CONCEPTUAL MODELING PROTOCOL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT PROGRAM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nez Perce Tribe Air Quality Program Air Toxics Monitoring.
Advertisements

The History of Trona Cloud Hazardous Air Pollutants “Left Click” to Next Slide.
EPA Air Toxics Programs Ruben R. Casso Toxics Coordinator EPA Region 6 Phone
The Trona Cloud Featuring OCI, FMC, General Chemical, and Solvay Minerals “Left Click” to Next Slide.
ANALYSIS OF TRACER DATA FROM URBAN DISPERSION EXPERIMENTS Akula Venkatram and Vlad Isakov  Motivation for Field Experiments  Field Studies Conducted.
Performance of Air Quality Models in Urban Areas  Objectives and Motivation  St. Louis study and ISC urban  Model Improvements  Performance of Improved.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Meteorological Data Issues for Class II Increment Analysis.
Use of Prognostic Meteorological Model Output in Dispersion Models Eighth Modeling Conference Research Triangle Park, NC.
The Use of High Resolution Mesoscale Model Fields with the CALPUFF Dispersion Modelling System in Prince George BC Bryan McEwen Master’s project
An initial linkage of the CMAQ modeling system at neighborhood scales with a human exposure model Jason Ching/Thomas Pierce Air-Surface Processes Modeling.
INTEGRATION OF MEASURED, MODELLED & REMOTELY SENSED AIR QUALITY DATA & IMPACTS ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN HIGHVELD Kubeshnie Bhugwandin - November 2009.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
Air Quality Modeling.
Development and Testing of Comprehensive Transport and Dispersion Model Evaluation Methodologies Steven Hanna (GMU and HSPH) OFCM Hanna 19 June 2003.
Organic Chemistry - Carbon Compounds Carbon - C, atomic number 6, molecular weight 12 Electron configuration: 1s 2 2s 2 2p 2 Tetravalent – 4 single bonds.
Lakeshore Air Toxics Study (LATS) Jeff Stoakes Senior Environmental Manager Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM ) 1.
EPA PBT MONITORING WORKSHOP A NOAA PERSPECTIVE? Richard S. Artz and Jawed Hameedi National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Silver Spring, Maryland.
1 WILMINGTON AIR QUALITY STUDY Status Update and Introduction to Modeling Protocol Vlad Isakov Todd Sax August 27, 2003 California Air Resources Board.
Wilmington Air Quality Study Modeling for Neighborhood Assessment Todd Sax Vlad Isakov September 12, 2002 California Air Resources Board.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Air Quality Monitoring Networks Maine DEP 2015 Annual AQ Monitoring Meeting MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Protecting Maine’s Air, Land and.
Air Toxics Study Prepared in collaboration with the University of Louisville, School of Public Health Depts. Epidemiology and Clinical Investigation Sciences.
Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Health Impacts of Air Pollution on Communities Source Category Regulations Dan Donohoue Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Regional Modeling Update September 12, 2002 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Ajith Kaduwela, Ph.D Luis F. Woodhouse, Ph.D.
Modeling Overview For Barrio Logan Community Health Neighborhood Assessment Program Andrew Ranzieri Vlad Isakov Tony Servin Shuming Du October 10, 2001.
Proposed Regulatory Framework Kentucky Air Toxic Program (KATP) Presentation to: Kentucky Chemical Industry Council November 10, 2005 Environmental & Public.
Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP,
1 CAPCOA Health Impacts of Air Pollution on Communities September 19-20, : :35 Current Paradigms: Strengths and Limitations Source Category.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Planning and Technical Support Division August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Estimate of Air Emissions from Shale Gas Development and Production in North Carolina July 8, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission.
CPHA 2014 Cumulative Impacts of Air Pollution Mapped at a Neighbourhood Level Stephanie Gower Toronto Public Health May 27, 2014 Co-authors: Ronald Macfarlane,
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Overview and Status of the Emissions Data Analysis and Modeling Portions of the Virginia Mercury Study 1 st Technical Meeting Richmond, VA 31 May 2007.
Icfi.com April 30, 2009 icfi.com © 2006 ICF International. All rights reserved. AIR TOXICS IN MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA: A MONITORING AND MODELING STUDY WEBINAR:
Talking About Air Toxics John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
Air Toxics Update Melanie Loyzim February 25, 2010.
1 Microscale Air Dispersion Modeling Community Health Neighborhood Assessment Program Working Draft Do Not Cite or Quote Tony Servin, P.E. October 10,
Cristina Gonzalez-Maddux ITEP MODEL INPUTS AND FEDERAL GUIDANCE CRISTINA GONZALEZ-MADDUX ITEP, RESEARCH SPECIALIST.
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
1 Tracer Experiments Barrio Logan Working Draft Do Not Cite or Quote Tony Servin, P.E. Shuming Du, Ph.D. Vlad Isakov, Ph.D. September 12, 2002 Air Resources.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
1 Neighborhood Assessment: Technical Issues to be investigated in the Wilmington Air Quality Study Vlad Isakov Todd Sax May 06, 2003 California Air Resources.
JATAP Joint Air Toxics Assessment Project 2011 National Tribal Forum for Air Quality Spokane, WA June 14-16, 2011 A Successful Multi-Jurisdictional Research.
1 Open Discussion Technical Challenges for Statewide Application Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May.
Evaluation of 2002 Multi-pollutant Platform: Air Toxics, Mercury, Ozone, and Particulate Matter US EPA / OAQPS / AQAD / AQMG Sharon Phillips, Kai Wang,
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
1 DRAFT Report for Air Quality Analysis on Cumulative Emissions, Barrio Logan Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support.
Air Toxics & Public Health Committee Update Heidi Hales Monitoring and Assessment Committee Meeting Troy, NH April 24, 2007.
Producing Meteorological Fields for Local Scale Pollutant Transport and Dispersion Estimates 1)Using the CALPUFF modeling system. 2)The model system produces.
EPA’s 8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling Comments on Model Evaluation By Bob Paine, ENSR (Peer reviewed by the A&WMA AB-3 Committee)
1 8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling – AWMA AB3 Comments on Lagrangian and Eulerian Long Range Transport/Regional Models By Bob Paine, ENSR.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Linda C. Murchison California Air Resources Board May 6th, 2002 Environmental Justice Program Barrio Logan Case Study Air Resources Board California Environmental.
AERLINE: Air Exposure Research model for LINE sources
Institute for Nature Management, Minsk, Belarus
ISG – Emission statements Update
Presentation transcript:

