doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 1 Smart Grid ad hoc – March 2011 Date: 15 March 2011 Abstract: NIST PAP#2 Status Australian Smart Metering FERC meeting UK Consultation NameCompanyAddressPhone Bruce KraemerMarvell5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA,

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 2 Smart Grid – March 2011 Tuesday pm1 - Room 4912 UK Consultation Update of activities in P2030 IEEE Smart Grid Australian Smart Metering RFI Revision NIST Smart Grid PAP#2 Report plan & Open SG Thursday pm1 - Room 4912 Work plan for NIST Smart Grid PAP#2 Report V2 ITU Focus Group ITU-R paper - WP1A document

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 3 March 15 Meeting Topics TopicActionsFeb 2 Agenda PAP2Vote closed Jan 28 Call Feb 11 Meeting Mar 10 Review vote & next steps Australian Smart Metering Questions by Jan 31 Response by Feb 11 Generate responses Review responses FERC Standards acceptance meeting UK ConsultationStatus = closed awaiting publication of Gov’t response

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 4 Smart Metering Implementation Programme: prospectus status Consultation has closed and is awaiting publication of the Government’s response. (1 of 21 consultations in similar state) UK aim is to provide a summary of public responses to consultation within three months of the closing date of October 28.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 5 Sponsor Ballot group formed in February Initial Sponsor Ballot Opened: Wednesday March Closes: Friday April

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 6 P2030 Introduction Title: Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and Information Technology Operation With the Electric Power System (EPS), and End-Use Applications and Loads Scope: This document provides guidelines for smart grid interoperability. This guide provides a knowledge base addressing terminology, characteristics, functional performance and evaluation criteria, and the application of engineering principles for smart grid interoperability of the electric power system with end use applications and loads. The guide discusses alternate approaches to good practices for the smart grid. Purpose: This standard provides guidelines in understanding and defining smart grid interoperability of the electric power system with end-use applications and loads. Integration of energy technology and information and communications technology is necessary to achieve seamless operation for electric generation, delivery, and end-use benefits to permit two way power flow with communication and control. Interconnection and intra-facing frameworks and strategies with design definitions are addressed in this standard, providing guidance in expanding the current knowledge base. This expanded knowledge base is needed as a key element in grid architectural designs and operation to promote a more reliable and flexible electric power system.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 7 Sponsor Ballot questions Do we have attendees enrolled in sponsor ballot? Is the ballot document for review? –“Balloters are not permitted to duplicate or distribute the draft or approved standards to any other party without permission granted from the IEEE” If I didn’t join the ballot group can I submit a comment? –Yes rogue comments or public comments are accepted.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 8 Pull downs About Smart Grid Conceptual Model Media Center Conferences Publications Standards Education Public Policy

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 9 Australia has issued a call for candidates for their Smart Metering HAN Responses from 802 should be provided –Probably best from individual WG, e.g , , –

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 10 Australian HAN RFI The schedule for the RFI is as follows: 20 December 2010Issue the RFI to standards organisations 21 January 2011Standards organisations to register their participation via 31 January 2011Closing date for questions 11 February 2011Submissions due date 14 to 25 February 2011Preparation of initial evaluation and first draft of review to be sent to the BRWG 28 February 2011Issue RFI draft evaluation to the BRWG 8-9 March 2011First BRWG workshop review March 2011BRWG's HAN Technical Group work (as required) 5-6 April 2011Final BRWG workshop review 12 April 2011Submission of the RFI report and Smart Metering Infrastructure Functionality Specification Change Control to the NSSC 20 April 2011NSSC meeting May 2011Issue HAN interface standard report to the MCE's SCO

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 11 Question wording - submitted Jan 28 Secretariat, National Smart Energy Metering Program, Within the IEEE Standards Association is a group of projects referred to as 802. The IEEE 802® LAN/MAN Standards Committee develops LAN and metropolitan area network (MAN) standards. The most widely used standards are for the Ethernet family, Token Ring, Wireless LAN, Wireless PAN, Wireless MAN, Wireless RAN, Bridging and Virtual Bridged LANs. An individual working group provides the focus for each area. Upon reviewing your HAN RFI we decided we need to get an answer to a question before further completing responses. Some portions of the HAN RFI can be read as a request for standards information while others appear to be a system procurement specification. The technology contained in a complete Smart Metering HAN system cannot be provided by any single SDO and would need to be provided by a wide variety of Standards Organizations. Standards created by IEEE such as those in the 802 family (e.g , , , ) contain specifications for only ISO layers 1 and 2. Layers 3 and 4 for protocols such as TCP/IP are provided by IETF. Several of the questions refer to transfer of smart metering protocol messages at layers 5-7 that would be contained in a higher level protocol specification developed by yet another organization outside IEEE 802 such as IEC or ZigBee and their Smart Energy Profile 2.0 (SEP 2.0). Additionally, testing and certification is typically provided by a trade organization such as ZigBee, Bluetooth SIG, WiMAX, and the Wi-Fi Alliance. We propose to directly answer those questions that refer to technology under our control and explain how technology supplied by other SDO and trade sources would complete the response. Do you have any comments on our approach?

