C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – 07-01-18 From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version 12.0.31.7 (8) 

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.

Advertisements

Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.

Eric TorrenceJanuary Oregon Tau Activities Tau Trigger Efficiency Z→ττ Dijet Fakes Tau Spin Analysis Tau Trigger Activities Validation HLT Monitoring.

ESTIMATING THE FAKE LEPTON BACKGROUND IN A SEARCH FOR PAIR PRODUCED STOPS AT CMS David Kolchmeyer Advisor: Alberto Graziano.

1 Measurements at 8 TeV of TTbar events with additional particles in the final state Boris Mangano (ETH Zürich) on behalf of the CMS collaboration Boris.

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 21 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 21 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.

Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.

The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.

Background studies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics May 6 th, 2010.

1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.

1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 9 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 9 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.

1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.

Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Zhijun Liang,Song-Ming Wang,Dong liu, Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica 8/28/20151 TWiki page.

VH (H->bb) Cut Flow Status. Introduction Hoping to start the mini-ntuple etc production now Some push over last few days but still not as much as would.

CATphysics meeting, 14/11/2008D. Froidevaux Introduction and news + New fellows since end of September: W. Fedorko (ADT), M. Jimenez (ADE), D. Kollar (ADP),

H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.

Analysis Plans for Jets + EtMiss Signatures Pierre Savard ATLAS Toronto Group Meeting January

Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.

19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,

28 July 2006 CERN REU Status Report 1 Lindsey Gray, University of Florida RCT Trigger Supervisor and Database Project Status Lindsey Gray Advisors: Dr.

Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.

Higgs to 4 leptons in Athena with eventView Stathes Paganis (University of Sheffield) with Rosy.Nikolaidou (Saclay) Nektarios Benekos (Max Planck Institute)

1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.

W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.

Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Triggers Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.

Data-based background predictions for new particle searches at the LHC David Stuart Univ. of California, Santa Barbara Texas A&M Seminar March 24, 2010.

Slides for EB3. Left Problems from EB2 1. Why muon triggers are not used in e  channel? 2. Add backgrounds estimation for signal search region 3. Add.

Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,

Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,

28/01/101 Zvv bkg, how to get an estimate with first data ? R. Brunelière Time schedule is tight. Goal : get an estimate by may/june if we get data from.

28/4/2006Chris Collins-Tooth tth, (h → bb) with EventViews Chris Collins-Tooth, Christian Shaw 03-May-2006.

A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.

Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.

Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Triggers Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.

C.Clement Eta RegionTraining regionVariable set |  |

Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.

Wuppertal ttbar strategy meeting 16 August 2012, T. Cornelissen 1 Sebastian, Thijs Status of JetElectron QCD fit in resonance analysis.

Using direct photons for L1Calo monitoring + looking at data09 Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting February 18, 2010.

Electron Identification Efficiency from Z→ee Maria Fiascaris University of Oxford In collaboration with Tony Weidberg and Lucia di Ciaccio ATLAS UK SM.

Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.

Current Status of e-ID based on BDT Algorithm Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with X. Li, T. Dai, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) BNL Analysis Jamboree March.

 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.

Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.

E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”

H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.

1 Review BDT developments Migrate to version 12, AOD BDT for W , Z  AS group.

Anna Kaczmarska Tau Workshop, Copenhagen, /16 Z → ττ (electron, τ –had) analysis with mc08 data Anna Kaczmarska IFJ-PAN Cracow Elżbieta Richter-Wąs.

Estimating the isolated lepton rate in multi-jet events Manuel & Alexander Ivo, Stan, Martijn, Auke, Els et al.

1 Top activities in Milano. 2 Overview Study of W+jets background to semileptonic tt –I. Besana (1 st year PhD student, continuing work of diploma thesis)

Data Driven study for Same Sign Dileptons July 31 st 2009, “CMS SUSY Leptonic Meeting” 1 Sanjay Padhi.

Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.

2nd lepton veto, in the one-lepton SUSY analysis

ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair

Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.

Effect of t42 algorithm on jets

SM Direct Photons meeting

The University of Manchester

Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington

Validation of valid3 samples Zee(106050) and Jpsiee(105751)

D3PDs production+validation, preliminary TeV

Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs

ZZ→llnn Analysis Thomas Barber University of Cambridge

tth, (h→bb) with EventViews

W/Z+jets Background Determination in the ATLAS ICHEP SUSY Notes

Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification

Samples and MC Selection

The others’ latest result about SUSY search with same-sign dimuon

Northern Illinois University / NICADD

Presentation transcript:

C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8)  Reconstruction is failure -> Should use  ready (validated) within 1-2 weeks Opportunity to validate the recoed samples MC samples available in ~1month  Here I looked at the status of EventView in Software Versions 1

C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – How could cut flow look like? 1.emu or ee (tightest lepton criteria applied) jet jets 1.Question: how many jets needed for SUSY dilepton analysis? 2.Plot Njet for Z+jets (with the various njet bins properly weighted and SUSY points), 4.ETmiss cut 5.Other SUSY topology cuts? Overlap removal 2 Types of leptons = loose ⊃ medium ⊃ tight Eg. Loose: an electron candidate from the egamma group (El_author==1) This is very loose (ala D0, I am not sure this is the best) Eg. Tight = Loose + isEM Remove a jet if it overlaps with a Loose? Medium? Tight electron?

C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – Overlap removal (2) 3 1)Remove jet if it overlaps with a Loose electron. Many (real) jets will look like a loose electron, so many events will have jets removed, with the risk to decrease Njet for background, the risk is smaller for the signal. Safe side from the electron efficiency point of view since we favour higher electron efficiency, we prefer to consider event loose EM objects as electrons than as jets From S/B point of view, dilepton signature much more powerful tool to decrease QCD than Njet (reasonable guess), so again even though we decrease Njet by mistake, that should not lose us as much discrimination against QCD as decreasing nlepton 2)Remove only if it overlaps with a Tight electron? Problem with fake background estimation, because Njet might not be the same in the loose and tight lepton samples

C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – Overlap removal for reconstructed objects Overlap removal and insertion criteria for truth information: did not look at that yet. Particles are inserted in the EventView using ”Inserters” for each particle type (Atlas/PhysicsAnalysis/EventViewBuilder/EventViewInserters/) Insertion order is steered up in EventViewBuilder/EventViewBuilderAlgs/share/defaultEventView_jobOptions.py Overlap removal (3) 4 Order matters pT ordered The first inserted electron is the highest pT one found in the electron container

C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – Electrons are inserted in order of decreasing pT Electron_i is inserted only if its DR to all electrons_j<i is larger than deltaRCut =0.1 (default) Default defined in EventViewBuilder/EventViewInserters/src/EVElectronInserter.cxx Can be changed in: defaultEventView_jobOptions.py Some electron precuts put there as well, to filter what is going into the ntuple. Overlap removal (4) 5 Jets are inserted in order of decreasing pT Can decide also in defaultEventView_jobOption.py if special care has to be taken about overlap with  Other jets  Tracks  Calo clusters  Muon A certain DR can be defined as well (did not find default value yet) Overlap cannot be removed with objects not yet inserted.

C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – Find out more about the electron / jet removal, what is the defaut value of DR The electron objects in the analysis should be matched to the electron object(s) in the trigger Need to think about the trigger, because it will decide a lot of things Study performance of  ETmiss+jet  Single lepton (+jet)  Dilepton trigger What to use for the first year of data taking? next 6