CONCEPTUAL MODELING PROTOCOL FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

Objectives of Modeling Protocol ldevelop and evaluate methodologies to estimate annual average concentrations of various pollutants released from multiple sources at the neighborhood scale (Barrio Logan) lrecommend a method to perform neighborhood assessments

Size of Modeling Domain lMicro-scale (Neighborhood scale) modeling - receptors located near emission sources, i.e., meters to few kilometers from the sources lRegional scale modeling - source and receptor distances of several kilometers, to hundreds of kilometers, to the size of air basins

Air Toxic Pollutants To Be Modeled lMicro-scale modeling - more than 100 pollutants, including: Acetaldehyde, Acrolein, Acrylonitrile, Arsenic, Benzene, Beryllium, 1,3- Butadiene, Cadmium, Chloroform, Hexavalent Chromium, Ethylene Dibromide, Dioxin, Diesel PM, Formaldehyde, Hydrazine, Lead, Manganese, Methylene Chloride, Mercury, Nickel, (PCBs), Perchloroethylene, Trichloroethylene, Vinyl Chloride lRegional modeling - 30 pollutants: Acetaldehyde, Acrolein, Arsenic, Benzene, Beryllium, 1,3-Butadiene, Cadmium, Carbon Tetrachloride, Chloroform, Diesel PM, Ethylene Dichloride, Ethylene Oxide, Formaldehyde, Hexavalent Chromium, Iron, Lead, Manganese, Mercury, Methylene Chloride, MTBE, Nickel, o-Dichlorobenzene, p-Dichlorobenzene, Perchloroethylene, Styrene, Toluene, Trichloroethylene, Vinyl Chloride, Xylenes, Zinc

