More about 802.11. 802.11 channels In 802.11 b/g, there are 11 channels, starting at 2.412GHz at a spacing of 5MHz. Each channel owns a bandwidth of 22MHz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Speaker Fu-Yuan Chuang Advisor Ho-Ting Wu Date
Advertisements

Doc.:IEEE /321r0 Submission May 2002 Y. Liu, et al Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation Yonghe Liu, Jin-meng Ho, Matthew B. Shoemake, Jie Liang.
QoS In WLAN By Abdulbaset Hassan Muneer Bazama. Outline Introduction QoS Parameters medium access control schemes (MAC) e medium access.
WLAN QoS Ronald Lucas. Introduction With the emergence of Voice Over IP, requirements to support Voice Over IP over Wireless LAN’s without degradation.
Achieving Quality of Service in Wireless Networks A simulation comparison of MAC layer protocols. CS444N Presentation By: Priyank Garg Rushabh Doshi.
Session: IT 601: Mobile Computing IEEE e Prof. Anirudha Sahoo IIT Bombay.
Improving IEEE WLAN: QoS and Throughput Perspective Sunghyun Choi, Ph.D. Assistant Professor School of Electrical Engineering Seoul National University.
IEEE802.11e Enhanced MAC for QoS and Efficiency  What is QoS and why do we need it?  Overview of e  EDCA, TXOP, Traffic classes, burst ACKs 
Distributed Control Algorithms for Service Differentiation in Wireless Packet Networks Michael Barry, Andrew T Campbell, Andras Veres
Submission Kai Kang, SHRCWC May 2013 A Mechanism to Provide QoS in IEEE e MAC Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Presented by Scott Kristjanson CMPT-820 Multimedia Systems Instructor: Dr. Mohamed Hefeeda 1 Cross-Layer Wireless Multimedia.
1 Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std e TM November 2005.
Evaluate IEEE e EDCA Performance Tyler Ngo CMPE 257.
IEEE e QoS on WLANs Speaker : Min-Hua Yang Advisor : Ho-Ting Wu Date: 10/25/05.
802.11n MAC layer simulation Submitted by: Niv Tokman Aya Mire Oren Gur-Arie.
WiFi Models EE 228A Lecture 5 Teresa Tung and Jean Walrand
1 QoS Schemes for IEEE Wireless LAN – An Evaluation by Anders Lindgren, Andreas Almquist and Olov Schelen Presented by Tony Sung, 10 th Feburary.
802.11g & e Presenter : Milk. Outline g  Overview of g  g & b co-exist QoS Limitations of e  Overview of.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
QoS of Voice over with NS simulator Prepared by: Yoshpa Benny Shraer Alexander Vainer Albert Instructors: Prof. Reuven Cohen Mr. Itai Dabran.
PLANETE group, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis July 1, 2003 Adaptive Channel allocation for QoS Enhancement in IEEE Wireless LANs Presented by: Mohammad.
1 Real-Time Traffic over the IEEE Medium Access Control Layer Tian He J. Sobrinho and A. krishnakumar.
Providing QoS in Ad Hoc Networks with Distributed Resource Reservation IEEE802.11e and extensions Ulf Körner and Ali Hamidian.
Voice over WiFi R 張素熒 R 朱原陞 R 王振宇
Voice Capacity analysis over Introducing VoIP and WLans IEEE based Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) are becoming popular While WLANs.
IEEE EDCF: a QoS Solution for WLAN Javier del Prado 1, Sunghyun Choi 2 and Sai Shankar 1 1 Philips Research USA - Briarcliff Manor, NY 2 Seoul National.
Admission Control and Scheduling for QoS Guarantees for Variable-Bit-Rate Applications on Wireless Channels I-Hong Hou P.R. Kumar University of Illinois,
Doc.: IEEE /065r0 Submission January 2001 Brockmann, Hoeben, Wentink (Intersil) g MAC Analysis Menzo Wentink Ron Brockmann.
Doc.: IEEE /1077r1 Submission Sep 2013 Slide 1 EDCA Enhancements for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddress Phone Hui
The Delay Distribution of IEEE e EDCA and DCF IPCCC 2006 April , Phoenix, Arizona Paal E. Engelstad UniK / Telenor R&D Olav.
1 Real-Time Traffic over the IEEE Medium Access Control Layer Tian He.
Access Delay Distribution Estimation in Networks Avideh Zakhor Joint work with: E. Haghani and M. Krishnan.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0221r1 Mar 2013 BroadcomSlide QoS Queue Architecture and Possible 802.1bz Bridge Model Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1263r2 Submission Dec 2009 Z. Chen, C. Zhu et al [Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving] Date: Authors: Slide.
Quality of Service Schemes for IEEE Wireless LANs-An Evaluation 主講人 : 黃政偉.
802.11e EDCA WLN 2005 Sydney, Nov Paal E. Engelstad (presenter) UniK / Telenor R&D Olav N. Østerbø Telenor R&D
A Theory of QoS for Wireless I-Hong Hou Vivek Borkar P.R. Kumar University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Using in an FTTP Application. FTTP Application.
November 2000 Jin-Meng Ho, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /367 Submission p-DCF for Prioritized MAC Service Jin-Meng Ho, Sid Schrum, and.
doc.: IEEE /409r0 Submission March 2002 Mathilde BenvenisteSlide 1 Persistence Factors in EDCF Mathilde Benveniste
Doc.: IEEE /577r0 Submission July 2003 Qiang NI, Pierre Ansel, Thierry Turletti, INRIASlide 1 A Fair Scheduling Scheme for HCF Qiang Ni, Pierre.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0221r0 Feb 2013 BroadcomSlide QoS Queue Architecture and Possible 802.1bz Bridge Model Date: Authors:
Balancing Uplink and Downlink Delay of VoIP Traffic in WLANs
IEEE e Performance Evaluation
UL OFDMA Random Access Control
Idle sense.
QoS Handling of Trigger Frame
IEEE : Wireless LANs ALOHA, Slotted ALOHA
Design of medical-grade wireless LAN
Proposal for a separate QAP EDCF parameter set
QoS Tutorial Date: Authors: Nov 2008 Nov 2008
Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA
[Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving]
Speaker:Fu-Yuan Chuang Advisor:Ho-Ting Wu Date:
[Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving]
Simulation for EDCF Enhancement Comparison
QoS Provisioning for IEEE MAC Protocols
EDCA Parameters for WAVE
Enhanced IEEE by Integrating Multiuser Dynamic OFDMA
802.11e QoS Tutorial Date: Authors: Nov 2008 Nov 2008
EDCA Enhancements for HEW
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
Student : Min-Hua Yang Advisor : Ho-Ting Wu Date :
Alternate EDCA Parameter Set
802.11e QoS Tutorial Date: Authors: Oct 2008 Oct 2008
Infocom 2004 Speaker : Bo-Chun Wang
Coex Simulation and Analysis
CID 1195 Date: Authors: August 2018
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Wireless MAC Multimedia Extensions Albert Banchs, Witold Pokorski
Presentation transcript:

