2008 Facility Plan Update May 2008. Purpose  Comprehensive Plan through 2033 –Builds on Past Work –Adjust for Changing Conditions  Identify Capacity,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Overview Dean Fisher, P.E., PMP, CCM July 25, 2013.
Advertisements

Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Overview Jim Herberg, P.E., BCEE June 14, 2012.
Wakulla County Sewer Project Eutaw Utilities Presentation April 7, 2011.
Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works
w-fn005 1 Ocean Outfall Legislation Compliance City of Hollywood Department of Public Utilities LARGE USER MEETING October 2, 2008.
Quantification of Spill Data from Domestic Facilities Andy Squires Pinellas County Environmental Management Keith Hackett Janicki Environmental, Inc.
The Town of Discovery Bay Community Services District Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan NOVEMBER 9, 2011.
Wastewater Treatment Plants & Bacteria: Strategies for Compliance Wastewater Collection Systems Teague Harris Pate Engineers, Inc. John Montgomery Municipal.
Where does the sludge go? grams per person per day Sludge handling/disposal accounts for 25-50% of the cost –Sludge treatment:- Convert organics.
Strategic Process Engineering Liquid Treatment Processes at the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant Tier 1 Workshop Blue Plains Users October.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Water Services Department Arizona Mexico Commission Bi-National Meeting March 9-11, 2008 David Cavazos Deputy City Manager Water Services Department Arizona.
Hopkins – St. Louis Park – Minneapolis Regional Sanitary Sewer Improvements Draft Facility Plan January 20, 2010 Metropolitan Council Public Information.
1 CITY OF MONROE WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT BUDGET Presented by Barry S. LaRoy, P.E. Director of Water & Wastewater Utilities March 27, 2010.
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Overview Nick Kanetis, P.E. June 14, 2013.
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Preliminary Seventh Power Plan Energy Efficiency Estimates October 14, 2014 West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Seattle.
A Review of State-of-the-Practice Equipment at the Plum Creek WWTP By Tim Grotheer Plum Creek Wastewater Authority & Dave Oerke RTW Professional Engineers.
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Preliminary Seventh Power Plan Energy Efficiency Estimates November 18, 2014 West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Seattle.
Municipal Wastewater Efficiency Improvements Potential Savings for the 6 th Power Plan September 30, 2008 Regional Technical Forum South Treatment Plant.
Design Considerations for High Strength Wastewater
Wastewater generation
Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Retrofit for Ammonia and Nitrate Removal
Increasing Energy Efficiency at the Allegan WWTP MWEA/AWWA Joint Annual Conference August 19, 2010.
Michael Tamblin, P.E., BCEE Stearns & Wheler, LLC Protecting and Enhancing the Ramapo Watershed – A Designated Sole Source Aquifer Supplying New York and.
Biological Aerated Filtration (BAF) at the Denver Water Recycling Plant 2006 Water Reuse Workshop Golden, CO Russell Plakke, Denver Water.
Waste Water Facilities Plan Update November 2, 2009 Palmer Engineering Company / Hazen & Sawyer / CDP Public Hearing Presentation.
Department of the Environment Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program Phase I- Trading between point sources and trading involving connecting on-site septic.
SITE LOCATION AND DESIGN APPROVAL FOR DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS GARY SOLDANO, P.E. SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE SUPERVISOR TECHNICAL SERVICES UNIT.
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Austin, TX. May 6, 2015 David James Santiago.
METRO WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Facilities Plan Update July 2, 2009 Palmer Engineering Company / Hazen & Sawyer / CDP.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
2010 Water Quality Implementation Report Water Quality Management Plan for 2009 Water Year Provo River and Jordanelle & Deer Creek Reservoirs.
Wastewater Treatment Plant # 2 Engineering Services Council Workshop July 8, 2014.
Status update presentation #1 for the Cayucos Sustainable Water Project Status update presentation #1 for the Cayucos Sustainable Water Project November.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Proposed Capital Program and the 2010 Capital Budget Presented to The Environment Committee August.
City of Tallahassee Wastewater Treatment System Hydrogeology Workshop – 2005 May 12 – 13, 2005.
City of Alexandria, Virginia Sanitary Sewer Master Plan February 23, 2013 City Council Public Hearing.
NC AWWA-WEA 95th Annual Conference
EXPANSION OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY’S NORTHWEST WATER TREATMENT PLANT Public Utilities.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Public Information Meeting Wastewater Treatment January 26, 2016.
COMPARISON OF MBBR AND Suspended growth BNR Performance at the HRWTF
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
Kevin Colvett, PE Jonathan Childs, PE CH2M HILL, Nashville CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN AND ENGINEERING REPORT, PHASE III, FOR THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD, TN Presentation.
2011 WCW Conference. Fort McMurray James Sacker, Director Environmental Hugh Crawford, Wastewater Supervisor Plant Operations staff Alberta Environment.
COOSA-NORTH GEORGIA REGIONAL WATER PLANNING COUNCIL Water Demand Forecasting: Energy Update May 4, 2016 NGWRP Meeting CH2M.
Town of Davie Utilities Department Renuka M. Bajnath John McGeary.
1 CTC 450 Review WW Sludge Processes. 2 Objectives Understand the basics with respect to operation of wastewater systems.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2015 / 16 First Quarter Enterprise Performance Measures Update John Ward Director of Engineering.
City of Farmersville Wastewater Project January 26, 2016 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
1 BIOSOLIDS SHORT AND LONG RANGE PLANNING Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 11, 2011.
CTC 450 Review WW Sludge Processes.
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
North Texas Municipal Water District “Regional Service Through Unity … Meeting Our Region’s Needs Today and Tomorrow” Water Supplies Vital for the Future.
Jon Risgaard, Wastewater Branch Rick Bolich, Raleigh Regional Office
The Nuts & Bolts of TBLL Development
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Project
Facilities Plan Update
Biosolids Planning – Core Team Meeting
City of Janesville Wastewater Facility Plan Amendment Public Hearing
City Council Business Meeting
The Wausau Wastewater Treatment Facility
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Commission Agenda Item #5
Post Point Treatment Plant Resource Recovery Project Update
Presentation transcript:

