Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 5 Develop Policies and Plans that Support Individual and Community.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Claudia de Windt Senior Legal Specialist Department of Sustainable Development Strengthening Humanitarian Assistance and Prevention and Response Coordination.

Advertisements

Heidi Deutsch, NACCHO PACE EH Summit Louisville, KY March 28-29, 2006

Local Public Health System Assessment

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 2 Diagnose and Investigate Health Problems and Health Hazards.

WELCOME. Objectives why MAPP is a long-term, system-wide paradigm shift in public health practice; who to involve; the benefits of the process; the phases.

DISASTER PLANNING: Do it Before Disaster Strikes Community Issues Satellite Workshops Department of Commerce & Economic Opportunity.

National Public Health Performance Standards Program Orientation to the Essential Public Health Services.

EMS Checklist (ISO model)

Public Health Core Functions

What do we do? Assessment Planning Education Outreach Information Intervention Research Convening Respond Collaboration Prevention Needs analysis Facilitation.

Principles of Standards and Measures

WELCOME _______________________________________________________________.

A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.

A Place to Call Home 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness November 2006.

Performance Improvement Processes

Community Health Assessments: Requirements and Models April 25, 2013 Gianfranco Pezzino Senior Fellow Kansas Health Institute.

A Healthy Place to Live, Learn, Work and Play:

WELCOME. Connecting the Dots Using MAPP to Accomplish the Goals of Live Well, San Diego! County of San Diego Health and Human Services Wilma Wooten, M.D.,

PREPARE AMERICA for a Unified Response to Terrorism A NATIONAL HOMELAND SECURITY PREPAREDNESS TRAINING SOLUTION OFFERED BY AMERICA’S COMMUNITY COLLEGES.

National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:5 Develop Policies and Plans that Support Individual and Community.

National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:8 Assure a Competent Public Health and Personal Healthcare Workforce.

The Quality Management System

National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:10 Research for New Insights and Innovative Solutions to Health.

National Public Health Performance Standards Program Overview Presentation.

Public Health Accreditation: County of San Diego HHSA’s Experience.

2012 Annual Meeting November 7, 2012 Dorchester House.

National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:3 Inform, Educate, and Empower People about Health Issues.

District Planning Council Program Overview. District Planning Concept Local Elected Officials Emergency Managers Emergency Responders Local Business Community.

by Joint Commission International (JCI)

Performance Standards: Opportunities for Quality Improvement for Maternal and Child Health Dennis Lenaway, PhD, MPH Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

5t5t Domain Develop Public Health Policies and Plans James Hodina.

York District Local Public Health System Assessment Sharon Leahy-Lind District Public Health Liaison-York York District Public Health Sanford DHHS Office.

Nursing Home Incident Command System

National Public Health Performance Standards Program Overview Presentation.

National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:9 Evaluate Effectiveness, Accessibility, and Quality of Personal.

Introduction to MAPP Lowrie Ward, MPH, CPH Program Analyst, Accreditation Preparation & Quality Improvement National Association of County and City Health.

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.

Augusta Health Forum Specialty Providers Home Health Parks Economic Development Colleges Employers Nursing Homes Mental Health Drug Treatment Civic.

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 4 Mobilize Community Partnerships to Identify and Solve Health.

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 7 Link People to Needed Personal Health Services and Assure the.

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 1 Monitor Health Status to Identify Community Health Problems.

Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.

ISO GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. ISO Environmental Management Systems 2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to: 

Environmental Management System Definitions

WELCOME. Who’s Here? What is Public Health? Improving health is a shared responsibility not only of health care providers, and public health officials,

Department of State Health Services Public Health in Texas.

NFPA 1600 Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs.

Benton-Franklin Community Health Alliance, Lourdes Health Network, Kadlec Regional Medical Center, Kennewick General Hospital, Group Health Cooperative,

An Analysis of the Quality of Wisconsin’s Community Health Improvement Plans and Processes 2011 Wisconsin Health Improvement and Research Partnerships.

Health Emergency Risk Management Pir Mohammad Paya MD, MPH,DCBHD Senior Technical Specialist Public Health in Emergencies Asian Disaster Preparedness Center.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

WELCOME. Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships: what is it and why should we care? National Association of County & City Health Officials.

National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 10 Research for New Insights and Innovative Solutions to Health.

