AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June 15 -18, 2003 Auckland New Zealand AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM François Soumis & Mirela Stojković.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 4 Building A New Trust Model.
Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
Vastly Distributed System ATCSCC CDM net TFM hub TRACONs TRACON(s) Towers ARTCC ARTCC(s) Towers Airports Industry AOC(s) GA International.
Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment I)
Collaborative Gate Allocation Alex Cuevas, Joanna Ji, Mattan Mansoor, Katie McLaughlin, Joshua Sachse, and Amir Shushtarian.
Evaluation of an Auction Mechanism for Allocating Airport Arrival Slots Eric J. Cholankeril William Hall John-Paul Clarke June 5, 2003.
Overview 1 Airport & Aircraft Management 2 Flight Scheduling 3 Reports 4 ContentsContents.
Line Balancing Problem A B C 4.1mins D 1.7mins E 2.7 mins F 3.3 mins G 2.6 mins 2.2 mins 3.4 mins.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n New Approaches to Improving the Robustness of Airline Schedules Prof.
Optimizing Airline Operations with NetAdvisor Contact: Ashish Tripathy Website:
© 2002 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Economic Effects of Congestion and Delay Joe Sinnott March 2002.
CREW SCHEDULING Past and Future Jacques Desrosiers HEC & GERAD Montréal, Canada.
5/25/2015 Operations Research Group Continental Airlines Bridging Schedule Changes When Bookings Exist Judy Pastor Continental Airlines AGIFORS YM 2002.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Evans benefits ARAM1 jee 6/4/2015 Assessment of Aviation Delay Reduction Benefits for Nowcasts and Short Term Forecasts James Evans.
Airlines and Linear Programming (and other stuff) Dr. Ron Lembke.
Sabre Airline Solutions
Airlines and Linear Programming Dr. Ron Tibben-Lembke.
1 A Second Stage Network Recourse Problem in Stochastic Airline Crew Scheduling Joyce W. Yen University of Michigan John R. Birge Northwestern University.
Airspace Resource Allocation -Operations Impact Prof. R. John Hansman, Director MIT International Center for Air Transportation
Flying the A-380 The Case for Bigger Aircraft MIT meets Lufthansa 2003.
Airline Fleet Routing and Flight Scheduling under Market Competitions
New Approaches to Add Robustness into Airline Schedules Shan Lan, Cindy Barnhart and John-Paul Clarke Center for Transportation and Logistics Massachusetts.
Skeye Aviation Systems is a business unit of ARKYS ARKYS is a Microsoft Partner. ARKYS Team of developers and analysts are Certified Microsoft Silver Developers.
Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II) Saba Neyshabouri.
The JetBlue Story: The JetBlue Story:   JetBlue Airways took to the air on February 11, 2000 with the inauguration of service between New York City's.
Airline Schedule Planning: Accomplishments and Opportunities Airline Schedule Planning: Accomplishments and Opportunities C. Barnhart and A. Cohn, 2004.
Luis Cadarso(1), Vikrant Vaze(2), Cynthia Barnhart(3), Ángel Marín(1)
Airborne Flights with ETA before the GDP Start Time CDM A&D Meeting 5 June 2001.
Content : 1. Introduction 2. Traffic forecasting and traffic allocation ◦ 2.1. Traffic forecasting ◦ 2.2. Traffic allocation 3. Fleeting problems ◦ 3.1.
Carmen Systems Carmen person, Title 23 September 2003.
AGIFORS, 5/28/03 Aircraft Routing and Crew Pairing Optimization Diego Klabjan, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign George L. Nemhauser, Georgia.
Crew Planning Optimization Mastering the planning objectives
1 Botond Kovari: Crew Planning 1 st Int. Conf. on Research in Air Transportation - Zilina, Nov 22-24, 2004 Cost Optimisation Methods in Air Crew Planning.
B OARD P RESENTATION 2006 Group 8 Dickson CHAN / Michelle CHONG / Jonathan WONG / Karen WONG.
Agenda Business problem context Definitions Problem Description
NetLine/Crew The Integrated Solution for Resource Management Presenter: Tilo Hillmer Manager Business Development Lufthansa Systems Berlin.
MIT ICAT ICATMIT M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Virtual Hubs: A Case Study Michelle Karow
Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars CONGESTION PRICING IN AIR TRANSPORTATION Karine Deschinkel Laboratoire PRiSM – Université de Versailles.
Carmen Passenger Recovery Solver
Weather Operations at Western US Airports Rick Curtis Chief Meteorologist Southwest Airlines
Federal Aviation Administration ATO Future Schedule Generation Performance Analysis and Strategy January 27, 2010.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Aviation Data Bases Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative Technology Administration United States.
LMINET2: An Enhanced LMINET Dou Long, Shahab Hasan December 10, 2008.
O&D Demand Forecasting: Dealing with Real-World Complexities Greg Campbell and Loren Williams.
Start Presentation. A Boeing Company The role of Simulation in installation of Explosive Detection Systems Auckland June 03 Helping our customers increase.
ASIA PACIFIC Air Traffic Flow Management
A Joint Research Project funded under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) of the European Commission Innovations in Automated Planning.
Erik Andersson CTO Carmen Systems
Airlines and Linear Programming (and other stuff) Dr. Ron Lembke.
Company presentation by Per Norén Chief Executive Officer AGIFORS 2003, New York.
15-853:Algorithms in the Real World
Proprietary & Confidential May 2003 Creating significant value from CALEB Technologies’ proven decision support- based solutions AGIFORS Conference New.
Route and Network Planning
Improving Revenue by System Integration and Cooperative Optimization Reservations & Yield Management Study Group Annual Meeting Berlin April 2002.
1 An Integer Linear Programming model for Airline Use (in the context of CDM) Intro to Air Traffic Control Dr. Lance Sherry Ref: Exploiting the Opportunities.
Airline Applications Developers since 1983 Over 120 AIMS Installations Worldwide ISO 9001 Certification Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliant Approved by FAA.
AGIFORS -- Airlines Operations, June Auckland, NZKeeping The World On Schedule1 AGIFORS Airline Operations 2003 Auckland, NZ, June
MODEL FOR DAILY OPERATIONAL FLIGHT SCHEDULE DESIGNING Slavica Nedeljković Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade Serbia and.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
LGA before and after AIR-21 December 13, 2000 Metron Inc.
Flight Rescheduling Jo-Anne Loh (jl3963) Anna Ming (axm2000) Dhruv Purushottam (dp2631) IEOR 4405 Production Scheduling (Spring 2016)
Introduction to Linear Programs
A Modeling Framework for Flight Schedule Planning
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Airlines and Linear Programming (and other stuff)
Presentation transcript:

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM François Soumis & Mirela Stojković AD OPT Research Consultants, GERAD

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Altitude Suite of Products Altitude has developed a suite of crew planning, optimization and management solutions: –Crew Pairing System –Preferential Bidding System (PBS) –Bidline System –Manpower Planning System (MPP) –Vacation Bidding System (VBS)

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand AIRCRAFT RECOVERY PROBLEM PASSENGERS PLANNING DECISIONS PLANNING DECISIONS PERTURBATIONS FLIGHT DELAYS AIRPORT CAPACITY PERTURBATIONS FLIGHT DELAYS AIRPORT CAPACITY FLIGHTS CANCELLATIONS DELAYS AIRCRAFT ASSIGNMENT ROUTING FLIGHTS CANCELLATIONS DELAYS AIRCRAFT ASSIGNMENT ROUTING CREW

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand AIRCRAFT RECOVERY PROBLEM CREWFLIGHTS EXTENDED DUTIES SWAPS CREWFLIGHTS EXTENDED DUTIES SWAPS REROUTING PASSENGERS MINIMIZE DELAYS PRESERVE CONNECTIONS PASSENGERS MINIMIZE DELAYS PRESERVE CONNECTIONS REROUTING PLANNING DECISIONS PLANNING DECISIONS PERTURBATIONS FLIGHT DELAYS AIRPORT CAPACITY PERTURBATIONS FLIGHT DELAYS AIRPORT CAPACITY FLIGHTS CANCELLATIONS DELAYS AIRCRAFT ASSIGNMENT ROUTING FLIGHTS CANCELLATIONS DELAYS AIRCRAFT ASSIGNMENT ROUTING

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand MODULAR SYSTEM INTERACTIVE MODULE (SMALL DISRUPTIONS) Graphical user interface Cost evaluation: aircraft, crew, passengers Network search engine –3 best swap alternatives for each disruption

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand OPTIMIZATION MODULE (MAJOR DISRUPTIONS ) Fix all disruptions simultaneously –Adjust flight schedule: delays, cancellations –Reroute aircraft and crews Minimize aircraft + crew + passenger cost Constraints: –Airport: capacity –Flight: maximal delay, aircraft type –Aircraft: connection time, maintenance –Crew: qualification, duty duration, connection time

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Schedule Thinning Scenarios Thunderstorm at YYZ, 102 involved flights Capacity Reduction Period Stabilization period

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Scheduled vs. Reduced Flight Loads Reduction: 27% Flight statistics: Cancelled flights: 0 Delayed flights: 23 Average delay: 39 min Solution time: 47 sec

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Reduction: 45% Flight statistics: Cancelled flights: 0 Delayed flights: 31 Average delay: 51 min Solution time: 45 sec

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Scheduled vs. Reduced Flight Loads Reduction: 63% Flight statistics: Cancelled flights: 1 Delayed flights: 39 Average delay: 56 min Solution time: 56 sec