Micro-scale Models to Estimate Annual Concentrations lTraditional Models l ISCST3 - U.S. EPA regulatory model l CALINE - U.S. EPA approved model for line sources lAdvanced Models l AERMOD - recommended as replacement for ISCST3 l CALPUFF- recommended model for complex terrain and for long-range transport lNew and Emerging Models l Lagrangian particle dispersion model - state-of-the- science short-range model that estimates concentrations at scales of meters to tens of meters from a source

Input Data For Micro-scale Modeling  meteorology (hourly surface observations from local airports and on-site measurements)  point source emissions (including some traditional “area wide” sources, e.g. dry cleaners)  mobile source emissions (hourly traffic volumes and emission factors)  source configurations (e.g., stack heights)  receptor locations

Micro-scale Modeling Domain - Mobile Sources

Micro-scale Modeling Domain - Point Sources

Regional Models To Estimate Annual Concentrations lTraditional Models UAM (Urban Airshed Model) - used for air quality planning lAdvanced Models Models-3 - state-of-science model developed by U.S. EPA

Regional Scale Modeling Objective: Estimate annual concentrations due to transport of pollutants from distant sources or air basin(s) that contribute to neighborhood areas (background concentrations) Improvements to Regional Scale Modeling: l Incorporate SAPRC 99 and air toxic chemistry l Apply over air basin(s) using an entire year of data for meteorology and emissions

Inputs For Regional Scale Modeling lDevelopment of Regional Emissions Inventory l Update the 1998 database to reflect seasonal variations in emissions and update toxic emissions as well l Utilize latest version of EMFAC2000 to estimate motor vehicle emissions lDevelopment of Meteorological Inputs for Regional Air Quality Models l CALMET - a diagnostic model that requires observational data for winds and temperature l MM5 - an advanced state-of-science prognostic meteorological model to simulate winds and temperatures

Location of the coarse and fine grids used in MM5 model

CALMET - Wind Fields (Morning)

CALMET - Wind Fields (Afternoon)

MM5 - Wind Fields (Afternoon)

Regional scale air quality modeling domain

Model Performance Evaluation lA scientific process to ensure models are working properly and are estimating reliable concentrations lCompare model estimates of concentrations with observational data and conduct operational and diagnostic evaluation lFollow the procedures identified in ARB's Technical Guidance Document on modeling. lStandard statistical techniques such as bias and gross error will be calculated for annual model estimates of concentrations as well as for monthly and seasonal averaging times

Databases For Evaluating Model Performance Micro-scale models: lConduct a field monitoring study to collect a database for short-range dispersion in urban neighborhood areas lField study includes release of a tracer gas, bag sampling and continuous monitoring of the tracer gas, and meteorological measurements which include six sonic anemometers and a mini-sodar lSampling will be conducted over a one week period for four seasons of year at several sites lFunding available for total of 20 weeks of sampling

Databases For Evaluating Model Performance Regional Models: lUse routine meteorological and air quality (criteria and toxic) data collected by air districts and ARB lUtilize data collected from recent studies (SCOS97 and CRPAQS/CCOS) and other data gathered from special monitoring studies

Recommendations From Study lIdentify which micro-scale and regional models are best suited for assessing neighborhood impacts lDevelop recommendations for guidelines to determine the cumulative impacts posed by air pollutants at the neighborhood-scale lShare modeling results and recommendations with U.S. EPA and other interested groups