Linking General Education Student Learning Outcomes to Course Embedded Assessment SMSU-WP Fall 2005 Assessment Target.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
Advertisements

Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
General Studies Areas Core Areas –Literacy & Critical Inquiry (L) –Mathematical Studies (MA/CS) –Humanities & Fine Arts (HU) –Social & Behavioral Sciences.
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
Critical Thinking Course Introduction and Lesson 1
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Fit to Learn Using the Employability Skills Framework to improve your performance at College The Employability Skills Framework has been developed by business.
Graduate Expectations. Critical Thinking & Life Management. IBT graduates are expected to: identify and demonstrate the essential employability skills.
General Education Models General Education Reform Committee Lloyd Duman Carol Lindsay Sherry Simkins Karen Ruppel Bob Vogeler Peter Zao Bob Murray.
The Rainforest Katie Farlow, Whitney McManus, Rita Hill, Quiana Allen & Lauren McCarthy.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science Amy Roediger.
Assessing General Education Joe Safdie San Diego Mesa College Joe Safdie San Diego Mesa College.
NMU Towards the 21 st Century Mitchell Klett Alan Willis Ruth Watry Laura Reissner Gary Brunswick.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Basics of A-G Courses. UC ARTICULATION CONFERENCE Overview  Purpose of “a-g” subject requirements & course lists  Enhancements to “a-g” course criteria.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Critical Thinking in Education. Defining Critical Thinking Asking pertinent questions Evaluates statements & arguments Admits a lack of knowledge & understanding.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Outcomes-based Education at UC. Created, Implemented, Maintained and Assessed by Faculty (Supported by Everyone!)
LeMoyne-Owen College December 16, 2009 Mimi Czarnik, Professor of English and Dean of Humanities Becky Burton, Associate Professor of Biology Alverno College,
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
CriteriaExemplary (4 - 5) Good (2 – 3) Needs Improvement (0 – 1) Identifying Problem and Main Objective Initial QuestionsQuestions are probing and help.
SLB /04/07 Thinking and Communicating “The Spiritual Life is Thinking!” (R.B. Thieme, Jr.)
Developing Programmatic Objectives Presentation to Department of English SUNY Oneonta October 1, 2008.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
Common Core Standards and Implications for CaMSP Meeting the Challenge of Complexity, Coherence and Integration.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Communication & Collaboration Communicate Clearly  Articulate thoughts and ideas effectively using oral, written and nonverbal communication skills in.
Historical Thinking Skills
Language Objective: Students will be able to practice agreeing and disagreeing with partner or small group, interpret and discuss illustrations, identify.
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
Assessment 101: A Review of the Basics Jill Allison Kern, PhD Director of Assessment Christopher Newport University January 2013.
ATL’s in the Personal Project
Historical Thinking Skills
LA&S Objectives and You (Yes, You Too!) Ben Railton English Chris Cratsley Interim Director of Assessment.
VELS The Arts. VELS (3 STRANDS) Physical, Personal and Social Learning Discipline-based Learning Interdisciplinary Learning.
Unpacking the Elements of Scientific Reasoning Keisha Varma, Patricia Ross, Frances Lawrenz, Gill Roehrig, Douglas Huffman, Leah McGuire, Ying-Chih Chen,
Historical Thinking Skills A.P. World History Mr. Schabo Crestwood High School All info care of College Board:
HISTORICAL THINKING A lesson on WHY and HOW we study history.
Historical Thinking Skills. Skill Type I: Chronological Reasoning Skill 1: Historical Causation Historical thinking involves the ability to identify,
Source : The Problem Learning and innovation skills increasingly are being recognized as the skills that separate students who are.
Literacy and Numeracy Benchmarks Prepared by SAPDC Learning Facilitator Team.
Research for Nurses: Methods and Interpretation Chapter 1 What is research? What is nursing research? What are the goals of Nursing research?
7 Themes. Chronological Reasoning 1. Historical Causation: relationships among multiple historical causes and effects, distinguishing between those that.
2 nd Grade Language Arts World Class Outcome Create meaning strategically in: Reading Writing Speaking Listening Evaluate how authors are strategic in.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Arkansas State University – Jonesboro Institutional Priority “Develop a culture of learning to enhance institutional outcomes”
MU Core Revision Proposal The Atom Visual Structure Please read information provided in each slide as well as the notes under each slide.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
Orange Coast College Office of Institutional Effectiveness ISLO Update to Institutional Effectiveness Committee 4/25/2014 ISLO GE SLO Local AA/AS.
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
Have you earned an ? Associate of Arts degree, A.A
Writing and Revising SLOs with Best Practices in Mind
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
SLOs: What Are They? Information in this presentation comes from the Fundamentals of Assessment conference led by Dr. Amy Driscoll and sponsored by.
Narrative Writing Grades 6-12
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Grade 6 Outdoor School Program Curriculum Map
SCSU General Education Proposal Meetings
Identify, analyze, evaluate, recognize, describe, compare, explain, make, construct... Foundations of U.S. History and the Historical Thinking Skills.
Creating-1: Generate and conceptualize artistic ideas and work.
Historical Thinking Skills
Presentation transcript:

Linking General Education Student Learning Outcomes to Course Embedded Assessment SMSU-WP Fall 2005 Assessment Target

Hierarchy of Objectives Mission Institution Goals Gen Ed Learning Objectives Degree Program Objectives Discipline Objectives Course Objectives Unassociated Course Objectives Fall 2005

Where are We in the Process? Phase: 1.Course Level Assessment (At this time I only have 7 of 22 Course Assessment Reports from Spring) 2.Course Linked to Gen. Ed. Learning Objectives and review/revise Gen. Ed. Learning Objectives 3.Linking: Course – Discipline – Degree Program – General Education Objectives 4.Rework Institution Goals 5.Mission Review 6.Long-range Plan 2011 – HLC Self-Study 2013

1.Faculty members are asked to incorporate one General Education Learning Objective into their Course Embedded Assessment Plans. 2.Since the General Education Learning Objectives are under review, Dean Law and the Faculty Assessment Coordinator have picked one Learning Objective in each of the areas as likely final Learning Objectives that will arise from the review. 3.Faculty are asked to pick one Learning Objective from one of the State-Level Goals Skill Areas (e.g. Communicating #3). The Fall 2005 target Learning Objectives are highlighted in light green in the table. Fall 2005 General Education Assessment Targets

General Education Reporting Matrix SMSU-WP State-Level Goals SKILL AREAS Learning Objectives Communicating To develop students' effective use of the English language and quantitative and other symbolic systems essential to their success in school and in the world. Students should be able to read and listen critically and to write and speak with thoughtfulness, clarity, coherence, and persuasiveness. Students will demonstrate the ability to….. 1. analyze and evaluate their own and others’ speaking and writing. 2. conceive of writing as a recursive process that involves many strategies, including generating material, evaluating sources when used, drafting, revising, and editing. 3. make formal written and oral presentations employing correct diction, syntax, usage, grammar and mechanics. 4. focus on a purpose (e.g., explaining, problem solving, argument) and vary approaches to writing and speaking based on that purpose. 5. respond to the needs of different venues and audiences and choose works for appropriateness and effect. 6. communicate effectively in groups by listening, reflecting, and responding appropriately and in context. 7. use mathematical and statistical models, standard quantitative symbols, and various graphical tactics to present information with clarity, accuracy, and precision.

Higher-Order Thinking To develop students’ ability to distinguish among opinions, facts, and inferences; to identify underlying or implicit assumptions; to make informed judgments; and to solve problems by applying evaluative standards. Students will demonstrate the ability to …. 1. recognize the problematic elements of presentations of information and argument and to formulate diagnostic questions for resolving issues and solving problems. 2. use linguistic, mathematical or other symbolic approaches to describe problems, identify alternative solutions, and make reasoned choices among those solutions. 3. analyze and synthesize information from a variety of sources and apply the results to resolving complex situations, and problems. 4. defend conclusions using relevant evidence and reasoned argument. 5. reflect on and evaluate their critical-thinking processes.

Managing Information To develop students’ abilities to locate, organize, store, retrieve, evaluate, synthesize, and annotate information from print, electronic, and other sources in preparation for solving problems and making informed decisions. Students will demonstrate the ability to … 1. access and/or generate information from a variety of sources, including the most contemporary technological information efficiently. 2. evaluate information for its currency, usefulness, truthfulness, and accuracy. 3. organize, store, and retrieve information efficiently. 4. reorganize information for an intended purpose, such as research projects. 5. present information clearly and concisely, using traditional and contemporary technologies.

