Socratic Seminars EXPECTATIONS FOR A SUCCESSFUL DISCUSSION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reading for an English Class (created by Jim Burke)
Advertisements

Leading the Socratic Seminar
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
Socratic Seminars. We will end the year with an in-class discussion project called Socratic Seminars. We will use our class novel to get ideas for discussion.
1 Florida 4-H Leadership Series Communications The activities in this lesson are taken from Unlock Your Leadership Potential, Leader’s Guide, Florida 4-H.
Everything you need to know in order to set up your Reader’s Notebook
Socratic Seminar Ms. Melvin.
Socratic Seminar Skills
Socratic Seminar “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Reading Strategies.
Socratic Seminar #1 WHY ETHNIC STUDIES?
State the rule or law the society has Analyze: What is the underlying value this rule stems from? Evaluate: State why you disagree with.
Communication Skills with Friends & Family
Socratic Seminars.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
SOCRATIC SEMINARS HELP US ENGAGE A TEXT IN CLASS. THE THOUGHT PROCESS IS WHEN WE WORK TOGETHER TO UNDERSTAND A TEXT IT WILL HELP EVERYONE’S UNDERSTANDING.
SOCRATIC SEMINARS Socrates - 470/469 BC – 399 BC Greek Philosopher.
Fishbowl A Socratic Seminar Adventure. What is a Socratic Seminar? The Socratic Method, named after the classical Greek philosopher Socrates, is a form.
The Socratic Seminar 1. Socrates Socrates was a famous Greek philosopher. His focus was the development of the human character. His method of teaching.
Socratic Seminar.
Reflection: TOPIC: Are people naturally “good” or are they forced to be “good” by social rules and legal institutions? INTRODUCE EVIDENCE: Why do you believe.
TKAM Philosophical Debate Task 1: Quote Analysis Task 2: Philosophical Debate Task 3: Reflection.
Synthesis Unit Points for Exploration Ohhhhh!…so my sources are having this conversation you keep talking about!
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
What is a Socratic Seminar?  Socratic – Socrates ( B.C.) Classical Greek Philosopher who developed the Theory of Knowledge.
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
A seminar is not a test of memory. You are not “learning a subject”; your goal is to understand the ideas, issues, and values reflected in the text.
Socratic Seminar “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Listening (It’s just as important as speaking!). Listening v. Hearing What is hearing? The act of receiving sound What is listening? The 4-step process.
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
Communicating Effectively (1:46) Click here to launch video Click here to download print activity.
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Bell Work (woohoo!) Pick up a SOAPPSTone and complete it. Be ready to discuss in 5 minutes. Remember what we learned about POV this week. Be as thorough.
Socratic Seminar By participating in Scholars will practice academic behavior and language that will be expected in a 21 st century classroom & worksplace.
SOCRATIC SEMINAR GUIDELINES:  Do not raise your hand during discussion.  Do not interrupt another person. Begin speaking when he or she has finished.
Socratic Seminar Should Animal Testing Be Banned? Should There Be More Security In Schools? Should America Make Stricter Gun Laws?
Socratic Seminar. What is a Socratic Seminar? In a Socratic Seminar participants seek deeper understanding of complex ideas through thoughtful dialogue.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Socratic Seminar #2 Grab your journals. Find a partner and sit next to them. After 5 minutes of discussion we will break. You will then have 3.
What Makes a Good Discussion in a Grand Conversation?
EQ 15: How do I participate in Socratic Seminar? 10/15* Read and annotate the Socratic Seminar guidelines and rubric. Write 2 things you will excel in.
ETHICS Shawnna Burchfield HU Table of Contents Analytical Skill Building  Critical Reading Skills  Writing Skills  Thinking Skills Knowledge.
Introduction to Socratic Seminar. Dialogue Vs. Debate Dialogue is… Collaborative About understanding the text Open-ended Exploring different possibilities.
Socratic Seminar Socrates (June 4, ca. 470 BC – May 7, 399 BC) was a Greek (Athenian) philosopher.June 4470 BCMay 7399 BCAthenianphilosopher.
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
What is a Socratic Seminar? Socratic Seminar. What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates. Socrates was a classic greek philosopher.
THE SOCRATIC SEMINAR Guidelines Roles Responsibilities.
“The Most Dangerous Game”
Be ready to check 90 seconds after the bell.
Socratic Seminars A Socratic Seminar is a scholarly discussion of an essential question in which student opinions are shared, proven, and politely argued.
Socratic Seminar “I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.” - Socrates.
Foundation of Socratic Seminars
Socratic Seminars.
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Socratic Seminar By participating in
Expectations for a successful discussion
Intro to Socratic Seminars
Socratic Seminar *I can balance listening with speaking.
Title of notes: Text Annotation page 7 right side (RS)
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Expectations for a successful discussion
Practice Socratic Seminar: “The Necklace”
Socratic Seminars “Freedom and order are not incompatible…truth is strength…free discussion is the very life of truth” – Thomas Huxley.
Socratic Seminars.
Socratic Seminars A Socratic Seminar is a scholarly discussion of an essential question in which student opinions are shared, proven, and politely argued.
English 3 Unit: Fahrenheit 451
English 4 Unit: Looking for Alaska
English 4 Unit: Looking for Alaska
Fostering Critical and Creative Thinking
“The unexamined life is not worth living.”—Socrates
Presentation transcript:

Socratic Seminars EXPECTATIONS FOR A SUCCESSFUL DISCUSSION

3 ways to get a grade (must do two out of the three) 1. Ask a question. 2. Respond to a question. 3. Add a comment.

Grading others 1. Observation notes ◦Select three people to observe during the seminar: the person to your right, the person to your left, and the person directly across from you. ◦During the seminar, you are responsible for evaluating comments, questions, ideas, references to the text, distracting behavior, etc.

Rules 1. Speak so that all can hear you. 2. Listen closely. 3. Speak without raising hands. 4. Refer to the text. 5. Ask for clarification, don’t remain confused. 6. Talk to each other/make eye contact. 7. Invite and allow others to speak. 8. Consider all viewpoints and ideas. Discuss ideas rather than each other’s opinions. 9. Stick to the point that is being discussed. Make note about other ideas you would like to bring up later. 10. Know that you are responsible for the quality of the seminar.

Goals 1. Listen to what others say. 2. Explain your own ideas. 3. Speak and work with others, whether you are close to them or not. 4. Receive correction and criticism from others. 5. Ask about what you don’t understand. 6. Admit when you are wrong. 7. Think about questions for which the answers are uncertain. 8. Learn from others. Teach others. Teach yourself. 9. Become more aware of how others see you.

A Socratic Seminar Does Not… 1. Argue or debate. 2. Monopolize the conversation. 3. Answer only to the discussion leader. 4. Ignore the commentary of others. 5. Jump from question to question. 6. Have a right or wrong conclusion.

Question and Answer Stems 1. I think or believe that ______________. 2. It seems to me that ______________. 3. What do you by ______________? 4. Will you explain that again? 5. What do you think about ___________? 6. I discovered from _____________ that _______________. 7. I don’t agree with you because ________________. 8. I have a different answer than you. I found that __________________. 9. The author seems to ________________ in _________________. 10. Why do you suppose __________________? 11. Based on _______________, I infer that _____________. 12. So you’re saying that _________________________. What I’m hearing you say is ______________________. 13. Maybe we could ___________________. 14 What if we __________________________. 15. As I was saying, if I could please finish my thought. 16. What I was trying to say was _______________.

Questions for Socratic Seminar 1. Discuss the various ways that color is used to set a mood in the story. How does such visual language add to the development of the setting? 2.Is General Zaroff a credible character? Could such a situation unfold in today’s society? Why or why not? 3.How does the fact that the story took place on an island contribute to the story? 4.Do you agree with Zaroff's belief that "instinct is no match for reason"? Why or why not? In what ways does Rainsford demonstrate both instinct and reason during the hunt? 5.Do you think that the story is a commentary on the ethics of hunting? Why or why not? What moral positions could be drawn out from the text?

Sample Interaction Speaker 1: Do you think that the story is a commentary on the ethics of hunting? Why or why not? What moral positions could be drawn out from the text? Speaker 2: I think the story definitely makes the reader think about the ethics of hunting and the value of life. It truly helps internalize the idea of human vs animal and which lives matter. Do all lives matter? Is it okay to hunt animals? If so, what’s the purpose? Sport? Food? Fun? After reading the story, I am less likely to go hunting because I’ve never really thought about how an animal might feel. Speaker 3: I disagree with you on the hunting aspect. I have always been a hunter, and this story will not change that. However, it will certainly change the reason that I hunt. I am a firm believer that hunting should not solely be for sport. In my own life, I’ll make an effort to eat or donate the meat to ensure that I’m not hunting just to kill.