2008 Facility Plan Update May 2008

Purpose  Comprehensive Plan through 2033 –Builds on Past Work –Adjust for Changing Conditions  Identify Capacity, Compliance, and Rehabilitation needs –Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility –Biosolids Management Program –Transmission System  Develop Cost-Effective Capital Improvement Program –To meet Future (more stringent) Effluent Quality Requirements –Accommodate Growth  Renewal 2003 Wastewater Utility Plan –Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG)

Updates 2003 Wastewater Utility Plan Defines South Secondary Improvements (PAR 1085) Updates Transmission System InfoWorks Model Updates 2007 Land Use Model Updates Plant GPS-X and Hydraulic Models Includes PELs from Future Effluent Limits Study Updates 2003 Facility Plan & 2002 Service Area Utility Plan, and 2007 Biosolids Study Incorporates North Secondary Improvements (PAR 942) What’s Included in 2008 Update Does not include IS/Support facilities

South Secondary Improvements  Parallel Track –Ammonia Compliance Deadline December 31, 2014 Jan 08 South Secondary Predesign Define South Secondary Needs Jun 07Jul 07 Technical Team Review Develop Alternative Layouts and Costs Aug 07 Begin Facility Plan Feb 07 Complete Facility Plan Mar 08 Complete Predesign Mar 09

Metro District Service Area 615 square miles and includes City and County of Denver and parts of Adams, Arapahoe, and Jefferson counties Six Drainage Basins

Member Municipalities and Special Connectors 20 Member Municipalities and 25 Special Connectors

Metro District Service Area Including Brighton and South Adams

Population and Employment Projections  Projections based on: –Updated Member Municipality & Special Connector information –Current population, employment & boundary information from DRCOG  TAZ Data (Transportation Analysis Zones) –Buildout projections from the Land Use Model  Population – Increase 39% or 1.5% per year thru 2033  Employment – Increase 52% or 2.0% per year thru 2033

