GOES-R AWG 2 nd Validation Workshop 9-10 January 2014, College Park, MD GOES-R and JPSS SST Monitoring System Sasha Ignatov, Prasanjit Dash, Xingming Liang,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JPSS and GOES-R SST Sasha Ignatov
Advertisements

15 May 2009ACSPO v1.10 GAC1 ACSPO upgrade to v1.10 Effective Date: 04 March 2009 Sasha Ignatov, XingMing Liang, Yury Kihai, Boris Petrenko, John Stroup.
March 6, 2013iQuam v21 In situ Quality Monitor (iQuam) version 2 Near-real time online Quality Control, Monitoring, and Data Serving tool for SST Cal/Val.
Pathfinder –> MODIS -> VIIRS Evolution of a CDR Robert Evans, Peter Minnett, Guillermo Podesta Kay Kilpatrick (retired), Sue Walsh, Vicki Halliwell, Liz.
GHRSST XI Science Team Meeting, ST-VAL, June 2010, Lima, Peru Recent developments to the SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) and SST validation with In situ.
1 Overview LTSRF Status GHRSST Reanalysis Example L4 Analyses Future Activities GlobColour Connection Villefranche sur mer,
Satellite SST Radiance Assimilation and SST Data Impacts James Cummings Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA Sea Surface Temperature Science.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder SST field, Versions 5 & 6 Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’ RSMAS Nov 8, 2010 with.
8 November 2010SST Science Team Meeting1 Towards Community Consensus SSTs and Clear-Sky Radiances from AVHRR SST Science Team Meeting 8-10 November 2010,
1 High Resolution Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis Errors Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University)
NOAA Climate Obs 4th Annual Review Silver Spring, MD May 10-12, NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center 1.SSTs for Daily SST OI NOAA’s National.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 NOAA Operational Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Products from NOAA.
1 Improved Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analyses for Climate NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Thomas M. Smith Richard W. Reynolds Kenneth.
1 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center April 2005 Climate Observation Program Blended SST Analysis Changes and Implications for the Buoy Network 1.Plans.
Introduction Land surface temperature (LST) measurement is important for understanding climate change, modeling the hydrological and biogeochemical cycles,
4 June 2009GHRSST-X STM - SQUAM1 The SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) 10 th GHRSST Science Team Meeting 1-5 June 2009, Santa Rosa, CA Alexander “Sasha” Ignatov*,
CPC Unified Gauge – Satellite Merged Precipitation Analysis for Improved Monitoring and Assessments of Global Climate Pingping Xie, Soo-Hyun Yoo,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 CLOUD MASK AND QUALITY CONTROL FOR SST WITHIN THE ADVANCED CLEAR SKY PROCESSOR.
S-NPP EDR Validated Maturity Readiness Review 3-4 September 2014, College Park, MD Validated Stage 3 SST Maturity Review Alexander Ignatov And STAR JPSS.
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Robert H. Evans & Peter J. Minnett Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 MAP (Maximum A Posteriori) x is reduced state vector [SST(x), TCWV(w)]
GHRSST, V1, CGMS 41 July 2013 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Add CGMS agency logo here (in the slide master) Coordination Group.
Number of match-ups Mean Anomaly Fig. 3. Time-series of night MUT SST anomaly statistics compared to daily OISST SST. SST from different platforms mostly.
Quantifying the effect of ambient cloud on clear-sky ocean brightness temperatures and SSTs Korak Saha 1,2, Alexander Ignatov 1, and XingMing Liang 1,2.
DMI-OI analysis in the Arctic DMI-OI processing scheme or Arctic Arctic bias correction method Arctic L4 Reanalysis Biases (AATSR – Pathfinder) Validation.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 In Situ SST for Satellite Cal/Val and Quality Control Alexander Ignatov.
GHRSST XIV STM – AUS TAG. Woods Hole 18 June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 1 GHRSST 2013 Annual Meeting – AUS TAG breakout session 18 June, 2013, Woods Hole, MA SQUAM.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Team Sasha Ignatov (STAR)
1 SST Near-Real Time Online Validation Tools Sasha Ignatov (STAR) AWG Annual Meeting June 2011, Ft Collins, CO.
Monitoring/Validation of HR SSTs in SQUAM GHRSST-XV, 2-6 June 2014, Cape Town, South Africa 1 The 15 th GHRSST 2014 meeting, ST-VAL Breakout session 2–6.
