Moving Research into Classrooms: Hillsboro School District’s Plan for Multi-tiered Literacy Instruction K-12 College of Education Center on Teaching and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the Literacy Coach In a Primary School: A Collaborative Model International Reading Association Annual Conference Atlanta, 2008 Presenters.
Advertisements

RTI: Questions and Answers June, Response to Intervention (RTI) What is it? a problem-solving systema problem-solving system a way to monitor progressa.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention This ppt is an adaptation of a specific PISD Training on RTI, The Educational Testing and.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Reading Intervention “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” -Margaret Fuller-
Teacher Leadership Initiative Trainings
B-ELL Leadership Professional Development Oregon Reading First October 2 nd, 2008 University of Oregon © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Promoting Equity and Access Lynn Boyer West Virginia Department of Education.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
General Universal Level Targeted Level Intensive Level Bonus
RTI: Questions and Answers June, Response to Intervention (RTI) What is it? a problem-solving systema problem-solving system a way to monitor progressa.
May Dr. Schultz, Dr. Owen, Dr. Ryan, Dr. Stephens.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Welcome to Third Grade Curriculum Night Our Goal is that by the end of the year all students will score a level 3 or 4 on the Math and Reading End of Grade.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
Lee County’s Just Read, Florida! District Plan K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Plan Dianne Johnson, Ali Conant C. Keith Woodfin, John Scheller.
Secondary Intensive Reading Block Evan Lefsky, Ph.D. Reading Specialist, 6-12.
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Pearson Copyright Tier Reading Model 3/26/08.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Judy Rockley September 2012  Based on student data interventions are chosen from a list of scientifically based programs that are.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
Welcome to Third Grade Curriculum Night Our Goal is that by the end of the year all students will be proficient and prepared for fourth grade.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
D62 Response to Intervention
Harry Wong Says Procedures are the Way to Go… Response to Intervention is a procedure-based system. It is also a problem solving system. Something isn’t.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Spotlight on Districts and Campuses Bonham Independent School District February 25, 2011.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… … a process for providing high quality instruction, assessment, and intervention that allows schools to.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Annual Title I Parent Meeting October 24, 2016
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
English Language Arts Program Update
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Presentation transcript:

Moving Research into Classrooms: Hillsboro School District’s Plan for Multi-tiered Literacy Instruction K-12 College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Introductions Brenda Kephart, Office of School Performance Director Christie M. Petersen, Title I Coordinator Pam Zinn, EBISS Coordinator

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning The Mission of the Hillsboro School District is to ensure each student graduates prepared to succeed and contribute in a global society by engaging our diverse learners in challenging, personalized programs of educational excellence.

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Demographics Year Total Pop HispanicWhiteBlackAsian ,898 2, %12, % % % ,081 3, %12, % %1, % ,562 5, %12, % %1, % ,251 6, %11, % %1, %

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Students in Need ( Free-Reduced Lunch Rates ) YearNumbersPercentage % % %

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Time Line for Hillsboro All Title schools started using Universal Screenings Reading Coaches in Title Schools Supplemental Kinder started Title Schools have basic literacy plan that all followed- with Literacy Quadrant resource Approved core, supplemental and intervention programs- Scientifically Research Based Literacy Cadre started with non Title Principals PBIS Implementation first phase in 17 schools

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Time Line for Hillsboro LA Task Force for new LA adoption- spent one year in process PBIS phase two of roll out in another nine schools K-12 Literacy Plan implemented EBISS Leadership team formed Instructional/Intervention Coaches added to the non Title Elementary & Secondary Schools Developed HSD EBISS/RTI Manual Begin roll out of RtI phase one PBIS last phase of roll out of four remaining schools

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Critical Features: K-12 Literacy Plan MATERIALS & INSTRUCTION TIME & GROUPING ASSESSMENT & DATA UTILIZATION SCHOOL ORGANIZATION & SUPPORT PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SCHOOL & DISTRICT LEADERSHIP COACHING

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning  We can effectively teach all children.  Administer universal benchmark assessments three times a year.  Deliver instruction from a core program for all.  Use research-based, scientifically validated curriculum, interventions, and instruction.  Use a multi-tier model of service delivery.  Intervene early.  Use data to make instructional decisions.  Monitor student progress to inform instruction.  Increase time and intensity of instruction when students fall behind. CORE Principles of HSD K-12 Literacy Framework

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning A Closer Look at Our Data

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Kindergarten Progress DIBELS Data

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning First Grade Progress DIBELS Data

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Second Grade Progress DIBELS Data

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning How Are We Doing?

