PLUTO FOR WINDOWS P lanning L and U se and T ransport O ptions Dr. Csaba OROSZ associate Prof. Department. of Highway and Railway Engineering, BUTE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Changing Travel Behaviour Phil Goodwin Centre for Transport and Society, UWE Bristol.
Advertisements

Limerick City Green Routes Corridor Selection Study Presentation to Limerick City Council 14 th February 2008.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Appraising sub-regional and local growth strategies in the Nottingham-Leicester- Derby Area, UK. Policy applications of a new model of transport and land.
Political Support Needed to Improve Transportation 06 | 25 | 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SFMTA | Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Market and Geary.
International Symposium on Road Pricing 2003 Evaluation of Singapore’s Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) System ( present) A P G Menon MSI Global.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Hertfordshire Congestion Topic Group 11 June 2010.
Fundamental Requirements for Sustaining Mobility Prof. Dr. Ahmad Farhan Sadullah School of Civil Engineering Universiti Sains Malaysia 30 April 2013 A.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
DEC Seoul Development Institute Take Transit, Enjoy More Time for Life SEOUL Challenges for Environmentally Sustainable Transport Dr. GyengChul Kim.
Enhanced analytical decision support tools The Scheme level Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January.
SCATTER-SELMA joint workshop, Brussels, 8 June 2004 Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
Community attitudes to transportation Commuting behaviour and attitudes to government involvement and policies Australasian Railways Association Australian.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
Christopher Kost October 2013 Park it right! Lessons in parking management from European cities.
Seminar 23rd November 2001 Other Policies: Demand Management & Highway Investment Professor Marcial Echenique.
Presented on January 20, ◦ Services 2 3 fixed routes, 1 bus 23 vans, 19 daily vehicle runs.
CENTRAL ACCESS SCHEME FOR THE CITY OF KILKENNY Traffic Considerations The feed back resulting from public consultation did cause us to revisit the traffic.
Ultra at Heathrow & beyond BASE April 2013 Presentation by Adam Ruddle, Key Account Manager, Ultra Global PRT.
Sustainable travel for Limerick and Area By Professor Lewis Lesley.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
D/TTAS - Transport policy data needs Transport Statistics Liaison Group 19 th September 2013.
Protecting Telford’s uniqueness and our community assets Keith Harris Service Delivery Manager – Transport & Highway Development.
Transport Demand and Management Implementation Lessons Learnt from European Experience Rudolf M. Petersen Energy Efficiency Policies in the Land Transport.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Presentation to the Sustainable Prosperity Conference
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SKOPJE: NEW APROACH FOR BETTER QUALITY OF SERVICE
Methodology for the Use of Regional Planning Models to Assess Impact of Various Congestion Pricing Strategies Sub-network Extraction A sub-network focusing.
The Palestinian Perspective on the Cooperation in R&D in Sustainable Urban Mobility Khaled Al-Sahili An-Najah National University Palestine Rabat 19 May.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
Civil and Environmental Engineering 1 Norway’s toll rings: Full scale implementations of urban pricing Dr. Terje Tretvik - SINTEF, Norway IMPRINT-EUROPE.
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas FISCHER Almada, 26 th March 2009 Parking Policy Graz.
Traffic Management and Transport Demand Management Gladys Frame Consultant Traffic Engineer The World Bank Module 4: Urban Transport Planning.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
1 Central Laboratories Just what are the Benefits of Cycling Projects? Glen Koorey Principal Researcher, Traffic Engineering & Road Safety Opus Central.
Skopje Tram, Investors Roundtable 18 January 2012.
IPART’s review of CityRail’s regulatory framework – stakeholder roundtable 31 July 2008.
TRANSMILENIO ENRIQUE LILLO EMME/2 UGM May Bogotá n 7 million people n Mean annual population growth of 4,5 % over the last 10 years n 25 % of Colombian.
Congestion Management for China’s Transit Metropolis Cities by Professors P. Jones, D. Turner and B. Heydecker of UCL. January 2015 Workshop Beijing.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
Park & Ride Plaza Liberty Market, Lahore Presenters: Planner Aqeel Suliman Planner Kiran Shahzadi.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.
Introduction CE331 Transportation Engineering Fall 2013 Dr. Reg Souleyrette.
Preconditions for the introduction of free public transport in Tallinn Dago Antov Tallinn University of Technology Professor on transport planning 1 Tasuta.
Transportation System Engineering 1 , 61360
Chapter 12: Urban Transportation Policy “Everything in life is somewhere else, and you get there in a car.” E. B. White, One Man’s Meat, (NY: Harper &
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Title of Presentation Bike Sharing System CE 635 Huang Liu.
Andres Harjo Transport Department City of Tallinn
Parking and Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary
1st November, 2016 Transport Modelling – Developing a better understanding of Short Lived Events Marcel Pooke – Operational Modelling & Visualisation Manager.
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
International Symposium on Road Pricing 2003 Evaluation of Singapore’s Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) System ( present) A P G Menon MSI Global.
Presentation transcript:

PLUTO FOR WINDOWS P lanning L and U se and T ransport O ptions Dr. Csaba OROSZ associate Prof. Department. of Highway and Railway Engineering, BUTE

PLUTO for Windows 2 Introduction S imulation of the land use and transport system in a hypothetical city : ‘Plutopia’ (mid- size city in Britain) H elp s explore the interaction of transport planning policies Users (You) = transport and land use planners in the city & politicians C onditions and trends  set objectives and strategies  achievement s and feedback analysis

3 Structure of Plutopia - Symmetrical circular city - 10 identical sectors - 10 radial routes (each consists of 9 links) - 2 ring roads - 10 concentric zones ( administrati on)

PLUTO for Windows 4 Options CONSTRUCTION1 BUS SERVICES2 BUS LANES 3 PARKING 4 MANAGEMENT TRAFFIC 5 TRAFFIC 6 CALMING MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY AND RESTRAINT DEVELOPMENT7 MAINTENANCE 8 CONTROL EXPENDITURE FINANCIAL9 DECISIONS

PLUTO for Windows TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND RESTRAINT: a) Cell System b) Cordon Charge c) Road Pricing d) Park and Ride e) SCOOT/TRANSYT f) Traffic Information Options

PLUTO for Windows 6 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 PEAK HOUR - INBOUND TRAFFIC PER SECTOR LINK CAPACITY FLOWS SPEED VEH. BUSES CARS BUSES CARS BUSES RR RR

PLUTO for Windows 7 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 - OUTBOUND TRAFFIC PER SECTOR LINK CAPACITY FLOWS SPEED VEH. BUSESCARS BUSES CARS BUSES : RR RR LOCAL LINKS

PLUTO for Windows 8 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 MORNING PEAK HOUR TRIP ENDS (HOME BASED) ZONE ORIGINS DESTINATIONS MODE SPLIT CAR NO CAR CAR WALK : TOTAL ,30 0,24

9 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 PEAK PERIOD TRIP CHARACTERISTICS CAR BUS USER WALKER ALL USER CO NCO AV DISTANCE / LEG (KMS) AV IN-VEH-TIME / LEG (MINS) AV EXCESS TIME / LEG (MINS) AV FARES & FEES PAID ($) / LEG AV BEHAVIOURAL COST (GENERALISED $) THOUSANDS OF TRIPS / DAY THOUSANDS OF PAX. KM

10 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 OFF-PEAK HOUR - INBOUND TRAFFIC PER SECTOR LINK CAPACITY FLOWS SPEED VEH. BUSES CARS BUSES CARS BUSES : RR OUTBOUND TRAFFIC PER SECTOR LINK CAPACITY FLOWS SPEED VEH. BUSES CARS BUSES CARS BUSES : RR LOCAL LINKS 484 8

11 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 MORNING OFF-PEAK HOUR TRIP END (HOME BASED) ZONE ORIGINS DESTINATIONS MODE SPLIT CAR NO CAR CAR WALK : TOTAL OFF-PEAK PERIOD TRIP CHARACTERISTICS CAR BUS USER WALKER ALL USER CO NCO AV DISTANCE / LEG (KMS) : THOUSANDS OF PAX. KM

12 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 PARKING REPORT ZONE PNR PUBLIC PUBLIC CHARGE CONGESTION SPACES SPACES PARKING $/HR LONG STAY ***** SHORT STAY TOTAL REV $/DY = (LONG STAY) 2278 (SHORT STAY)

PLUTO for Windows 13 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 PUBLIC TRANSPORT REPORT COMMERCIAL IMPLEMENTED PEAK OFF-PEAK PEAK OFF-PEAK FREQUENCY PER HOUR FIXED FARE PART ($) VARIABLE FARE PART ($/KM) COST (K$) TO THE 0 0 CITY BUS FLEET  28  18

14 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 MEASURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE LINK NOISE PARTICLES CO DAYTIME P OP P OP P OP INDEX RR RR LOCAL CITY

PLUTO for Windows 15 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 ACCIDENT REPORT FOR THE ENTIRE CITY VEHICLE USER CASUALTIES PEDESTRIAN CASUALTIES FATAL SERIOUS SLIGHT FATAL SERIOUS SLIGHT LINK : RR RR LOCAL TOTAL  17

