Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Treatment Success and Milestones
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
Long Term Follow-Up After Imatinib Cessation for Patients in Deep Molecular Response: The Update Results of the STIM1 Study1 Preliminary Report of the.
Ponatinib in Patients (pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL) Resistant or.
Final Study Results of the Phase III Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Trial (DASISION, CA )1.
Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma 1,2 The Cardiovascular Impact of Carfilzomib in Multiple Myeloma 3 1 Stewart.
Kovacs G et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 23.
Results of a Phase 2 Randomised, Open- Label, Study of Lower Doses of Quizartinib (AC220; ASP2689) in Subjects with FLT3-ITD Positive Relapsed or Refractory.
1 Baz R et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract Lacy MQ et al.
1 Rea D et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 811.
Comparison of Nilotinib and Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd Beyond One Year Larson.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Therapeutic Response to Azacitidine (AZA) in Patients with Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (sMDS) Enrolled in the AVIDA Registry 1 Prospective Trial.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Ponatinib as Initial Therapy for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 1483.
Discontinuation of Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Maintained Complete Molecular Response: Updated Results of the STIM 1 Discontinuation.
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
David Marin, Imperial College London Early molecular prediction of response to TKI.
Current use of imatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia Michael O’Dwyer Haematologica March 2003.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
ENESTnd 24-Month Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Bortezomib Induction and Maintenance Treatment Improves Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Extended Follow-Up of the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance.
Early Molecular and Cytogenic Response Is Predictive for Long-Term Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Hanfstein B.
Increased Incidence of Therapy- Related Myeloid Neoplasia (t-MN) After Initial Therapy for CLL with Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide (FC) vs Fludarabine (F):
Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of PD , a Cyclin ‐ Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination with Letrozole vs Letrozole Alone.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Frontline Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) Shows Superior Efficacy in Comparison to Bendamustine.
Dasatinib Compared to Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Twelve- Month Efficacy and Safety.
Initial Findings from the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib,
Switching to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase with Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib: Results from the LASOR.
Continued Overall Survival Benefit After 5 Years’ Follow-Up with Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) versus Melphalan-Prednisone (MP) in Patients with.
Changes in Quality of Life and Disease- Related Symptoms in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy: RESPONSE Trial.
A Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I BCR ‐ ABL Mutation:
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide for Previously Untreated Deletion (del) 5q Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Age 60 or Older Who Are Not Candidates.
Significant Prognostic Impact of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET Scan Performed During and at the End of Treatment with R-CHOP in High- Tumor Mass Follicular.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP):
Dasatinib or Imatinib (IM) in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Two-Year Follow-Up from DASISION Kantarjian H et al.
Bosutinib as Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Resistance or Intolerance to Imatinib: 36-Month Minimum Follow-Up Update Cortes.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
Results from the International, Randomized Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib versus Chlorambucil in Patients 65 Years and Older with Treatment-Naïve CLL/SLL (RESONATE-2TM)1.
Phase III EURO-SKI: Cessation of TKI Therapy Safe, Feasible for Pts Who Achieve Deep Molecular Response New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference.
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Soverini S et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 346.
Early Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Predict for Better Outcomes in Untreated Patients with CML-CP — Comparison of 4 TKI Modalities (Standard- and.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Monitoring Milestones in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Diagnosis and Treatment
Crossover for pts meeting ELN 2013 failure criteria
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Delayed achievement of cytogenetic and molecular response is associated with increased risk of progression among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Wiestner A et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 008.
Leber B et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 94.
Presentation transcript:

Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses and Predicts for an Increased Likelihood of Discontinuation of the 1 st Line Agent Apperley JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 93.

Background In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), rapid reductions in tumor load, defined by ≤65% Philadelphia chromosome negativity and/or BCR-ABL IS <10% at 3 months, are associated with an improved probability of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, about 15% to 20% of patients experience cytopenias shortly after starting tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and receive drug interruptions and/or dose reduction. It is unclear whether these early periods of altered treatment should be considered in the interpretation of the results of BCR-ABL IS <10% at 3 months. Study objective: To investigate the effects of therapy interruptions and dose reduction during the first 3 months of therapy on the achievement of BCR-ABL IS <10% at 3 months, CCyR rate at 12 months and ability to remain on study. Apperley JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 93.

Study Methods This was a randomized Phase III trial of imatinib (IM) versus dasatinib (DA) for patients with newly diagnosed CML. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) results of BCR-ABL IS levels at 3 months were available for 585 of 632 patients who completed 3 months of therapy: –IM (n = 292) –DA (n = 293) Patients were divided according to the agent assigned on randomization and the amount missed: –Patients who did not miss Tx (IM0, DA0): IM0 (n = 243); DA0 (n = 211) –Patients who missed 1-14 days of Tx (IM1-14, DA1-14): IM1-14 (n = 38); DA1-14 (n = 37) –Patients who missed >14 days of Tx (IM>14, DA>14): IM>14 (n = 11); DA>14 (n = 45) Apperley JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 93.

