Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Simulation of the efficiency of hydrogen recombiners as safety devices Ernst-Arndt Reinecke, Stephan Kelm, Wilfried.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NATO ASI Conference, Kyiv Pollutant Dispersion Investigation of buoyancy effects on distribution of mean concentration field in the turbulent circulation.
Advertisements

Hongjie Zhang Purge gas flow impact on tritium permeation Integrated simulation on tritium permeation in the solid breeder unit FNST, August 18-20, 2009.
Toshio Mogi, Woo-Kyung Kim, Ritsu Dobashi The University of Tokyo
1 Validation of CFD Calculations Against Impinging Jet Experiments Prankul Middha and Olav R. Hansen, GexCon, Norway Joachim Grune, ProScience, Karlsruhe,
ICHS 2007, San Sebastian, Spain 1 SAFETY OF LABORATORIES FOR NEW HYDROGEN TECHNIQUES Heitsch, M., Baraldi, D., Moretto, P., Wilkening, H. Institute for.
Applications of API Process Simulation Pharmaceutical API Process Development and Design.
Forschungszentrum Jülich in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft E.-A. Reinecke, S. Kelm, S. Struth, Ch. Granzow, U. Schwarz* Catalytic recombiners Design studies.
International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, Pisa, 8-10 September CFD modeling of large scale LH2 spills in open environment Dr. A.G Venetsanos.
Enclosure Fire Dynamics
CFD Modeling for Helium Releases in a Private Garage without Forced Ventilation Papanikolaou E. A. Venetsanos A. G. NCSR "DEMOKRITOS" Institute of Nuclear.
Thermal Analysis of Helium- Cooled T-tube Divertor S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, Madison (June 14-15, 2005) G. W. Woodruff School.
On numerical simulation of liquefied and gaseous hydrogen releases at large scales V. Molkov, D. Makarov, E. Prost 8-10 September 2005, Pisa, Italy First.
Enclosure Fire Dynamics
Evaluation of Safety Distances Related to Unconfined Hydrogen Explosions Sergey Dorofeev FM Global 1 st ICHS, Pisa, Italy, September 8-10, 2005.
Introduction to API Process Simulation
FIRE MODELING OF THE SANDIA TESTS (NUREG/CG-4681) An Educational Program to Improve the Level of Teaching Risk-Informed, Performance-based Fire Protection.
1-D Steady Conduction: Plane Wall
Analysis of Buoyancy-Driven Ventilation of Hydrogen from Buildings C. Dennis Barley, Keith Gawlik, Jim Ohi, Russell Hewett National Renewable Laboratory.
Pro-Science 4 th International Conference of Hydrogen Safety, September 12-14, 2011, SAN FRANCISCO, USA EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF IGNITED UNSTEADY HYDROGEN.
Prediction of heat and mass transfer in canister filters Tony Smith S & C Thermofluids Limited PHOENICS User Conference Melbourne 2004 Co-authors - Martin.
ICHS4, San Francisco, September E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport
Modeling Jet-A Vaporization in a Wing Fuel Tank
A Numerical / Analytical Model of Hydrogen Release and Mixing in Partially Confined Spaces Kuldeep Prasad, William Pitts and Jiann Yang Fire Research Division.
Large-Scale Hydrogen Release In An Isothermal Confined Area J.M. LACOME – Y. DAGBA – D. JAMOIS – L. PERRETTE- C. PROUST ICHS- San Sebastian, sept 2007.
Thermal Model of MEMS Thruster Apurva Varia Propulsion Branch Code 597.
Page 1 SIMULATIONS OF HYDROGEN RELEASES FROM STORAGE TANKS: DISPERSION AND CONSEQUENCES OF IGNITION By Benjamin Angers 1, Ahmed Hourri 1 and Pierre Bénard.
Submerged PC Cooling By: Patrick Hague Geoffrey Clark Christopher Fitzgerald Group 11.
2-D Heat Transfer Model of A Horizontal U-Tube M. S. Islam 1, A. Fujimoto 2, A. Saida 2 and T. Fukuhara 2 2-D Heat Transfer Model of A Horizontal U-Tube.
Nuclear Thermal Hydraulic System Experiment
ICHS, September 2007 On The Use Of Spray Systems: An Example Of R&D Work In Hydrogen Safety For Nuclear Applications C. Joseph-Auguste 1, H. Cheikhravat.
