The Research Ethics Process RPT Conference 28 th April 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NHS R&D Jessica Bisset Acting Research Operations Manager UH Bristol.
Advertisements

The NIHR Clinical Research Network supports research to make patients, and the NHS, better Carrying out Research at Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation.
PrevNext | Slide 1 Michigan Electronic Grants System MEGS MEGS Additional Features Last Updated: 2/4/2011.
Briefing on MHRA routine inspection of non-commercial clinical trials
NICEs support to the Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee Tom Dent Programme Director Interventional Procedures Programme National.
The HPSS Research Ethics Service Northern Ireland Dr Siobhan McGrath Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland Mar2007.
Research Policy & Management RACD INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH GOVERNANCE.
Ethics – where to start! October 2013 Lois Neal FMS Research & Innovation Office.
Research involving adults lacking the capacity to consent Legal, ethical and practical issues Dr Mikey Dunn Senior Research Associate in Health and Social.
Create division of responsibilities document Submit sponsorship application Register project with R&I Add reference number to spreadsheet Allocate study.
An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
New Trials If you are seeking a collaboration with the UCL CCTU we require you to apply: At least 3 months before the application deadline By using the.
Continuing professional development (CPD): standards and audit Samantha Herelle, Health and Care Professions Council Friday 20 June 2014, London Borough.
LEO: LSHTM Ethics Online Patricia Henley Quality & Governance Manager London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Managing Sponsorship Research Services University of Oxford.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
RAISING ASPIRATIONS Work Experience Programme 13 th – 17 th July 2015.
The Research Project: ethical approval process
School of Psychology Online Ethics Guide No. 1 Submitting an application for ethical review. JRC/13/10/2014.
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
Funding Application Advice Session. BBC Children in Need "BBC Children in Need's vision is that every child in UK has a safe, happy and secure childhood.
Applying to a Research Ethics Committee
British Association of Dermatologists’ Biologics Intervention Register Approval Process July 2007.
STUDENT ASSOCIATION BUDGET WORKSHOP Please sign in at the front of the room.
CaSE CAREERS ADVICE AND STUDENT EMPLOYABILITY (CASE) WHAT WE DO – For Students By Andrea Popeau Thomas –
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Establishment and functioning of a REC Retha Britz.
Ethics and Regulatory Approvals Alison Robertson CMDHB Research Officer.
Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) New system for Research Ethics Committees Sure Start – April 2004 Joan Kirkbride OREC Manager for.
Revalidation Implementation for doctors in training Dr Lorna Burrows, National Revalidation Fellow, NHS South of England.
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices March 2006 Building Quality into the Financial Audit Process The NAO’s experience Gareth Caller.
Establishing a baseline of the seven day services clinical standards in acute care ‘A how to guide’ To activate the links in this slide set please view.
The work of the Research Ethics Committee Dr Carol Chu.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
GCP & ETHICS COMMITTEES Ravi Rengachari Vector Control Research Centre PONDICHERRY.
Cardiff and Vale UHB Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Caerdydd a’r Fro NHS R&D Overview How to avoid the common pitfalls? Thomas Fairman Research Liaison Manager.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Regulations & Processes.
Introduction to orientation MOVES FOLIO Course. Introduction- Orientation A key role for supervisors is to provide orientation (also known as induction)
Research Governance Dr. Sheila Francis
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
R&D – a perspective Dr Nana Theodorou Research Coordinator Sheffield Clinical Research Office.
Where does R&D fit? Dr Clara Kalu Senior Portfolio Co-ordinator UCL Students’ Research.
Breach reporting to the REC Catherine Blewett, HRA Improvement & Liaison Manager.
Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSSREC) April 2014.
Commissioning Surrey Healthwatch Update to the Health & Wellbeing Board 6 th September 2012.
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
Accessing the NHS for Research – NHS R&D Permissions Jemma Hughes R&D Manager ABMU Health Board.
LEO: LSHTM Ethics Online Patricia Henley Quality & Governance Manager Research Governance & Integrity Office London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
NRES Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Version 4.0 April 2009 Training Modules for Research Ethics Committee Co-ordinators Lynda McCormack, Co-ordinator.
IRAS: Workshop Mike Morgan, R&D Governance Officer.
Family Assessment Service Engagement Event 21 st August 2013 NWCE-9A3GPK.
Safety Audits An essential tool for active safety management April 2015 Dr Emer Bell Integrated Risk Solutions.
Finding a trainee position – advice and tips. If you have trouble finding a trainee position Make sure your CV stands out for the right reasons Your CV.
The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.
Governor Support Service Training Governor Workshop 31 st March 2016 As a service we have a responsibility to enable all governors to access appropriate,
Why Are Outcomes Important? Outcomes must be established to move our participants towards greater independence in the community in which they live.
Briefing on MHRA routine inspection of non-commercial clinical trials
Our Ethical Review Process
Paediatric Medicine: The Paediatric Investigation Plan
Public Participation Network
Public Participation Network
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
What’s Changing in Research Administration?
Research Ethics: a short guide for PhD students 2017/18
Registration and Assessment
And don’t forget… ethics and R&D
Compliance of Voluntary Organisations
TIBC Budget Formulation Improvement Project
Compliance of Voluntary Organisations
Timelines for research review in the UK
Presentation transcript:

The Research Ethics Process RPT Conference 28 th April 2006

Presentation Aims To explain how to use the process in order to apply for ethical approval To explain how to use the process in order to apply for ethical approval Clarify use of the online form Clarify use of the online form Clarify FAQs Clarify FAQs

What do you mean I have to complete the COREC form….. This is only: A little piece of research!! A little piece of research!! A simple study!! A simple study!! A questionnaire study!! A questionnaire study!! A staff study!! A staff study!! An observational study!! An observational study!!

