Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Advertisements

HFST Council Meeting FHWA Update Frank Julian Federal Highway Administration Resource Center - Safety and Design Team August, ATSSA Mid Year.
Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Rumble Strip(e) June 16, 2011 Simone Ardoin Assistant Road Design Engineer Administrator.
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 Road maintenance and construction Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time spent: 6 hrs.
Ken Kochevar FHWA Division Office Safety and Design Team Leader Ph: (916) The Safety Edge What is it? How does it work? What are the benefits?
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
57 th Traffic Conference. The National Problem — ,200 Fatalities 2.68M Injuries $230.6B / year $820 per person 3.3 Million Deaths Since 1928.
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
HSM Practitioner’s Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash
Highway Safety & Wildlife: A National Perspective October 24-25, 2005 Patrick Hasson National Technical Service Team Leader Safety and Design FHWA Tel:
1 The Road Towards Zero Deaths: Rules to Live By Joe Toole Associate Administrator for Safety Federal Highway Administration Missouri Traffic and Safety.
1 LOW COST SYSTEMATIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Sue Groth Mn/DOT Sue.Grothdot.state.mn.us.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Meeting the AASHTO Safety Goal Daniel L. Carter, PE UNC Highway Safety Research Center AASHTO Safety Mgmt Subcommittee Meeting September 2, 2009.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
T RIBAL S AFETY C HAMPIONS W ORKSHOP December 2 – 3, 2014 Embassy Suites Hotel & Conference Center Norman, Oklahoma Proven Safety Countermeasures Huy A.
ALDOT HSIP FUNDING OPPORTUNTIES ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF SAFETY OPERATIONS SONYA BAKER TIMOTHY BARNETT MAY 13, 2015.
INTERTRIBAL TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OCTOBER 30, 2003.
Cross Sections CE 453 Lecture 22 Iowa DOT Design Manual Chapter 3.
INDOT Rumble Striping: A Systemic Safety Measure June 4 th, 2015.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
1 Delineation, signing and lighting Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time Spent: 8 hrs.
Module Use research and appropriate methods for selecting effective countermeasures and targeting diverse cultural and geographic populations. Countermeasure.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS. 1-2 Introduction Highway Traffic Fatalities Trend.
. Efforts to Reduce Crashes on County Roads in Iowa.
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Introduction – Session #1.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Selecting Countermeasures 1 Module 5 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise, Idaho.
THE HISTORY OF MOBY-DICK David J Russell II. GEOMETRIC DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL FACTORS THAT IMPACT TRUCK USE OF TOLL ROADS David J Russell II.
Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study FUTURE DIRECTION Annual TAC Meeting,2007 Roya Amjadi FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center.
Project Development – High Priority Segments -- ATP 2 10/29/2012 Road Surface? Paved Gravel Segment received Stars for Lane Departure Crash Density & Critical.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
The 2010 Evaluation of Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 2010 Thomas M. Welch, P.E. State Transportation.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Lane Departures By: Deborah S. McAvoy, M.S., P.E., PTOE Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
MICHIGAN’s INITIATIVES FOR REDUCING HIGHWAY FATALITIES.
Louisiana Local Road Safety Program
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
Safe Road Infrastructure George Mavroyeni – Executive Director, Major Projects (former Executive Director, Road Safety and Network Access) May 2011.
6-Answers-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise – Part A – Session #6.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
Successes in Reducing Highway Fatalities Kathy Harvey, MoDOT State Design Engineer July 16, 2008 Albuquerque, N.M.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Combination Centerline and Edgeline Rumble Strips Dr. Frank Gross, VHB.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Engineering Study Griffin View Drive & Harbor Hills Blvd. Prepared for Lake County Public Works Engineering 437 Ardice Avenue Eustis, Florida Purchase.
US 421 Centerline Rumble Strips in Chatham Co. Renee B. Roach, P.E. and Al Grandy May 2, 2007.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Introduction – Session #1.
1 Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements (ELCSI) Pooled Fund Study Roya Amjadi, Highway Research Engineer FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center 10/24/08.
Cable Median Barrier with Inside Shoulder Rumble Strips on Divided Roads Raghavan Srinivasan, Bo Lan, & Daniel Carter, UNC Highway Safety Research Center.
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,
California’s Experience with HFST 1.  Overview  Challenging Locations  Collision Reduction (State and Local Roads)  Typical Placement and current.
SCOHTS Meeting April 28-30, Completed NCHRP Projects Report 641 – Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips.
6-1 Module 6: Group Activity Wright County Safety Review Identifying Opportunities for Making Roads Safer 6-1.
Module 3: Vision and Driving Topics 2-6
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 Funding Resources for Highway Safety (FY2001 Fed-Aid) $1.4 $5.6 Min. Guarantee Bridge Surface Transp. Program National Hwy.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Effective Systemic Curve Improvements
Safety Audit Components
Presentation transcript:

Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation

Over 70% of all Fatal Crashes are Roadway Departures …and nearly 60% of them are in Curves Similarly, nearly 70% of Serious Injuries are Roadway Departures …with over 50% occurring in Curves 31% of all Fatal Crashes

Reduce the likelihood of vehicle leaving the roadway Minimize the adverse consequence of leaving the roadway

Providing basic traffic signing reduces Curve crashes Head-on collisions Nighttime crashes Other run-off-road crashes 30% Crash Reduction

Providing chevrons or other signing Improves view of curve from tangent Provides continuous positive guidance through curve Up to 25% Crash Reduction

Curve Advisory Reporting Service (CARS) System MUTCD requirements Standardized method to evaluate curves Automated curve speed calculations Accurate and defensible Ease of use and low-cost

Providing edge lines Use of edge lines and raised pavement marker Significant return on investment, up to 55:1 66% Crash Reduction

Improve horizontal sight distance In particular at locations with substantial sight distance restrictions More critical when an intersection or driveway is within or just beyond curve Up to 20% Crash Reduction

Providing shoulder or edge line rumble strips Proportion of vehicles that run off the road is significantly greater on a curve An effective means of locating the edge of the travel way during inclement weather Up to 30% Crash Reduction

Providing centerline rumble strips Effective in reducing head- on and opposite direction sideswipe crashes No adverse effect on motorcyclist or bicyclists Up to 37% Crash Reduction

Provide a Safety Edge TM treatment Virtually eliminates the over-correction RwD crash Adds about 1% to asphalt quantities for a typical overlay Up to 6% Crash Reduction

With Safety Edge Without Safety Edge

Providing a skid-resistant pavement surface Reduces RwD related to wet-pavement conditions May be less expensive than modifications to the alignment or changing the superelevation Up to 35% Crash Reduction

Providing lighting on curves Along county routes, approximately 58% of fatal crashes along horizontal curves took place during nighttime hours Can be costly to implement Alternate enhancements to delineation may be an interim step Up to 54% Crash Reduction (Nighttime Only)

Providing dynamic curve warning devices Actuated warning devices Either constant operation or speed activated More effective for truck related crashes Should limit applications 39% for all crashes, up to 71% Crash Reduction for Truck related rollovers

Providing wider lanes Design vehicle occupies a greater width because of offtracking Drivers experience difficulty in steering their vehicles along the center of the lane Improving from 10-ft to 12-ft lanes Up to 12% Crash Reduction

Providing a wider shoulder Can be limited to curve locations Inside and outside Inside reduces occurrence of over-correction crashes Outside provides for an improved recovery for roadway departures Up to 87% Crash Reduction

Modifying horizontal alignment Used only at very highly over-represented locations Can be very costly Up to 67% Crash Reduction

Improve roadside slopes 90% crash reduction Remove/relocate objects 98% crash reduction Delineate objects 8% crash reduction Add roadside hardware 94% crash reduction

Improvements for curves have the potential to reduce crashes and crash severity on rural roads Identifying where safety funding should be allocated continues to be a challenge Focus on the most at-risk crash types Concentrate on the most at-risk locations Utilized low-cost countermeasures Combine countermeasures where appropriate

Safety Effects of Horizontal Curve and Grade Combinations on Rural Two-Lane Highways 077/13077.pdf A Guide for Reducing Collisions on Horizontal Curves _Reducing_Collisions_on_Horizontal_Curv_ aspx Low Cost Treatments for Horizontal Curve Safety a07002/fhwasa07002.pdf Horizontal Curve Safety