Which VIIRS product to use: ACSPO vs. NAVO GHRSST-XV, 2-6 June 2014, Cape Town, South Africa 1 Prasanjit Dash 1,2, Alex Ignatov 1, Yuri Kihai 1,3, John.
1 RTM/NWP-BASED SST ALGORITHMS FOR VIIRS USING MODIS AS A PROXY B. Petrenko 1,2, A. Ignatov 1, Y. Kihai 1,3, J. Stroup 1,4, X. Liang 1,5 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR,
A system for satellite LST product monitoring and retrieval algorithm evaluation Peng Yu 12, Yunyue Yu 2, Zhuo Wang 12, and Yuling Liu 12 1 ESSIC/CICS,
AQUA AMSR-E MODIS POES AVHRR TRMM TMI ENVISAT AATSR GOES Imager Multi-sensor Improved SST (MISST) for GODAE Part I: Chelle Gentemann, Gary Wick Part II:
GHRSST XI Meeting, IC-TAG Breakout Session, 22 June 2010, Lima, Peru Cross-monitoring of L4 SST fields in the SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM)
Retrieval Algorithms The derivations for each satellite consist of two steps: 1) cloud detection using a Bayesian Probabilistic Cloud Mask; and 2) application.
Request for SST Beta Maturity 23 February 2013, College Park, MD Request for SST Beta Maturity Sasha Ignatov – SST Lead John Stroup – SST Technical Liaison.
GHRSST XIV Science Team Meeting. Woods Hole June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 1 GHRSST 2013 Annual Meeting 17–21 June, 2013, Woods Hole, MA Preliminary analyses.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Monitoring of IR Clear-sky Radiances over Oceans for SST (MICROS) Alexander.
24 January th AMS Symposium on Future Operational Environmental Satellite Systems 22 – 26 January 2012, New Orleans, LA NPP VIIRS SST Algorithm.
2 November 2011JPSS SST at STAR 1 2 nd NASA SST Science Team Meeting 2 – 4 November 2011, Miami Beach, FL Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) SST Algorithm.
Quality Flags: Two separate sets of QFs are provided in IDPS Product: (1) SST QFs; and (2) VIIRS Cloud Mask. Analyses were aimed at identifying a suitable.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Ship SST data for satellite SST and ocean.
GHRSST HL_TAG meeting Copenhagen, March 2010 Validation of L2P products in the Arctic Motivation: Consistent inter-satellite validation of L2p SST observations.
AQUA AMSR-E MODIS POES AVHRR TRMM TMI ENVISAT AATSR GOES Imager Multi-sensor Improved SST (MISST) for GODAE Part I: Chelle Gentemann, Gary Wick Part II:
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Advanced Clear-Sky Processor.
Use of high resolution global SST data in operational analysis and assimilation systems at the UK Met Office. Matt Martin, John Stark,
International GHRSST User Symposium Santa Rosa, California, USA 28-29th May 2009 MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures Peter J Minnett & Robert H. Evans With.
1 March 2011iQuam GHRSST DV-WG, HL-TAG and ST-VAL Meeting 28 February – 2 March 2011, Boulder, CO In situ Quality Monitor (iQuam) Near-real time.
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS JMA’s Cal/Val activities Presented to CGMS-44 Working Group.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder Versions 5 & 6 SST field to various reference fields Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’
Uncertainty estimation from first principles: The future of SSES? Gary Corlett (University of Leicester) Chris Merchant (University of Edinburgh)
Prototyping SST Retrievals from GOES-R ABI with MSG SEVIRI Data Nikolay V. Shabanov 1,2, (301)
29 May 2009GHRSST User's Symp - SQUAM1 The SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) 1 st GHRSST Int’l User’s Symposium May 2009, Santa Rosa, CA Alexander “Sasha”
Validation of MTSAT-1R SST for the TWP+ Experiment Leon Majewski 1, Jon Mittaz 2, George Kruger 1,3, Helen Beggs 3, Andy Harris 2, Sandra Castro 4 1 Observations.
GSICS Telecon July 2012 AVHRR, MODIS, VIIRS Radiance Monitoring in MICROS and GSICS help to SST Sasha Ignatov.
Monitoring of SST Radiances
Joint GRWG and GDWG Meeting February 2010, Toulouse, France
SST – GSICS Connections
NOAA Report on Ocean Parameters - SST Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 9 Author: Sasha Ignatov.
Progress toward DCC Demo product
Extending MICROS to include Solar Reflectance Bands (SRB)
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
DCC inter-calibration of Himawari-8/AHI VNIR bands
Using Double Differences in MICROS for Cross-Sensor Consistency Checks
Towards Understanding and Resolving Cross-Platform Biases in MICROS
Radiometric Consistency between AVHRR, MODIS, and VIIRS in SST Bands
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
Why use NWP for GSICS? It is crucial for climate and very desirable for NWP that we understand the characteristics of satellite radiance biases Simultaneous.
Presentation transcript:

GOES-R AWG 2 nd Validation Workshop 9-10 January 2014, College Park, MD GOES-R and JPSS SST Monitoring System Sasha Ignatov, Prasanjit Dash, Xingming Liang, Feng Xu, Yury Kihai, Xinjia Zhou With support from John Sapper, John Stroup, Boris Petrenko, Marouan Boauli 9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation1

SQUAM - SST Quality Monitor Monitor SST Products (L2, L3, L4) for Self- and Cross- Consistency; Validate against in situ SSTs ( i Quam) i Quam - In situ Quality Monitor QC in situ SSTs, Monitor on Web, Distribute to users Input to SQUAM MICROS - Monitoring IR Clear-sky Radiances over Oceans for SST Monitor Clear-sky ocean radiances for Self- and Cross- Consistency; Validate against CRTM simulations NOAA JPSS and GOES-R Cal/Val Tools 9 January 20142GOES-R SST Validation SST Community Resources, Support JPSS and GOES-R

3 Principles of NOAA SST Monitoring 9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation Monitor automatically, in Near-Real Time, Globally, Online -Satellite SSTs against reference SST -Satellite sensor radiances associated with SST -Reference SSTs (in situ, L4) Monitor GOES-R and JPSS SST products in context of other community SST products Monitor deviations from a reference state (expected to be centered at zero, and have a narrow Gaussian distribution) Supplement heritage VAL against in situ SST (sparse, geographically biased, suboptimal quality, not available in NRT) with global consistency checks against another reference, L4 analysis fields (global coverage, large statistics, more uniform data quality, available in NRT)

SST Monitoring in SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) 9 January 20144GOES-R SST Validation Das, et al: SST Quality Monitor. JTECH, 2010.

DAY: VIIRS L2 minus OSTIA L4 28 December 2013 Deviation from Reference SST is flat & close to 0 Residual Cloud/Aerosol leakages seen as cold spots Warm spots show areas with diurnal warming during daytime 9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation5

DAY: VIIRS L2 minus in situ SST 28 December 2013 Much fewer match-ups with in situ data than with L4 Validation statistics may not be globally representative Daily validation statistics may not be accurate and stable 9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation6

DAY: VIIRS L2 minus OSTIA L4 28 December 2013 Shape close to Gaussian but skewed positively due to diurnal warming Domain & Performance Stats close to expected 9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation7

DAY: VIIRS L2 minus in situ SST 28 December 2013 Shape close to Gaussian Domain & Performance Stats better than spec 9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation8

DAY 28 December 2013 – Summary NOBSMin/ MaxMean/ STDMed/ RSDSkew/ Kurt 117,600, / / / / +7.9 ΔT = “VIIRS minus OSTIA” SST 9 January 2014 NOBSMin/ MaxMean/ STDMed/ RSDSkew/ Kurt 1, / / / / +2.8 ΔT = “VIIRS minus in situ” SST 9GOES-R SST Validation

DAY STD DEV wrt. In situ SST Outliers come from satellite and in situ data IDPS shows larger STD although improved recently 9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation10 Daily val against in situ SST is noisy due to small match-up sample & lack of global coverage IDPS SST improved recently but has been out of family for the full 2 years of monitoring

DAY STD DEV wrt. Reynolds L4 9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation11 IDPS shows much larger STD IDPS SST has been out of family but improved in mid Still significantly deviates from family, but less than earlier in the mission

DAY STD DEV wrt. OSTIA L4 9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation12 IDPS shows much larger STD Comparison with OSTIA SST suggest the same qualitative observations as against Reynolds and in situ, although quantitatively, comparison statistics may differ

VIIRS, MODIS, and AVHRR Radiance Monitoring in MICROS 9 January Liang, Ignatov: Monitoring IR Clear-Sky Radiances over Oceans for SST. JTECH, GOES-R SST Validation

