Moral Theory An explanation of why an action is right or wrong or why a person or a person’s character is good or bad Tells us what it is about an action.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilitarianism Maximize good.
Advertisements

Hedonism & Utilitarianism
Revision Notes Utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism.
Normative Ethics Metaethics ETHICS
John Stuart Mill in Biography of John Stuart Born20 May 1806 Pentonville, London, EnglandDied8 May 1873 (aged 66) Avignon, FranceEra19th-century.
Before we get to this standard, we must understand that in Ethics, there are two types of Ethical Standards: §Consequential Ethical Standards §Nonconsequential.
1Utilitarianism Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Chapter Seven: Utilitarianism
Consequentialist Ethical Theories Egoism: the good is whatever promotes my long-term interests Hedonism: we should pursue pleasures that are not mixed.
How Actions Can Be Morally Evaluated l Teleological Ethics: we are morally obligated to do X because of its good consequences l Deontological Ethics: X.
Utilitarianism the Good, the Bad, the Ugly. Utilitarianism Utilitarianism: the idea that the moral worth of an action is determined solely by its usefulness.
UTILITARIANISM: GREATEST HAPPINESS FOR THE GREATEST NUMBER
Normative Ethical Theory Jim Okapal Asst. Professor of Philosophy Missouri Western State University.
UTILITARIANISM: A comparison of Bentham and Mill’s versions
Utilitarianism: happiness and preferences
Consequentialism, Natural Law Theory, Kantian Moral Theory
Utilitarian Approach. Utilitarianism The founder of classical utilitarianism is Jeremy Bentham. According to Bentham human beings always try to avoid.
Ethical Theory and Business Chapter Two
Consequentialist Theories of Ethics. Do Consequences make an action right? Many ethicists have argued that we should decide moral right and wrong by looking.
Consequentialism Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill ( ) Principle of Utility: actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness,
Utilitarianism Lesson # 4 Leadership and Ethics. Utilitarianism What is Utilitarianism?
Utilitarianism. Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters; pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we.
Utilitarianism How ought we to act?.
Utilitarianism or Consequentialism Good actions are those that result in good consequences. The moral value of an action is extrinsic to the action itself.
What is Utilitarianism?
Ethics LL.B. STUDIES 2015 LECTURE 2. Part one Mapping ethics.
Ethics A look at the reasons behind decisions about what is right and wrong. What is the right thing to do?
Utilitarianism Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec. 13 Recapping: 3 main points of Utilitarianism:  Actions are judged right or wrong solely on the basis of their.
Act and Rule Utilitariansim
Justice John Stuart Mill. British Philosopher 1806 – 1873 Most Famous Works: Utiliarianism deals with ethics. On Liberty deals with political philosophy.
Thesis Question Is the part of the moral theory family Utilitarianism?
 Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec. 14 Recapping... 3 main points of Utilitarianism:  Actions are judged right or wrong solely on the basis of.
Normative Ethical Theory: Utilitarianism and Kantian Deontology
Session 3: Utilitarianism Dr. Chan Ho Mun Dept of Public & Social Administration City University of Hong Kong June 7, 2007.
Utilitarianism. Types of Theory Teleological Teleological The consequence of the moral act is the important thing.
Utilitarianism is a kind of consequentialism
Utilitarianism Utility = net pleasure or happiness Utilitarians generally use the terms happiness and utility interchangeably The right act is that which.
UTILITARIANISM “A moral theory according to which an action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility.” (Jeremy Bentham, Introduction.
A Brief Overview of Western Ethics M. Blake Hargrove University of Texas at Arlington 1.
Consequentialism, Natural Law Theory, Kantian Moral Theory
Utilitarianism is a theory about what we ought to do. It states that we should always choose actions which produce the greatest amount of happiness for.
Utilitarianism Utility = net pleasure or happiness
Utilitarianism What is Utility?. Teleological vs. Deontological.
LO: I will know about the Hedonic Calculus Hmk: Do some biographical work on John Stuart Mill Starter: Using your homework, what did you find out about.
Utilitarian Theory of Ethics Utilitarian theory is a consequentialist approach to judging moral behavior. Consequentialist hold that –consequences count.
Ethics A look at the reasons behind decisions about what is right and wrong. What is the right thing to do?
Consequentialism (utilitarism). General description 'Consequentialist theories regard the moral value of actions, rules of conduct, and so on, as dependent.
Moral Theory An explanation of why an action is right or wrong or why a person or a person’s character is good or bad Tells us what it is about an action.
Utilitarianism.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 10 Utilitarianism.
Morality and the Moral Life. Ethics (moral philosophy): The study of morality using the methods of philosophy. Morality: Our beliefs about right and wrong.
Utilitarianism.
PHIL242: MEDICAL ETHICS SUM2014, M-F, 9:40-10:40, SAV 156
Mill’s Utilitarianism
Lesson III Normative Ethics
John Stuart Mill’s Moral Theory
John Stuart Mill What do we know about him already?
10 mins challenge Exercise: You have 30 happiness points to distribute across nine things. Draw four columns marked Put these nine in the first column:
Utilitarianism Objection Too permissive
Utilitarianism.
OBE 117 BUSINESS AND SOCIETY.
Utilitarianism Utility = net pleasure or happiness
Moral Theories: Utilitarianism
1. STABILITY: constant, consistent
Utilitarianism Morality Depends on the Consequences
On your whiteboard: List the strengths and weaknesses of act utilitarianism.
Presentation transcript:

Moral Theory An explanation of why an action is right or wrong or why a person or a person’s character is good or bad Tells us what it is about an action that makes it right

Moral Theory Consequentialist theory—Asserts that the rightness of actions depends solely on their consequences Deontological theory—Asserts that the rightness of actions is determined partly or entirely by their intrinsic value

Utilitarianism The view that right actions are those that result in the most beneficial balance of good over bad consequences for everyone involved

Utilitarianism Act-utilitarianism—The rightness of actions depends solely on the relative good produced by individual actions Rule-utilitarianism—A right action is one that conforms to a rule that, if followed consistently, would create for everyone involved the most beneficial balance of good over bad

Utilitarianism Classical Utilitarianism—Jeremy Bentham Utilitarianism Refined—John Stuart Mill Mill thinks that some kinds of pleasures are more valuable than others. Bentham insists that pleasures should be measured by their quantity, not quality. Mill declares that it is better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.

Utilitarianism A Defense of Utilitarianism—Kai Nielsen The moral worth of an action is determined by its consequences. We are responsible not only for the consequences of our actions, but also for the consequences of our nonactions.

Utilitarianism Against Utilitarianism—Bernard Williams Utilitarianism is a bad moral theory. Utilitarianism makes unintelligible our integrity. Utilitarianism involves the notion of negative responsibility.

Utilitarianism The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas— Ursula Le Guin Le Guin offers a critical portrait of utilitarianism. Would you walk away from Omelas?

Utilitarianism The Utilitarian Social Engineer and the Savage— Aldous Huxley Huxley contrasts freedom and high culture with happiness. Is the truth in the middle, as Huxley implies—between complete, unregulated freedom of will and social stability wherein we can find happiness?