GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona 12-15 May 2003 1 The challenge of regulating natural monopolies in electrical distribution – experices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Autorità per lenergia elettrica e il gas 1 Incentive-based regulation of electricity distribution in Italy FSR Workshop Improving and extending Incentive-based.
Advertisements

PMAPS 2012, Istanbul June C. J. Wallnerström, KTH - Royal Insitue of Technology 1 A Pre-Study Towards Investigating the Art of Choosing Right Level.
Smart Grid: an Ontario Perspective Brian Hewson, Senior Manager Regulatory Policy Hamilton May 8, 2013.
Water Services for the Poor – the Manila experience Global Forum on Sustainable Development Paris, France December 18, 2003.
Orienting Public Spending towards Achieving Results - Performance and Performance Management: A Conceptual Overview Joel Turkewitz World Bank.
17 th UPDEA CONGRESS IMPROVEMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURES FOR A BETTER PERFORMANCE OF AFRICAN POWER UTILITIES By Mr. Cheikh KA (SENELEC,
0 © 2011 Silver Spring Networks. All rights reserved. Building the Smart Grid.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Regulatory Proposal December We provide distribution services to 1.4 million residential and business customers We deliver electricity to.
Bent Ole Gram Mortensen Legal framework as a core element of district cooling success – the case of Denmark HE 2014, Wuhan.
Energy Efficiency in India – Role of CSOs Gaurav Shukla CUTS International, India Regional Training Workshop (June 27-29, 2012) Beijing, China Advanced.
Energy regulation and quality of service Eric Groom FEU, World Bank 4 th Poverty Reduction Strategy Forum Athens, June
TARIFF REGULATION IN THE NIGERIAN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY INDUSTRY
CREE Site Visit Oslo, September 19, 2013 Who Should Pay for Transmission? Nils-Henrik M. von der Fehr.
1 A Review of Potential Gains from Reforms ECRA Workshop 6 November 2006 Dr Brian Wharmby Independent Consultant, former Technical Director of Ofgem
Towards Regional Independent Operators – a main driver for successful market integration.
Amount and cost of losses June 11 th Florence School of Regulation Jose Luis Mata.
Economic Impact of Poor Power Quality on Industry Nepal Adopted from The Internet for Educational Purpose Sudaryatno Sudirham October 2003.
RETHINKING THE ELECTRICITY GRID RETHINKING THE ELECTRICITY GRID 14 May 2012 Presented by: PATRICIA DE SUZZONI ADVISOR TO THE CHAIR OF CRE (French Energy.
1 Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission Tariff Regulation Gocha Shonia Department of Methodology and informational provision.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Transformation of the Electric Power Industry: Value of Regulatory Impact Assessments Greg R. White Commissioner.
The California energy crisis Introduction (Wolak March ‘01) –Wholesale: averaged $33 MWH in 1999, $116 MWH in 2000, $310MWH Jan –Natural gas $3-$4.
ENTELA SHEHAJ Albanian Energy Regulator (ERE) DOES MONITORING METHODOLOGY MATTERS? Electricity Market Monitoring in Albania.
1 THE RATE CASE PROCESS A Blend of Science and Superstition Presentation to the Mongolian Energy Regulatory Board By Burl Haar Executive Secretary Minnesota.
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
McGranaghan US Session 2 Block 4 Question 12 Barcelona May Statistical Framework for Establishing Target Reliability Levels and Classifying.
Regulatory Approaches to Managing Investment Uncertainty Gülefşan Demirbaş ICER VWG2 Co-Chair.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 5 Energy Regulation Module 5: STRUCTURE, COMPOSITION AND ROLE OF AN ENERGY REGULATOR.
Impact of Liberalization of the Electricity Market on Energy Efficiency, Quality of Supply and Environmental Performance Eric BONNEVILLE ECI Webconference.
Rate-Making California Water Association. The rates and terms of service provided by private utility companies in California are regulated by the California.
1 Märt Ots Energy Market Inspectorate Vilnius Energy regulation in Estonia.
1 JOINT ECB-MNB CONFERENCE Moving away from a cash-based payment system to a “less cash” society Budapest November 2012.
Samordningsrådet med kunskapsplattform för smarta elnät Smart Grid and Smart Metering - Swedish Experiences Karin Widegren, Director Swedish Coordination.
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Internet Policy Day 3 - Workshop Session No. 5 The impact of telecomms regulation Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
The strategy for improved electricity distribution maintenance 9 June 2008.
Gaunt ZA Session 5 – Block 2.2 – Paper 5.68 Barcelona May LV Network Sizing in Electrification Projects Replacing a deterministic method with.
Energy Efficiency Action Plan Kathleen Hogan Director, Climate Protection Partnerships Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NARUC Winter Meetings.
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION, RENEWABLE ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY. IMPACT ON POWER QUALITY AND NETWORK PLANNING “Inauguration of the 6th Framework Programme”
Sustainable Energy Plan June 22, 2002 Sustainable Development Council John Auguste (Ministry of Works, Communications, and Public Utilities)
“ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF REDUCED LOSS TRANSFORMERS: Experiences in Spain" 14 th May 2003 J.Frau Spain Session 5 – Block 1.2.
Promoting Gas-Interconnector Investment - Insights from Laboratory Experiments Bastian Henze Tilburg University, CentER & TILEC GRI Workshop Stockholm,
Implications of regulatory changes of the market model on the distribution business.
ITU training workshop on Strategic Costing and Business Planning for Quadplay Session 16: Practical exercise 6 – tying it all together ITU ADVANCED LEVEL.
Canadian Electricity Association Post CAMPUT Workshop Performance Based Regulation in Alberta.
Objective of an efficient materials management. The objective of an efficient materials management is to provide the right materials (tools, work tools,
Public Forum 10 December 2014 SAPN Regulatory Proposal Bev Hughson Consumer Challenge Panel Member.
1 RORB Return on Rate Base. Legal Basis  Section 43, (f) of Republic Act No Section 43. Functions of the ERC – x x x (a) x x x (f) x x x “The rates.
Institutional Support Vladimir Koritarov Argonne National Laboratory April 2016.
Kazakhstan Electric Association KEA Established in 1998 Unites 21 participants and 12 observers Among participants 9 distribution companies 3 vertically.
Electricity Power Market: Competitive and Non-competitive Markets Ito Diejomaoh.
Gints Zeltiņš Commissioner of the Public Utilities Commission of Latvia Multi-sectoral regulator: Public Utilities Commission of Latvia.
State Regulation in the Natural Monopoly Sphere Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Regulation of Natural Monopolies ALMATY – 2006.
Federal Energy Service Company (FESCO). The potential of power consumption decrease at different stages of energy efficiency projects implementation Existing.
Heat Network Demonstration SBRI: policy context & objectives for the competition Natalie Miles Heat Strategy and Policy (Heat Networks)
Workshop for West-African Telecommunication Regulators Abuja (Nigeria), September 21-22, 2000.
Economic Regulation of Irish Water
The Ontario Energy Board and Demand-Side Management
Regulatory ‘Do’s’ and ‘Don’ts’ for DSOs to serve consumers’ interests Garrett Blaney co-chair, CEER Distribution Systems Working Group CEER Annual Conference.
NERSA presentation at the PPC meeting held on 24 May 2006
EE6501 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Agenda Context Motivation Scope Main expected results.
Economic Regulation of Irish Water
Future Challenges For Metropolises
AB “Energijos skirstymo operatorius” Financial results for 6 months of
WATER REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Regulation for Smart Grids
Joel Turkewitz World Bank
Presentation transcript:

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May The challenge of regulating natural monopolies in electrical distribution – experices from Sweden Magnus Gammelgard Royal Institute of Technology / KTH Stockholm, Sweden

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Agenda Regulation of Swedish Distribution Utilities Network Performance Assessment Model The model and the regulatory authority Implications on utilities Conclusion

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May The regulation of Swedish local distribution utilities Swedish market deregulated in 1996 –Including ~ 5 million domestic customers –~ local distribution utilities Ex post regulation New electricity act in 2002 A regulatory authority with limited resources Looking at the utilities from the outside

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Objectives and goals of the regulation

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May A shift for utilities What used to be: Profit Tariff Costs Resulted in Tariff = Costs + Profit

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May A shift for utilities Has become: Profit ? Tariff Costs Limits Profit = Tariff - Costs

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May The Network Performance Assessment Model A regulatory tool – legal regulation not dependant of the model History –Developed since 1998 –Pilot tests in 2001, 2002 and 2003 –In operational use 2004 Developed on commission of the regulatory authority

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Input data For every customer –Geographical position, actual energy consumption and revenues For connections to other networks –Geographical position, energy delivered and voltage level Outage duration and frequencies (averages) for announced and unannounced outages Local generation –Revenues, voltage level and energy delivered

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Two main steps in the model 1. Creation of a fictitious network 2. Valuation of the network Cost of delivering electricity to customers Reliability level (Based on the fictitious network)(Outage data from actual network)

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Creation of fictitious network Voltage level 1 Voltage level 2 Voltage level 3 Voltage level 4 Boundary Point

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Valuation of the network Cost of delivering electricity to customers Valuation of reliability level

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May The model and the regulatory authority Intended use of the model –Instrument for selecting utilities Actual revenues compared to the model’s result (Network Performance) Majority of utilities will not be closer reviewed –Establishing a climate for self-regulation Code of conduct Support communication

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Implications on utilities – three dimensions Requirements in order to use the model Changed fundamental principles Implications on the businesses

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Requirements in order to use the model – input data Input data availability –Several parameters for every customer in Sweden! (~5 million customers in total) Integrating input data –Separate (IT-)systems for positions, revenues and energy consumption Input data quality

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Changed fundamental principles No guaranteed return –Managing costs according to the allowed revenues – not covering costs Regulation from the outside –Managing cost efficiently should make a good (and approved) profit History not considered –Historical investments does not justify higher tariffs –Actual capital costs could be lower

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Implications on the businesses Possibilities to increase incomes Limited possibility to influence Possible to influence through outages

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Evaluating investments –If possible to assess changes in input data –The changed Network Performance is a valuation of the investment Implications on the businesses

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Implications on the businesses Decrease costs –External to model –Evaluate savings compared to effects on the Network Performance

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Conclusions Model not possible to implement without widespread availability of input data –Coordinated IT-systems For the regulatory authority: –Decide on the exact use of the model –Identify incentives created

GAMMELGARD SE Session 5 – Block 2 – Paper 39 Barcelona May Conclusions For the utility: –Fundamentally altered regulation environment –Possible to influence allowed income through outages –Actual costs external to model –Managing costs – a challenge