Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture 13 - Synchrotron Radiation 2 For a relativistic particle, the total radiated power (S&E.
Advertisements

Radio frequency usage/applications Dr S. T. Boogert (accelerator physicist) John Adams Institute at Royal Holloway Royal Holloway.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Accelerator Physics  Basic Formalism  Linear Accelerators  Circular Accelerators  Magnets  Beam Optics  Our Accelerator Greg LeBlanc Lead Accelerator.
PAMELA Contact Author: CONFORM is an RCUK-funded Basic Technology Programme PAMELA: Concepts Particle Accelerator for MEdicaL Applications K.Peach(JAI,
LHeC Test Facility Meeting
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  As you’ll show in homework, the synchrotron tune (longitudinal oscillations/turn) is generally
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
Particle accelerators and detectors -Short Answers.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
Physics of Particle Accelerators Kalanand Mishra Department of Physics University of Cincinnati.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Let’s look at the Hill’ equation again…  We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a “sine-like” and “cosine-like”
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 23 rd Annual HUGS Program June 2-20, 2008 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June 3 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
Optimizing Cost and Minimizing Energy Loss for Race-Track LHeC Design Jake Skrabacz University of Notre Dame Univ. of Michigan CERN REU 2008 CERN AB-department.
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In terms of total charge and current  In terms of free charge an current USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2013 Lecture 2 - Basic.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Synchrotron Radiation
Lecture 25 - E. Wilson - 12/15/ Slide 1 Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
What I’ve been doing. My Problem: Conceptually LHeC: linear electron collider Basic Design: linac will be connected to a recirculation track (why?) Goal:
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Harmonic.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Lecture 5 - E. Wilson - 6/29/ Slide 1 Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
The Strong RF Focusing:
Electron Polarization In MEIC
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Longitudinal Dynamics & RF Capture
Jefferson Lab Student Seminar Series
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 8
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 3
Accelerator Physics Weak Focussing
Accelerator Physics NMI and Synchrotron Radiation
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
Accelerator Physics Synchrotron Radiation
Physics 696 Topics in Advanced Accelerator Design I
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 7
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
EQUILIBRIA AND SYNCHROTRON STABILITY IN TWO ENERGY STORAGE RINGs*
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Presentation transcript:

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 USPAS Course on Recirculating Linear Accelerators G. A. Krafft and L. Merminga Jefferson Lab Lecture 3

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Talk Outline. “Classical” Microtrons - Basic Principles - Veksler and Phase Stability - Conventional Microtron - Performance. Racetrack Microtrons - Basic Principles - Design Considerations - Examples. Polytrons - Design Considerations - Argonne “Hexatron”

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Classical Microtron: Veksler (1945) RF Cavity Extraction Magnetic Field

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Basic Principles For the geometry given For each orbit, separately, and exactly

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Non-relativistic cyclotron frequency: Relativistic cyclotron frequency: Bend radius of each orbit is: In a conventional cyclotron, the particles move in a circular orbit that grows in size with energy, but where the relatively heavy particles stay in resonance with the RF, which drives the accelerating DEEs at the non-relativistic cyclotron frequency. By contrast, a microtron uses the “other side” of the cyclotron frequency formula. The cyclotron frequency decreases, proportional to energy, and the beam orbit radius increases in each orbit by precisely the amount which leads to arrival of the particles in the succeeding orbits precisely in phase.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Microtron Resonance Condition Must have that the bunch pattern repeat in time. This condition is only possible if the time it takes to go around each orbit is precisely an integral number of RF periods First Orbit Each Subsequent Orbit For classical microtron assume can inject so that

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Parameter Choices The energy gain in each pass must be identical for this resonance to be achieved, because once is chosen, is fixed. Because the energy gain of non-relativistic ions from an RF cavity IS energy dependent, there is no way (presently!) to make a classical microtron for ions. For the same reason, in electron microtrons one would like the electrons close to relativistic after the first acceleration step. Concern about injection conditions, as here in the microtron case, will be a recurring theme in the next two lectures on examples! Notice that this field strength is NOT state-of-the-art, and that one normally chooses the magnetic field to be this value. High frequency RF is expensive too!

