Test-beam Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector Carsten Rott Daniela Bortoletto, Gino Bolla, Amitava Roy Purdue University 28 April 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance of Silicon Pixels after Radiation Daniela Bortoletto Gino Bolla Amitava Roy Carsten Rott.
Advertisements

Collection Of Plots for A Testbeam Paper. List of Possible Plots R/Phi resolution, charge sharing, noise etc. Noise performance and few Landau distributions.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
Development of an Active Pixel Sensor Vertex Detector H. Matis, F. Bieser, G. Rai, F. Retiere, S. Wurzel, H. Wieman, E. Yamamato, LBNL S. Kleinfelder,
1 Status of the CMS Pixel project Lorenzo Uplegger RD07 Florence 28 June 2007.
Update on Analysis of FNAL TB09 Jianchun Wang for the group Syracuse Univesity Jan 29 th,2010.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
For the RD42 Collaboration
VELO Beamtest Trigger VELO meeting 08/12/2005 Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
Testbeam 2010 with CAPTAN System Jianchun Wang Syracuse University.
Status on Testbeam Analysis Jianchun Wang Syracuse University VELO meeting, August 28, 2007.
Test of Pixel Sensors for the CMS experiment Amitava Roy Purdue University.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Slide 1 sCVD Diamond for the CMS Pixel Detector May 2004 R.Stone, Rutgers J.Doroshenko, L.Perera, S.Schnetzer RD42 Collaboration Meeting Overview.
4/28/01APS1 Test of Forward Pixel Sensors for the CMS experiment Amitava Roy Daniela Bortoletto Gino Bolla Carsten Rott Purdue University.
November 3-8, 2002D. Bortoletto - Vertex Silicon Sensors for CMS Daniela Bortoletto Purdue University Grad students: Kim Giolo, Amit Roy, Seunghee.
Jianchun Wang Marina Artuso Syracuse University 11/06/00 MC Simulation of Silicon Pixel Detector.
Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April DS ROD Prototype: “final” optohybrids “final” CCUM integrated in the rod with new FEC_to_CCUM adapter (Guido.
Genova/Pavia/Roma Flavio Gatti, PSI, July 1st, Timing Counter july 2004.
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
Si Pixel Tracking Detectors Introduction Sensor Readout Chip Mechanical Issues Performance -Diamond.
First Results from Cherwell, a CMOS sensor for Particle Physics By James Mylroie-Smith
Calibration of the calorimeter by punch-through muons and cosmic muons Doroshenko M. E391 collaboration.
SLHC Sensors at Meson Test Ryan Rivera ESE/CD, Fermilab All-Experimenter’s Meeting April 19, 2010.
3D-FBK pixel sensors with CMS readout: first tests results M. Obertino, A. Solano, A. Vilela Pereira, E. Alagoz, J. Andresen, K. Arndt, G. Bolla, D. Bortoletto,
Summary of CMS 3D pixel sensors R&D Enver Alagoz 1 On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration 1 Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
11 Wish list for July May testbeam Keep It (Stupidly) Simple..
Sensor Choice The story here is surely damage – See that silicon worked well in the PLT test until we shifted the timing to optimize diamond Reducing BX.
Recent developments on Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS) for charged particle tracking. Outline The MAPS sensor (reminder) MIMOSA-22, a fast MAPS-sensor.
First tests of CHERWELL, a Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor. A CMOS Image Sensor (CIS) using 180 nm technology James Mylroie-Smith Queen Mary, University.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Charge Sharing & Hit Identification & Cluster Information.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
G. BrunoOffline week - February Comparison between test- beam data and the SPD simulations in Aliroot G. Bruno, R. Santoro Outline:  strategy of.
Report on CMS 3D sensor tests Enver Alagoz 1 On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration 1 Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Forward Pixel Beamtest Analysis Carsten Rott Purdue University Januar 24, 2001.
IEEE October 16-22, 2004 First Look at the Beam Test Results of the FPIX2 Readout Chip for the BTeV Silicon Pixel Detector First Look at the Beam Test.
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
Test of Single Crystal Diamond Pixel Detector at Fermilab MTEST Simon Kwan Fermilab April 28, 2010.
David Hutchcroft 1 VELO software. Lite clusters in Kalman fit 2 The VELO clusters are available both as a lite and “full” version Two consecutive blocks.
May 14, 2001C.Rott1 The CMS Forward Pixel Detector Carsten Rott Purdue University May 14, 2001.
Vertex detector update 1 Oct Y. Sugimoto KEK.
Nantes — 2008, July Analysis of results from EmCal beam test at CERN PS (and SPS) energies P. La Rocca & F. Riggi University & INFN Catania University.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
J. Brau LCWS 2006 March, J. Brau LCWS Bangalore March, 2006 C. Baltay, W. Emmet, H. Neal, D. Rabinowitz Yale University Jim Brau, O. Igonkina,
Performance of Silicon Pixels at -5 & -10 C after Radiation Daniela Bortoletto Gino Bolla Amitava Roy Carsten Rott.
Tracking at the Fermilab Test Beam Facility Matthew Jones, Lorenzo Uplegger April 29 th Infieri Workshop.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
Irradiated 3D sensor testbeam results Alex Krzywda On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration Purdue University March 15, 2012.
FBK 3D CMS pixel sensors preliminary lab measurements E. Alagoz 1, A. Krzywda 1, D. Bortoletto 1, I. Shipsey 1, G. Bolla 1, and G. F. Dalla Betta 2, M.
10/25/2007Nick Sinev, ALCPG07, FNAL, October Simulation of charge collection in chronopixel device Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
BTeV Beam Test Results Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing J.A. Appel, J.N. Butler, G. Cardoso, H. Cheung, G. Chiodini, D.C. Christian, E.E.
NA62 Collaboration Meeting – Anacapri 1 September 2009 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Aras Papadelis. NIKHEF 1 Aras Papadelis B-physics meeting 15/ Results from the Nov2004 VELO test beam (and what followed…)
Pixel Offline Status Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 10/28/04, Pixel testbeam meeting.
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
Daniela Bortoletto, Amitava Roy, Carsten Rott, Gino Bolla
Design and Characterization of a Novel, Radiation-Resistant Active Pixel Sensor in a Standard 0.25 m CMOS Technology P.P. Allport, G. Casse, A. Evans,
Saikat Biswas, A. Abuhoza, U. Frankenfeld, C. Garabatos,
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Presentation transcript:

Test-beam Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector Carsten Rott Daniela Bortoletto, Gino Bolla, Amitava Roy Purdue University 28 April 2001

Test-beam Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector Carsten Rott Daniela Bortoletto Gino Bolla Amitava Roy Purdue University 28 April 2001

Pixels/blade 24 Blades/disk The CMS Detector APS 2001 C. Rott Barrel + Forward Pixel Disks FPIX-Disk

The Pixel Detector 150  m x  m pixel thickness 270  m 22x30 pixel array rad. hard DMILL ROC APS 2001 C. Rott

Telescope   Beam Si-Strips vertical Si-Strips horizontal Scint. Counters   X/Y-Fibers 1mm Dia. few mm 2 Extrapolated track  x = 2.0  m  y = 3.6  m  Pixel Detector and Repeater Card APS 2001 C. Rott 250GeV/c pion beam Repeater card can be rotated Can trigger on region as. small as 1mm 2

Charge sharing comparison Charge sharing between rows (rotated by 20 o ) Charge sharing between rows (not rotated) 150  m APS 2001 C. Rott PH is 12bit ADC value Charge sharing is increased by rotating the sensor Charge sharing can be used to improve the resolution

 distribution Position correction curve APS 2001 C. Rott  is the difference of the fraction of charge deposited in the neighboring pixel A is a normalization factor  vs position ( 20 o rotation angle)

Resolution Resolution in micron between rows (rotated by 20 o ) Resolution in micron between rows (not rotated) APS 2001 C. Rott

Resolution APS 2001 C. Rott 0 0 rotation 20 0 rotation Highest resolution for large charge sharing and hits in between pixel

Signal height: Noise: Signal to noise ratio of 60 S/N and Efficiency APS 2001 C. Rott An absolute efficiency could not be measured because of a time stamp problem. A strong correlation between tracked position and pixel hit position, suggests high efficiency.

Conclusions Charge sharing can improve the resolution Resolution at 20 0 rotation  m Resolution at 0 0 rotation  m Resolution is position dependent S/N = 60 High efficiency APS 2001 C. Rott