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning How Are We Doing?

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Hillsboro School District’s IES Practice Guide Implementation

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Recommendation 1 Screen all students for potential reading problems at the beginning of the year and again in the middle of the year. Regularly monitor the progress of students who are at elevated risk for developing reading disabilities.

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Hillsboro’s Plan for Universal Screening  District level team KAT (K-8 Assessment Team) 3 times yearly DIBELS & easyCBM (K-8)  Things that need to be in place Coordinator at District and school level Initial training then Refresher trainings Calibration training Periodic fidelity checks

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Tier 1: Benchmark  DIBELS two additional times per year  In program assessments Tier 2: Strategic  DIBELS Monthly  In program assessments (core & interventions) Tier 3: Intensive  Non-EBISS schools DIBELS bi-monthly In program assessments  EBISS Schools DIBELS Weekly In program assessments Progress Monitoring Schedule

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Students are significantly below benchmark targets as measured by multiple assessments. Ninety minutes of intensive instruction is needed to help the student catch up in a replacement program. An additional thirty to sixty minutes focused on the area of weakness may be needed. Assessments occur every 1-2 weeks. INTENSIVE STRATEGIC Students are not meeting benchmark targets as measured by multiple assessments. Ninety minutes of instruction (direct, re/pre teaching and adjustments in pacing and complexity is needed for the student to catch up. Assessments must occur every 3-4 weeks. BENCHMARK Students are generally meeting benchmark targets as measured by multiple assessments. There may be an occasional need for re-teaching. Some sort of differentiated instruction is woven into lesson planning. Generally, no interventions are need. Assessments should occur every 6- 8 weeks. ADVANCED Students consistently exceed benchmark targets and handle advanced materials. Interventions need to provide challenge, extension and enrichment. Assessments should occur every 6-8 weeks.

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Recommendation 2 Provide differentiated reading instruction for all students based on assessments of students’ current reading levels (Tier 1)

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Advanced Instruction Time Elementary: 90 minutes of Adopted Reading Curriculum and 60 minutes Language Arts (Writing, Grammar, Speaking & Spelling) Middle School: 90 Minutes Accelerated Language Arts Curriculum High School: Advanced Language Arts Class Instruction Advanced Instruction (High School: AP/IB) Comprehensive supplemental instruction Small differentiated groups within the class Balanced non-fiction and fictional text Independent application of higher order thinking skills Extended vocabulary and comprehension strategies Application of skills and strategies Challenging materials for student level/rate Standards beyond grade level expectations Transitional support between tiers Assessment Universal Screening, Formative, and Summative

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Benchmark (Tier 1) Instruction Time: Elementary: 90 minutes of Adopted Reading Curriculum and 60 minutes Language Arts (Writing, Grammar, Speaking & Spelling) Middle School: 90 Minutes Adopted Language Arts Curriculum Instruction High School: Language Arts Class Instruction: Comprehensive adopted core instruction Comprehensive supplemental instruction Small differentiated groups within the class Balanced non-fiction and fictional text Develop higher order thinking skills Enhance vocabulary and comprehension strategies Explicit, direct and sequential instruction, modeling, think-aloud, check for understanding, active engagement, and guided practice Independent practice Transitional support between tiers Assessment Universal Screening, Formative, and Summative

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Tier 1 Support in HSD  Houghton Mifflin Core  Houghton Mifflin Enhancements  Coaching  Teacher training in reading and interpreting data  Data driven decision rules

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning HSD Decision Rules for Non-EBISS Schools Grade level collaboration team meetings every 4-6 weeks:  Based on DIBELS PM & In program assessment, decisions are made regarding a student’s response to intervention  Level of support adjusted

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning HSD Decision Rules (EBISS Schools)  EBISS Intervention Team meetings every 6 weeks  Standardized Decision Rules & Protocols that are used to guide instructional decision making for students (RtI/ LD eligibility)