PLUTO for Windows 16 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 ACCESSIBILITIES AND PLANNING POLICY %ACCESSIBILITY PROP. APPLICATIONS APPROVED CAR USER NC USER HOUSING RETAIL COMMERCIAL P O P P OP ZONE

17 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 LAND USE DATA HOUSEHOLDS RETAIL FLOOR COMMER. FL. SPACE (KSQM) SPACE (KSQM) CO NCO NEW TOTAL NEW TOTAL NEW ZONE TOTAL

PLUTO for Windows 18 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 PROJECT REPORTS EXPENDITURE ON TRAFFIC CALMING THE LOCAL NETWORK SO FAR IS 100 K$ EXPENDITURE ON SAFETY EDUCATION CAMPAIGNS SO FAR IS: 500 K$ EXPENDITURE SO FAR ON NETWORK SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS IS FOR LINKS 1 TO 9 : FOR THE TWO RINGROADS AND THE LOCAL NETWORK:

19 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 MAJOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS(K$) PROJ DESCR INVESTM REQUIRED MAX STATUS NO SO FAR INVESTM INVEST /YR 1 LINK PCU SHELVED 2 LINK PCU LINK PCU LINK PCU COMPLETE 5 LINK PCU LINK PCU LINK PCU RR PCU RR PCU RR1 INTERCH 3000 PCU PARKING ZONE LS PARKING ZONE LS PARKING ZONE LS PARKING ZONE LS

20 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 CAPITAL ACCOUNT (K$) INHERITED BALANCE 8558 INTEREST ON DEPOSITS, (RATE = 4%) 342 CENTRAL GOVT GRANT 5199 TOTAL INCOME 5541 EXPENDITURE ON ENGINEERING PROJECTS ROAD MAINTENANCE BUS LANE CAPITAL 0 CAR PARK CAPITAL WORKS 0 PARK AND RIDE CAPITAL WORKS 0 TRAFFIC RESTRAINT CAPITAL WORKS 0 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CAPITAL WORKS 0 SAFETY AND TRAFFIC CALMING CAPITAL WORKS TOTAL OUTGOINGS NET TRANSFER 7408 BALANCE 11293

21 Annual Report CURRENT ACCOUNT (K$) INHERITED BALANCE INTEREST ON DEPOSITS, (RATE = 4%) 515 LOCAL TAXATION, (RATE = 15$/HEAD/YR) 3899 COMMERCIAL TAXATION, (RATE = 400$/PROP./YR) 506 PARKING REVENUE 4039 ROAD USER FEES 0 PARK AND RIDE REVENUE 0 TOTAL INCOME 8959 ADMINISTRATIVE AND STAFF COSTS SUBSIDY TO BUS COMPANY 0 CAR PARK OPERATION COSTS PARK AND RIDE OPERATIONS 0 TRAFFIC RESTRAINT OPERATION 0 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OPERATION COSTS 0 SAFETY CAMPAIGNS -100 BUS LANE OPERATION COSTS 0 TOTAL OUTGOINGS NET TRANSFER BALANCE 7597

22 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 RESOURCE COSTS (M$) THIS PREVIOUS INTEREST TOTAL YEAR YEARS ON PREV YEARS TRAVELLER TIME RESOURCE COSTS OF ACCIDENTS COSTS OF CAR OWNERSHIP CAR OPERATING COSTS BUS OPERATING COSTS continued on next slide…

PLUTO for Windows 23 domiv1 RUN NO 1 /RESOURCE COSTS (M$)/ THIS PREVIOUS INTEREST TOTAL YEAR YEARS ON PREV YEARS CAR PARK LAND RENTAL INTEREST ON CAPITAL EXPENDIT POLICY OPERATION AND ADMIN COSTS TOTAL CURRENT VALUE OF CAPITAL ASSETS (M$) 108 Annual Report

PLUTO for Windows 24 Annual Report domiv1 RUN NO 1 PUBLIC OPINION REPORT ROAD USERS APPALLED AT THE POOR STATE OF MAINTENANCE BUS USERS PROTEST NOT ENOUGH BUSES IN THE PEAK BUS USERS PROTEST NOT ENOUGH OFF PEAK BUSES PROTEST AT SHORTAGE OF LONG STAY PARK SPACES PROTESTS OVER PEAK PERIOD CONGESTION PROTESTS OVER BUSES SLOW SPEED IN PEAK AT ELECTIONS YOU WOULD GET 57 % OF THE VOTE /Best result is approx. 85 % / INDEX OF BUSINESS CONFIDENCE = 79 /Best result is approx. 165)/

PLUTO for Windows 25 Have a successful work in PLUTOPIA!