Flow and Load Projections  Unit Flow Factors –85 gallons per capita per day –17 gallons per day per employee  Developed Service Area Projections  Adjusted to Determine Primary Influent Flows and Loads –Exclusion of area tributary to a future Box Elder WWTP –Reduction in flow of 5 mgd for the Sand Creek Water Reclamation Facility –Additional loads, such as in-plant and hauled wastes –Increase in BOD loads from DIA

Historic and Projected Primary Influent Flow and Loads

Existing Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility Liquid Stream Capacity  Current max month rated capacity 220 mgd with EPC (~185 mgd Annual Average)  Capacity without EPC 161 mgd Annual Average (Secondary Treatment)  North and South Secondary Expansions required to meet capacity and regulatory requirements  RWHTF AAF capacity needs to be 210 mgd in 2033

Existing Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility Solids Stream Capacity  Improvements to the digesters and high-solids centrifuges are planned during

Existing Transmission System Summary  219 miles of interceptors, 12 miles of force mains and 4 lift stations  Capacity evaluation based on: –Previous modeling from 2002 SAUP –Updated Land Use Model –Updates to existing InfoWorks Model

Phase 5 Beyond 2023 Discharge Permit Requirements Anticipated to Remain Unchanged Through Planning Period 3Minimum dissolved oxygen, mg/L pH range, standard units 0.011Maximum chlorine residual, mg/L 30TSS, mg/L 17CBOD, mg/L – 8.68 – 8.68 – Nitrates (plus nitrites), mg-N/L Daily maximum 7-day average 30-day average – Total ammonia, mg-N/L Daily maximum 7-day average 30-day average Discharge Permit Requirements Anticipated to Change in Phase 2 Phase Phase Parameter Total phosphorus, mg-P/L Phasing Assumption Assumed Range Total nitrogen, mg-N/L Phasing Assumption Assumed Range Phase Parameter Discharge Permit Requirements Anticipated to Change in Phases 4 and 5 Regulatory Assumptions

Improvements and Project Implementation  Transmission System improvements driven by rehabilitation needs and capacity constraints due to growth  RWHTF improvements phased over planning period to meet capacity, regulatory, and rehabilitation needs  Used recently developed Metro District Cost Estimating Guide for consistent and better cost estimates  Recommended improvements “packaged,” according to type, location, and timing –Construction Efficiencies –Save Capital Costs  Goal of the phased program is to continuously meet customer service and regulatory requirements through the end of the planning period

Transmission System Rehabilitation  Inspection Program –Closed-circuit television and surface inspections –CCTV inspection annually on portion of system –CCTV taping of each interceptor every 10 years –Three categories based on degree of degradation  Transmission Division reviews to assess condition  Engineering Department performs second review, further refines the condition, develops a cost estimate and schedule

Transmission System Rehabilitation  CIPP  Slip Lining  Manhole Rehab

Transmission System Capacity Improvements  Transmission System hydraulic modeling –2002 model updated with Sand Creek Basin Wastewater Master Plan –Model updated with revised population, employment, and unit flows –Model runs performed for 2007, 2015, and 2030 –Assumed northeast Service Area flows will continue to RWHTF –Flow data being collected to further refine model calibration in 2008

Metro District Transmission System Capacity Concerns in 2015

Metro District Transmission System Capacity Concerns in 2030

Transmission System Project Implementation Schedule

Basis for RWHTF Recommended Improvements  2003 Facility Plan established basic direction –Five-stage air-activated sludge with BNR –Phasing out the high-purity oxygen system  North Secondary Improvements Project (PAR 942) –CaRRB process to address centrate treatment  Objective is to have similar processes in the North and South Complexes that operate and perform in a comparable fashion

RWHTF Recommended Improvements

RWHTF Project Implementation Schedule

Projected Capital Expenditures $1.86 billion projected $1,528,000,000 – RWHTF $332,000,000 – Transmission System

Questions

RWHTF Buildout Site Plan (230 mgd)