Model minus Observation (“M-O”) Biases -M (Model) = Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) simulated TOA Brightness Temperatures (w/ Reynolds SST, GFS profiles as input) -O (Observation) = Clear-Sky sensor (AVHRR, MODIS, VIIRS) BTs Double Differences (“DD”) for Cross-Platform Consistency -“M” used as a “Transfer Standard” -DDs cancel out/minimize effect of systematic errors & instabilities in BTs arising from e.g. -Errors/Instabilities in Reynolds SST & GFS -Missing aerosol -Possible systemic biases in CRTM -Updates to ACSPO algorithm M-O Biases and Double Differences (“DD”) 9 January GOES-R SST Validation

All AVHRRs (except N16 and Metop-B), MODISs, and VIIRS are now consistent to within ±0.1K VIIRS Cal change 7 Mar 2012 reset by +0.14K – now better in family Before 13 Sep 2012: Terra & Aqua/MODIS were biased by -0.6K (suboptimal CRTM coeffs in v2.02) Both are back in family now, after CRTM V2.1 implemented on 13 Sep 2012 Metop–B out of family by ~+0.3 K (likely due to suboptimal CRTM coefficients in CRTM V2.1) N16: unstable and out of family CRTM V2.1 implemented Metop-B: out of family Double Differences in IR11 (VIIRS M15) 9 January VIIRS recalibration GOES-R SST Validation

All AVHRRs, MODISs and NPP/VIIRS SSTs are consistent to within ±0.1K As a result of VIIRS Cal Change on 7 Mar 2012, VIIRS SST went out of family Was brought back in family when new SST coefficients implemented 3 May 2012 CRTM update resulted regression SSTs more noise, and the new coefficients have been implemented since Dec More data is needed to understand their performance N16: unstable and out of family VIIRS recalibrationCRTM V2.1 implemented Double Differences in SST 9 January New Reg. Coeff. used GOES-R SST Validation

In situ SST QC & Monitoring in iQuam 9 January Xu, Ignatov: In situ SST Quality Monitor. JTECH, GOES-R SST Validation

9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation18 In situ Quality Monitor (iQuam) performs the following functions  QC: Accurate/flexible QC of in situ SSTs, consistent with wider Meteorological and Oceanographic communities  Monitoring: Report online statistical summaries of in situ minus reference L4 SST (stratified by ships, drifters, tropical & coastal moored, ARGO floats; and individual platforms)  Data Serving: Serve QCed in situ SST data online for SST community Objectives of in situ SST Quality Monitor

9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation19 Quality Control – Consistent with UK MO CategoryCheckType of error handledPhysical basis PreprocessingDuplicate Removal Duplicates arise from multiple transmission or data set merging Identical space/time/ID PlausibilityPlausibility checks Unreasonable field valuesRange of single fields & Relationships among them Internal consistency TrackingPoints falling out of trackTravel speed exceeds limit Spike checkDiscontinuities in SST time series along track SST gradient exceeds limit External consistency Reference Check Measurements deviating far away from reference Bayesian approach (*) (Ref. SST: Daily OI SST v2) Mutual consistency Cross- platform Check Mutual verification with nearby measurements (“buddies check”) Bayesian approach (*) based on space/time correlation of SST field (Correlation model: 2-scale SOAR, Martin et al., 2002) (*) Lorenc and Hammon, 1988; Ingleby and Haddleston, 2007

9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation20

9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation21 Monthly Statistical Summaries Outliers detected by each QC check Moments of ΔT S =T in situ - T Reynolds Histograms of ΔT S

9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation22 Time Series of Monthly Statistics (1981-pr) No of Platforms No of Observations Bias in ΔT S SD of ΔT S ships drifters moorings

9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation23 Monitoring individual platforms List of platforms & individual statistics Error Rate History Time Series of ΔT S Monthly Trajectory

9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation24 Data for Download Last monthly file updated in NRT every 6hrs. Initial QC performed on the fly. Final QC requires ~7 days. QC’ed data in HDF format available for download (1981-pr)

9 January GOES-R SST Validation Status of NOAA SST Monitoring Well established for polar products AVHHR (NOAA, NAVO, EUMETSAT) MODIS-Terra, MODIS-Aqua (NOAA) VIIRS (NOAA) Progress made towards Monitoring Geo products Some elements of SQUAM and MICROS web design in place Prototyped using MSG SEVIRI (NOAA) Not linked to SQUAM and MICROS main pages yet

Future work 9 January 2014GOES-R SST Validation26 Polar Products Bring into SQUAM remaining community SST products - MOD28/MYD28 and (A)ATSR Update and unify functionality Geo products Complete development of Geo functionality in SQUAM and MICROS Set up match-up processing with iQuam in situ data Link to main SQUAM and MICROS pages Get ready for GOES-R launch!