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 12 Australian Response (Jan 30, 2011) We are happy with your approach and look forward to receiving the information. Kind regards Andrew Mann NSMP Program Director Submission: response-to-australian-han-rfi.doc

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 13 FERC Jan 31, 2011 meeting The purpose of the technical conference is to obtain further information to aid the Commission’s determination of whether there is “sufficient consensus” that the five families of standards posted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology are ready for Commission consideration in a rulemaking proceeding, as directed by section 1305(d) of the Energy Independence and Security Act of All interested parties are invited to file written comments on or before March 2, 2011 that relate to the issues discussed during the technical conference. Commenters are encouraged to use the questions presented in the attached agenda for the conference to organize their comments.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 14 Prior Events In January 2010, NIST issued a Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, containing a list of standards identified as applicable to the smart grid. On October 6, 2010, NIST notified the Commission by letter that it had selected five families of standards as ready for consideration by regulators and posted summaries of those families of standards on its website. In response to these subjects, panelists are encouraged to discuss topics that include, but are not limited to, the following: –Time and resources devoted to the review of standards; –Contribution of standards to increasing interoperability; –The standards’ attention to cyber security concepts such as authentication, encryption, integrity, and availability; –Consideration of legacy system integration issues; –The U.S. power industry’s familiarity with the identified standards –Lessons learned from industries within and outside the power

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 15 October 7 FERC Action News Release: October 7, 2010 Docket No. RM View Printable PDF VersionView Printable PDF Version FERC takes first step in smart grid rulemaking process The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) today took the first step in starting a formal rulemaking proceeding involving the five groups of smart grid standards identified by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as ready for consideration. The NIST standards are the first of what may be several hundred more to be identified for FERC consideration in the coming years. NIST handed off the first standards to FERC under Section 1305 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), which requires FERC to adopt in a formal rulemaking proceeding standards and protocols necessary to ensure smart grid functionality and interoperability in interstate transmission of electric power, and regional and wholesale electricity markets. FERC has created a docket, RM , for this rulemaking, and in the near future will issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) that will include opportunity for public comment.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 16 The Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Development and Identification Process Going Forward Purpose of Jan 31 FERC meeting The Commission understands that the process for identifying smart grid standards at NIST has been and is likely to remain dynamic in nature. The Commission seeks information on the development and identification of smart grid interoperability standards going forward. Panelists are encouraged to address: –Changes that have been made in the process for developing, reviewing, and identifying smart grid standards subsequent to the process used by NIST to select the five families of standards posted on October 6, –How any revisions to NIST’s existing process to identify smart grid standards for regulatory consideration will provide for the sharing of information, transparency and the development of consensus.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 17 FERC Jan 31 Meeting Topics In response to these subjects, panelists are encouraged to discuss topics that include, but are not limited to, the following: –Time and resources devoted to the review of standards; –Contribution of standards to increasing interoperability; –The standards’ attention to cyber security concepts such as –authentication, encryption, integrity, and availability; –Consideration of legacy system integration issues; –The U.S. power industry’s familiarity with the identified standards; –Lessons learned from industries within and outside the power sector. Panelists –Wayne Longcore, Director of Enterprise Architecture and Standards, CMS Energy – Paul De Martini, CTO and VP of Smart Grid Strategy, Cisco Systems –Ron Ambrosio, Global Research Leader, IBM Energy and Utilities, IBM –Mike Assante, CEO, National Board of Information Security Examiners (NBISE) –Nate Kube, Co-founder and CTO, Wurldtech –Andy Bochman, Energy Security Lead, IBM

