 Indicator 1 – Graduation  Indicator 2 – Dropout Rates  Indicator 3 – Assessment  Indicator 4 – Suspension/Expulsion  Indicator 5 – School Age LRE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Question 8 Virginia Department of Education 8. Does the IEP consider the strengths, interests, preferences, and needs of the student? (34 C.F.R §300.43(a)(2)
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
1 Transition FUTURE. 2 WHY FOCUS ON TRANSITION? One of the primary purposes of Public Law , the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Creating Collaborative Standards-Based IEPs: A Training for IEP Team Members Session Three.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
March 2009Oregon Department of Education1 Indicator B13: Secondary Transition Services.
1 Massachusetts DOE IEP Transition Process FUTURE.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
A Closer Look: The Transition Components of the IEP
WISM Program Review in ESD 113 Region October 2012 Where are the challenges?
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
Transition and Indicator 13 Writing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) That Meet the Legal Mandate A Webinar Series Presented by The California Community.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Transition Plan Writing for the School Year.
Module 4 Providing Opportunities for Students with Disabilities.
Preparing Students with Special Needs for College and Career March 26 Educator’s Institute 2012 Lovegren-O’Brien Bass 3/26/12.
New York City Department of Education Office of Special Education Initiatives Placement and Referral Center Transition Services: An Overview.
Transition and the IEP Why is effective transition planning important?
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
Texas Transition Conference February 16, 2010 Dr. Ed O’Leary Texas Transition Conference February 16, 2010 Dr. Ed O’Leary.
Summary of Performance: A New Tool for NC Teachers November 18, 2013 Dr. Valerie L. Mazzotti National Post-School Outcomes Center University of Oregon.
Transitioning to Adulthood
Writing Transition Focused IEPs Pamela Sacchitella and Jennifer Cacioppo.
South Dakota Transition Summer Institute Going Beyond Indicator 13 Requirements July 14-16, 2014 Dr. Ed O’Leary South Dakota Transition Summer Institute.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Transition 101 Division of Students with Disabilities & English Language Learners.
Transition Plans A results-oriented process that focuses on improving the academic and functional achievement of the child with a disability to facilitate.
Educational Services for Individuals with Exceptionalities Transition Planning.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Sally Simich, Keith Ozols, and Peter FitzGerald Hood River, Oregon February 2013.
Secondary Transition Services YTP Statewide Conference Hood River, Oregon February 18, 2010 February 2010Oregon Department of Education1.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Sally Simich. IDEA 2004 Requires a SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE: “a local educational agency shall provide the child with a summary of the child's academic.
Transition Planning ESE 426 January 27, Is designed to be within a results-oriented process, that is focused on improving the academic and functional.
District 214 – Transition Planning System Buffalo Grove High School Special Education Department.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
Post Secondary Transition CANAR, NOVEMBER 12, 2015.
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8 Transition Services.
IEP Development for Students of Transition Age. ODE is Finding….. Based on paper reviews/on-sites, the most common areas of non-compliance for PSG are:
1 State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator # Measurement 1Graduation 2Dropout 3Statewide Assessments 4Suspension and Expulsion 5Least Restrictive Environment.
Board of Education Meeting September 10, Special Education Quality Review - Monitor compliance related to programs and services provided to students.
Transition Planning and Anticipated Services in the Individualized Education Program (IEP) Process.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
Curriculum Committee Meeting Exceptional Children’s Division Presented by: Sam Dempsey Division Director Exceptional Children’s Division November 20, 2012.
Road to Discovery: Transition to Adult Living, Learning and Working 1 Funded by the Iowa Department of Education Developed by PACER Center®
Age Appropriate Assessments: A Necessary Component to Transition.
Secondary Transition for Children with Disabilities 1 August 30, 2012.
IEP Team. Develops the IEP including the transition component for a single student.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
Secondary Transition Overview Douglas County ESD Jackie Burr Secondary Transition Specialist November 15, 2007.
Indicator 13  Is a point of law re: IDEA  Is one of 20 Indicators  Part of the State Performance Plan (SPP)  Improve transition services for students.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
1 IEP Case Study: PLEPs, PLOPs, PLAFPs, and IEPs Week 7 and 8 (Combined)
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
Transition Plan Writing for the School Year.
Transition Planning A Resource Guide For Case Managers.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
TRANSITION from School to Work to Independence Presented by: Attorney Janine A. Solomon © Massachusetts Advocates for Children June.
Mission Possible: Planning a Successful Life for Students with Intellectual Disabilities TAC it up! VCU T/TAC May 2010.
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
IEP and the IPS Crosswalk
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Presentation transcript:

