Assessing scenario-based learning John Mitchell Electronic and Electrical Engineering With thanks to: Sally Day, Rosalind Duhs, Lewis Elton, Tony Kenyon,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of an objective assessment tool to evaluate students basic electrical engineering skills Nandini Alinier University of Hertfordshire, U.K. Engineering.
Advertisements

Enhancing Induction: Principles for Improving the Student Experience Engaging the learner: Why did I get 37%? Professor Brenda Smith Goldsmiths, University.
QAA Enhancement Themes Conference Heriot Watt University Wednesday 5 th March 2008 Poster Presentation by Mhairi Freeman (lecturer), Sally Michie, Stephanie.
Experience of using formative assessment and students perception of formative assessment Paul Ong Greg Benfield Margaret Price.
Completing the cycle: an investigation of structured reflection as a tool to encourage student engagement with feedback Jackie Pates Lancaster Environment.
SADC Course in Statistics Producing a product portfolio Module I3 Session
Assessment for Learning (AfL) Unit 1: Rationale and Overview
Group demonstrations and reports in engineering John Mitchell UCL Electronic and Electrical Engineering With thanks to: Sally Day, Rosalind Duhs, Lewis.
Innovation in Assessment? Why? Poor student feedback regarding feedback timeliness and usefulness Staff workloads Student lack of awareness as to what.
Assessment, Marking & Feedback
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Moving away from the lecture? BVMS programme 2013 Jim Anderson School of Veterinary Medicine MVLS.
Benn Thomsen Third Year Fourth Year Second Year First Year An integrated part of the course structure Electronic Circuits Digital.
Correction, feedback and assessment: Their role in learning
Feedback sessions - Helping first year students get the most out of assessment and feedback Sue R Whittle & Linda B Bonnett Faculty of Biological Sciences.
Maximising learning from feedback: three approaches Devin Sapsford George Zorinyants Richard Carr.
What is the focus of our training session?
An introductory tutorial
Effective Assessment and Feedback
Case Studies M.Sc. in Applied Statistics Dr. Órlaith Burke Michaelmas Term 2012.
The Enterprise Skills Portfolio
Placement Workshop Y2, Sem 2 Professional Practice Module (PPM)
A2 coursework What do I have to do? What is required? You have to carry out a piece of research that is related to the specification You have to carry.
The 5 Minute Marking Plan The big picture? (The purpose of marking for this piece of work / project?) Key marking points to share with students? Common.
Professional Perspectives: Electronic Engineering Paul Spencer Dean of School, Electronic Engineering Kal Winston* Adviser, Study Skills Centre.
Assessing and Responding to Student Writing ______________________________  Spring Institute on Teaching with Writing Communication Across the Curriculum.
POGIL vs Traditional Lecture in Organic I Gary D. Anderson Department of Chemistry Marshall University Huntington, WV.
Assessment matters: What guides might we use as individuals, teams and institutions to help our assessment endeavours? A presentation to Wolverhampton.
The art of reflection.
Assessment and Feedback
Recording Excellence Nicole Duplain School of Humanities.
Improving Students’ understanding of Feedback
Enhancing the utilization of feedback by students Maria Jackson & Leah Marks Study context: One-year postgraduate taught masters in Medical Genetics.
Discussion examples Andrea Zhok.
Developing Higher Level Study Skills
Introducing small-group workshops as formative assessment in large first year psychology modules Suzanne Guerin School of Psychology, University College.
Study Skills for Computing CC1H01
Using formative assessment. Aims of the session This session is intended to help us to consider: the reasons for assessment; the differences between formative.
Marion Webb January  By the end of the session, participants will be able to:  Discuss the role of assessment for learning  Describe key assessment.
Making sense of Assessment for Learning Ann Madgwick & Jo Walls 29 June 2007.
Lessons learnt and changed understanding: Can Machine Dynamics students survive without my lectures? Ian Howard Mechanical Engineering.
'Learner Autonomy through the production of a public history resource' Emma Robertson.
Soaring to the heights of personal success Enabling candidates to raise grades from B to A and from A to A*
Formative Assessment in Flanders Second Chance Learning in Hoboken.
Group work – why do it? Rachel Horn – Civil & Structural Engineering.
Matthew Dean Faculty of Technology (Teaching and Learning)
Session Four: Assessment of learning in the classroom Short Course in Learning and Teaching in the Classroom Janet Holmshaw and Jeff Sapiro Middlesex University,
Clare Saunders and Danielle Lamb Subject Centre for Philosophical and Religious Studies.
Student Peer Review An introductory tutorial. The peer review process Conduct study Write manuscript Peer review Submit to journal Accept Revise Reject.
California Educational Research Association Annual Meeting Rancho Mirage, CA – December 5, 2008 Hoky Min, Gregory K. W. K. Chung, Rebecca Buschang, Lianna.
The selection of appropriate assessment methods in a course is influenced by many factors: the intended learning outcomes, the discipline and related professional.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Assessment ModellingTasks LessonsAssessment Reflecting.
D4 Curriculum Design Workshop Liz Bennett and Sue Folley Discover - Dream - Design - Deliver.
IB: Language and Literature
Why bother giving feedback?. How not to provide feedback?
CC1H01N1 – Study Skills for Computing/Multimedia Week 2 – Lecture – Reflective Writing.
© 2015 albert-learning.com How to talk to your boss How to talk to your boss!!
ON LINE TOPIC Assessment.  Educational assessment is the process of documenting, usually in measurable terms, knowledge, skills, attitudes and beliefs.
Applying Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Blended Learning Blogging and Collaborative Activity Design R Papworth, R Walker & W Britcliffe E-Learning.
You can see some interest in what you are learning. You show some interest in things outside school. A lot of what happens in school interests you. You.
Assessment for Learning Centre for Academic Practice Enhancement, Middlesex University.
D4 Curriculum Design Workshop Discover - Dream - Design - Deliver Bennett & Folley (2016)
D4L – Active Learning Curriculum Design Workshop
Assessment brief Post graduate route.
In-Service Teacher Training
An Introduction to e-Assessment
Assessing and giving feedback to students
Creative assessment and feedback
Giving Effective Feedback and Feedforward
Presentation transcript:

Assessing scenario-based learning John Mitchell Electronic and Electrical Engineering With thanks to: Sally Day, Rosalind Duhs, Lewis Elton, Tony Kenyon, Oleg Mitrofanov, Cyril Renaud, Miguel Rio, Ed Romans, Seb Savory, Jan Smith, Benn Thomsen. SYMPOSIA ON ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING

Developing scenario-based learning for formative and summative assessment It is not in fact teaching but assessment that plays the largest part in guiding students learning. 1 it can be argued that giving learners feedback is just about the most important dimension of the work of teachers in post-compulsory education … but perhaps all told, formative feedback is the vital dimension, as given at the right time and in the best possible way it can lead learners steadily towards successful achievement in summative assessment contexts. 2 1 Snyder B.R, (1971) The Hidden Curriculum. New York; Alfred A Knopf 2 Race P. (2005) Making Learning Happen, Chapter 5, Learning through Feedback, London, Sage

Proforma Very useful for general feedback Common areas of mistakes Less easy to use for more open task

Scenarios Follow the model developed by Civil Engineering of one week, self contained, group work scenarios (problems) Aim of supporting learning rather than teaching new material Pilot process of 3 first year scenarios and two second year scenarios just completed

Scenario Assessment A mix of instruments used –Milestones –Presentations Individual technical reports Traditional reports Critical Assessments of other teams solutions –Group technical report User manual Due diligence document –Individual Narratives

