College-wide Partnerships: Integrated Planning. Once upon a time…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
Advertisements

Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
March 23, Todays Outcomes By the end of todays workshop, participants will be able to... Revise and/or finalize SAOs within their areas Discover.
Fall 2013 PDD Accreditation Overview Just Completed a Report and were Reaffirmed… Why Another Report ?!
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
History, Status and Challenges as of August 2010 Outcomes, Assessment and Accreditation.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
STRATEGIC PLANNING STATUS AND DIRECTION Report to the PPPC September 16, 2013 Michael Berman VP for Technology & Communication.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Cosumnes River College Refreshing our Vision, Mission & Values Students, Faculty, Staff & Administration March 28, 2008.
District System of Support A systems approach to supporting effective master scheduling.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 1. LAHC 2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 All Accreditation Commission recommendations successfully.
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Educational and Facilities Master Plan: In-Flight Update Flex Day January 26, 2006.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Changing the Culture – Facilitating Campus Wide Involvement in the Self-Evaluation Process ASCCC Accreditation Institute February, 20, 2015, 2:15 pm –
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Polk County Public Schools through Strategic Plan.
Strategic Planning and AdvancEd Accreditation In partnership with Quality New Mexico Taos NMSBA Leadership Conference July 13, 2012.
KATIE TOWNSEND-MERINO, PALOMAR COLLEGE KEVIN BONTENBAL, CUESTA COLLEGE JOHN NIXON, ACCJC ASCCC ACCREDITATION INSTITUTE, 2012 Implementing Improvement Plans.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Accreditation Overview.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
Total Cost of Ownership for Technology Resources at Mission College Description and Recommendations.
Using Data for Program Improvement State and Local Activities in Minnesota Lisa Backer: 619 Coordinator/Part C Data Manager Loraine Jensen: Part C Coordinator.
Accreditation Institute, 3/20/10 Newport Beach, CA Dr. Dan Walden, Dean of Academic Affairs & ALO, LASC Mr. Glenn Yoshida, Department Chair (Natural Sciences/Health/PE),
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Committee on University Effectiveness Working Group on Institutional Assessment April 8, 2011.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Accreditation Update to ICC Student Development & Services March 16, 2015 Gohar Momjian Associate Vice Chancellor of Institutional Development Accreditation.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Accreditation Update Self-Study Progress and Review MPC Flex Days Spring 2015.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
A Presentation for the Annual Conference of the Missouri Community College Association November 6, 2003 Larry McDoniel Ann Campion Riley Assessment of.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
HOW INSTITUTIONS MAKE MEANINGFUL CHANGE WITH OUTCOME ASSESSMENT MARCH 21, 2014 MIRAMAR COLLEGE: A CULTURE OF IMPROVEMENT.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLAN TIMELINE Mr. Rick Miranda Acting Vice President, Academic Affairs/Asst. Superintendent Dr. Kristi Blackburn Dean of Institutional.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
STUDENT SERVICES & ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT MEETING “RETURN WEEK” FRIDAY JANUARY 15, 2016.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Accreditation - Fall Standard IB - Institutional Effectiveness The College will develop and implement a comprehensive communication plan. The College.
Committee Orientation
The ADDIE Instructional Design Process
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Assessment Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/14/2018
Berkeley City College Accreditation Follow-up Report Update
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Completing your Program Review
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
“All Hands” Meeting Institutional Self-Evaluation Report (ISER)
Accreditation follow-up report
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

College-wide Partnerships: Integrated Planning

Once upon a time…

There was a college… Close to 10,000 students Dedicated faculty, staff and administrators A main campus and two centers In a college town with a popular CSU Near the ocean

And they lived happily ever after! The End

However… 2002 ACCJC Action Letter “…deficiencies in planning…”

SHOW CAUSE!

Why? How?