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Classical Microtron Possibilities 1 1/2 1/3 1/4 2, 1, 2, 1 3, 1, 3/2, 1 4, 1, 4/3, 1 5, 1, 5/4, 1 3, 2, 3, 2 4, 2, 2, 2 5, 2, 5/3, 2 6, 2, 3/2, 2 4, 3, 4, 3 5, 3, 5/2, 3 6, 3, 2, 3 7, 3, 7/4, 3 5, 4, 5, 4 6, 4, 3, 4 7, 4, 7/3, 4 8, 4, 2, 4 Assumption: Beam injected at low energy and energy gain is the same for each pass

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Magnetic Field For same microtron magnet, no advantage to higher ; RF is more expensive RF Cavity Extraction

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Going along diagonal changes frequency RF Cavity Extraction Magnetic Field To deal with lower frequencies, go up the diagonal

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Phase Stability Electrons arriving EARLY get more energy, have a longer path, and arrive later on the next pass. Extremely important discovery in accelerator physics. McMillan used same idea to design first electron synchrotron. Invented independently by Veksler (for microtrons!) and McMillan

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Phase Stability Condition “Synchronous” electron has Difference equation for differences after passing through cavity pass : Because for an electron passing the cavity

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Phase Stability Condition

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Phase Stability Condition Have Phase Stability if i.e.,

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Homework Show that for any two-by-two unimodular real matrix M (det(M)=1), the condition that the eigenvalues of M remain on the unit circle is equivalent to Show the stability condition follows from this condition on M, applied to the single pass longitudinal transfer matrix. Note is proportional to. Compute the synchrotron phase advance per pass in the microtron as a function of and the synchronous phase.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Problems with Classical Microtron. Injection. Would like to get magnetic field up to get to higher beam energy for same field volume, without increasing the RF frequency. Solution: Higher “injection” energy

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Conventional Microtron Make with Now resonance conditions imply And now it is possible to have (at the expense of higher RF power!)

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Performance of Microtrons The first and last entries are among the largest “classical” microtrons ever built. for them all

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Racetrack Microtrons. Basic idea: increase the flexibility of parameter choices while retaining the inherent longitudinal stability of the microtron geometry.. Use the increased flexibility to make bending magnets better suited to containing higher energy beams than in conventional microtrons. Solve “injection” problems by injection at relatively high energies. Trick: split the two halves of the microtron Injection

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Revised Resonance Conditions To evaluate racetrack microtron longitudinal stability, use the same formulas as for classical microtron. For largest acceptance. Huge advantage: because of the possibilities of long straights, long linacs operated in a longitudinally stable way are possible. In particular, there is now space for both CW normal conducting linacs and CW superconducting linacs.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Homework Design a 30 MeV-200 MeV racetrack microtron. In particular, specify (1)The bender fields (2)The radius of largest orbit (3)M56 of largest orbit (4)Energy gain of linac section (5)Linac length (6)Range of stable synchronous phase There are many “right” answers for the information given, and I insist on at least two passes! Assume that the accelerating structures have zero transverse extent.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Examples of Racetrack Microtrons

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Polytrons For GeV scale energies or higher, the bend magnets for a racetrack microtron design become uneconomical. A way must be found to confine the active bending field to a relatively small bending area. A way to do this is illustrated in the idea of a polytron, which is a generalization of the racetrack microtron with the total bend between linacs of 360/p, where p is an even integer. To the best of my knowledge, no polytron has ever been built, although Argonne’s hexatron was a serious competitor to the original NEAL proposal from SURA. My guess is that superconducting machines like CEBAF will always be preferred to polytrons, although Herminghaus has given some reasons that one might expect to get smaller energy spread out of these devices.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Polytron Arrangements

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Polytron Properties Polytrons have a greater phase stable area. Proof, examine the stability of But now the section bends only Stability Condition

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Polytron Properties NB, the numbers are right, just not the formula

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Argonne “Hexatron”

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Enhanced Longitudinal Stability (Herminghaus) By proper choice of synchrotron frequency, it may be possible to cancel of RF phase and amplitude errors. For a 5-pass device and phase advance Sum vanishes after fifth pass!! One actually likes to run on the storage ring “linear resonance” for polytrons!

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS Recirculating Linacs Krafft/Merminga13 February 2001 Summary. Microtrons, racetrack microtrons, and polytrons have been introduced.. These devices have been shown to be Phase Stable.. Examples of these devices, including a superconducting racetrack microtron, have been presented.. We’re ready to take the next step, independent orbit recirculating accelerators.