Air Quality Action Plan Steering Group Meeting Wednesday 18 th June 2014 Land, Air and Water Quality Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transport Study to support an impact assessment of the Urban Mobility Package on SUMPs CoR Meeting June 13 DG MOVE.
Advertisements

Shaping the Market Provider Engagement Events June and July 2009 Summary.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
APEC Air Cargo Security Workshop Bangkok, Thailand June 2008.
Area Profiles Worcestershire Partnership Management Group David Onions Corporate Business Intelligence and Performance Manager.
RTS Re-fresh North East Transport Consultative Forum Tuesday 30th October 2012.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
ENVIRONMENT SELECT COMMITTEE – 7 April 2008 Progress with the Air Quality Management Area.
DEVELOPING A TECHNOLOGY PROJECT IN STUDENT AFFAIRS A Guide to the Process Paul Schantz November, 2010.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
Air Quality Action Planning – Perth & Kinross Tom J Brydone Environmental Health Manager.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
© 2005 Prentice Hall14-1 Stumpf and Teague Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design with UML.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
Opportunities and Constraints on Possible Options for Transport Sector CDM Projects – Brazilian Case Studies Suzana Kahn Ribeiro Importance of Transport.
Software Project Management
Introduction to Cost-Benefit Analysis: Using Market Prices
Adur & Worthing Services working in partnership IMPROVING THE STREET SCENE WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL CONFERENCE Wednesday 7 th June 2006 PRESENTATION.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Regions Pilot cases at the Municipality of Rethymnon 2nd PP meeting Portugal, 8-10 July 2013.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
Early Market Briefing Proposed tender for the Australia-Timor-Leste Partnership for Human Development (ATLPHD) 14 September 2015, Dili.
Low Emission Strategy for Oxford Building on successful Partnership working between Oxford City Council and Oxfordshire County Council following recent.
Case study: SEA for land-use plan amendments of Krasna Hora municipality.
Chapter 3 Project Management Chapter 3 Project Management Organising, planning and scheduling software projects.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Assessment of options to streamline legislation on industrial emissions IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing 4 May 2007 Caspar Corden Entec UK Limited.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
Conclusions of the National Stakeholders Meeting The Secretariat, RRCAP.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
KEITH WOOD COMMUNITY PLANNING MANAGER NEWARK AND SHERWOOD DISTRICT COUNCIL A Presentation to the 3 rd Annual AAP Conference – 6 November 2009 The Role.
ERP Implementation Lifecycle
Coordinate On-The-Job Instruction Rick Bough Sarah Britton.
MGT 461 Lecture #27 Project Execution and Control Ghazala Amin.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Making progress in impact assessment Gwyn Jones AEA 12 May 2009.
SM Sec.1 Dated 13/11/10 STRATEGY & STRUCTURE Group 3.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
GET SERIOUS ABOUT CO2 Understanding Local Carbon Budgets.
The importance of engaging in Health systems strengthening to ensure Nutrition interventions are truly delivered within the health system TECHNICAL MEETING.
UHC 2030 CSO engagement mechanism Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
Introduction to Software Project Management Lecture1.
Engaging CSOs in UHC 2030 Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
Towards Effective Climate Finance in LAC Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre.
Helen Green Public Health Registrar (ST3) West Midlands
i ii Further Assessment* (12 months) Updating and Screening Assessment
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Twelfth Policy Board meeting Lima, Peru 8-9 July 2014
THE BUSINESS ANALYSIS PROCESS MODEL
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2020 World Programme
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Prison health in the WHO European Region
Strategy
Investing in Source Water Protection
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points
KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND INVESTMENT “GOOD PRACTICES”
AB 617 Community Air Protection Program
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Air Quality Action Plan Steering Group Meeting Wednesday 18 th June 2014 Land, Air and Water Quality Team

1.Introductions – a.WRS; b.Everyone else; 2.Aim of tonight’s meeting -Establish a plan of action -Discuss CBA process/outcomes/additions -Establish sub-groups 3. Ownership/responsibility -Solving poor air quality requires partnership working and co- operation between a number of individuals and organisations. Each of us has an interest and a portion of the responsibility. 4. Finish time

Local Air Quality Management LAQM work has been carried out, under the Environment Act 1995, since the late 1990s. It aims to protect public health by: Monitoring air quality Identifying areas of poor air quality Working towards improving identified poor air quality Where a breach of air quality standards is identified an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) must be declared. There are currently 9 AQMAs across Worcestershire.

Air Quality Action Plan for Worcestershire All of the identified AQMAs are covered by the Air Quality Action Plan for Worcestershire. The Action Plan links national, regional and local policy to present potential actions that may be taken to improve air quality. The Action Plan aims to include and consider all types of action that may improve air quality in the AQMAs.

Types of Action There are two types of action: Generic Actions Applicable to a number of AQMAs in County Examples include freight quality partnership, promoting flexible working arrangements, variable message signage etc. Specific Actions Applicable to specific circumstances or characteristics in individual AQMAs. Examples include traffic light phasing, junction review, bus stop location etc.

Air Quality Action Plan - Actions Deciding which actions are the best ones to take forward – it’s difficult! The aim is to take forward the actions which give the greatest improvement in air quality. In a small number of cases determining which actions these are is straightforward. For example: Action Pedestrianisation of streets within affected area If we remove all the traffic from the affected area it is easy to conclude that we will significantly reduce traffic based emissions and improve air quality. However, in most cases it is much more difficult. For example: Action Alteration to phasing of traffic light systems in affected area How do we estimate how much this will improve congestion? And in turn reduce emissions? And in turn improve NO2 levels? It is a complex and multifaceated process.

Air Quality Action Plan - Actions Deciding which actions are the best ones to take forward In addition to considering the potential improvement in air quality it is necessary to consider the following: Feasibility Cost Timescale Support To try and address all these points we developed the basic cost-benefit analysis that was provided to you prior to this meeting. We also provided you with an explanation of the process of the cost benefit analysis.

Air Quality Action Plan - Actions Cost Benefit Analysis - Weaknesses or Stumbling Blocks? Weaknesses - Generally relate to lack of availability of information or data Degree – Difficult to predict with lack of information so consideration was given to the type of action vs source apportionment, amount of NO 2 reduction required and the AQMA characteristics. Cost – Most actual costs are unknown so actions have been costed relative to each other. Timeline – Can vary according to uptake and implementation Feasibility – some actions may become unfeasible when more information is available

Air Quality Action Plan - Actions Cost Benefit Analysis – Critique 1.County Council Comments received -Copy provided as a hand out. 2.Major criticisms or objections? 3. Insights into assumptions/factors being considered?

Air Quality Action Plan - Actions Way Forward 1.Proposed sub-groups a.Split by AQMA; allocation of members and identification of lead b.Roles of facilitation, funding, technical competency and power c.Comments or requests to lead d.Where would Public Health Consultant and Act on Energy like to appear 2.Working together a.Identify roles and tasks amongst group b.Facilitated by WRS c.Set timeline to progress actions

Air Quality Action Plan - Actions Next Expressions of interest in being involved in sub-groups/requests to lead sub-groups to be sent to WRS. Sub-groups to meet/teleconference and progress actions Next Meeting ~ proposed 6 months to report back on progress made by sub-groups