ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing constructed response items
Advertisements

Evidence & Preference: Bias in Scoring TEDS-M Scoring Training Seminar Miami Beach, Florida.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Chapter 8: Construct and External Validity in Experimental Research
1 K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update English Language Arts February 2012.
A2 Unit 4A Geography fieldwork investigation Candidates taking Unit 4A have, in section A, the opportunity to extend an area of the subject content into.
1 Module 2: Tasks that Prompt Students’ to Represent Your Outcome Statements “ Every assessment is also based on a set of beliefs about the kinds of tasks.
Evaluating a journal article. Overview: Start with a brief summary of the article. Give the listener an overview of what was done, what was found, and.
A Terse Self-Test about Testing
Assessment: Reliability, Validity, and Absence of bias
Developing Classroom Assessments for the NGSS What evidence of student thinking is needed to determine if a student has met a PE (performance expectation)?
Robert J. Mislevy & Min Liu University of Maryland Geneva Haertel SRI International Robert J. Mislevy & Min Liu University of Maryland Geneva Haertel SRI.
SLRF 2010 Slide 1 Oct 16, 2010 What is the construct in task-based language assessment? Robert J. Mislevy Professor, Measurement, Statistics and Evaluation.
Planning Value of Planning What to consider when planning a lesson Learning Performance Structure of a Lesson Plan.
Writing Good Software Engineering Research Papers A Paper by Mary Shaw In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE),
(1) If Language is a Complex Adaptive System, What is Language Assessment? Presented at “Language as a Complex Adaptive System”, an invited conference.
Teaching Event –commentaries –written responses to a set of task-specific prompts. –provide contextual information needed to understand the artifacts and.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments 1 Introduction to Comparability Inclusive Assessment Seminar.
Dr. Robert Mayes University of Wyoming Science and Mathematics Teaching Center
5E INQUIRY LEARNING CYCLE. EngageExplore ExplainElaborate Evaluate.
Science and Engineering Practices
The 5 E Instructional Model
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. Introducing Inferential Statistics.
Terry Vendlinski Geneva Haertel SRI International
Introduction to Primary Science APP. What do the AFs look like? AF1 – Thinking Scientifically AF2- Understanding the applications & implications of science.
ECD in the Scenario-Based GED ® Science Test Kevin McCarthy Dennis Fulkerson Science Content Specialists CCSSO NCSA June 29, 2012 Minneapolis This material.
Foundational Work using Evidence-Centered Design.
Attention as a Limited Capacity Resource
Inquiry-based Learning and Digital Libraries in Undergraduate Science Education Xornam Apedoe Learning & Instruction University of San Francisco November.
PACT Areas that are Scored 1. Context for Learning 2. Planning 3. Instruction 4. Assessment 5. Reflection 6. Academic Language strand that runs across.
Staff Development and the Change Process
GOMATH! Day 2 Network 609 Core Curriculum Planning June 2013 Presenter: Karen Cardinali.
What is the TPA? Teacher candidates must show through a work sample that they have the knowledge, skills, and abilities required of a beginning teacher.
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
Robert J. Mislevy University of Maryland Geneva Haertel & Britte Haugan Cheng SRI International Robert J. Mislevy University of Maryland Geneva Haertel.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
AP World History Continuity and Change Over Time Essay.
The Strategy Unit Plan. Begin by noting the name of the writing strategy students will learn PLANS essay strategy.
Ideas and Activities to Differentiate Instruction through Comprehensible Input.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
Illustration of a Validity Argument for Two Alternate Assessment Approaches Presentation at the OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Steve Ferrara American.
Construct-Centered Design (CCD) What is CCD? Adaptation of aspects of learning-goals-driven design (Krajcik, McNeill, & Reiser, 2007) and evidence- centered.
Writing Constructed Responses Praxis II Principles of Learning and Teaching.
The role of students in the representation of their own learning. The one-stop shop for the HE Progress File
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Obtaining Valid and Reliable Classroom Evidence Chapter 4:
Criteria for selection of a data collection instrument. 1.Practicality of the instrument: -Concerns its cost and appropriateness for the study population.
Assessment Basics and Active Student Involvement Block II.
AF5.3 L1-2 Processing and analysing data to support the evaluation process and draw conclusions Say what happened in an investigation.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
Performance Based Assessment. What is Performance Based Assessment? PBA is a form of assessment that requires students to perform a task rather than an.
Using Evidence-Centered Design to develop Scenario Based Interactive Computer Tasks Daisy Rutstein.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
A. Strategies The general approach taken into an enquiry.
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
PSY 302 Entire Course For more classes visit PSY 302 Week 1 DQ 1 Career Possibilities PSY 302 Week 1 DQ 2 Employee Selection PSY.
 1. optional (check to see if your college requires it)  2. Test Length: 50 min  3. Nature of Prompt: Analyze an argument  4. Prompt is virtually.
Principles of Language Assessment
SAT Notes: Please get out your notebook and turn to the writing section. We are taking notes today.
Understanding by Design
Learning goals and assessment (MBA)
Attention as a Limited Capacity Resource
Welcome to the CSBM workshop: Managing the school environment
SLIVER SECOND ROUND SCORING RUBRIC
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
Next Generation Science Standards
K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update
Data Meeting One (60 minutes)
AICE General Paper What IS this class?.
Presentation transcript:

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument The design pattern is organized around Focal KSAs. They will be involved in the Claim, although there may be other KSAs that are included in the target of inference (e.g., Model Formation—but what models, what context?). Associated with Characteristic Features of Tasks.

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument The Rationale provides background into the nature of the Focal KSAs, and the kinds of things that people do in what kinds of situations that evidence it. It contributes to the Warrant in the assessment argument.

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument Additional KSAs play multiple roles. You need to think about which ones you really DO want to include as targets of inference (validity) and which ones you really DON’T (invalidity).

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument The Additional KSAs you DO want to include as targets of inference are part of the claim. E.g., knowing Mendel’s laws as well as being able to formulate a model in an investigation. Connected with Variable Features of Tasks.

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument The Additional KSAs you DON’T want to include as targets of inference introduce alternative explanations for poor performance. (Especially important for assessing special populations – UDL & acommodations.) Connected with Variable Features of Tasks & Work Products.

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument The Characteristic Features of Tasks help you think about critical data concerning the situation –what you need to get evidence about the Focal KSAs.

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument Variable Features of Tasks also help you think about data concerning the situation – but now to influence difficulty … or to bring in or reduce demand for Additional KSAs to avoid alternative explanations.

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument Some Variable Features of Tasks help you match features of tasks and background / knowledge / characteristics of students: Interests, familiarity, previous instruction.

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument Potential Work Products help you think about what you want to capture from a performance – product, process, constructed model, written explanation, etc. Can also call attention to demand for Additional KSAs, & avoid alternative explanations (e.g., Stella)

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument Potential Observations are possibilities for the qualities of Work Products – i.e., the data concerning the performance.

ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why this DP addresses evidence about focal KSAs Additional KSAs Other knowledge/skills/abilities that may be required by tasks. Characteristic features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that are needed to evoke evidence about the focal KSAs. Variable features of tasks Aspects of assessment situations that can be varied to shift difficulty or focus. Potential work products What students actually say, do, or make, to produce evidence. Potential observations Aspects of work products we might identify and evaluate, as evidence about students’ KSAs. Potential rubrics Ways of evaluating work products to produce values of observations. Claim about student Warrant for assessment argument Alternative explanations since so unless Data concerning situation Data concerning performance Other information concerning student vis a vis assessment situation Student acting in assessment situation since Warrant for scoring since Warrant for task design How Design Patterns Support Thinking about the Assessment Argument And Potential Rubrics are algorithms/rubrics/rules for evaluating Work Products to get the data concerning the performance.