Residential Real-Time Pricing: Bringing Home the Potential Kathryn Tholin Assessing the Potential for Demand Response Programs The Institute for Regulatory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

Residential Real-Time Pricing in Illinois: The Policy Implications of Measuring and Evaluating the Impact of Dynamic Pricing Anthony Star Director of Policy.
Quick, But Not Risky Ken Nickolai. START HERE Much of your discussion will be about money. Think both about money that will be spent… And money that.
Dynamic Pricing - Potential and Issues Joe Wharton and Ahmad Faruqui Kansas Corporation Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency March 25, 2008.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
January 20, 2004 California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Larsh Johnson – President and Chief Technical Officer, eMeter Sanjoy Chatterjee – Principal, Chatterjee.
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
Automated Demand Response Pilot 2005/2004 Load Impact Results and Recommendations Final Report © 2005 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) Research & Consulting.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
SMUD’s SmartPricing Options Marketing Strategy Jennifer Potter July 31, 2014 Powering forward. Together.
Residential Real-Time Pricing Is The Real-Deal Anthony Star Director of Policy and Evaluation Transforming the Electricity Market Institute for Regulatory.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
The Smart Grid: Green IT and Data Centers February 2, 2011: 4:10 p.m. Charles O’Donnell, Vice President, Engineering Liebert AC Power Emerson Network.
Retail Real-Time Pricing for Mass Market Customers: Experience, Perspectives, And Implications For A Post-2006 Policy Framework Bob Lieberman, Center for.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Real-time Pricing for Illinois Consumers Anthony Star Community Energy Cooperative Demand Response Coordinating Committee Webinar December 15, 2006.
Energy Action Fuel Poverty Conference Smart Meters - Tariff Benefits for Fuel Poor Choosing the Right Supplier Cathy Mannion 6 th October 2014.
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
SMART REGULATORY APPROACH FOR SMART GRID INVESTMENTS Barbara R. Alexander Consumer Affairs Consultant 83 Wedgewood Dr. Winthrop, ME (207)
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
What Drives the Response in Demand Response? Craig Boice Boice Dunham Group Metering, Billing, CRM/CIS America 2005 Las Vegas, Nevada April 13, 2005 BOICE.
Progressive Energy Solutions, LLC July 28, 2010 NYMEX N. Illinois Hub Electric Prices 12-Month Forward Prices Through July 15, 2010 * NEU Electric and.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Honey, I’m Home - How Are Electricity Prices for Tomorrow? Lawrence Kotewa Project Manager, Community Energy Cooperative April 13, 2005 Community Energy.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
Demand Response Research and Capabilities at LBNL Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Midwest Demand Response Initiative.
Electric Restructuring In Pennsylvania Sonny Popowsky Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate May 10, 2007 Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Transforming.
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (c) 2013 New Jersey Government Energy Aggregation P.L c. 24 “GEA Act” Gary E Finger Ombudsman New Jersey Board.
Smart Grid Consumer Perspectives. Top Ten Things Consumers Want from the Grid Data Guidance Reliability Control Comfort Convenience – and ease of communication.
Reshaping Utility/ Consumer Relationships MEC October 5, 2010 Pinehurst, NC Penni McLean-Conner.
Submitted to Southeast Symposium on Contemporary Engineering Topics (SSCET) New Orleans, LA - August 31.
South Lake Union On-Street Parking Plan November 1, 2005.
1 Overview of the Proposed Energy Education Study Presentation to the LIOB September 26, 2011 Sacramento, California.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
HOW WILL AMI & DYNAMIC PRICING AFFECT LOW INCOME USERS? Ahmad Faruqui, Ph. D. Principal National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners New York,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Smart Grid: What’s In It for the Customer? Wharton Energy Conference 2010 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing & Regulatory Services.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
Utilities’ Update on Energy Savings Assistance Program Studies Ordered in D LIOB Meeting August 21, 2013 Sacramento, California.
Demand Response
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
Communicating Thermostats for Residential Time-of-Use Rates: They Do Make a Difference Presented at ACEEE Summer Study 2008.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
BLACK HILLS ENERGY 2016 Energy Efficiency Portfolio Annual Results Overview December 8, :00am – 12:00pm MST Mark James – Energy Efficiency Program.
SMECO Demand Response filing
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Presentation transcript:

Residential Real-Time Pricing: Bringing Home the Potential Kathryn Tholin Assessing the Potential for Demand Response Programs The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies, Illinois State University May 12, 2006

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 2 Introduction Since 2003 the Community Energy Cooperative and ComEd have successfully operated the Energy-Smart Pricing Plan sm (ESPP), a large real-time electricity pricing program for residential consumers Overview of presentation: –What’s the program? –What have we learned? –Future directions

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 3 The Community Energy Cooperative Founded in 2000 by the Chicago-based Center for Neighborhood Technology The Cooperative helps consumers and communities obtain the information and services they need to control energy costs We have worked closely with ComEd, the state and communities Programs have ranged from C&I curtailment to air conditioner exchanges to pricing programs

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 4 Why Real-Time Pricing For Residential Customers? Two important reasons –Benefits to individuals –Benefits to the system

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 5 Why Real-Time Pricing For Residential Customers? Individual benefits –Access to low-cost wholesale prices most hours and most days –Ability to avoid paying the risk premium built into flat rates –Choice –Control