History of Student-Centred Learning in E&EE 2004 – Problem Based Learning Modules Begin 2008 – First Scenario Weeks Piloted STUDENT–CENTRED LEARNING: WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR STUDENTS AND LECTURERS? Geraldine ONeill and Tim McMahonIn: Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching

Problem Based Learning 4 Problems over 12 Weeks (Term 1) 6 Students per group, groups stay the same, Students expected to spend 10 hours per week total (inc private study) on a problem No lectures! Reports and Presentations

Rational for assessment developments Students didnt perceive that they were receiving feedback Highlighted in the national student survey Feedback on my work has been prompt. Agree – 41% I have received detailed comments on my work. Agree – 49% Feedback on my work has helped me clarify things I did not understand. Agree – 53% The NSS has highlighted that students are notably less positive about assessment and feedback on their assignments than about other aspects of their learning experience. Exploring the National Student Survey, The HEA NSS - Engineering and Technology, UCL perceive

Problem Based Learning Iterative Assessment Cycle –Report submitted at end of problem for summative assessment –Opportunity to use feedback to improve report –At End portfolio of reports submitted for formative assessment Narrative Commentary introduced Peer Assessment

Summative Feedback Referencing: –Referencing of figure that have been taken from sources is good. However, there are few references in the text. This must be improved. Other Comments: –Good report which is well presented. There are some parts that are better than others, and although some attempts have been made to pull things together summary of the specifications would have been useful. Grade: B

Narratives The following are suggested questions to guide you in developing this piece of writing: –How did my group go about tackling this problem? –Was this a successful approach? –If so, what made it successful and how can I use that in future? –If not, what were the major difficulties, and how would I avoid them in future? –How good was our solution to the problem? –If I could tackle this problem again, how could I improve what we did? –How have I learned to cope with all the information I had to find for myself? –Has the group shared this information effectively? –How have we handled difficult issues in our group? –Did I do my best to ensure that the team worked well? –Do I recognise the importance of deadlines? –Did I and/or my group stick to the deadlines? –What else do I feel is of importance to include?

Narratives – advice given Merely documenting the steps you have gone through in the problem solving process will not earn you a very high mark – you will need to demonstrate what you have learned from the process. But often ignored!

Narratives Oh yeah, the narrative [wry chuckle]. The narrative, I didnt like the way the narrative was 50% of the marks because we spent a lot of time on those reports, a lot of time doing research into suitable system diagrams and everything else and I didnt like the way half the marks just went to the narrative…

Opportunities for Feedback in Scenario Assessment Formative Summative

Encouraging Brainstorming

Milestones

Presentations Presentations mid-way as guides rather than later as assessment Student dedicate significant time to presentations Too much focus on Information not enough on message Opportunity to learn from other groups and provide mid-point feedback

Competitions

Reports Attempted to get away from usual reports –User Manuals/Documentation –Very specific guidance given

Marking Grid Marking Proforma1 st Grade /52 nd Grade /5 Problem Definition This could have been improved, You need a lot more details 2 Design description It is not clear why some choices have been made. And a bullet point time line does not give any idea on some of the design. Your design is based on an error in your data-collection. 2 Theoretical Analysis The theory is adequate but you have not used it to its full potential. 3 Results and Conclusion There is almost no analysis in the conclusion, and you do not compare your results with the theory. 1 Individual input You claim to have done your part of the work over 1 day. You should have spend more time trying to understand the rest of the issues. 2 Reflective commentary More comments on what you have learned are needed 3 Total Mark20

Written Feedback

Student Debrief and Feedback Session Not yet fully utilised General comments to the whole group Citing good and bad practice

Assessment Weighting Course marking scheme (1-5 range) Currently a low percentage of final grade All aspects rewarded but none too heavily Group vs Individual? Peer Assessment?

Conclusions Student always appreciate feedback Even if they then go on to ignore it! Use assessment to guide learning rather than just to judge learning Linking feedback to further assessment seems vital Scenario Brief MilestonesFeedbackAssessment Summative Feedback