More about

channels In b/g, there are 11 channels, starting at 2.412GHz at a spacing of 5MHz. Each channel owns a bandwidth of 22MHz. So, only 3 non-overlapping channels, 1,6, a has more channels and you may check at

802.11a/g modulation From wiki:

802.11e e has been proposed as an enhancement for There are many things proposed in , we are going to discuss the Quality of service (QoS). There are different types of traffic – Data: usually large volume, but no specific requirements for deadline. Better not lose it. – VoIP: small in volume (a VoIP session may need only 16Kbps or even less with some data processing), but very sensitive to delay. If passed the deadline, dropping is fine. – Video: large volume. but very sensitive to delay. If passed the deadline, dropping is fine. – …

QoS Two kinds of QoS. – Give guaranteed bounds, such as “the delay will be no more than 10ms for the VoIP packets, but the delay will be no more than 1s for the data packets.” – Give prioritized service, such as “when I have both a VoIP packet and a data packet, I will choose to serve the VoIP packet with probability 0.90.”

Priorities There are 8 priorities defined in e. – Voice – Video – Best Effort – Background

Access Category (AC) Provides 4 Access Categories (AC). – AC_VO – AC_VI – AC_BE – AC_BK Defined EDCA to provide prioritized service. How?

EDCA The basic idea is to let higher priority packets have – Shorter IFS – Smaller contention window

EDCA Each station maintains 4 queues, one for each AC. Internally, each AC contends for access the transmitter. The AC that wins will be the next packets to be sent.

EDCA AC_VO: – AIFS = SIFS + 2 * SLOT (QSTA), AIFS = SIFS + SLOT (QAP), – CWmin = (aCWmin+1)/4 – CWmax = (aCWmin+1)/2 AC_VI: – AIFS = SIFS + 2 * SLOT (QSTA), AIFS = SIFS + SLOT (QAP), – CWmin = (aCWmin+1)/2 – CWmax = aCWmin AC_BE: – AIFS = SIFS + 3 * SLOT – CWmin = aCWmin – CWmax = aCWmax AC_BK: – AIFS = SIFS + 7 * SLOT – CWmin = aCWmin – CWmax = aCWmax

TXOP (Transmission Opportunity) Another key feature is the Transmission Opportunity. In DCF, if there is one node at 6Mbps and the other at 54Mbps, both loaded with traffic to the AP sent in 1500-byte packets. Assume the AP does not have downlink traffic. What will the average network speed like? Closer to 6Mbps, at 30Mbps, or closer to 54Mbps?

TXOP Closer to 6Mbps – every time the slow node gets a chance to transmit, it uses about 2ms. Every time the fast node gets a chance to send, it uses about 300us. But they gets equal opportunity to send! So, a slow node can drag down the speed of the entire network.

TXOP So, TXOP is something quite reasonable to have. Every node, when gets a chance to send, can send for no more than a TXOP length. For a fast node, it may use the TXOP to send multiple packets. The packet is followed by SIFS then an ACK then SIFS then another packet – no need to backoff. For a slow node, it can transmit only for this long. It may have to fragment the packet if the packet cannot be fit in a TXOP length. So, everyone is competing for an equal share of air time.

TXOP The length of the TXOP: 1.5ms, 3ms for g/a; 3ms, 6ms for b.