Achievement of BCR-ABL IS <10% at 3 Months OutcomeIM0IM1-14IM>14 BCR-ABL IS <10%78.6%63.2%63.5% p-value0.033 DA0DA1-14DA>14 BCR-ABL IS <10%93.8%91.9%77.8% p-value0.001 More patients who received DA missed days of dosing (28%) than patients who received IM (17%); p = 0.008: - Median number of missed days for DA = 16 (range 1-62) - Median number of missed days for IM = 12.5 (range 1-42) Predictably, the likelihood of a qRT-PCR level of BCR-ABL IS <10% at 3 months is higher with DA than with IM, but DA is less well tolerated in the early months. Apperley JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 93 (abstract only).

Summary of BCR-ABL IS <10% Results at 3 Months Of patients who received >95% of the standard doses, BCR-ABL IS <10% at 3 months occurred in 78.7% (IM) versus 93.8% (DA). In contrast, of patients who missed >20% of the prescribed doses, BCR-ABL IS <10% at 3 months occurred in 60% (IM) versus 84% (DA). Thus, drug interruptions and dose reductions are associated with a reduced probability of achieving BCR- ABL IS <10% at 3 months. –This effect is not observed among patients missing <14 days of DA. –It is less marked for reduced average dosing of DA. –These results suggest that the higher potency of DA compensates for dose reduction or a few missed days of therapy. Apperley JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 93 (abstract only).

BCR-ABL IS <1% (MR2) as a Surrogate for CCyR OutcomeIM0IM1-14IM>14 12-month MR2 rate78% 90% p-value0.5 DA0DA1-14DA>14 12-month MR2 rate96%88.6%79.5% p-value /632 (17%) of patients had discontinued the study by 12 months, and qRT-PCR results were available for all remaining patients. These results confirm the superiority of DA over IM for MR2 and the potential impact of missing early doses of DA. However, it is not yet clear whether these results are related to inadequate dosing or whether failure to tolerate the recommended dose is indicative of higher-risk disease. Apperley JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 93 (abstract only).

Treatment Continuation and Discontinuation Rates Proportion of patientsIM0/DA0 IM1- 14/DA1- 14 IM>14/D A>14 Able to receive Tx consistently through months %71%57% IM0IM1-14IM>14 Who discontinued Tx12.5%38.1%35.7% DA0DA1-14DA>14 Who discontinued Tx4.4%12.8%18.8% Apperley JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 93 (abstract only). Thus, tolerance of the daily drug in the first 3 months predicts future tolerability and efficacy during the subsequent 9 months and long-term compliance with the first-line therapy.

BCR-ABL IS <0.1% (MR3) Rates with Respect to Average Dosing During the First 3 Months Treatment Prescribed dose completed >95%80%-95%<80% IM50%52.8%54.9% p-value0.17 DA68.1%59.4%53.1% p-value0.038 Apperley JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 93 (abstract only). Because long-term qRT-PCR monitoring was provided for all patients entered into the study irrespective of their continuation in the study, it was possible to study the achievement of MR3 at 12 months in an intention-to-treat analysis with all patients.

Author Conclusions Similar results were obtained using the number of days of missed drug (data not shown), suggesting that early failure to tolerate IM as first-line therapy does not affect subsequent responses because effective alternative therapy is available for the majority of patients. In contrast, failure to tolerate DA is associated with a reduced chance of MR3 at 12 months. Patients who experience cessation or reduction of either agent in the first 3 months are less likely to achieve BCR- ABL IS <10% at 3 months and are more likely to require a change of drug in the longer term. –Therefore, these patients require close observation during the first year. Apperley JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 93.

Investigator Commentary: Interruption or Reduction of TKIs in the First 3 Months After Diagnosis of CML In this study, the investigators examined the important question of treatment continuation during the first 3 months after CML diagnosis and evaluated how this affects the probability of getting the best response at 3 months. They found that patients who undergo any treatment interruption, even for only a day, already have a diminished probability of a good response at 3 months. The more treatment the patient misses, the higher the probability that the patient’s disease will progress or undergo transformation. Interview with Jorge E Cortes, MD, January 24, 2014 Different reasons exist for dose interruptions, and each of them probably carries a different implication for long-term prognosis. If the interruption is due to nonmyelosuppressive toxicity, then the dose can be reduced or changed to a different TKI, and I believe the prognosis will be unchanged. Noncompliance and myelosuppression carry a different meaning because you expect these patients in the long run to have a lower incidence of CCyR or major molecular response and probably more adverse events such as transformation. Interview with Hagop M Kantarjian, MD, January 29, 2014