Valuing To develop students’ abilities to understand the moral and ethical values of a diverse society and to understand that many courses of action are guided by value judgments about the way things ought to be. Students should be able to make informed decisions through identifying personal values and the values of others and through understanding how such values develop. They should be able to analyze the ethical implications of choices made on the basis of these values. Students will demonstrate the ability to…. 1. compare and contrast historical and cultural ethical perspectives and belief systems. 2. utilize cultural, behavioral, and historical knowledge to clarify and articulate a personal value system. 3. recognize the ramification of one’s value decisions on self and others. 4. recognize conflicts within and between value systems and recognize and analyze ethical issues as they arise in a variety of contexts. 5. consider multiple perspectives, recognize biases, deal with ambiguity, and take a reasonable position.

State-Level Goals KNOWLEDGE AREAS Learning Objectives Social & Behavioral Sciences To develop students’ understanding of themselves and the world around them through study of content and the processes used by historians and social and behavioral scientists to discover, describe, explain, and predict human behavior and social systems. Students must understand the diversities and complexities of the cultural and social world, past and present, and come to an informed sense of self and others. (Students must fulfill the state statute requirements for the United States and Missouri constitutions.) Students will demonstrate the ability to…. 1. explain social institutions, structures, and processes across a range of historical periods and cultures. 2. develop and communicate hypothetical explanations for individual human behavior within the large-scale historical and social context. 3. draw on history and the social sciences to evaluate contemporary problems. 4. describe and analytically compare social, cultural, and historical settings and processes other than one’s own. 5. articulate the interconnectedness of people and places around the globe. 6. describe and explain the constitutions of the United States and Missouri.

Humanities & Fine Arts To develop students’ understanding of the ways in which humans have addressed their condition through imaginative work in the humanities and fine arts; to deepen their understanding of how that imaginative process is informed and limited by social, cultural, linguistic, and historical circumstances; and to appreciate the world of the creative imagination as a form of knowledge. Students will demonstrate the ability to…. 1. describe the scope and variety of works in the humanities and fine arts (e.g., fine and performing arts, literature, and speculative thought). 2. explain the historical, cultural, and social contexts of the humanities and fine arts. 3. identify the aesthetic standards used to make critical judgments in various artistic fields. 4. develop a plausible understanding of the differences and relationships between formal and popular culture. 5. articulate a response based upon aesthetic standards to observance of works in the humanities and fine arts.

Mathematics To develop students’ understanding of fundamental mathematical concepts and their applications. Students should develop a level of quantitative literacy that would enable them to make decisions and solve problems and which could serve as a basis for continued learning. (The mathematics requirement for general education should have the same prerequisite(s) and level of rigor as college algebra.) Students will demonstrate the ability to…. 1.describe contributions to society from the discipline of mathematics. 2. recognize and use connections within mathematics and between mathematics and other disciplines. 3. read, interpret, analyze, and synthesize quantitative data (e.g., graphs, tables, statistics, and survey data) to make reasoned estimates. 4. formulate and use generalizations based upon pattern recognition. 5. apply and use mathematical models (e.g., algebraic, geometric, statistical) to solve problems.

Life & Physical Sciences To develop students’ understanding of the principles and laboratory procedures of life and physical sciences and to cultivate their abilities to apply the empirical methods of scientific inquiry. Students should understand how scientific discovery changes theoretical views of the world, informs our imaginations, and shapes human history. Students should also understand that science is shaped by historical and social contexts. Students will demonstrate the ability to…. 1. explain how to use the scientific method and how to develop and test hypotheses in order to draw defensible conclusions. 2. evaluate scientific evidence and argument. 3. describe the basic principles of the physical universe. 4. describe concepts of the nature, organization, and evolution of living systems. 5. explain how human choices affect the earth and living systems.

Faculty are asked to their course name and number and the one General Education Learning Objective that they will build into their Course Assessment Plan for Fall Faculty are asked to select two other course objectives (ones that they did not assess in Spring 2005) and build their Course Assessment Plan based on the three selected Learning Objectives. Their Fall 2005 Course Assessment Plans should be submitted by September 15, Fall 2005 General Education Assessment Targets