“For the 3 rd time (2008, 2010, 2011) visiting team reports and official communication from the Commission to the college noted non-compliance with Recommendation 2.” From the Team Evaluation Report…

2002: 1 st new planning model : Planning model on shelf 2005: 2 nd new planning model : Planning model mostly on shelf 2009: 3 rd new planning model 2010: 4 th new planning model : Implementation of planning model critiqued by ACCJC team Which Planning Model?

Task 1: Deconstruct the Team Evaluation Report

To meet the standards, the team recommends that the college complete the strategic plan, institute an ongoing systematic evaluation process that communicates and clarifies the assessment tools used to measure the effectiveness of ongoing planning, program review, resource allocation processes, and student learning outcomes. (Standard I.B., I.B.3., I.B.4., I.B.6., I.B.7.) Recommendation 2

“…planning efforts continue to be out of compliance with the standards on planning in the following ways: -Core principles are aspirational statements rather than strategic goals; -Strategic plan was not informed by EMP; -Strategic plan did not identify time- bound, measurable, realistic and specific objectives.” From the Evaluation Report

Revisit and articulate the challenges facing the district in order to replace the Core Principles with more specific and therefore more effective institutional goals Prepare an addendum to the San Luis Obispo County Community College District, Cuesta College Educational Master Plan that would describe those challenges and the rationale for the institutional goals Evaluate the 2010 Integrated Planning Model to ensure that all components of that model meet accreditation standards Spring 2012 To-Do

Add planning components as needed to ensure that the district’s planning processes included a complete cycle of evaluation, integrated planning, resource allocation, implementation, and re-evaluation Revise the integrated planning model to explain more clearly the links among the planning processes Craft clear definitions of all planning processes and terms and collect those definitions in a single document Spring 2012 To-Do

Establish timelines and process descriptions for each planning process in the 2012 Integrated Planning Model Prepare a strategic plan progress report documenting progress on the activities identified in the San Luis Obispo County Community College District Strategic Plan Prepare a strategic plan to include objectives based on the new and improved institutional goals that are specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time- bound Spring 2012 To-Do

Task 1: Assess the Integrated Planning Model

What’s missing? What’s working? What’s unclear? Assess the Integrated Planning Model

An aspirational statement? A planning-to-plan objective? What does the report mean by…

Consensus on concepts Consensus on language Task 1: Build A New Integrated Planning Model

An aspirational statement = based in brainstorming instead of data A planning-to-plan objective versus specific actions Can you identify these? The report means …

Identify primary writer/trainer Appoint a brainstorming group Train brainstorming group Together identify  The function of the planning element  Who writes and who reviews  The annual timeline Task 1: Build a New Integrated Planning Model

Brainstorming group = first readers Series of drafts to larger and larger audience VIOLA! An Integrated Planning Manual! Task 1: Build a New Integrated Planning Model

Lots of Options! Task 1: Build A New Integrated Planning Model

Each standing committee Flex day presentations Tee shirts, water bottles Task 1: Training on New Integrated Planning Model

What comes first in your model? Task 1: Implement the Planning Model

What you have: An EMP with core principles What you need: Goals that are data-based Solution: EMP Addendum! Task 1: Implement the Planning Model

Gather data Analyze data to identify challenges Goals = statements of the College’s response to the challenges Task 1: Implement the Planning Model

What comes second in your model? Task 1: Implement the Planning Model

What you have: A strategic plan with planning-to- plan objectives What you need: Measurable objectives Solution: 1- Progress report to close out current strategic plan 2- New strategic plan with measurable objectives based on new Institutional Goals Task 1: Implement the Planning Model

Institutional Goal 2 San Luis Obispo County Community College District will build a sustainable base of enrollment by effectively responding to the needs of its local service area. Can you write an objective? Task 1: Implement the Planning Model

S = Specific M = Measurable A = Attainable R = Realistic T = Time-bound Task 1: Implement the Planning Model

Institutional Objective 2.1: Increase the capture rate of the local 24‐ 40 age cohort by 2% annually Institutional Objective 2.2: Increase the local high school capture rate by 2% annually Task 1: Implement the Planning Model

Returning to our story…