WELCOME. Nuts and Bolts of Community Assessment with MAPP Heidi M. Deutsch, MA MSDM National Association of County & City Health Officials Sue Grinnell.

MAPP - What and Why?. MAPP is: A community-wide strategic planning tool for improving public health. A method to help communities prioritize public health.

Healthcare Coalitions. Topics and Objectives Topics  Definition  Purpose  Preparedness  Response  Members  Oversight & Structure  Resources Objectives.

HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.

The Status of the Nation’s Emergency Management System Gail L. Warden Chair, Committee on The Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System.

Community Health Centers of Arkansas Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Workshop August 11, 2017 Mark Fuller.

ACCREDITATION AT DISTRICT 4

CMS Policy & Procedures

2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities

Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)

Building Public Health Nursing Capacity through Shared Services

Central New York HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COALITION

Presentation transcript:

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 5 Develop Policies and Plans that Support Individual and Community Health Efforts

5.1.1 Does the LPHS include a governmental local public health presence (i.e., local health department) to assure the provision of Essential Public Health Services to the community? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the local health department: Maintain current documentation describing its mission? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the local health department: Maintain current documentation describing its statutory, chartered, and/or legal responsibilities? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the local health department: Assess its functions against the operational definition of a functional local health department? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.1.2 Does the LPHS assure the availability of resources for the local health department’s contributions to the Essential Public Health Services? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do resources for the local health department include: Availability of legal counsel on issues related to the provision of Essential Public Health Services? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do resources for the local health department include: Funding for mandated public health programs? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do resources for the local health department include: Funding for needed public health programs, as identified by the community? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do resources for the local health department include: The personnel required to deliver Essential Public Health Services, including a designated local health official? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do resources for the local health department include: The facilities, equipment, and supplies required to deliver Essential Public Health Services? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.1.4 Does the LHD work with the state public health agency and other state partners to assure the provision of public health services? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.2.1 Does the LPHS contribute to the development of public health policies? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS engage constituents in identifying and analyzing issues? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS advocate for prevention and protection policies for those in the community who bear a disproportionate risk for mortality or morbidity? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Within the past year, has the LPHS been involved in activities that influenced or informed the public health policy process? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.2.2 Does the LPHS alert policymakers and the public of public health impacts from current and/or proposed policies? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.2.3 Does the LPHS review public health policies at least every three to five years? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do reviews include: Assessment of outcomes and/or consequences? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do reviews include: Examination of potential community health impact of other policy areas (e.g., fiscal, social, environmental)? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the review process include: Community constituents, including those affected by the policy? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.3.1 Has the LPHS established a community health improvement process (e.g., MAPP, PACE-EH)? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Did the community health improvement process use an established tool such as MAPP or PACE- EH? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Is there broad participation in the community health improvement process? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the process include: Information from community health assessments? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the process include: Issues and themes identified by the community? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the process include: Identification of community assets and resources? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the process include: Prioritization of community health issues? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the process include: Development of measurable health objectives? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the process result in the development of a community health improvement plan? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.3.2 Has the LPHS developed strategies to address community health objectives? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Have the individuals or organizations accountable for the implementation of these strategies been identified? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.3.3 Does the local health department (LHD) conduct a strategic planning process? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LHD review its organizational strategic plan to determine how it can best be aligned with the community health improvement process? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.4.1 Do LPHS organizations participate in a task force or coalition of community partners to develop and maintain local and/or regional emergency preparedness and response plans? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does task force participation include broad representation from the LPHS? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.4.2 Does the LPHS have an all-hazards emergency preparedness and response plan? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the plan: Identify public health disasters and emergencies that might trigger its implementation? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the plan: Align with existing plans, protocols and procedures for emergency response within the community? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the plan: Clearly outline protocols and standard operating procedures for emergency response? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

5.4.3 Has the All-Hazards plan been reviewed and, if appropriate, revised within the past two years? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Has any part of the plan been tested through simulations of one or more “mock events” within the past two years? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Did the mock event include a written After Action Report identifying opportunities for improvement? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Was the plan modified based on these findings? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Schools Recreation Centers Employers Transit Elected Officials Doctors EMS Law Enforcement Nursing Homes Fire Corrections Mental Health Faith Institutions Civic Groups Non-Profit Organizations Neighborhood Organizations Laboratories Home Health Community Health Centers Hospitals Tribal Health Drug Treatment Public Health Agency Thank You!