Material Measurement Laboratory Cryogenic Engineering Conference :45 AM Single-phase ambient and cryogenic temperature heat transfer.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
September 08-10, 2014 Philadelphia, USA
Wu. Y., International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, September Initial Assessment of the Impact of Jet Flame Hazard From Hydrogen Cars In.
MODELLING OF MULTIPHASE FLOWS OVER SURFACE WITH PENETRABLE ROUGH RELIEF Yevgeniy A. Shkvar National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine
IASFPWG – Seattle, WA Jet-A Vaporization Computer Model A Fortran Code Written by Prof. Polymeropolous of Rutgers University International Aircraft.
Experimental and numerical studies on the bonfire test of high- pressure hydrogen storage vessels Prof. Jinyang Zheng Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang.
Isothermal 2D zonal air volume model
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne, March 21 – 23, 2012 Hydrogen Stratification in Experimental Facilities and PWR Containments – Results and Conclusions of Selected.
EGEE 520 A 2-D Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration Model Yu Zhang.
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, San Francisco, USA, September, J. Yanez, A. Kotchourko, M. Kuznetsov, A. Lelyakin, T. Jordan.
Jet Fuel Vaporization and Condensation: Modeling and Validation Robert Ochs and C.E. Polymeropoulos Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey International.
Mr. Nektarios Koutsourakis1,2 Dr. Alexander Venetsanos2
1 Paper – Paillère et al. International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, ICHS, Pisa, September 8-10, 2005 Modelling of H2 Dispersion and Combustion.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne, Germany, March 21 – 23, 2012 Aerosol Retention in Containment Leak Paths: Indications for a Code Model in the Light of COLIMA Experimental.
6 th September 20061S. Eicher, M. Battistin Upgrade Thermal Management Workshop September 6 th 2006 Bdg 40 Sara Eicher, Michele Battistin CFD Calculations.
© GexCon AS JIP Meeting, May 2011, Bergen, Norway 1 Ichard M. 1, Hansen O.R. 1, Middha P. 1 and Willoughby D. 2 1 GexCon AS 2 HSL.
Combustor modeling Webinar
Combustor modeling in a 1D flow network tool
MULTI-COMPONENT FUEL VAPORIZATION IN A SIMULATED AIRCRAFT FUEL TANK C. E. Polymeropoulos Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 Post-test calculations of CERES experiments using ASTEC code Lajos Tarczal 1, Gabor Lajtha 2 1 Paks Nuclear Power.
A.N.Zagoruiko. Anaerobic catalytic oxidation of hydrocarbons in moving heat waves. Case simulation: propane oxidative dehydrogenation in a packed adiabatic.
Professor Eduardo Cabrera
S.G. Giannissi1,2, I.C.Tolias1,2, A.G. Venetsanos1
ICHS 2015 – Yokohama, Japan | ID195
International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics
Chapter 8: Internal Flow
Audrey DUCLOS1, C. Proust2,3, J. Daubech2, and F. Verbecke1
MODELING OF HYDROGEN PRESSURIZATION AND EXTRACTION IN CRYOGENIC PRESSURE VESSELS DUE TO VACUUM INSULATION FAILURE. Julio Moreno-Blanco, Francisco Elizalde-Blancas,
International Conference on Hydrogen Safety
Comparison between Serrated & Notched Serrated Heat Exchanger Fin Performance Presented by NABILA RUBAIYA.
DEVELOPMENT OF AN ITALIAN FIRE PREVENTION
SOME ISSUES CONCERNING THE CFD MODELLING OF CONFINED HYDROGEN RELEASES
Modeling and Analysis of a Hydrogen Release in a Large Scale Facility
E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi
Natural and Forced Ventilation of Buoyant Gas Released in a Full-Scale Garage : Comparison of Model Predictions and Experimental Data Kuldeep Prasad, William.
ICHS5 – 2013 September, Brussels, Belgium | ID161
CFD computations of liquid hydrogen releases
HYDROGEN – METHANE MIXTURES: DISPERSION AND STRATIFICATION STUDIES
Gilles Bernard-Michel (CEA)
Presentation transcript:

Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Simulation of the efficiency of hydrogen recombiners as safety devices Ernst-Arndt Reinecke, Stephan Kelm, Wilfried Jahn, Christian Jäkel, Hans-Josef Allelein International Conference on Hydrogen Safety September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 2E.-A. Reinecke et al. Overview Simulation of the efficiency of hydrogen recombiners as safety devices  Passive auto-catalytic recombiner (PAR)  Goal of the numerical study  Scenario investigated  Model approach  Results

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 3E.-A. Reinecke et al. Unintended H 2 release inside confined space safety measuredevice detectionsensor release interruptionautomatic valve avoid hydrogen accumulation and ignition/explosion ventilation recombiner

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 4E.-A. Reinecke et al. Passive auto-catalytic recombiner (PAR)

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 5E.-A. Reinecke et al. Commercial PARs in Nuclear Power Plants Vendors  AECL, Canada  AREVA, France/Germany  NIS, Germany Source: Siempelkamp

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 6E.-A. Reinecke et al. Operational boundary conditions NPP containment  large temperature and density gradients  large natural convection loops  large geometry (20,000-70,000 m³, typical length scales 5-50 m)  steam-inertized in early accident phase Typical H2 and FC applications  significant smaller scales  different thermal hydraulic conditions NPP PAR applicability ? H2 & FC GOAL:

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 7E.-A. Reinecke et al. Scenario

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 8E.-A. Reinecke et al. Source: CEA Experiment GARAGE facility at CEA/France  single vehicle private garage (~40 m³)  concentration measurement at ~60 pos. Test 1: He release (~2 g/s) for ~2 min data recently published: Gupta et al., Int J Hydrogen Energy 34 (2009) 5902–5911

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 9E.-A. Reinecke et al. Release scenario and measurement locations

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 10E.-A. Reinecke et al. Approach Scenario based on GARAGE experiment (CEA) 1.Simulation of the helium release and distribution scenario and validation against experimental data 2.Replace helium by hydrogen and verify the calculated distribution 3.Add a PAR to the scenario and compare mitigated/unmitigated scenario

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 11E.-A. Reinecke et al. Model approach

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 12E.-A. Reinecke et al. Coupled Modeling Approach Macro ScaleMeso ScaleMicro Scale REKO-DIREKT (in-house) ANSYS CFX

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 13E.-A. Reinecke et al. PAR model: REKO-DIREKT Input: T, y i, p Output: T, y i, mchemical (catalytical) reaction natural convection Chimney Catalyst section mass/heat transfer

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 14E.-A. Reinecke et al. T / °C y H2 / Vol.-% CFX  REKO-DIREKT - Inlet gas temperature - Inlet gas composition - Pressure REKO-DIREKT  CFX - Outlet gas temperature - Outlet gas composition - Mass flow through PAR REKO-DIREKT  CFX REKO-DIREKT

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 15E.-A. Reinecke et al. Results

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 16E.-A. Reinecke et al. Unmitigated release - setup Physical Model:  Half Symmetry  RANS equations  Ideal gas equation of state  Isothermal  SST-model incl. buoyancy prod. & dissipation  Injection He: 240 g (1,99 g/s) H2: 120 g (0,99 g/s)  Wall functions at inner walls  Vent: Outlet Boundary

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 17E.-A. Reinecke et al. Helium/Hydrogen concentration profiles

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 18E.-A. Reinecke et al. Mitigated release - setup Physical Model:  Half Symmetry  RANS equations  Ideal gas equation of state  SST-model incl. buoyancy prod. & dissipation  Injection H2: 120 g (0,99 g/s)  Wall functions at inner walls +Fixed Wall Temperature +Temperature dependent properties +No heat radiation  Vent: Outlet Boundary

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 19E.-A. Reinecke et al. Comparison mitigated/unmitigated scenario 800 s 240 s 120 s

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 20E.-A. Reinecke et al. Comparison mitigated/unmitigated scenario

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 21E.-A. Reinecke et al. Details mitigated scenario

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 22E.-A. Reinecke et al. PAR model details

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 23E.-A. Reinecke et al. Flammable cloud volume histories

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 24E.-A. Reinecke et al. Performance (estimates) Processor  1 CPU Quadcore I7-860, 2.8 GHz  Open Suse Linux 11.3  CFX 12.1 Calculation time (1200 s)  unmitigated scenario: ~10 d  mitigated scenario: ~40 d  REKO-DIREKT: ~6 min  more time steps  more gas components (H2+O2+N2+H2O)

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 25E.-A. Reinecke et al. Conclusions

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 26E.-A. Reinecke et al. Conclusions (1/2) Goal  investigate the applicability of PAR from NPP containment to typical H2&FC application  significant differences in operational boundary conditions  first study based on GARAGE experiment, performed with ANSYS- CFX and REKO-DIREKT Results  H 2 injection of 1.5 m³, flammable cloud was removed within 10 minutes  hot exhaust plume promotes the transport of hydrogen rich gas mixture towards the PAR inlet

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 27E.-A. Reinecke et al. Conclusions (2/2) Next steps  parameter variation  injection rate, location, and direction  PAR design and number  geometry of the enclosure  consideration of possible PAR ignition scenarios  validation against mitigation experiments in new multi-compartment facility, currently under construction at JÜLICH

ICHS-4 September 12-14, 2011, San Francisco, CA Folie 28E.-A. Reinecke et al. Thank you for your attention !