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 18 FERC Jan 31 Video Archive View Archives: Webcasts are archived for a period of three months from the time of the meeting. Webcast archives are generally available by the end of the event day for Open Meetings, and by the end of the next day for Technical conferences. MP3 archives are generally available the next day as well. January 2011 January 31, Technical Conference on Smart Grid Interoperability Standards (RM ) Video with Audio Webcast Archive: Windows Media Flash Media or Real Player Downloadable MP3 format audio files: (right-click and choose "Save Target As..." to download to your computer) Windows Media Flash Media or Real Player Downloadable MP3 format audio files: (right-click and choose "Save Target As..." to download to your computer) A transcript of the conference will be immediately available from Ace Reporting Company ( or ) for a fee.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 19 NIST Proposal - Overview According to NIST, the suites of smart grid standards will: Provide a Common Information Model necessary for exchanges of data between devices and networks, primarily in the transmission (IEC 61970) and distribution (IEC 61968) domains (the IEC numbers reference two related groups of standards); Facilitate substation automation, communication and interoperability through a common data format (IEC 61850); Facilitate exchanges of information between control centers (IEC ); and Address the cyber security of the communication protocols defined by the preceding IEC standards (IEC 62351). EISA does not authorize FERC to require compliance with the final standards; however, FERC may consider requiring compliance with the standards under its Federal Power Act authorities. The summaries of the smart grid standards are available on FERC’s eLibrary under Docket No. RM There will be an opportunity for public comment on the standards only after FERC issues the NOPR in this case.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 20

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 21

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 22 Five Families of Standards Sent to FERC IEC and IEC 61968: Providing a Common Information Model (CIM) necessary for exchanges of data between devices and networks, primarily in the transmission (IEC 61970) and distribution (IEC 61968) domains. IEC 61850: Facilitating substation automation and communication as well as interoperability through a common data format. IEC ‐ 6: Facilitating exchanges of information between control centers. IEC 62351: Addressing the cyber security of the communication protocols defined by the preceding IEC standards.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 23

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 24

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 25

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 26

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 27 Abstract: This work area investigates the strengths, weaknesses, capabilities, and constraints of existing and emerging standards-based physical media for wireless communications. The approach is to work with the appropriate standard development organizations (SDOs) to determine the characteristics of each technology for Smart Grid application areas and types. Results are used to assess the appropriateness of wireless communications technologies for meeting Smart Grid applications.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 28 NIST Timeline (Anticipated) Release of draft 0.6 Draft 0.5 July 28, 2010 Call for Input to Section 6 August 4, 2010 End of draft 0.5 review period September 15, 2010 December 3, 2010 November 4, 2010 OpenSG + PAP2 meeting, Fort Lauderdale SGIP face-to-face, St Louis Tentative PAP 2 meeting September 16, 2010 End of draft 0.6 review period September 30, 2010 October 29, 2010 Release of Version 1 January 15, 2011 Extended edit period Release of Version 2 ? June/July 2011 ? Continuation of project to extend findings

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 29 PAP#2 Version 1 Version 1.0 released Jan 13, sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Objective3/NIST_PAP2_ Guidelines_for_Assessing_Wireless_Standards_for_Sm art_Grid_Applications_1.0.pdfhttp://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki- sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Objective3/NIST_PAP2_ Guidelines_for_Assessing_Wireless_Standards_for_Sm art_Grid_Applications_1.0.pdf

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 30 Jan 27 Vote Guidance PAP 2 Members, I want to thank all of you who voted on the NIST special Publication, Guidelines for Assessing Wireless Standards for Smart Grid Applications, Version 1.0. If you still plan on casting a vote, please do so on the PAP2 mailing list by tomorrow January 28, 2011, 11:59PM EST. As the title of the document should make clear, this document is about methodologies and how to evaluate wireless communications. It is intended to be technology agnostic. Therefore it does NOT constitute an endorsement by NIST or PAP 2 for any specific wireless technology that can be used by Smart Grid applications, nor should it be used for such purposes. This document contains a few examples on how to go about evaluating wireless communications. Any mention or reference to specific technologies is for demonstration purposes only and is not intended to be an official endorsement for the examples provided. I also want to bring to everyone's attention that the reference in the guidelines document for the wireless characterization matrix is there to capture the work accomplished by PAP 2 up to a certain point. This guidelines document does not include the wireless characterization matrix. The matrix will be updated and completed during the course of generating subsequent versions of PAP 2 deliverables. I expect work to begin on this immediately and no later than March Please note that with your collective support this document represents a deliverable for what PAP 2 has done up to this point. It is a stake in the ground before we move on to the next phase. Once again, Thank you for your continued interest and support for PAP 2 activities. -Nada

