Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LGMA California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement
Advertisements

FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
The US Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) What Must I do to Prepare?
Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Key Themes/Concepts Jeannie Perron, JD, DVM Covington & Burling LLP.
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
Intentional Adulteration Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
1 Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
Proposed Rule Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors/Certification Bodies
China Stakeholder Session China September 24-27, 2013.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Washington, D.C. ● Brussels ● San Francisco ● Shanghai Presented to: FDLI Safeguarding Ingredient Supply Chain Conference September 10, 2013 Washington,
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
Focus on Prevention FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain The Codex General Principles of Food Hygiene Module 2.3.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Version 1/15/2013.
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
Natural Resource Concerns. In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share.
Proposed Rule for Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
Prepared by: Taruna Navraksha Irfaan Shashi Food Quality & Certification.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Rules Tim Slawinski Food and Dairy Division Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Erik R. Lieberman Prepared for AgroBalt 2014 April 4, 2014
Preparing for the Food Safety Modernization Act
Best Practices: Where Industry Should Lead on Ensuring Proper Testing & Auditing Stephen F. Sundlof, DVM, PhD Senior Advisor for Animal and Food Safety.
Impact of FSMA on the Regulation of Domestic and Imported Animal Food by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. at Wild Bird Feeding Industry 2011 Annual Meeting Naples,
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
Implementation into Child Nutrition Programs
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs 1.
Enforcement Litigation and Compliance Washington, DC December 9-10, 2015 FSMA Update Jennifer Erickson, Regulatory Counsel, Center for Veterinary Medicine,
& Food Safety Modernization Act Update North American Agricultural Marketing Officials July 15,
FDA job description  Regulates about 25% of all consumer purchases  Mission summary: protect and advance public health  Products: food, cosmetics, drugs,
Overview FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Section 104
FSMA Implementation -- Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
FSMA: Preventative Controls for Human Food Final Rule In this presentation we discuss the Preventative Controls for Human Food rule and compliance dates.
FSMA Communications and Engagement for International Stakeholders March 21, 2016 Julie Moss, PhD, RD Deputy Director, International Affairs Staff, Center.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
Import Safety Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Final Rule Accredited Third-Party Certification 1.
Understanding FDA’s Food Supplier Verification Program (FSVP)
Understanding FDA’s Food Supplier Verification Program (FSVP)
The Seafood HACCP Regulation
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
FSMA Implementation Jennifer Thomas
HACCP Essential Tool for Food Safety
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
Role of the Preventive Control Qualified Individual
The Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
The Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
H A C C P HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS 1 December 2018
Foreign Supplier Verification & Voluntary Qualified Importer Programs
US REGULATORY UPDATE: IMPACT OF FSMA & VFD ON THE AQUACULTURE INDUSTRY
What Is VQIP? FDA required to establish a program to provide for the expedited review of food imported by voluntary participants. Eligibility is limited.
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)

Key Principles Importers would be responsible for ensuring that the food they bring into the U.S. meets FDA safety standards The requirements provide flexibility based on the risk of the food Under FSMA section 404, requirements must be consistent with WTO, other agreements 2

Who Is Covered? All importers must establish and follow an FSVP, unless otherwise exempted. U.S. importer is the person who has purchased the food offered for import. –If there is no U.S. owner at the time of entry, the importer is the U.S. consignee –If no U.S. owner or consignee at time of entry, the importer is the U.S. agent/representative of the foreign owner/consignee.

Who Is Exempt? Importers of juice and seafood whose suppliers are in compliance with the HACCP program (part 120 or 123) Small quantities of food imported for research and evaluation purposes Food imported for personal consumption

Who Is Exempt (cont’d) Low acid canned food (microbial hazards only) Alcoholic beverages Food that is transshipped or that is imported for future export and not consumed or distributed in the U.S.

