OPPD Listens Future Generation and Supply Resource Options Timothy J. Burke, Vice President, Customer Service and Public Affairs, OPPD 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calista AVCP Regional Energy Plan. Preliminary Planning and Stakeholder Involvement Resource Inventory and Data Analysis Develop and Review Draft Energy.
Advertisements

American Solar Transformation Initiative Program Overview Tyler Espinoza, Senior Project Manager, Optony Inc. Ben Foster, Senior.
Traci L. Bender Nebraska Public Power District APPA Business & Financial Conference September 15, 2009 Risk Analysis.
RAMAC Marketing Breakfast The Fundamentals of Market Research December 6, 2013 Chris Kann CSK Marketing, Inc.
Seattle City Light Strategic Plan Survey April 2012 Strategic Plan Survey April 2012.
Pasadena Water & Power 2009 Integrated Resource Plan Public Meeting #3 December 17, 2008.
Chapter Understanding Customer Expectations and Perceptions Through Marketing Research Donna J. Hill, Ph.D. Fall 2000.
Community Capacity Building Program Strategic Planning
© 2004 Keynote Systems Customer Experience Management (CEM) Bonny Brown, Ph.D. Director, Research & Public Services.
System Benefits Charge in New York: Technology & Market Development Program 2012 – 2016.
Seattle City Light Strategic Plan Customer & Stakeholder Outreach Seattle City Council May 21, 2012.
1 Portfolio Analysis Mike Hopkins Senior Manager, Price Risk & Resource Planning.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Green Jobs Initiative Dixie Sommers Bureau of Labor Statistics Association of Public Data Users 2010 Annual Conference September.
1 ______ ___ ____ ___ _____ _______ Seattle City Light Rate Design Outreach November 1, 2013 Summary of Online Survey Results 11/1 Review Panel Discussion.
DNV GL © SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL © Second Annual Utility of the Future Pulse Survey Key Findings 1 July 15, 2015 Presentation to C/CAG RMCP.
© 2005 Virtue Ventures LLC. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License Feasibility Analysis For Social Enterprise.
Colorado Springs Utilities: Planning Our Energy Future.
SAN MATEO COUNTY CCA TECHNICAL STUDY: OVERVIEW Community Choice Energy Advisory Committee June 25 th,2015.
Climate Policy Development Tom Peterson The Center For Climate Strategies August 25, 2005.
1 Tapping into the ‘silent majority’s’ voice: The use of sample surveys in community engagement programs Presented by: Libby Paholski.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 3: Set Performance Goals Toolkit 3A: Set Energy Performance.
Presented by: Pechanga Environmental Department Designing and Managing a Recycling Program Source Reduction Strategies for Tribal Solid Waste Programs.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
KPC&L’s Energy Efficiency Initiatives Kevin Bryant Vice President, Energy Solutions Kansas City Power & Light September 26, 2007.
BREAK OUT SESSION: GROUP 2- CONSUMER EDUCATION/ PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUP NARUC VOLUNTEERS: Kellie Armstead- DC PSC Susan Corbin – MPSC NERC Lead Patrick.
Australians’ views on climate change policy and processes A Climate for Change Federal Parliamentary briefing, 21 March 2011 Dr Fiona Cameron, Senior Research.
Developing the New Zealand Energy Strategy IPS Roundtable Series on energy sustainability 4 August 2006 Stuart Calman.
Beyond Mandates, Does Green Pave the Way? Marlene Santos Vice President, Customer Service Florida Power & Light Company October 17, 2009.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
1 Purpose: The purpose of this Appendix to the State of the Community Report is to present county residents’ and community leaders’ perceptions about:
Strategic Planning for DSM in a Community-owned Utility Presented by Shu-Sun Kwan & Ed Arguello Colorado Springs Utilities 2005 APPA Engineering & Operations.
Presented to: Ontario Sustainable Energy Association (OSEA) June 2008 Public Perceptions of a Possible Green Energy Act darn:
Copyright 2000 Prentice Hall5-1 Chapter 5 Marketing Information and Research: Analyzing the Business Environment.
Experience you can trust. Phase 1: Cataloguing Available End-Use and Efficiency Load Data September 15, 2009 End-Use Load Data Update Project.
Improving Your Business Results Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec – All Rights Reserved 1 Designing a Product, Service, Process or.
Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group April 30, 2008 SCAQMD Diamond Bar, California.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 7-1 Chapter 7 Strategic Management: Planning for Long-Term Success.
Investing Our Energy In You Traverse City Light & Power Electric Generation TCL&P Study Session December 1, 2009.
July 19, 2005 Community Preparedness: Helping Community Leaders Prepare for Industrial Prospects.
WPC Youth Survey World Petroleum Council. WPC Youth Survey Participants : By Origin: Online survey conducted between June-August 2008, including on-site.
IEBC and Q2 Insights Webinar Capturing the Student Voice Brad Phillips President, IEBC Kirsty Nunez President, Q2Insights.
14–1 Project Closure and Review Deliverables FIGURE 14.1.
On/Off Operation of Carbon Capture Systems in the Dynamic Electric Grid On/Off Operation of Carbon Capture Systems in the Dynamic Electric Grid Rochelle.
Citizen of Edmonton Findings: Edmonton Public School Board Preference Measurement April 14, 2008 Public Presentation EPSB Board Meeting.
Working With Stakeholders. Continuous Effort Stakeholder engagement is the process by which an organization involves people who may be affected by the.
1 California Energy Commission April 27, 2015 Valerie Winn Chief, State Agency Relations Contingency Planning and Diablo Canyon Power Plant.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
1 Energy Information Administration On-line or off-the-shelf, EIA is the first place to go for the last word in energy information Who is EIA? Independent.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Pasadena Water & Power Integrated Resource Planning “IRP” April 18, 2016 Leesa Nayudu, Resource Planning Manager.
Imperial Irrigation District 2016 Integrated Resource Plan: Imperial Irrigation District April 18th, 2016.
College Heights State College neighborhood plan SWOT analysis meetings pm State College Planning Commission Church of Christ.
Traversing New Waters: Eight Years Post-Crisis A Panel on the Impact of the Regulatory Tsunami on Securities.
1 Energy Vision Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting February 16, 2016.
Getting to Net Zero Taskforce March 4. Agenda Getting to Net Zero Task Force Meeting. March 4th, :00PM-9:00 PM Smith Campus Center 700 pm Welcome.
Orchard Park State College neighborhood plan SWOT analysis meetings pm State College Planning Commission South Hills Business School.
1 International Institute of Business Analysis Vision: The world's leading association for Business Analysis professionals” Mission: To develop and maintain.
Strategic Planning. Agenda Icebreaker Welcome and Introductions Agenda Review What is Strategic Planning Types of Strategic Planning Planning to Plan.
Strategic Planning. What is Strategic Planning Used by community groups, government departments, organizations and businesses to develop blueprint for.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Haida Gwaii Community Electricity Plan
MISSION Strategy Opportunities Objectives Targets Change Environment
SPSG Meeting August 17, 2016 Salt Lake City, UT
Sustainability-based Analytics
Portfolio Analysis Mike Hopkins
Strategic Planning.
Presentation transcript:

OPPD Listens Future Generation and Supply Resource Options Timothy J. Burke, Vice President, Customer Service and Public Affairs, OPPD 1

The Stakeholder Process

The Schedule 3

The Process 4 OPPD’s mission is to provide affordable, reliable and environmentally sensitive energy service to our customers.

Privileged and Confidential Phase 1 – Information Gathering 14 Open Houses/Community Outreach across service territory On-line and in-person comment form Engaged customers through social media and website through OPPDListens.com Education about the power industry

Privileged and Confidential Phase 1 – What We Heard Top 5 Comment Trends Positive feedback for the OPPD stakeholder process Support for general renewables Advocates for solar energy Interest in incentive programs Proponents of energy-efficiency and conservation programs

Privileged and Confidential Phase 2 – Market Research Qualitative and Quantitative Research conducted by industry leader – Market Strategies International 8 residential and 1 commercial industrial focus groups (Qualitative) Sought impressions of 15 portfolio options On-line Survey (Quantitative) A statistically representative random sample of OPPD customers

Survey Methodology  Online survey  Data collection 3/31 - 4/6  Over 400 surveys collected across OPPD territory  Questions focused on trade-offs of economic, environment, cost and risk attributes Focus Groups Methodology  In-person focus groups 8 residential focus groups 1 commercial/industrial focus group  Conducted focus groups 4/1 – 4/3  Discussion focused on trade-offs of resources attributes; Resource Options were presented for evaluation Phase 2: Market Research Approach © Market Strategies International 2014 All rights and information reserved

 Each respondent is shown 16 pairs of scenarios, each systematically rotated (A-B, B-C, C-A, etc.). In 16 pairs, each respondent sees each scenario twice.  By having customers make trade-offs, a value is assigned for each scenario for each respondent that indicates both the relative rank order and the strength of their preference. Phase 2: Survey Trade-Off Analysis © Market Strategies International 2014 All rights and information reserved

Privileged and Confidential Phase 2 – What We Heard Five resource options surfaced by the customers. All five options capture the community’s preferences for: Affordability Renewable features Reduction in conventional emissions and greenhouse gases Customer energy-efficiency programs

Privileged and Confidential Phase 3 – Moderated Public Forum Forum was streamed live to locations throughout the district The goals of the panel were: Report back what was heard in Phase 1 & 2 Present the customer preferred options Give the public the opportunity to clarify questions and provide feedback

Stakeholders trust OPPD to make the right decisions They want electricity to be affordable, but willing to pay slightly more for: –Additional Demand-Side Management Programs –Additional reductions in environmental emissions –Low tipping point on bill increases They were not in favor of short-term retrofitting or refueling of a facility if it is uneconomic in a short timeframe after work is completed. Stakeholder process showed that customer expectation is aligned with OPPD’s mission statement Stakeholder Summary

Phase 2: Provided Reaction to Resource Option Attributes All rights and information reserved

Phase 2: Survey Trade-Off Analysis (cont’d) = Current plan © Market Strategies International 2014 All rights and information reserved

= Current plan © Market Strategies International 2014 All rights and information reserved Phase 2: Survey Trade-Off Analysis (cont’d)

= Current plan © Market Strategies International 2014 All rights and information reserved Phase 2: Survey Trade-Off Analysis (cont’d)

= Current plan © Market Strategies International 2014 All rights and information reserved Phase 2: Survey Trade-Off Analysis (cont’d)

Privileged and Confidential

Thoroughly evaluated feasible options Listened to and considered stakeholder input Aligned option with mission Provide affordable, reliable and environmentally sensitive energy services to our customers Provided Board with a fair, equitable and informed recommendation