 Indicator 1 – Graduation  Indicator 2 – Dropout Rates  Indicator 3 – Assessment  Indicator 4 – Suspension/Expulsion  Indicator 5 – School Age LRE  Indicator 6 – Preschool LRE  Indicator 7 – Preschool Outcomes  Indicator 8 – Parent Involvement  Indicator 9 – Disproportionality   Indicator 10 – Disproportionality  Indicator 11 – Child Find  Indicator 12 – Early Childhood Transition  Indicator 13 – Secondary Transition  Indicator 14 – Post-School Outcomes  Indicator 15 – Identification and Correction of Noncompliance  Indicator 16 – Complaint Timelines  Indicator 17 – Due Process Timelines  Indicator 18 – Hearing Requests Resolved by Resolution Sessions  Indicator 19 – Mediation Agreements  Indicator 20 – State Reported Data

 13. Improve transition services for students with disabilities at age 16 [now age 14] and above  14. Improve the outcomes for students moving from secondary to postsecondary activities  State expects100% compliance for these two indicators  Conducting exit surveys and post-exit surveys

IEP Results Process for Transition Services Includes: Courses of study Includes: Instruction Related services Community experiences Employment and other post- school adult living objectives When appropriate: Daily living skills Functional vocational evaluation Step I Measurable Post-secondary Goals Step II: Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance Step III: Transition Services Step IV: Measurable Annual Goals Age- appropriate transition assessments Training Education Employment Independent Living Skills – where appropriate O’Leary, E., 2005 © Copyright

 Formal and/or informal assessments which: ◦ Provide relevant information about the student in relation to key areas of transition planning ◦ Provide information about the student’s current levels of functional performance ◦ Indicate appropriate accommodations to support student success ◦ Provide a basis for measurable postsecondary goals ◦ Provide a basis for measurable annual goals

 Combination of formal and informal to reflect the following areas: ◦ Interests ◦ Preferences ◦ Aptitudes ◦ Abilities  It is considered a transition assessment if it is important or pertinent to post-school goals  Assessments may overlap in providing information relevant to more than one area of the transition plan.

 Standardized tests measure student abilities ◦ SAT ◦ ACT ◦ ERB ◦ PSSA ◦ Woodcock-Johnson  Aptitude tests measure student capabilities ◦ IQ tests ◦ During the re-evaluation year, at least one formal assessment needs to be administered

 Student surveys/interviews  Parent surveys/interviews  Observations  Teacher questionnaires  Work samples  Curriculum-Based Assessments  Functional Behavioral Assessments  Situational assessments  Progress monitoring probes

 Formal and informal assessments with a vision of the student’s ultimate goal: ◦ Standardized tests ◦ Anecdotal input from teachers, students, and parents ◦ Curriculum based assessments ◦ Strengths and needs must be bulleted, not in paragraph form, and have transition statements in the needs

 See hand out ◦ Should say “has the goal” ◦ Can’t say not a need ◦ Example: Jane has the goal of independent living without supports.

 Must be listed in the IEP.  The courses the student will take in order to achieve postsecondary goals.  Should be listed for each of the 3 areas  Can be repeated  For example: ◦ Post-secondary education- College Prep. English, Algebra 2, American History, Chemistry ◦ Employment- Office Applications, College Prep English, child development, psychology ◦ Independent living- Cooking, Sewing, Art, Child Development

 At least one activity needs to relate to IEP goal  See handout  Person responsible can be parent, counselor, student, teacher  Should keep a running list so that at graduation it is evident the activities that student has completed to prepare for life after high school.

 Must contain four parts: ◦ Condition – when, where, how ◦ Student’s name ◦ Observable behavior  no fuzzy words ◦ Criteria  100% of the time on 5 observed consecutive opportunities ◦ Ideally contains a baseline

 What are Phillip/Julia’s transition assessments?  What were the conclusions?  Where does Phillip/Julia want to be after graduation?  What are the classes, services, training, accommodations to get Phillip/Julia there?  What is Phillip/Julia going to do to get there?