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Scheduled vs. Reduced Flight Loads Reduction: 27% in [17:00 17:44], 63% in [17:45 18:29] Flight statistics: Cancelled flights: 0 Delayed flights: 36 Average delay: 37 min Solution time: 51 sec

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Scheduled vs. Reduced Flight Loads Reduction: 63% in [17:00 17:44], 27% in [17:45 18:29] Flight statistics: Cancelled flights: 0 Delayed flights: 31 Average delay: 56 min Solution time: 56 sec

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Scenario 63_27: Aircraft Statistics Aircraft itineraries: 77 Disrupted aircraft itineraries: 11 Cancelled flights: 0 Situation before reoptimizing aircraft itineraries: –Number of additional flights to be cancelled: 20 Situation after reoptimizing aircraft itineraries (aircraft swaps): –Number of additional flights to be cancelled: 0 –Additionally modified aircraft itineraries: 22

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Aircraft itineraries after the flight schedule modifications

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Aircraft Swaps at YYZ

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand New Aircraft Itineraries

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Related Crew Itineraries 15:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:0000:00 D 0790YYZ 3552YYZ Crew_013 Crew_034 Crew_050 Reference hour Reduction period Stabilization period Crew_bbb: Maximum duty time violation Delayed flight

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Related Crew Itineraries 15:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:0000:00 D 0790YYZ 3552YYZ Crew_013 Crew_034 Crew_050 Reference hour Reduction period Stabilization period Crew_bbb: Maximum duty time violation 0582 YYZ0828Crew_033 Crew_ccc: Short connection YYZ0793Crew_058 Delayed flight

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Related Crew Itineraries 15:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:0000:00 D 0790YYZ 3552YYZ Crew_013 Crew_034 Crew_050 Reference hour Reduction period Stabilization period Crew_bbb: Maximum duty time violation 0582 YYZ0828Crew_033 Crew_ccc: Short connection YYZ0793Crew_058 YYZ 0518 Crew_081 YYZ Crew_087 Crew_eee: Unqualified crew Delayed flight

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Scenario 63_27: Impact on Crew Modified aircraft itineraries: 33 out of 77 Crew disruptions: ??? out of 88 Optimization aircraft + crew Only 7 disrupted crews Swaps to settle problem involve only 6 more crews

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Crew Swaps at YYZ Crew_ :0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:0000:00 YYZ D 3634 D 0790 YYZ 3192D 0543YYZ 0175YYZ 3552YYZ 0463D 0175 Crew_005 Crew_007 Crew_013 Crew_029 Crew_030 Crew_034 Crew_050 YYZ Reference hour YULYHZ YWG DEN YOWYWG Reduction period Stabilization period ORD LGA Crew_099 YYZ1126 Crew_bbb: Maximum duty time violation DEN 0582 YYZ0828BOSCrew_033 Crew_ccc: Short connection YYZ0456YOW 0461 YYZ0793Crew_058 YYZ 0518 YQBCrew_081 YYZ YUL Crew_087 Crew_eee: Unqualified crew Crew_aaa: Legal itinerary YOW

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Sample of the planned passenger connections at YYZ 16:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:0000:0001: YUL ORD YUL LGA Reduction period Stabilization period LAX YYC 0759 YEG YQR 3553 YYJ 3878 YWG YOW a Passenger connection a: planned passengers

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Sample of the planned passenger connections at YYZ 16:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:0000:0001: YUL ORD YUL LGA Delayed flight Reduction period Stabilization period LAX YYC 0759 YEG YQR 3553 YYJ 3878 YWG YOW 2; 0 5; 0 5; 4 a; b Short connection a: planned passengers b: served passengers

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Scenario 63_27: Passengers Statistics Passengers ScheduledServed Arrivals Departures Total (99%)

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Solution Summary Capacity reduction (%) _6363_27 Cancelled flights00100 Delayed flights Average delay (min) Modified aircraft itineraries Modified crew itineraries CPU (sec)

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand Conclusion OPTIMIZATION MODULE GLOBAL VIEW FIX MANY PERTURBATIONS SIMULTANEOUSLY CONSIDER AIRCRAFT, CREW, PASSENGERS SOLUTION TIME < 1 MINUTE OPTIMIZATION MODULE GLOBAL VIEW FIX MANY PERTURBATIONS SIMULTANEOUSLY CONSIDER AIRCRAFT, CREW, PASSENGERS SOLUTION TIME < 1 MINUTE INTERACTIVE MODULE VISUALISATION EVALUATION FINE TUNING INTERACTIVE MODULE VISUALISATION EVALUATION FINE TUNING MAJOR OR MEDIUM DISRUPTIONS NEW PLAN

AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM AGIFORS Airline Operations June , 2003 Auckland New Zealand AD OPT Technologies 3535 Queen Mary, Suite 650 Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3V 1H AIRCRAFT RECOVERY SYSTEM François Soumis & Mirela Stojković AD OPT Research Consultants, GERAD