New Puzzles in Supermassive Black Hole Evolution Charles L. Steinhardt IPMU, University of Tokyo October 14, 2010 Steinhardt & Elvis 2010, MNRAS, 402,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Black Holes in the Early Universe Accretion and Feedback Geoff Bicknell & Alex Wagner Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics Australian National.
Advertisements

High Redshift Quasar Survey Survey Science Group Workshop, 2013 High1 Resort Yiseul Jeon, Myungshin Im, W.-K. Park, J. H. Kim, M. Karouzos, J.-W. Kim,
Marianne Vestergaard Dark Cosmology Centre, Copenhagen First Galaxies, Quasars, and GRBs, June Determining Black Hole Masses in Distant Quasars.
The Highest-Redshift Quasars and the End of Cosmic Dark Ages Xiaohui Fan Collaborators: Strauss,Schneider,Richards, Hennawi,Gunn,Becker,White,Rix,Pentericci,
MPIA Heidelberg, July 2011 Quasar Death Martin Elvis Charles L. Steinhardt 1, Heng Hao 2, Monica Young 3, Guido Risaliti 4, Francesca Civano Harvard-Smithsonian.
AGN Eddington Ratio Distributions
February 9, 11:00 am. The unusually bright centers found in some galaxies are called 1.active galactic nuclei. 2.starbursts. 3.halos. 4.supermassive.
Supermassive Black Holes in Radio-loud AGNs
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Accretion and ejection in AGN, Como,
Quasar Clustering from SDSS DR7: Dependencies on FIRST Radio Magnitudes Andria C. Schwortz, Sarah Eftekharzadeh, Adam D. Myers, Yue Shen Clustering is.
On the geometry of broad emission region in quasars Roberto Decarli Turin - May, 20 th, 2008 Università degli Studi dell’Insubria Dipartimento di Fisica.
1 The Population and Luminosity Function of AGNs from SDSS Lei Hao Collaborators: Michael Strauss SDSS collaboration Princeton University CFA Lunch Talk:
Quasar Luminosity Functions at High Redshifts Gordon Richards Drexel University With thanks to Michael Strauss, Xiaohui Fan, Don Schneider, and Linhua.
UV to Mid-IR SEDs of Low Redshift Quasars Zhaohui Shang (Tianjin Normal University/University of Wyoming) Michael Brotherton, Danny Dale (University of.
Constraining Astronomical Populations with Truncated Data Sets Brandon C. Kelly (CfA, Hubble Fellow, 6/11/2015Brandon C. Kelly,
The relation among black holes, their host galaxies and AGN activity INAF ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI ASTROFISICA NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ASTROPHYSICS Galaxies.
Modelling the Broad Line Region Andrea Ruff Rachel Webster University of Melbourne.
Chapter 25: Quasars and active galaxies Features of quasars Quasars and distant galaxies Seyfert and radio galaxies Active galactic nuclei Supermassive.
A Unified, Merger-Driven Model of the Origin of Starbursts, Quasars, the Cosmic X-Ray Background, Supermassive Black Holes, and Galaxy Spheroids Hopkins,
ACCRETION MODELS FOR BLACK HOLE EVOLUTION Francesco Shankar In collaboration with: D. Weinberg J. Miralda-Escude’ L. Ferrarese A. Cavaliere S. Mathur CCAPP/OSU.
Advanced Methods for Studying Astronomical Populations: Inferring Distributions and Evolution of Derived (not Measured!) Quantities Brandon C. Kelly (CfA,
Christopher | Vlad | David | Nino SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES.
MASSIVE BLACK HOLES: formation & evolution Martin Rees Cambridge University.
This is the Local Group of galaxies, about 45 galaxies within about 1 Mpc of the Milky Way. Most are dwarf-elliptical or iregular. A distance of one million.
1 The Fundamental Plane Relationship of Astrophysical Black Holes Ran Wang Supervisor: Xuebing Wu Peking University Ran Wang Supervisor: Xuebing Wu Peking.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Black Hole Growth and Galaxy Evolution Meg Urry Yale University.
Modern Quasar SEDs Zhaohui Shang ( Tianjin Normal University ) Kunming, Feb
Gravitational Waves from Massive Black-Hole Binaries Stuart Wyithe (U. Melb) NGC 6420.
W.Kollatschny, Zetzl, Z.Alvi.  Information about the Structure and the Kinematics of the inner most region surrounding an AGN can be revealed by analyzing.