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 31 PAP#2 Report – Jan 31 Vote Summary PAP 2 Members, Results of the Vote on the Guidelines for Assessing Wireless Standards, for Smart Grid Application, version 1.0: First, I want to Thank all of you who voted on the Draft Guidelines for Assessing Wireless Standards, for Smart Grid Application, version 1.0. The results are as follows: Out of the 199 subscribers of the PAP 2 mailing list, there were 14 YES, 3 NO and 2 ABSTAIN votes. Therefore the results of the vote are 97.48% in support of the document to be released as version 1.0. Note that all subscribers of the PAP 2 mailing were allowed to vote and a YES vote was assumed in case of a no response. Given the results of this vote, the document shall then proceed to the final publication stages. Next PAP 2 meetings schedule I have scheduled a teleconference for PAP 2 on Friday February 11, 2011 at 1pm in order to review the results of the vote and develop a new action item list for PAP 2 going forward in light of the comments received. Call-in information will be forthcoming. The next face-to-face meeting for PAP 2 will occur on Thursday March 10, 2011 from 8AM until 12pm. This meeting is co-located with OpenSG in South San Francisco. Logistics details are available here:

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 32 OpenSG + PAP#2 meeting OpenSG Users Group Meeting: Enabling the Smart Grid March 7-10, 2011 >> South San Francisco, CA Who Should Attend Utilities that are using standards-based integration to meet their business challenges will find this conference invaluable. Project managers, system architects, business and IT managers, and control center personnel will all benefit from this meeting. The meeting is open to all current or potential OpenSG users – you do not have to be a OpenSGug member to attend. Attendees gain firsthand access to OSG experts and come away with new insights on the power of OSG activities. Dates: March 7 – 10, 2011 March 7: OpenSG Boot Camp Sessions March 8 – 10: User Group General and Work Group Sessions Click on Agenda in the left panel for more details Registration There are five registration options: *Member Full Conference: Early Bird (through February 18): $550 / $600 starting February 19 through onsite *Non-Member Full Conference: Early Bird (through February 18): $750 / $800 starting February 19 through onsite SG Communications-PAP01/02 Session Only (1 day): Early Bird (through February 18): $150 / $200 starting February 19 through onsite OpenADR/PAP09 Session Only (1 day): Early Bird (through February 18): $150 / $200 starting February 19 through onsite Boot Camp Session Only (1 day): Early Bird (through February 18): $100 / $150 starting February 19 through onsite *Full Conference registration includes access to Boot Camp, and all sessions on Tuesday through Thursday.

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide Priority Action Plan for Wireless communications (PAP#2) Face-to-Face Meeting March 10, 2011 San Francisco, CA NIST

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 34 Reminders Minutes will be taken Attendance –Roll Call –Send an with your name and affiliation to: PAP 2 will follow the SGIP Working Group Consensus and Voting Operating Procedures available at: sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PMO/PMO_Voting_and_Conse nsus_Operating_Procedure_for_Working_Groups_AP PROVED.docx, October 5, sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PMO/PMO_Voting_and_Conse nsus_Operating_Procedure_for_Working_Groups_AP PROVED.docx 34

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 35 March 10 Meeting Agenda 1.Review/Approve agenda 2.Approve minutes of February 25, 2011 telecon 3.Status update of PAP 2 Version 1.0 document –SGAC and CSWG reviews –PMO Input from PAP 2 – Vishant Shah 4.Establishment of PAP 2 voting rights 5.Review and discussion PAP 2 future work items –Develop work plan –Recruit volunteers –Develop timeline 6.Meeting announcements 7.New business

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 36 Recent Documnts March 10 meeting Minutes Feb 25 conference call Proposed Operating procedures sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless/Proposed_operating_procedures_for_pap2.pdf Meeting minutes

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 37 Next PAP 2 meetings Next face-to-face meeting –SGIP meeting July 12-14, Montreal Canada –Logistics available here: PAP 2 conference call schedule

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 38 Comments for the OpenSG/PAP#2 meeting March 10, The PAP#2 community needs to agree whether the completion of the Version 2 report will be (primarily) schedule driven or accomplishment driven. Based upon opinions voiced about Version 1 it appears that an accomplishment driven approach is preferred. It certainly appears that it would be ideal to complete Version 2 around July Further discussion will be needed to determine exactly what the deliverables would be (see comment #2) and to generate a reasonable estimate of the time required to complete them. Is there general consensus or developing such a results oriented project plan?