Overview of FSVP Importers’ FSVPs must ensure that: –The supplier uses procedures that provide the same level of protection as those required under the preventive controls or produce safety regulations (if applicable) –The food is not adulterated or misbranded regarding allergen labeling

Overview of FSVP (cont’d) The requirements vary based on: –Type of food product –Category of importer, such as very small –Nature of the hazard identified in the food –Who is to control the hazard

FSVP Requirements In general, importers would need to conduct the following activities: –Compliance status review of foods and suppliers –Hazard analysis –Supplier verification activities –Complaint reviews, investigations, and corrective actions (if necessary) –Periodic reassessment of the FSVP –Importer identification at entry –Recordkeeping

Requirements (cont’d) Compliance status review – the importer would need to determine whether the food or supplier is the subject of a warning letter, import alert, or certification requirement Hazard analysis – the importer would need to identify hazards reasonably likely to occur for each food imported

Requirements (cont’d) Verification activities – importers to conduct activities that provide adequate assurances hazards identified are adequately controlled Corrective actions – importers review complaints received concerning foods they import; investigate causes of adulteration; take appropriate corrective actions; revise FSVPs when they appear inadequate

Requirements (cont’d) Periodic reassessment of the FSVP – within 3 years of establishing the FSVP or within 3 years of the last assessment; sooner if new information surfaces about potential hazards associated with the food Importer identification at entry (name and DUNS number) Recordkeeping

Control of Hazards The requirements for supplier verification are primarily based on who is to control the hazards identified as reasonably likely to occur in a food FDA is proposing two options for when the foreign supplier controls the hazard or verifies control by its supplier; the options differ primarily according to the nature of the hazard

Option 1 If the foreign supplier controls the hazard at its establishment and there is a reasonable probability that exposure to the hazard will result in serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals (SAHCODHA), the importer would be required to conduct or obtain documentation of onsite auditing of the foreign supplier

Option 1 (cont’d) For non-SAHCODHA hazards controlled by the foreign supplier, the importer would be required to conduct one or more verification activities before using or distributing the food, including: –Onsite auditing –Sampling and testing –Review of supplier food safety records –Some other appropriate procedure

Option 1 (cont’d) Onsite auditing would also be required for microbiological hazards in certain raw agricultural commodities

Option 2 For all hazards that the foreign supplier will either control or verify that its supplier is controlling, importers would need to choose a verification procedure from among: –Onsite auditing –Sampling and testing –Review of supplier food safety records –Some other appropriate procedure

Option 2 (cont’d) In determining which verification activities are needed and how often they should be conducted, the importer would need to consider: –Risk presented by the hazard –Probability that exposure to the hazard would result in serious harm –Food and foreign supplier’s compliance status

Modified FSVP Requirements Importation of a dietary supplement or dietary supplement component Importation of food by very small importer or from very small foreign supplier Importation of food from a foreign supplier in good compliance standing with a food safety system FDA has officially recognized as comparable to U.S. system

FDA intends to align the supplier verification provisions in the FSVP regulations with any supplier verification provisions that are included in the final rules on preventive controls for both human and animal food FSVP and Preventive Controls

Compliance Dates FDA is proposing to provide adequate time before importers would be required to come into compliance (generally 18 months after publication of the final rule)

Education and Technical Assistance Produce Safety Alliance (Cornell University, FDA, USDA) – Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance and Sprout Safety Alliance Institute for Food Safety and Health – FDA grant to Illinois Institute of Technology

Alliances’ Primary Goals Standardized training and education Education and outreach Develop training modules and delivery mechanisms Help develop guidance Source of information to the food industry

Input from FSMA Partners Is Vital Proposals are opportunity for government, industry, and the public to partner with FDA in putting FSMA regulations in place Your comments and feedback are important to us! Please provide your views, questions, and concerns to help FDA finalize the rules

How to Comment on the Proposed Rules Go to or Published July 29, 2013; comments due Nov. 26, 2013 (120 days) Comment period on produce and preventive controls rules extended to Nov. 15 to enable comment on how the rules can best work together 24

How to Comment on the Regulatory Impact Analysis Comments are being accepted separately on the Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis (PRIA) The PRIA is available at: − ReportsManualsForms/Reports/ EconomicAnalyses/default.htm.

Web Page: 26