $3.50 from $6.50) Track 2 and 3 – Increase of $2.25 over 3 years to $8.75

Reforms for interconnection of non- access traffic Carriers establish specified points or “edges” to their network for interconnection (similar to POPs for access traffic) Telephone numbers will be used to determine whether access charges or reciprocal compensation rates apply Phantom traffic—every originating provider to deliver accurate telephone number and other signaling information to both intermediate and terminating providers

Compensation for traffic exchanged between non-ILECs will be symmetrical at Track 1 rates Traffic between any two ILECs will be charged by each carrier at the rates applicable to its track Traffic exchanged between an ILEC and a non- ILEC will be symmetrical

Cost recovery Early Adopter Fund – Support for states that have created a fund to reduce state access charges—states to recover some of the funding they distributed to carriers who have reduced their intrastate access rates— to be used only to decrease the size of the state recovery mechanisms Restructure Mechanism – ILECs to recover any shortfall left after the SLC is increased