www.washingtonhra.com  3 million Americans  160,000 new cases each year  16 million by 2050  90% of patients have recurrences  Incremental cost.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Novel Oral Anticoagulants: Benefits and risks Matthew Moles, MD December 4, 2012 University of Colorado.
Advertisements

Update on Anti-platelets Gabriel A. Vidal, MD Vascular Neurology Ochsner Medical Center October 14 th, 2009.
Widimsky P, Tousek P, Rokyta R, et al. Charles University Prague, CZ PRAGUE-7 Study (Hot Lines presenter)
Standard Medical Therapy TRA 40 mg mg/d TRA 40 mg mg/d Placebo EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp for RI/urgent coronary revasc. 1  EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp.
Leadership. Knowledge. Community. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Antiplatelet Guidelines COMBINATION WARFARIN + ASA THERAPY WHEN: TO USE, TO CONSIDER,
CLINICAL CASES.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Phillip H. Lam, M.D. Chief Medical Resident Medstar Georgetown University Hospital.
Atrial fibrillation Daniel Gutenberger M.D. Chief Medical Director American General, Milwaukee.
Arrhythmias: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Atrial Fibrillation. Outline Epidemiology Signs and Symptoms Etiology Differential Diagnosis Diagnostic Tests Classification Management.
NILOFAR RAHMAN, MD AMIT KUMAR, MD. DEFINITION  A SVT with uncoordinated atrial activation with constant deterioration of atrial mechanical function 
ICD FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION EVIDENCE REVIEW
Evidence That D-dimer Levels Predict Subsequent Thromboembolic and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation during Oral Anticoagulant.
Clinical Title Date Jaret Tyler, MD Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiologist Assistant Professor of Medicine Ohio State’s Heart and Vascular Center Atrial.
Manufacturer: Daiichi Sankyo FDA Approval Date: 01/08/2015
Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Edoxaban Oral factor Xa inhibitor Bioavailability: 62% Tmax: 1-2 hrs Elimination: 50% renal Half-life: 9-11 hours.
Randomized Evaluation of Long- term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke.
Cardiac Arrhythmias in Coronary Heart Disease SIGN 94.
Atrial Fibrillation Warfarin and its newer alternatives
  Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Target
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
Dr Avinash Haridas Pillai
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
The Long Term Multi-Center Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study To reviewers and moderators: These.
New Agents Heather Kertland, PharmD.
Secondary prevention after a TIA or ischemic stroke.
Atrial Fibrillation Dr Nidhi Bhargava 8/10/13.
Blood Pressure Lability During Cardiac Surgery Is Associated With Adverse Outcomes Solomon Aronson, Edwin G. Avery, Cornelius Dyke, Joseph Varon, Jerrold.
ACTIVE Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin in Patients Unsuitable for Warfarin.
Specialized Atrial Fibrillation Clinic reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation Jeroen ML Hendriks, MSc Robert.
Dodson Thompson, DO Northlakes Community Clinic Minong, WI.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Stroke Prevention Using the Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Ximelagatran in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation SPORTIF V Trial Presented at American.
Grace Thacker Xavier University of Louisiana LSUHC – Internal Medicine
Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation M Samson – PGY-2 Riverside Campus July 17, 2015 Academic Day.
Update from the AHA 2010 Jonathan Silberberg February 2011.
ANTI-COAGULATION. ENOXAPARIN DOSING Obesity (BMI >= 40 kg/m2) – may increase prophylactic dose by 30% such as in bariatric surgery Abdominal Surgery ….
AF tips. Rate control No HFB-blocker or CCB or combo Decompensated low EF HFNo B-blocker or CCB Use Dig or Amio + diuresis/HF therapy Decompensated Nl.
WarfarinApixaban Primary outcome: major/clinically relevant bleeding (through 6 months) Secondary objective: Death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis Randomize.
Rhythm and Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation Tom Wallace, MD Cardiac Electrophysiology CHI St. Vincent Heart Clinic Arkansas.
The Case for Rate Control: In the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Charles W. Clogston, M.D. Cardiologist CHI St. Vincent Heart Clinic Arkansas April.
Palpitations & Atrial Fibrillation Dr Mehul B Dhinoja, Consultant Cardiologist & Electrophysiologist BMI The London Independent Hospital.
Atrial Fibrillation: An old age problem PCCS Village Hotel 18 th May 2011.
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation Dalia Hawwass PGY2 June 2015.
Atrial Fibrillation Jay H. Lee, MD Denver Health Medical Center Wednesday 2 July 2008.
Angela Aziz Donnelly April 5, 2016
Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation NEJM Aug 27, 2015.
Denise Sutter, PharmD, BCPS
Update on the Watchman Device CRT 2010 Washington, DC
You can never be too Thin…. An Update on NOACs
David R. Holmes, Jr., M.D. Mayo Clinic, Rochester
A Comparison of RE-LY and ROCKET AF Trial Designs and Outcomes
Guide on how to manage atrial fibrillation in the office
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
Use of NOACs is contraindicated for AF patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate- severe mitral stenosis (usually of rheumatic origin). Although.
Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY
Oral Anticoagulation and Preventing Stent Thrombosis
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
ATHENA Trial Presented at Heart Rhythm 2008 in San Francisco, USA
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Pradaxa Jeopardy Copyright 2001.
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
ACC 2003 Late Breaking Trials
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Pamela E. Scott et al. JACC 2018;71:
NICE 2014 Check pulse in patients presenting with:
Presenter Disclosure Information
Presentation transcript:

 3 million Americans  160,000 new cases each year  16 million by 2050  90% of patients have recurrences  Incremental cost = $26 billion JACC 2004; 43(1): Circ 2006; 114: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2011; 4(3):

RATE CONTROL RHYTHM CONTROL STROKE PREVENTION

An 84 year old woman with HTN presents for routine follow-up of long-standing atrial fibrillation. She is active and asymptomatic. She is on Toprol 100 mg daily and warfarin. Her resting HR is irregular and 97, blood pressure 110/68. Her exam is otherwise normal. What should you do next? A. Continue current therapy. B. Increase her Toprol to 150 mg daily. C. Start dronedarone 400 mg bid. D. Add digoxin mg daily. E. Refer for DCCV.

An 84 year old woman with HTN presents for routine follow-up of long-standing atrial fibrillation. She is active and asymptomatic. She is on Toprol 100 mg daily and warfarin. Her resting HR is irregular and 97, blood pressure 110/68. Her exam is otherwise normal. What should you do next? A. Continue current therapy. B. Increase her Toprol to 150 mg daily. C. Start dronedarone 400 mg bid. D. Add digoxin mg daily. E. Refer for DCCV.

 Rest heart rate ≤ 80 bpm.  24-hr Holter average ≤ 100 bpm.  6-min walk HR ≤ 110 bpm. NEJM. 347(23): 2002.

 614 patients with permanent atrial fibrillation  Strict vs. lenient rate control:  < 80 bpm vs. < 110 bpm  Noninferiority trial  1˚ EP: death from cardiovascular causes, hospitalization from CHF, CVA, systemic embolization, bleeding and life threatening arrhythmic events  Follow-up: 2-3 years

Dyspnea, fatigue or palpitations 45.6% vs. 46.0%Avg HR: 94±9 vs. 76±12

Paroxysmal <7 days Persistent >7 days Permanent >12 months

A 52 year old man with atrial fibrillation and mild LV systolic dysfunction presents with recurrent atrial fibrillation and heart failure despite multiple attempts at DCCV followed by trials of dofetilide and amiodarone. Vitals: HR 68, BP 120/80. What should you do next? A. Titrate heart failure medications, nothing further can be done for the atrial fibrillation. B. Refer for AV node ablation and pacemaker placement. C. Start dronedarone 400 mg bid. D. Cardiovert and refer for catheter ablation (pulmonary vein isolation).

A 52 year old man with atrial fibrillation and mild LV systolic dysfunction presents with recurrent atrial fibrillation and heart failure despite multiple attempts at DCCV followed by trials of dofetilide and amiodarone. Vitals: HR 68, BP 120/80. What should you do next? A. Titrate heart failure medications, nothing further can be done for the atrial fibrillation. B. Refer for AV node ablation and pacemaker placement. C. Start dronedarone 400 mg bid. D. Cardiovert and refer for catheter ablation (pulmonary vein isolation).

