Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: 2013-03-08 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission May 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 M-QoS Comments Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r0 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0443r0 March 2014 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 What Is P2P Traffic in HEW Simulation Scenarios? Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/772r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Non-HT Duplicate PPDU FILS Advertisement Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0327r0 March 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Microsleep for HE STA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r1 Submission May 2012 Huawei Slide 1 Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0141r0 January 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Element Fragmentation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0509r3 Submission Proposed Resolution to CID 72, 119 and 128 Qian ChenSlide 1 May 2014 Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, Intel, Qcomm Slide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning.
Doc.: IEEE /0550 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kiseon RyuLG Electronics10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide ai simulations Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/1127r01 Sep 2012 Hiroshi Mano (ATRD)Slide 1 TGai- Motion/Straw Poll-Sep-2012-Indian Wells Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 September 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Discussion of the comments related to FILS Request Parameter Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0645r0 Submission May 2014 Marc Emmelmann, SelfSlide 1 Discussion of LB201 CID4609 Date: Authors:
November 2005 Floyd Simpson, MotorolaSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /1193r0 Submission LB78 D3.0 Active Scanning Comments (clause ) Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0246r2 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC Corp. 1F, 6-3 Baoqiang Road, Xindian district, New Taipei City,
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0246r0 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC Corp. 1F, 6-3 Baoqiang Road, Xindian district, New Taipei City,
Doc.: IEEE /0871r0 Submission June 2011 Power Saving in Beam Beamforming for 11ad Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE ai March 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, IntelSlide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning Improvement.
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0407r3 Submission Proposed Resolution to Comments Pertaining to Section in CC12 Date: KB PngSlide 1 March 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0061r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Response frame transmission interval Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r4 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2215r4 Submission August 2007 Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Proposal –Radio Resource Measurement Capability Enabled.
Doc.: IEEE /2215r1 Submission July 2007 Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Proposal – Supported Radio Resource Measurement Bitmask IE.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/535r1 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Scanning and FILS requirements Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/1367r01 Nov 2012 Hiroshi Mano (ATRD)Slide 1 TGai- Motion/Straw Poll-Nov-2012-San-Antonio Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0292r1 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Beacon Pointer for FILS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0568r0 Submission May 2012 Young Hoon Kwon, Huawei Slide 1 AP Discovery Information Broadcasting Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0100r2 Submission January 2010 Kazuyuki Sakoda, Sony CorporationSlide 1 MAC beaconing sync comment resolution Date: Authors:
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /1015r1 Submission Gabor Bajko, Nokia, Canpolat, Intel, Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 Network Selection Optimization Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0896r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Request Filtering Criteria Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0041r1 AP Location Capability January 2007 Donghee Shim et alSlide 1 AP Location Capability Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0059r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRI Selection of the AP for Scanning Date: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1468r1 Submission Jan 09 Ashish Shukla, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 ERP Protection in IEEE s Mesh Network Date:
Doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Scanning with FILS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0590r0 Submission May 2010 Kazuyuki Sakoda, Sony CorporationSlide 1 MAC beaconing sync comment resolution overview Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1064r0 September 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Long Range, Low Power Design Criteria Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0537r0 Submission May 2010 Kazuyuki Sakoda, Sony CorporationSlide 1 General frame format comment resolution overview Date:
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Discussion on CID2199 Date: Authors: Jan 2014 Name Company
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
OCT based 6 GHz AP Operation Discussion
Improvement to TWT Parameter set selection
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Providing Faster GAS Response
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
CR for CID 1105 Date: Authors: January 2019 Month Year
MCCA Comments Resolution 159 ppt
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Broadcast Service Advertisements
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
MBCA and Beacon Timing element clean up
Resolutions of the Remaining Power Management Comments
Proposed Change to Intra-Mesh Congestion Notification Frame
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
Providing Faster GAS Response
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 2 Abstract CID266 resolution is done erroneously. The resolution to the comment CID266 will cause a bloat of the Probe Response frames. There is another comment CID281, that is not solved. CID281 proposes alternative resolution.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 Text related to CIDs STAs with dot11FILSActivated equal to true should respond to one or more Probe Request frames addressed to broadcast address with a Beacon frame if the criteria below are met: — The responding STA that is about to transmit a probe response receives an acknowledged Probe Response addressed to the requesting STA containing the BSS of the responding STA. — The next TBTT of the responding STA is within dot11BeaconResponseDuration and is no later than any deadline of Probe Response Reception Time, if the Probe Response Reception Time element is present in any Probe Request frame. Slide 3Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) March 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 CID 266 Comment: Following description is the condition of the Probe Request omission. "The responding STA that is about to transmit a probe response receives an acknowledged Probe Response addressed to the requesting STA containing information of the BSS of the responding STA.“ The comment does not specify any reason, or justification for the change. It just points the place of the standard. Slide 4Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) March 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 CID 266 Proposed change: ”... with a Beacon frame if the criteria below are is met: The responding STA that is about to transmit a probe response receives an acknowledged Probe Response addressed to the requesting STA containing information of the BSS of the responding STA. The next TBTT of the responding STA is within dot11BeaconResponseDuration and is no later than any deadline of Probe Response Reception Time, if the Probe Response Reception Time element is present in any Probe Request frame.” Slide 5Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) March 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 CID 266 Resolution code: ACCEPTED (EDITOR: :43:51Z) Need to check results. In D0.3, this was a hyphenated list (a change from D0.2), this modification results in only a single item which does not justify a list format. In pondering the options, made it a continuation of the paragraph ending in "criteria below is met:" Please comment if there is a better way of doing this. The comment is deleting a technical operation. The motivation and reasoning is to improve readability. The readability improvement is not a justification for technical change. Slide 6Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) March 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 CID 281 Comment: “There are two critria below. It is not clear whether the condition is all criteria must are met or any criteria is met. Not sure why the first criteria?” No proposed resolution. Slide 7Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) March 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 Why the first condition Slide 8Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) March 2013 — The responding STA that is about to transmit a probe response receives an acknowledged Probe Response addressed to the requesting STA containing the BSS of the responding STA. Traditionally the same frame (Beacon or Probe Response) has been provided the link quality assessment as well as the information of the BSS. This information may be collected separately: The devices may obtain the link performance information from any omni-directionally transmitted frame. When the congestion in the network increases, typically there are plenty of frames available for link assessment. For instance all ACK frames transmitted by the AP are suitable for link assessment. The devices may obtain information of the BSS through a frame that is transmitted by other STA.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 Why the first condition Slide 9Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) March 2013 — The responding STA that is about to transmit a probe response receives an acknowledged Probe Response addressed to the requesting STA containing the BSS of the responding STA. The condition enables a single response form the network to be transmitted to the scanning STA. This reduces the number of scanning frames transmission especially in the congested situations. The scanning STA desires to discover the network, i.e. BSS having the same SSID. Typically these BSS use the same authentication mechanism. To initiate a link setup, it is important for a STA to discover that the network exists. The condition defines a minimum response level is defined.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 Proposed text to STAs with dot11FILSActivated equal to true should respond to one or more Probe Request frames addressed to broadcast address with a Beacon frame if either of the criteria below are is met: — The responding STA that is about to transmit a probe response receives an acknowledged Probe Response addressed to the requesting STA containing information of the BSS SSID of the responding STA. — The next TBTT of the responding STA is within dot11BeaconResponseDuration and is no later than any deadline of Probe Response Reception Time, if the Probe Response Reception Time element is present in any Probe Request frame. The change is described in the document r1. The resolution improves readability, the reduces the number of probe responses and clarifies the first response condition. Slide 10Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) March 2013