Intervention Adjustments and Changes Adjustments to Intervention (Applied to intervention as necessary, does not require documentation or EBISS team decision) Considerations for the Student  Motivation o Add incentives o Change incentives o Increase success goal o Increase communication between interventionist, classroom teacher, and parent o Add a behavior plan o Add an attendance plan o Provide additional language support  Increase level of active engagement Considerations for Curriculum/Program  Check fidelity of implementation of program o Provide additional training o Add a coaching component o Materials are adequate to accommodate all students Considerations for Instruction (Practices)  Increase explicit strategy instruction  Increase pace of instruction  Increase opportunities to respond  Pre-Teach and/or Re-Teach Lessons  Employ standard cueing correction procedures  Build/activate prior knowledge  Increase the use of graphic organizers Considerations for Instruction (Logistics)  Change instructor  Change seating within group  Provide instruction in small units throughout the day  Change physical environment  Daily lesson completion (add time if needed) Change in Intervention Constitutes a new intervention, decided upon by EBISS team Add additional intervention session Reduce group size by 50% Change curriculum according to K-12 Literacy Plan

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Recommendation 3 Provide intensive, systematic instruction on up to three foundational reading skills in small groups to students who score below the benchmark score on universal screening. Typically, these groups meet between three and five times a week for 20 to 40 minutes (Tier 2).

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Strategic (Tier 2) Instruction TIME Elementary: 90 minutes of Explicit Adopted Reading Curriculum w/ additional 30 minutes Supplemental Curriculum and 60 minutes Language Arts (Writing, Grammar, Speaking, and Spelling) Middle School: 60 minutes Adopted Language Arts Instruction with support, plus 60 minutes Literacy Intervention High School: 2 classes: Adopted Language Arts Curriculum with support, plus Literacy Intervention INSTRUCTION Enhanced comprehensive adopted core instruction Accelerated supplemental intervention Highly qualified instructor Native language literacy support Small class (19-24) Daily small groups (low teacher ratio proportionally appropriate to grade level) Targeting instruction to meet student’s need(s): phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, language and writing Transitional support between tiers Communication with student, parents, instructional staff, and specialist Explicit, direct and sequential instruction, modeling, think-aloud, check for understanding, active engagement, and guided practice Assessment Universal Screening, Progress Monitoring, Formative, and Summative

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Houghton Mifflin Enhancement  Strengthen the core  Lesson Maps & Templates Taught daily Repetition of skills to build automaticity gradually Direct, Explicit Instruction for teacher-student interaction with opportunities for practice and feedback

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Recommendation 4 Monitoring the progress of Tier 2 students at least once a month. Use these data to determine whether students still require intervention. For those still making insufficient progress, teams should design a Tier 3 intervention plan.

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Collaboration  Teams meet monthly & review students data and use decision rules to make instructional changes  Collaboration/EBISS data teams are on going in nature and continue to meet, discuss, and determine next steps for students who continue to fall below aimlines.

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Recommendation 5 Provide intensive instruction on a daily basis that promotes the development of the various components of reading proficiency to students who show minimal progress after reasonable time in Tier 2 small group instruction (Tier 3)

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning HSD K-12 Literacy Plan moves right to Tier 3 if students are intensive to aggressively close the achievement gap for students!

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Yearly Goal Yearly Trend Line for Students 2 years Behind September June Yearly Growth for All and Catch-Up Growth for Some Benchmark Trend Line Catch-Up Growth

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Intensive (Tier 3) Instruction TIME Elementary: 90 minutes of Replacement Curriculum w/ additional 30 minutes Targeted Intervention and 60 minutes Language Arts (Writing, Grammar, Speaking and Spelling) Middle School: 90 minutes of Replacement Curriculum Literacy Intervention High School: 90 minutes of Replacement Curriculum Literacy Intervention INSTRUCTION Replacement intervention instruction Accelerated literacy intervention Highly qualified instructor Fidelity of instruction Native language literacy support Smallest class size (16-18) Daily small groups (low teacher ratio proportionally appropriate to grade level) Targeting instruction to meet students’ needs: phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, language & writing Transitional support between tiers Response to intervention model Communication with student, parents, instructional staff, and specialist Explicit, direct and sequential instruction, modeling, think-aloud, check for understanding, active engagement, and guided practice Multiple opportunities for practice 5 Mores: explicit instruction, modeling, guided practice, feedback, & time Assessment Universal Screening, Progress Monitoring, Formative, and Summative

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning Lincoln Street Video: Our Plan in Action!  Visitors welcome  Contact either Brenda Kephart or Christie Petersen for more information regarding scheduling.

College of Education University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it. Michelangelo