Inmarsat Presentation to MRATC 6 December 2007 Brian Mullan Head, Maritime Safety Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Advertisements

1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 11, 2006 ASTM Training Session Bob Morgan Brynn Iwanowski.
AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
Module N° 6 – Prescription/Performance based environment.
1 Safety Policy April Safety Policy National Level Regulator Service Provider Service Provider.
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
1 Overview of the 2011 Programme Budget Resolution Nicola Virgill-Rolle Alternate Representative Bahamas Chair Working Group on the Draft 2011 Programme.
EU funds’ evaluation plan , Latvia
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Regional Policy Delegated Act on the methodology for the quality review of major projects 1 Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI.
05 July 2007Cologne NPA WG66.009: Type and Group Ratings Juan Anton.
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Part I ~~ History.
UKSON e-Navigation Operational & Technical Working Group 16 th February 2007.
A Joint Code of Practice Objectives and Summary Presentation
STCW ‘78 The International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
PRESENTATION TO THE JOINT RULES COMMITTEE 15 MARCH 2012 ON THE PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PANEL ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED.
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
The New GMP Annex 11 and Chapter 4 Deadline for coming into operation: 30 June 2011.
City of Miami PROPOSED Fiscal Year 2009 BUDGET. 2 Budget Focus To prepare a structurally balanced general operating budget. To provide a budget, which.
School Board Audit Committee Training Module 7 Evaluation of the Audit Committee 1.
Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.
Quality Visits, Policies & Procedures 20 th & 21 st August 2014 Jude Conlon – Head of Operations & Quality 1.
Gemini Re-platforming Project Update April This presentation is to provide an overview of the Gemini Re-platforming Project (GRP) and provide early.
CIP Cyber Security – Security Management Controls
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) Phase III – Validation Thomas Howard Chris Pierce.
Slide 1 FAA’s Special Technical Audit of Boeing and the Audit Resolution Plan.
Secure System Administration & Certification DITSCAP Manual (Chapter 6) Phase 4 Post Accreditation Stephen I. Khan Ted Chapman University of Tulsa Department.
Safety Radio GMDSS.
Obligations of the Company
1.2.1 > ISPS Module ISPS Code Responsibilities
INTERTANKO ISTEC Meeting 26 – 28 March ISPS Code Areas of particular concern during Shipboard Verifications.
IMO Activities to enhance Maritime Security
How the IMO is meeting the challenges of dealing with maritime safety and security – an overview Neil Frank R. Ferrer Ocean Concerns Office Department.
ICT Strategy, Business Plan & Business Case for Community Information System Siobhan Hanna May 2009.
International Aerospace Quality Group The Initiatives of the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Steve Shepherd ~ European Sector Leader.
Familiarization with the 2010 Manila Amendments
Online Learning 1 Marine Facility Personnel with Security Responsibilities Canaport LNG
YOUR LOGO Round Table on "Dangerous Goods: Global and Regional Dimensions" Sea Transport Regulations Alfredo Parroquin Ohlson Technical Officer, Cargoes.
Copyright 2005 Welcome to The Great Lakes TL 9000 SIG TL 9000 Requirements Release 3.0 to Release 4.0 Differences Bob Clancy Vice President, BIZPHYX,
Client Name is.... Dr Lynda Speed
Rolf Zetterberg Swedish Maritime Safety Inspectorate Nordic Institute of Navigation e-Navigation Conference Oslo /17 Status of LRIT.
Equipment to be carried
Tripartite Discussions 31st Oct – 1st Nov 2005, Beijing Quality control on new buildings - Role and authority of Class Speaker – Robert Smart LR IACS Council.
City of Tshwane GDS August Reputation promise/mission The Auditor-General of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and, as the Supreme.
ICAO Flight Plan 2012 Workshop ARE YOU READY? Durban 24 August 2012.
PUBLIC SECTOR FINANCIAL CONTROL OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA By Ms Daina Vaivadienė Chief Specialist of the Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology.
LONG RANGE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING (LRIT) A FLAG STATE PERSPECTIVE
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
MARITIME SECURITY STATUS REPORT JOSEPH ANGELO U.S. COAST GUARD.
TC SES: Inmarsat GMDSS Satellite System Enhancing Maritime Safety
THE FUTURE OF C-BAND IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION PERSPECTIVES FROM INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS PATRICK MASAMBU DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL-ITSO International.
Hull Survey for New Construction Z23 (July 2006) John Finch Chairman IACS expert group on the Hull survey for New Construction September 2006.
International Aerospace Quality Group The Initiatives of the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Steve Shepherd ~ European Sector Leader.
INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL MARITIME SECURITY: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS LATEST DEVELOPMENTS AT IMO JOSEPH J. ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE.
One Inspection, Two Inspections, Three Inspections, More Peter M Swift.
DNS/DHCP REFRESH June, Executive Summary The Domain Name System (DNS) and Dynamic Host Protocol (DHCP) are the lifeblood of the network. Without.
PASSENGER SHIPS – now and in the future
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
Céline Pasty London, 14 April 2016
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
BACKGROUND 1987 Joint MSC/MEPC working group on:
IMO MSC 96 Summary Report London, 11 to 21 May 2016 BUREAU VERITAS
New Assessment & Test Methods
Overview of the recommendations on software updates
INMARSAT > CTO> RMA
Presentation transcript:

Inmarsat Presentation to MRATC 6 December 2007 Brian Mullan Head, Maritime Safety Services

Maritime Safety and Security Highlights Inmarsat in the GMDSS Long-Range ID and Tracking (LRIT) Equipment upgrades Amendments to Resolution A.888(21) Relocation of the constellation

Inmarsat in the GMDSS Inmarsat is still the sole IMO-mandated provider of satellite communications for the GMDSS Availability for GMDSS is a minimum of 99.9% Inmarsat has constantly and consistently exceeded this figure Independently audited by IMSO and reported on to IMO Inmarsat commercial services use the same satellites and network Inmarsat A closes at midnight on 31 December 2007 Agreed by IMO – MSC/Circ.1076 Successful closure programme almost concluded º Overseen throughout by IMSO GMDSS services continue to be provided by: Inmarsat B, Inmarsat C/mini-C and Inmarsat Fleet F77 º Potential for GMDSS on FleetBroadband being assessed

Long-Range ID and Tracking Inmarsats role is as a Communications Service Provider (CSP) Reliable satellites and ground networks in place Proven equipment fitted on ships for GMDSS and SSAS More than 107,000 Inmarsat C/mini-C* Some LRIT issues; being addressed Approval by Administrations in hand Plus Inmarsat D+ Upgradeable network EDR and EPADR Inmarsat will be ready for LRIT Mk.2 * As at 01 November 2007

Equipment Upgrades LRIT trials by the Marshall Islands All Inmarsat C/mini-C Deficiencies in LRIT performance detected (not GMDSS) Related to ~10-15% of 1,000 ships trialled If extrapolated this could mean ~7,500 ships worldwide º Most will require upgrades to software and/or hardware IMO agreement on requirement for upgrades New Work Items for COMSAR and NAV (2 sessions each) Applies to all navigation and communications electronics Flag Administrations to ensure performance standards compliance Ship owners to check with manufacturers or their agents º If necessary, equipment to be made compliant Software, firmware or hardware upgrades

IMO Resolution A.888(21) The IMO Criteria for the Provision of Mobile Satellite Communications Systems in the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) Amendments were proposed; potentially to make it simpler for other satellite systems to be approved The original requirements remain and were approved by MSC 83 No dilution of standards Minor amendments only; replacement Resolution A.XXX(25) expected to be approved by the IMO 25 th Assembly Inmarsat remains the sole, approved satcom provider for the GMDSS

Recognised Mobile Satellite Service Provider (RMSSP) Allied to the proposed revisions to A.888(21), there had been moves to remove references to Inmarsat in SOLAS Substitution by Recognised Mobile Satellite Services Provider (RMSSP) previously accepted in the IMO Collision Regulations No other provider has come forward and Norway led the move to revert back from RMSSP to Inmarsat Agreed by COMSAR 11 and endorsed by MSC 83 Currently, no other potential provider has applied to IMO for recognition as a future GMDSS provider Delivery of maritime safety information Subsequent need for PSA and oversight by IMSO

Relocation of the constellation Inmarsat-4 flight 3 (I4F3) planned for launch March/April 2008 After successful launch and deployment: Optimisation of constellation Some satellites will be repositioned Optimisation plans have been subject to detailed validation by the Inmarsat safety services department Evaluation shows no threat to maritime safety services Either before, during or after relocation Full satellite contingency will continue to be provided throughout IMSO have been advised of the plans and are content º Regular contingency exercises will continue to be carried out º IMSO will keep IMO advised accordingly

Summary Inmarsat is still the only IMO-mandated satcom provider for GMDSS No other applications have come forward Inmarsats role in LRIT is clear …and Inmarsat is prepared for potential increases in capacity requirements LRIT (and other) equipment upgrade requirements are clear at IMO Compliance path is similarly clear Resolution A.888(21) revisions maintain robust GMDSS requirements But door remains open to any potential provider to meet these requirements Maritime Safety Services closely engaged in relocation plans This process is dynamic and ongoing Full oversight of GMDSS contingencies by IMSO throughout

Brian Mullan Head, Maritime Safety Services Inmarsat plc 99 City Road London EC1Y 1AX United Kingdom Tel: Thank you!