Dynamics Modeling and First Design of Drag-Free Controller for ASTROD I Hongyin Li, W.-T. Ni Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solar Sail Attitude Control using a Combination of a Feedforward and a Feedback Controller D. Romagnoli, T. Oehlschlägel.
Advertisements

Benoit Pigneur and Kartik Ariyur School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University June 2013 Inexpensive Sensing For Full State Estimation of Spacecraft.
2 nd SSS, July 2010, Christina Scholz Performance Analysis of an Attitude Control System for Solar Sails Using Sliding Masses Christina Scholz Daniele.
ARO309 - Astronautics and Spacecraft Design Winter 2014 Try Lam CalPoly Pomona Aerospace Engineering.
NONLINEAR BACKSTEPPING CONTROL WITH OBSERVER DESIGN FOR A 4 ROTORS HELICOPTER L. Mederreg, F. Diaz and N. K. M’sirdi LRV Laboratoire de Robotique de Versailles,
Robust control Saba Rezvanian Fall-Winter 88.
(Includes references to Brian Clipp
Attitude Determination and Control
Progress in Two-second Filter Development Michael Heifetz, John Conklin.
Angular Momentum (of a particle) O The angular momentum of a particle, about the reference point O, is defined as the vector product of the position, relative.
Karla Vega University of California, Berkeley Attitude Determination and Control 6/9/2015.
Introduction to Attitude Control Systems
Ch. 7: Dynamics.
The City College of New York 1 Jizhong Xiao Department of Electrical Engineering City College of New York Manipulator Control Introduction.
AAE 666 Final Presentation Spacecraft Attitude Control Justin Smith Chieh-Min Ooi April 30, 2005.
Tracking using the Kalman Filter. Point Tracking Estimate the location of a given point along a sequence of images. (x 0,y 0 ) (x n,y n )
Single Point of Contact Manipulation of Unknown Objects Stuart Anderson Advisor: Reid Simmons School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University.
Course AE4-T40 Lecture 5: Control Apllication
Suspension Control with Thoughts on Modern Control Brett Shapiro 19 May May GWADW- G – v3.
Introduction to estimation theory Seoul Nat’l Univ.
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
1. 2 Outline 1.Introduction 2.Modeling 3.Simulation 4.Implementation 5.Demo 6.Conclusion.
Physics 311 Classical Mechanics Welcome! Syllabus. Discussion of Classical Mechanics. Topics to be Covered. The Role of Classical Mechanics in Physics.
Z B Zhou, Y Z Bai, L Liu, D Y Tan, H Yin Center for Gravitational Experiments, School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 01 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
Sliding Mode Control of PMSM Drives Subject to Torsional Oscillations in the Mechanical Load Jan Vittek University of Zilina Slovakia Stephen J Dodds School.
Mathematical Engineering in Avionics Applications Dr. SK Chaudhuri Sc. ‘H’ Sc. ‘H’ Associate Director, RCI 9 th June 2007, IISc Bangalore.
Angular Momentum; General Rotation
Mathematical Modelling of Dynamically Positioned Marine Vessels
Karman filter and attitude estimation Lin Zhong ELEC424, Fall 2010.
Institute of Flight Mechanics and Control Barcelona, LISA7 Symposium, June 17th 2008 IFR – University of Stuttgart LISA Pathfinder.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 18: Minimum Variance Estimator.
Guidance, Navigation and Controls Subsystem Winter 1999 Semester Review.
Modelling and Open Loop Simulation of Reentry Trajectory for RLV Missions Ashok Joshi and K. Sivan Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute.
Dynamics: Newton’s Laws of Motion
Workshop on MHD Control 2008 – O.Katsuro-Hopkins Computational analysis of advanced control methods applied to RWM control in tokamaks Oksana N. Katsuro-Hopkins.
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
Robotics Research Laboratory 1 Chapter 7 Multivariable and Optimal Control.
Newton’s 2nd Law: Translational Motion
Speed-Sensorless Estimation for Induction motors using Extended Kalman Filters 教 授: 龔應時 學 生: 楊政達 Murat Barut; Seta Bogosyan; Metin Gokasan; Industrial.
1 System Architecture Mark Herring (Stephen Merkowitz Presenting)
Optimizing Attitude Determination for Sun Devil Satellite – 1
Lecture 16: Introduction to Control (Part II)
Dynamics: Newton’s Laws of Motion. Force A force is a push or pull. An object at rest needs a force to get it moving; a moving object needs a force to.
Some problems in the optimization of the LISA orbits Guangyu Li 1 , Zhaohua Yi 1,2 , Yan Xia 1 Gerhard Heinzel 3 Oliver Jennrich 4 1 、 Purple Mountain.
Disturbance rejection control method
Simulation and Experimental Verification of Model Based Opto-Electronic Automation Drexel University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Penn State, 20 th -24 th July TH INTERNATIONAL LISA S YMPOSIUM D. Bortoluzzi, M. Da Lio, S. Vitale1 LTP dynamics and control D. Bortoluzzi, M. Da.
INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF ROBOTS (Part 1)
4.Results (1)Potential coefficients comparisons Fig.3 FIR filtering(Passband:0.005~0.1HZ) Fig.4 Comparison with ESA’s models (filter passband:0.015~0.1HZ)
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 ACS Dave Auslander, Dave Pankow, Han Chen, Yao-Ting Mao, UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
1 Project seminar on - By:- Tejaswinee Darure. Contents: 1] Aircraft (Boing-737) modeling a] Longitudinal Dynamics b] State space representation of system.
Dynamics: Newton’s Laws of Motion
Feedback Control Systems (FCS)
Modern Control for quantum optical systems
LQR Linear Quadratic Regulator
Improved Accuracy of the Gravity Probe B Science Results
Classical Torques on Gravity Probe B Gyros
Ch 8 : Rotational Motion .
Radar Micro-Doppler Analysis and Rotation Parameter Estimation for Rigid Targets with Complicated Micro-Motions Peng Lei, Jun Wang, Jinping Sun Beijing.
Mac Keiser and Alex Silbergleit
Dynamics and Control of Hexapod Systems
QUANSER Flight Control Systems Design 2DOF Helicopter 3DOF Helicopter 3DOF Hover 3DOF Gyroscope Quanser Education Solutions Powered by.
Kletskous Magnetic Stabilization
Mac Keiser and Alex Silbergleit
Jeff Stuart 1/31/2008 Dynamics and Control Simplified Rigid Body Equations of Motion AAE 450 Spring 2008.
Synthesis of Motion from Simple Animations
NONLINEAR AND ADAPTIVE SIGNAL ESTIMATION
NONLINEAR AND ADAPTIVE SIGNAL ESTIMATION
Presentation transcript:

Dynamics Modeling and First Design of Drag-Free Controller for ASTROD I Hongyin Li, W.-T. Ni Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences S. Theil, L. Pettazzi, M. S. Guilherme ZARM University of Bremen, Germany

ASTROD /07/15 Outline  Introduction of the Mission  Simulator  Controller Development  Conclusion  Outlook

ASTROD /07/15 Mission Introduction  Science goal Solar-system gravity mapping & relativistic gravity test  Orbit Heliocentric orbit, 0.5AU-1AU Orbit launch in 2015   SC configuration Cylinder : 2.5 (diameter)m ×2 m covered by solar panels. FEEP(Field Emission Electric Propulsion) Star Sensor, Gyroscope (??) EPS( Electrostatic Positioning/ Measurement System ) 1 test mass

ASTROD /07/15 Simulator  Equations of Motion  Disturbance & Environment

ASTROD /07/15 Coordinates I Heliocentric inertial frameCenter of mass of suni Earth-fixedCenter of earthe Spacecraft body-fixed frameCenter of mass of spacecraftb Sensor frame for test mass Geometrical center of sensor sens Body-fixed frame for test mass Center of mass of test masstm

ASTROD /07/15 Coordinates II FrameBase pointx directionz direction Heliocentric inertial frame Center of mass of sunAries Normal of ecliptic Spacecraft body- fixed frame Center of mass of spacecraft Parallel to symmetry axis of telescope Symmetrical axis Sensor frame for test mass Geometrical center of sensor Normal of the surface of the house nearby the telescope Normal of the upper surface of the house Body-fixed frame for test mass Center of mass of test mass Normal of the surface nearby the telescope Normal of the upper surface of test mass

ASTROD /07/15 Equations of Motion SC Translatio n SC Rotation TM Translatio n TM Rotation

ASTROD /07/15 Disturbance & Environment  Gravity Field (first order--spherical) Elements of

ASTROD /07/15 Disturbance & Environment  Gravity Field (second order… ) One of the Science goal of ASTROD I is to test the gravity field parameter of the solar gravity. So, It must be included in the further model.