The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High Redshift Quasars Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The University of Melbourne) (Harvard University) Fan et al. (2001)
Active Galaxies Definition – –Amount of Energy –Type of Energy Non-thermal Polarized Other characteristics –Emission spectra Hydrogen – Balmer series &
The Fundamental Plane of Astrophysical Black Holes WU Xue-Bing (Peking University) Collaborators: WANG Ran (PKU) KONG Minzhi (NAOC)
Quasars Chapter 17. Topics Quasars –characteristics –what are they? –what is their energy source? –where are they? –how old are they? –interactions of.
Scaling relations of spheroids over cosmic time: Tommaso Treu (UCSB)
Γαλαξίες – 3 Υπερμαζικές Μαύρες Τρύπες στα κέντρα γαλαξιών 15 Ιανουαρίου 2013.
Black Hole - Bulge Relation of High Redshift Quasars Xue-Bing Wu (Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University)
Spins of supermassive black holes in quasars and galaxies Jian-Min Wang ( 王建民 ) Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing Dec.
The Powerful Black Hole Wind in the Luminous Quasar PDS 456 James Reeves Astrophysics Group, Keele University & UMBC in collaboration with: E. Nardini.
Galaxies with Active Nuclei Chapter 14:. Active Galaxies Galaxies with extremely violent energy release in their nuclei (pl. of nucleus).  “active galactic.
Joint formation and evolution of SMBHs and their host galaxies: How do the Quasar-Spheroid correlations change with the Cosmic Time? A. Treves Università.
Astrophysics from Space Lecture 6: Supermassive black holes Prof. Dr. M. Baes (UGent) Prof. Dr. C. Waelkens (KUL) Academic year
AGN feedback in action: constraints on the scaling relations between BH and galaxy at high redshift Andrea Merloni (EXC, MPE) A. Bongiorno (MPE), COSMOS.
Black hole accretion history of active galactic nuclei 曹新伍 中国科学院上海天文台.
Super Massive Black Holes The Unknown Astrophysics of their initial formation.
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
Evolution of Accretion Disks around Massive Black Holes: Constraints from the Demography of Active Galactic Nuclei Qingjuan Yu UC Berkeley April 21, 2006.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
Quasar Surveys -- From Sloan to SNAP
A synthesis model for AGN evolution: unveiling SMBH growth with (past and future) X- ray surveys Ringberg Meeting, 2/2008 Andrea Merloni Max-Planck Institut.
Warm Dust in the Most Distant Quasars Ran Wang Department of Astronomy, Peking University, China.
Spectral Energy Distributions of obscured AGN E. Lusso, A. Comastri, E. Treister, D. Sanders, H. Hao, M. Elvis, C. Vignali, R. Gilli, G.Zamorani, M. Brusa,
Active Galactic Nuclei Origin of correlations.
Why is the BAT survey for AGN Important? All previous AGN surveys were biased- –Most AGN are ‘obscured’ in the UV/optical –IR properties show wide scatter.
AKARI Spectroscopic Study of the Rest-frame Optical Spectra of Quasars at 3.5 < z < 6.5 Hyunsung Jun¹, Myungshin Im¹, Hyung Mok Lee², and the QSONG team.
AGN in the VVDS (Bongiorno, Gavignaud, Zamorani et al.) 1.What has been done: main results on Type 1 AGN evolution and accretion properties of faint AGN.
Growth of SMBH studied through X-ray surveys
How to Better Weigh a Black Hole and Other Adventures in Quasar Physics Michael Brotherton.
Evolution of Black Hole Masses from Spectra of Quasar Gas Dynamics
The Growth of Supermassive Black Holes
Biases in Virial Black Hole Masses: an SDSS Perspective
Black Hole Candles for Expansion History of High-z Universe
Quasars, Active Galaxies, and super-massive black holes
Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona June 21, 2004
Active Versus Normal Galaxies
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
On the
Demographics of SDSS Quasars in Two-Dimension
Cosmological Evolution of the Duty Cycle of Quasars
Janie K. Hoormann University of Queensland 23 April 2019
Presentation transcript:

New Puzzles in Supermassive Black Hole Evolution Charles L. Steinhardt IPMU, University of Tokyo October 14, 2010 Steinhardt & Elvis 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2637 (arxiv: ) Steinhardt & Elvis 2010 MNRAS, in press (arxiv: ) Steinhardt & Elvis 2010 MNRAS 406, L1 (arxiv: ) Steinhardt, Elvis, & Amarie 2010, submitted

The supermassive black hole (SMBH) lifecycle 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff 4) Quiescence (well, almost)

The supermassive black hole (SMBH) lifecycle 1) Seeding 2) Growth: quasar phase (Soltan) 3) Turnoff 4) Quiescence (well, almost)

The supermassive black hole (SMBH) lifecycle 1) Seeding 2) Growth: quasar phase (Soltan) 3) Turnoff (M-  relation) 4) Quiescence (well, almost)

Quasar Luminosity Function Richards et al. (2006)

How to obtain black hole masses from one SDSS spectrum Kepler’s Laws on broad emission line gas, so we need v,R. Doppler broadening of spectral line  velocity Supermassive black hole “mass ladder” Continuum luminosity  radius Comparison with reverbation masses implies ~0.4 dex uncertainty (more on this later!)

Quasar Mass Function Vestergaard et al. (2008)

Common beliefs about SMBHs All quasars can radiate at the Eddington limit Quasars are “light-bulbs”: either on (at Eddington) or off Quasars “flicker” Luminosity is a proxy for mass Quasar dynamics come from host galaxy dynamics

Existing data Existing methods Existing catalogs But new methods

Existing data Quasar catalog and spectra come from SDSS DR5 Existing methods Existing catalogs But new methods

Existing data Quasar catalog and spectra come from SDSS DR5 Virial Mass Estimation: Vestergaard/Peterson, McLure/Dunlop Existing methods Existing catalogs But new methods

Existing data Quasar catalog and spectra come from SDSS DR5 Virial Mass Estimation: Vestergaard/Peterson, McLure/Dunlop Actual mass estimates: Shen et al. (2008) Bolometric luminosities: Richards et al. (2006), Shen et al. (2008) Existing methods Existing catalogs But new methods

Existing data Quasar catalog and spectra come from SDSS DR5 Virial Mass Estimation: Vestergaard/Peterson, McLure/Dunlop Actual mass estimates: Shen et al. (2008) Bolometric luminosities: Richards et al. (2006), Shen et al. (2008) Time to think two- (or three-) dimensionally! Existing methods Existing catalogs But new methods

0.2 < z < 0.4, H  ‏

SDSS Saturation Detection Limit Quasar Turnoff

0.2 < z < 0.4, H  ‏ Detection Limit Quasar Turnoff

Virial mass estimation may be better than previously believed! Best-fit exponential decays: e-folding of dex

0.2 < z < 0.4, H  ‏ Detection Limit Quasar Turnoff

Quasars at 1.6 < z < 1.8

Best-fit sub-Eddington boundary slopes

Risaliti, Young, & Elvis (2009)

Common beliefs about SMBHs All quasars can radiate at the Eddington limit Quasars are “light-bulbs”: either on (at Eddington) or off Quasars “flicker” Luminosity is a proxy for mass Quasar dynamics come from host galaxy dynamics FALSE!

Expected L/L E distribution at different M, 0.2<z<0.4 Normalized to peak

The L/L E distribution at different M, 0.2<z<0.4 Normalized to peak

The L/L E distribution at different M, 0.2<z<0.4 Normalized to peak

Common beliefs about SMBHs Quasars radiate at the Eddington limit Quasars are “light-bulbs”: either on (at Eddington) or off Quasars “flicker” Luminosity is a proxy for mass Quasar dynamics come from host galaxy dynamics FALSE! TRUE!FALSE!

Common beliefs about SMBHs Quasars radiate at the Eddington limit Quasars are “light-bulbs”: either on (at Eddington) or off Quasars “flicker” Luminosity is a proxy for mass Quasar dynamics come from host galaxy dynamics FALSE! TRUE!FALSE! MAYBE NOT?

SDSS quasar colors at high mass, low luminosity

Emission line ratios change at high mass Highest Mass Intermediate Mass Lowest Mass

Common beliefs about SMBHs Quasars radiate at the Eddington limit Quasars are “light-bulbs”: either on (at Eddington) or off Quasars “flicker” Luminosity is a proxy for mass Quasar dynamics come from host galaxy dynamics FALSE! TRUE!FALSE! MAYBE NOT?

Redshift range Luminosity at fixed mass, different z

Common beliefs about SMBHs Quasars radiate at the Eddington limit Quasars are “light-bulbs”: either on (at Eddington) or off Quasars “flicker” Luminosity is a proxy for mass Quasar dynamics come from host galaxy dynamics FALSE! TRUE!FALSE! MAYBE NOT? FALSE!