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 6 Why Real-Time Pricing For Residential Customers? Benefits to the system –Residential customers are numerous and disproportionately contribute to peak demand –Lower peak demand lowers prices for everybody –Lower peak demand improves reliability

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 7 How ESPP Works Today Pilot with ComEd—to inform future rate and program options 3-year pilot—4th year added to extend program to the establishment of competitive procurement in Illinois Hourly, market based prices The Cooperative provides consumer education and high price notifications Interval meters, with cycling component for small portion of participants

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 8 Current Program Characteristics Nearly 1,500 participants in % have central air conditioning; 40% have window air conditioning 47% in Chicago; 53% Suburban Diversity across race, income levels and housing types Participant demographics fairly similar to overall ComEd customer base

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 9 ESPP Has Seen A Variety of Prices and Weather Average Energy Price (¢/kWh) Summer Maximum Price (¢/kWh) Cooling Degree Days * Summer Days with High Price Notifications ,08757 * Ten year average cooling degree days is 799

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 10 What We’ve Learned Third party evaluations by Summit Blue Consulting utilized the latest analytical methods to model elasticities of demand and other characteristics of participants’ energy use Participants significantly changed their consumption behavior, reducing peak demand Participants have a high level of satisfaction with the program

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 11 Participants Changed Their Behavior In 2005, ESPP participants responded to hourly electricity prices in a manner similar to prior years, with an overall price elasticity of -4.7% [A doubling in price results in a 4.7% decrease in use for that hour] This level of response is strong and is comparable to those found in other programs that use price signals to motivate changes in consumer behavior

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 12 Participants Changed Their Behavior July 25, :00 AM7:00 AM1:00 PM7:00 PM kW Demand on ESPP Demand on Standard Rate Lowering Demand On One of The Hottest Days of 2005

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 13 Participants Changed Their Behavior -25% -20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 1:00 AM7:00 AM1:00 PM7:00 PM Air Conditioner Cycling ESPP Demand Reductions Increases with Air Conditioner Cycling

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 14 Participants Changed Their Behavior ESPP participants’ overall monthly summer energy (kWh) usage suggests a conservation effect –Reduction in usage of 3% to 4% relative to estimated usage had they not received hourly electricity prices –Surveys indicated that participants said they were almost always buying EnergyStar when replacing appliances

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 15 People Like The Program “I appreciate this program… I feel empowered to make a difference in my energy budget and in how I conserve energy. Thank you.” “I have long felt that joining the ESPP Plan is one of the smartest decisions I'd ever made!” “I am very happy with this program. I feel my bills have been lowered by my participation. It's good to know that I can make an impact on my electric bill by making small changes in my routine- Thanks!”

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 16 People Like The Program Saved money compared to standard rate—though results varied considerably, and included some months with higher costs than the standard rate

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 17 Comparison to standard rate is not helpful for quantifying future value of RTP –Currently this is a comparison to a frozen rate –2007 rates will be unbundled with standard distribution and transmission costs

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 18 In 2005, despite a very hot summer, and high power prices driven by natural gas costs, still a high retention rate YearPercent Renewing % % % Does not include participants who moved during the year People Like The Program

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 19 Conclusions Thus Far RTP can be successfully implemented with relatively inexpensive incremental technology Useful, reliable pricing information is critical component Consumer education needed (people want and use energy information that’s relevant to their situation) High price notifications focus people’s attention An automatic curtailment option such as an air conditioner cycling switch or a smart thermostat produces added benefits

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 20 A Large Scale Program Would Require… Information system for participants that goes beyond what an IDC can offer (price, usage, education, etc.) Education/awareness/exposure to RTP rate idea Appropriate metering infrastructure

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 21 What Is The Value To Customers? Elimination of risk premium –Recent New Jersey and Maryland results suggest a 20-40% premium –We don’t know yet what it will be in Illinois Ability to manage use and risk Information about energy, costs and efficiency options Customers value having control and choice

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 22 Meaningful Scale: Short-term Over the next 3 to 4 years initial market penetration (~3% of customers) –Create the accompanying program and outreach efforts –Determine cost allocation for meters and program –Measure participant behavior –Identify and test add-on technologies that increase price responsiveness Cycling switches Smart thermostats ???

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 23 Meaningful Scale: Long-Term Customers will be more aware of choices Meter costs continue to decline Full benefits of price response can be quantified Full potential of RTP becomes clear and achievable

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 24 More Long-Term Opportunities Grid friendly appliances New homes with enabling technology built-in Innovative information communications systems

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 25 How Would This Work In The Illinois Post-2006 Structure? Procurement –Already includes a provision for utility supplied hourly pricing for all customer classes Distribution –Current rate cases include unbundled charges that are level between supply options (except metering) Gives residential customers same rate choices as commercial/industrial customers

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 26 What’s Next In Illinois? ComEd and Ameren’s proposed 2007 rates will give all customers the option of real-time pricing Current rate cases include proposals for residential RTP program and funding mechanism SB1705 passed unanimously by Illinois General Assembly mandates RTP as an option for residential customers and allows for the inclusion of meter and program costs in the rate base if the ICC finds there would be net benefits from a large-scale program Current rate cases and related proceedings over the next few months will determine specific program parameters

Community Energy Cooperative at the Center for Neighborhood Technology 2125 West North Avenue, Chicago, IL ● 27 For More Information Community Energy Cooperative 2125 W North Ave Chicago, IL /