Challenges: Monitoring of Research: The Options Robert Bortolussi and Diann Nicholson IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax NS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 US Investigator Meeting DIAS-4, Chicago, July 2011 Good Clinical Practice (GCP) for Investigators and the Research Team.
Advertisements

The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
2.2. Challenges and Limitations to Oversight Andres Soosaar, Estonia.
Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Good Medical Practice Evidence to use for Appraisal Good Medical Practice 2006.
CROMS NIDCR Clinical Monitoring
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
Communitycentral. com.au Workshop Title: Governance and Management the whys and wherefores Workshop Stream: Organisational Development and Management Brentyn.
Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services, IWK Health Centre.
An Integrated Care Organisation Incorporating the Community Services of Brent, Ealing and Harrow Dr Alfa Sa’adu Consultant Physician Medical Director and.
The Institutional Review Board. What is an IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
The University of Houston Institutional Compliance Program Rev July 2011.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Managing Sponsorship Research Services University of Oxford.
Risk management Module 1 Introduction to risk management.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada The State of Program Evaluation in the Canadian Federal Government Glenn Wheeler Director, Results Measurement.
Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Nicola Dunbar, Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 10 July 2012.
Ontario Colleges Multi- college Ethics Review Process On behalf of the Multi-college ethics working group Lynda Atack, Centennial College Jill Dennis,
Use and Care of Vertebrate Animals: What Researchers Need to Know Brian Greene IACUC Chair and Associate Professor of Biology Missouri State University.
Electron Gun Group Laser Safety Review September 8, 2005 Agenda 5 year history of DOE lab laser safety reportable incidents Upcoming DOE laser safety review.
Response to FDA Audit 483 MX-4501N : Nine Category 483 Citations Meetings Minutes: Votes for, against, abstention and reason not recorded;
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
JCAHO UPDATE June The Bureau of Primary Health Care is continuing to encourage Community Health Centers to be JCAHO accredited. JCAHO’s new focus.
Compliance and Quality Bringing It Together for Your Board Kristin Jenkins, J.D., FACHE October 2008.
Janet Ellen Holwell, CCRC, CCRA President, NY Metropolitan Chapter of ACRP.
Medical Audit.
RAISING THE BAR Meeting CSA Guidelines And Preparing for Health Canada
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. 1 Part Four: Implementing Business Ethics in a Global Economy Chapter 9: Managing and Controlling Ethics.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Ethics in Quality Improvement Quality Academy Cohort 6 Melanie Rathgeber MERGE Consulting.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Governance: Challenges & Possible Solutions Audit and Risk Indaba 28 October 2011.
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Belinda Seto, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director for Extramural Research National Institutes of Health Human Subjects Research Enhancements Awards Renaissance.
The Research Subject Advocate (RSA). Pictured, left to right: Andrea Saltzman, RN; Enrico Cagliero, MD; Debi Dunkless.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz.
1 Railway Safety Regulator Strategic Plan: 2007/8 to 2009/10 Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Transport 28 March 2007.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
OBSERVED IN ORO REVIEWS COMPLIANCE ISSUES: OBSERVED IN ORO REVIEWS David A. Weber, Ph.D., FACNP Acting Chief Officer Office of Research.
Dispensary and Administration Site Information Presentation.
Yadvindera (Bobby) Bains MD Director of Radiation Oncology, Laredo Medical Center Adjunct Associate Professor, Dept of Radiation Oncology, University of.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
Date CCAC National Workshop Tri-Agency Financial Monitoring Review and Research with Animals May 8, 2009 Presented by: Carole Crête-Robidoux, Manager,
Office of Human Research Protection Georgia Health Sciences University.
Building a Culture of Research Ethics in the Ontario Colleges OTTE ROSENKRANTZ PHD.
Partnership Health: Evaluation and possibilities for an adapted structure Agenda item 11 Madhavi Bajekal, ONS (UK) PH coordinator Directors of Social Statistics.
Emergency Health Services Translating Research Into Practice Andrew Travers MD MSc FRCPC Staff Physician, QE-II Emergency Provincial Medical Director Emergency.
VA Central IRB K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs September.
CONDUCTING COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS Allen Ditch Director Corporate Quality Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
Board Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Good Clinical Practices and Best Research Practices at MU Health Betty Wilson, CIP, MS Senior Compliance Manager MU IRB Lori Wilcox, EdD Director of Academic.
Adverse events reporting system at Kaiser Permanente: Promoting collaboration for the protection of human subjects Arthur Durazo IRB Administrator Kaiser.
1 Auditing Your Fusion Center Privacy Policy. 22 Recommendations to the program resulting in improvements Updates to privacy documentation Informal discussions.
The Challenge of Risk Management : Justice Department Seminar The Risk Management Authority April 2007.
Chapter 5 ASX Guidelines for Listed Companies
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Reasons for Auditing There are many reasons for auditing. Some examples of these reasons might be: Requested by the IRB Committee Requested by an IRB.
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Evidence to use for Appraisal Good Medical Practice 2006
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
Good clinical practice
Presentation transcript:

Challenges: Monitoring of Research: The Options Robert Bortolussi and Diann Nicholson IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax NS

Monitoring of Research  MRC Guideline 1987: “Research officers … may be required to maintain scrutiny by periodic review of research and the factors involved in ethics approval.”  Canadian survey in 1995: only 18% of REB’s had any review process and only 2% had a systematic regular audit.  Internationally poor compliance with similar guidelines

Monitoring of Research Challenges & Issues:  Lack of clarity on goals,  Lack of standards,  Fear of negative effect on trust between REB and investigators,  Lack of funding to undertake a review.

Monitoring of Research Goal: To identify weaknesses in the system and develop tools to improve. Weijer,C et al CMAJ 1995, 152:  Strategies: 1. Continuing annual review 2. Monitoring of consent process 3. Monitoring of adherence to protocol 4. Monitoring of data integrity

Monitoring of Research Establishing standards: – Membership on Auditing Committee. – Selection of protocols. – Audit process. Establish an atmosphere of trust Two way dialogue, two way learning Record keeping review Consent for review Adverse event review

Monitoring of Research  Evaluation Criteria; – Evidence of good record keeping – Monitoring of integrity of data and adherence to protocol – Monitoring of consent – Monitoring of adverse events

Monitoring of Research Results

Monitoring of Research  Record Keeping – Original records (n = 32) – Continuing records (25)  Data Integrity – Laboratory information (26) – Validation of lab data (26) – Adequate storage (13) – Adherence to protocol (26)  Consent – Signature (174) – Date (167) – Consent taker (168) – Consent unchanged (174) Percent  91  93  100  92  100  96  99  98  95

Monitoring of Research For 19 studies with greater than minimal risk. Safety Committees – Formal47% – Informal53% Reported an SAE 6 Cases SAE’s at outside site 2 Cases SAE’s at local site 4 Cases – Reported to sponsor4 of 4 – Reported to local site3 of 4

Monitoring of Research  Recommendations: – Educational Measures – Change in Policy – Change in Process TOTAL Percent Number

Monitoring of Research Opportunities:  Clarity on goals must be demonstrated,  Development of standards,  Promote trust between REB and investigators,  Funding to undertake a review – Total of 9 to 20 person-hours occupied for each protocol reviewed in clerical, administrative and REB member activities.

Monitoring of Research Learn from the audit to develop educational, policy and process changes