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 39 Comments for the NIST PAP#2 meeting March 10, The OpenSG venue has been great for collecting utility requirements and data transaction information but there has not been an equal or adequate degree of cooperation and preparation on the wireless technology side. I propose that the wireless SDOs agree to organize a series of meetings and teleconferences to review the expected deliverables including, of course, revisions to the matrix rows, their more formal definitions, revision to the matrix columns, and selection of a small set of very well defined and relevant operating points and applications scenarios for throughput, capacity and range modeling. These meetings would be open to all participants but organized to drive completion of the wireless SDO deliverables. Group meetings may coincide with other industry events such as OpenSG meetings but would not be bound to only those dates and venues. Is there general consensus among the 802 wireless technologists to proceeding this way?

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 40 Comments for NIST PAP#2 3. Ron Cunningham has prepared a very comprehensive document describing his expectations of the content of Version 2. Unfortunately, I don’t believe that the PAP2 community can deliver everything requested in a reasonable period of time. I suggest that PAP2 stakeholders use Ron’s document as a starting point for a deliverable outline but negotiate agreement on the content of the the final result and completion target date. I expect the result will be somewhat less complete than Ron’s initial proposal but still far more “useful” than Version 1. It is important that mutual agreement be reached to insure both a useful deliverable and a reasonable completion date is established before serious work begins. Comments?

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 41 Comments for the OpenSG/PAP#2 meeting March 10, NIST has previously been the primary editor of the PAP#2 document During the development of the Version 1 report several industry suggestions were not incorporated and editing latency or capacity seemed to be the cause. Is NIST prepared to provide the staff resources to continue with this service in generating Version 2? Would it be appropriate for one or more technical editors to take over or assist in the generation of Version 2? This would provide more capacity for rapid incorporation of material, after approval for inclusion. Comments?

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 42

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 43 WP1A Text Annex 4 to Working Party 1A Chairman’s Report WORKING DOCUMENT TOWARD A PRELIMINARY DRAFT NEW REPORT ON SMART GRID POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Smart grid power management systems 3Smart grid communication network technologies The fundamental characteristic of a smart grid is its integrated communication and sensing network, which allows proactive management of the energy input sources as well as consumer demand. This communication capacity can and often will, be enabled by various technologies; however they all present different challenges and limitations. One solution uses communication via power lines. This solution requires only the addition of communication/sensing devices overlaid on the existing electric distribution infrastructure. Testing has shown PLC based ‘Smart Meter’ solutions to be sufficient for monthly readings or non-critical daily device communications[1][1] An attractive alternative are the various wireless Smart Grid solutions being developed worldwide and applied in Europe. Ranging from point-to-multipoint solutions (e.g. cellular radio or satellite) through RF mesh solutions, and including hybrid deployments of both architectures[2].[2] [1][1] ESB Networks, Smart Meter Project, 11 November 2010 – [2][2] ibid

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 44 OpenSG SharePoint Documents ents/Forms/AllItems.aspxhttp://osgug.ucaiug.org/UtiliComm/Shared%20Docum ents/Forms/AllItems.aspx

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 45 Subscription to NIST PAP#2 To see the complete NIST Priority Action Plan list go here: sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/PriorityActionPlans#Individual_PAP_Listshttp://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki- sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/PriorityActionPlans#Individual_PAP_Lists To subscribe to PAP#2 mailing list go here:

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 46 NIST Plans for discussion PAP 2 Members, I have started a doodle poll in order to find a suitable time for our biweekly calls. The options are for a call every two weeks starting on: Friday March 25, 1:00-2pm EDT or Tuesday March 29, 2:00-3pm EDT or Wednesday March 30 1:00-2pm EDT Please visit the link below to indicate your preference. Regards, Nada

doc.: IEEE /0382r1 Submission March 2011 Bruce Kraemer, MarvellSlide 47 Deliverables Paper & Matrix 1.Identify and fully define all necessary terminology (mesh, etc.) 2.Come up with sane metric definitions for Section 4 3.Come up with guidelines for filling out the wireless technologies matrix to make sure entries are comparable across technologies –This includes a selection of high priority, fully described “operating points” representing deployment scenarios 4.Come up with dates for submissions for column entries for the matrix and appoint coordinators for each technology represented in the matrix 5.Submit results to the PAP2 reflector and announce a comment period 6.Directly solicit SDO participation and schedule SDO calls to discuss submissions and comments on all of the above 7.Discuss & adjust the deliverables content using OpenSG as the venue and a proxy for the utility industry