What is a Research Ethics Committee (REC)? Lay, expert clinical and non-clinical members (Max 18 members, Hull currently have 16 inc. 5 lay members) Lay, expert clinical and non-clinical members (Max 18 members, Hull currently have 16 inc. 5 lay members) Provide independent advice to participants, researchers, funding bodies, sponsors, employers, care organisations and professionals on the extent to which proposals for research studies comply with recognised ethical standards Provide independent advice to participants, researchers, funding bodies, sponsors, employers, care organisations and professionals on the extent to which proposals for research studies comply with recognised ethical standards The purpose of a REC in reviewing the proposed study is to protect the dignity, rights, safety and well-being of all actual or potential research participants The purpose of a REC in reviewing the proposed study is to protect the dignity, rights, safety and well-being of all actual or potential research participants

EU Directive 2001/20/EC Requirements the directive sets for ethical review are: Requirements the directive sets for ethical review are: deliver a decision on a valid application within 60days deliver a decision on a valid application within 60days (valid application received the clock starts) one decision to be valid for the whole of the UK one decision to be valid for the whole of the UK one written request for clarification or further information to applicants (clock stops whilst waiting for response) one written request for clarification or further information to applicants (clock stops whilst waiting for response)

The Ethical Review process All RECs meet on a monthly basis to ensure that decisions can be made within the 60 day time frame. All RECs meet on a monthly basis to ensure that decisions can be made within the 60 day time frame. Applicants will be invited to attend the meeting in support of their applications (attendance is not compulsory) Applicants will be invited to attend the meeting in support of their applications (attendance is not compulsory)

The Ethics Review Process Contact appropriate R&D dept Contact appropriate R&D dept Write Research Protocol / Proposal Write Research Protocol / Proposal Complete COREC On-line form & R&D On-line form Complete COREC On-line form & R&D On-line form Submit to REC with Supporting Documents Submit to REC with Supporting Documents Ethical Review Carried out by Committee -- after Favourable Opinion Ethical Review Carried out by Committee -- after Favourable Opinion Trust Approval gained Trust Approval gained

The COREC On-Line Form Print off Guidance for Applicants document as reference tool Print off Guidance for Applicants document as reference tool Use link to create a tailor made application form Use link to create a tailor made application form Input user name and a pass word to create your own secure account Input user name and a pass word to create your own secure account

The Filter Page 6 Questions 6 Questions IMPORTANT! Answer carefully as these questions determine the pages of the form IMPORTANT! Answer carefully as these questions determine the pages of the form -- The information icon allows applicant to clarify each question -- The information icon allows applicant to clarify each question

The COREC On-Line Form REC Reference number & Submission date – complete form and enter this information later REC Reference number & Submission date – complete form and enter this information later Answer all Questions in Full Answer all Questions in Full Section A59 – Sponsor details Application not valid without this information Section A59 – Sponsor details Application not valid without this information

The COREC On-Line Form Section A35 – 36 Indemnity Application not valid without this information Section A35 – 36 Indemnity Application not valid without this information Signatures in Ink – Application not valid without the signatures Signatures in Ink – Application not valid without the signatures Separate Research Protocol / Proposal document Separate Research Protocol / Proposal document

Supporting Documents REC must review all documents to be used in the study REC must review all documents to be used in the study Version number and date on supporting documents– document not valid without this information Version number and date on supporting documents– document not valid without this information CV for Chief Investigator (& Ed. Supervisor if student application) CV for Chief Investigator (& Ed. Supervisor if student application)

Ready for Submission? When documents are complete a REC Reference number can be allocated When documents are complete a REC Reference number can be allocated If CTIMP study application must be booked through Central Allocations System ( ) If CTIMP study application must be booked through Central Allocations System ( ) If other study book direct with LREC (Hull ) If other study book direct with LREC (Hull )

Deadline Date LREC Must receive application documents before the deadline date (submission date) in order to process the documents and prepare them for review by committee members LREC Must receive application documents before the deadline date (submission date) in order to process the documents and prepare them for review by committee members Deadline date is the VERY LAST date documents can be submitted Deadline date is the VERY LAST date documents can be submitted

Validation Process LREC Coordinator carries out validation process LREC Coordinator carries out validation process If application not valid then documents will be returned to investigator with letter If application not valid then documents will be returned to investigator with letter If application valid – put forward to the next meeting and information sent out to all members for reading If application valid – put forward to the next meeting and information sent out to all members for reading

THE LREC Meeting All members review all studies All members review all studies Lead 1 and Lead 2 reviewers allocated to look at each study in detail Lead 1 and Lead 2 reviewers allocated to look at each study in detail Investigator in attendance – answer questions – saves time Investigator in attendance – answer questions – saves time No decision given at meeting No decision given at meeting

Decisions Favourable Opinion Favourable Opinion Provisional Opinion Provisional Opinion Unfavourable Opinion Unfavourable Opinion No decision – Expert Referee Opinion Sought No decision – Expert Referee Opinion Sought

Conditions of Approval Adverse Events Reports Adverse Events Reports Protocol Amendments Protocol Amendments Annual Progress Report Annual Progress Report Declaration of End of Study Declaration of End of Study Final Report Final Report

Dont Panic!! LREC Office is open 9am – 4.30pm LREC Office is open 9am – 4.30pm Room SC39 Coniston House Willerby (HMHT NHS Trust HQ) Room SC39 Coniston House Willerby (HMHT NHS Trust HQ) Happy to help Happy to help