ASTROD /07/15 Disturbance & Environment Coefficient of reflection Unit vector Effective area of SC Solar mean momentum flux / Solar pressure Solar Pressure

ASTROD /07/15 Solar Pressure deterministic part Solar pressure at 1AU Solar pressure at 0.5 AU is 4 times that of 1AU A low-pass filter is used to get the stochastic part with a white noise passed

ASTROD /07/15 Coupling between SC&TM Translation coupling Rotation coupling

ASTROD /07/15 Sensors and actuators  Star-Sensor  EPS-position measurement  EPS-attitude measurement  EPS-attitude suspension  FEEP-force  FEEP-torque White noise  shaped noise Need to consider sample frequency, nonlinearity in the future model….

ASTROD /07/15 Simulator

ASTROD /07/15 Controller Design  Structure of Controller  Requirements of controller  Synthesis  Closed loop Analysis

ASTROD /07/15 Structure of Controller DFACS 3 Sub-system SensorActuator SC-Attitude (3DOF) Star-Sensor Gyroscope (??) FEEP Drag-Free (3DOF-translation) EPSFEEP TM-Suspension (3DOF-rotation) EPS ( Electrostatic Positioning/ Measurement System ) EPS

ASTROD /07/15 Requirements of Controller SC-Attitude (3DOF) Drag-Free (3DOF-translation) TM-Suspension (3DOF-rotation) (????) It depends on the cross-talking between rotation and translation DOFs of test mass. It also need to meet the requirements of laser interferometer(not too big anglar velocity).

ASTROD /07/15 Synthesis I With the LQR method we can derive the optimal gain matrix K such that the state-feedback law minimizes the quadratic cost function Given following linear system : Just as the kalman filter we can get the minimum steady-state error covariance LQR: Linear-Quadratic-Regulator

ASTROD /07/15 Synthesis II  LQG = LQR + KF Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian = Linear-quadratic-regulator + kalman filter(Linear-quadratic-filter)  With DC disturbance need feed forward DC disturbance

ASTROD /07/15 LQG Design Plant

ASTROD /07/15 Controller Standard LQR used here is MIMO PD controller. It ’ s feedback is proportion (position, angle ) and derivative (velocity and angular velocity) of outputs of system. Feed forward part can cancel the static error.

ASTROD /07/15 Synthesis III  What does feed forward do to the frequency Response of the controller? Improve the performance in low frequency range.(integral ) but reduce the stability of the closed loop,need to trade-off …  Stability of the closed loop system? w ith some weight gains, there is still some poles on the right phase because the negative stiffness. So we need to chose the weight gain carefully. Try and tuning to get better performance as well as a stable system.

ASTROD /07/15 Closed loop analysis  Transfer function & PSD of Simulation Data  Pointing accuracy :

ASTROD /07/15 Test mass position

ASTROD /07/15 Transfer function analysis

ASTROD /07/15 PSD analysis

ASTROD /07/15 Conclusion  A model for ASTROD I is built. However it is simple, the structure is established and each subsystem can be extended to get a more detailed model.  LQG (LQR+KF) was developed which can meet the requirements of the mission.

ASTROD /07/15 Outlook  Detailed model Based on SC design –Inertial sensor : Cross-coupling between DOFs –Star sensor : Sample frequency , data fusion of two sensors. –Gyroscope to help the attitude estimate. –FEEP nonlinearity , frequency response.Location of FEEP clusters.  Advanced control strategy –Loop-Shaping with weighted LQR –Decoupling of controllers and DOFs –Robust Control method