Log M (solar) Comoving number density declines at different rates for different masses

Timescales  (M), N(t) = N 0 e -t/  (M)

Common beliefs about SMBHs Quasars radiate at the Eddington limit Quasars are “light-bulbs”: either on (at Eddington) or off Quasars “flicker” Luminosity is a proxy for mass Quasar dynamics come from host galaxy dynamics FALSE! TRUE!FALSE! MAYBE NOT? FALSE! SEEMINGLY FALSE!

k20% changes in: t0  M0 Track sensitivity to 20% changes in parameters

Sample Track: 1.8 < z < 2.0

Sample Track: 1.6 < z < 1.8

Sample Track: 1.4 < z < 1.6

Sample Track: 1.2 < z < 1.4

Sample Track: 1.0 < z < 1.2

Allowed track parameters at M 0 =8.5, t0=3.5 Gyr Quasars are typically on for just 1-2 Gyr!

Allowed parameters for tracks originating at all times

What would we ideally use to study quasar accretion? Mass and luminosity evolution of individual SMBH All relevant host galaxy parameters Only one snapshot SDSS cannot see the galaxy

What would we ideally use to study quasar accretion? Mass and luminosity evolution of individual SMBH All relevant host galaxy parameters Quasars ARE like light bulbs! SDSS cannot see the galaxy

What would we ideally use to study quasar accretion? Mass and luminosity evolution of individual SMBH All relevant host galaxy parameters Quasars ARE like light bulbs! There aren’t any!

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff 4) Quiescence (well, almost)

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff? Why is turnoff synchronized?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff? Why is turnoff synchronized? Why is turnoff but not growth linked to the host galaxy?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff? Why is turnoff synchronized? Why is turnoff but not growth linked to the host galaxy? What is the origin of the M-  relation?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff? Why is turnoff synchronized? Why is turnoff but not growth linked to the host galaxy? What is the origin of the M-  relation? How are supermassive black holes seeded synchronously?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff? Why is turnoff synchronized? Why is turnoff but not growth linked to the host galaxy? What is the origin of the M-  relation? How are supermassive black holes seeded synchronously? How do the biggest, earliest central black holes form?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff? Why is turnoff synchronized? Why is turnoff but not growth linked to the host galaxy? What is the origin of the M-  relation? How are supermassive black holes seeded synchronously? How do the biggest, earliest central black holes form? Does this mean they are seeded before the first stars?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff? Why is turnoff synchronized? Why is turnoff but not growth linked to the host galaxy? What is the origin of the M-  relation? How are supermassive black holes seeded synchronously? How do the biggest, earliest central black holes form? Does this mean they are seeded before the first stars? Is it possible to make primordial black hole seeds?

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff? Why is turnoff synchronized? Why is turnoff but not growth linked to the host galaxy? What is the origin of the M-  relation? How are supermassive black holes seeded synchronously? How do the biggest, earliest central black holes form? Does this mean they are seeded before the first stars? Is it possible to make primordial black hole seeds? Summary: We don’t know how supermassive black holes are born, how they grow, or why they die.

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff? Why is turnoff synchronized? Why is turnoff but not growth linked to the host galaxy? What is the origin of the M-  relation? How are supermassive black holes seeded synchronously? How do the biggest, earliest central black holes form? Does this mean they are seeded before the first stars? Is it possible to make primordial black hole seeds? Summary: We don’t know how supermassive black holes are born, how they grow, or why they die.

The supermassive black hole lifecycle: new, open questions 1) Seeding 2) Growth 3) Turnoff Are all quasars at a characteristic luminosity? Why is evolution synchronous but time-dependent? Why is the accretion rate sublinear in mass? Can we use quasars as standard candles? Is turnoff permanent? Are “intrinsically red” quasars in the midst of turnoff? Why is turnoff synchronized? Why is turnoff but not growth linked to the host galaxy? What is the origin of the M-  relation? How are supermassive black holes seeded synchronously? How do the biggest, earliest central black holes form? Does this mean they are seeded before the first stars? Is it possible to make primordial black hole seeds? Summary: Something exciting is about to happen!  Steinhardt & Elvis 2010, MNRAS 402, 2637 (sub-Eddington boundary)  Steinhardt & Elvis 2010, MNRAS in press (Turnoff/Synchronization)  Steinhardt & Elvis 2010, MNRAS 406, L1 (Virial Masses)  Steinhardt, Elvis, & Amarie 2010, sub. MNRAS (tracks)