A 52 year old man with atrial fibrillation and mild LV systolic dysfunction presents with recurrent atrial fibrillation and heart failure despite multiple attempts at DCCV followed by trials of dofetilide and amiodarone. Vitals: HR 68, BP 120/80. What should you do next? A. Titrate heart failure medications, nothing further can be done for the atrial fibrillation. B. Refer for AV node ablation and pacemaker placement. C. Start dronedarone 400 mg bid. D. Cardiovert and refer for catheter ablation (pulmonary vein isolation).

 1˚ EP ( recurrence or premature study drug discontinuation) : 74% vs 55%  Atrial fibrillation recurrence 63.5% vs. 42%  Premature discontinuation 10.4% vs. 13.3% J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010; 21:

 DAFNE: to determine the most appropriate loading dose for prevention of AF after DCCV Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation

Resting HRExertional HR

 4628 patients: dronedarone 400 mg bid vs placebo  1˚ EP: 1 st hospitalization due to CV events or death  Mean f/u 21 months  Rx discontinuation: 30.2% vs 30.8% > 70 years old hypertension diabetes mellitus prior TIA/CVA/embolization LA diameter ≥50 mm LVEF ≤ 40%

 Multi-national, RDBPC trial comparing placebo to dronedarone in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation  Inclusion criteria: > 65 years old with history of embolization, myocardial infarction, ASCAD, prior CHF or >75 years old/HTN/DM.  Exclusion criteria: class IV or unstable class III CHF  Composite endpoint: MACE (stroke, systemic arterial embolization, MI, cardiovascular death), cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause mortality

 Target enrollment: 10,800 patients  Stopped at 3149 patients significant increase in cardiovascular events in patients taking dronedarone (Permanent Atrial fibriLLAtion outcome Study using dronedarone)

 Hypothesis: Dronedarone will reduce the rate of hospitalization due to heart failure and possibly also reduce mortality by reducing arrhythmia.  Inclusion Criteria:  Class III-IV CHF or PND with LVEF ≤ 35%  Exclusion Criteria:  Acute pulmonary edema <12 hours prior  Recent myocardial infarction  Planned or recent cardiac surgery or angioplasty

 Planned enrollment: 1000 patients  Terminated after a median follow-up of 2 months HR 2.13; 95% CI: 1.07 to 4.25, p =0.03

A 52 year old man with atrial fibrillation and mild LV systolic dysfunction presents with recurrent atrial fibrillation and heart failure despite multiple attempts at DCCV followed by trials of dofetilide and amiodarone. Vitals: HR 68, BP 120/80. What should you do next? A. Titrate heart failure medications, nothing further can be done for the atrial fibrillation. B. Refer for AV node ablation and pacemaker placement. C. Start dronedarone 400 mg bid. D. Cardiovert and refer for catheter ablation (pulmonary vein isolation).

A 52 year old man with atrial fibrillation and mild LV systolic dysfunction presents with recurrent atrial fibrillation and heart failure despite multiple attempts at DCCV followed by trials of dofetilide and amiodarone. Vitals: HR 68, BP 120/80. What should you do next? A. Titrate heart failure medications, nothing further can be done for the atrial fibrillation. B. Refer for AV node ablation and pacemaker placement. C. Start dronedarone 400 mg bid. D. Cardiovert and refer for catheter ablation (pulmonary vein isolation).

…...

 Multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial  Hypothesis: Percutaneous LACA for the purpose of eliminating atrial fibrillation is superior to current state- of-the-art therapy with either rate control or rhythm control drugs.  Inclusion criteria: paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation with stroke/TIA or one or more risk factors  1˚ Endpoint: total mortality  Follow-up: minimum of 2 years

A 76 year old male with HTN and diabetes presents with the new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, discovered on a preoperative EKG for cataract surgery. He is active and asymptomatic. Medications include Toprol and Metformin. His resting heart rate is well controlled. What do you advise to decrease his risk for stroke? A. No additional treatment is necessary. B. Start ASA 325 mg daily. C. Start ASA 81 mg daily and Plavix 75 mg daily. D. Begin warfarin. E. Jantoven, dabigatran or rivaroxaban should be started.

otm.oxfordmedicine.com

A 76 year old male with HTN and diabetes presents with the new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, discovered on a preoperative EKG for cataract surgery. He is active and asymptomatic. Medications include Toprol and Metformin. His resting heart rate is well controlled. What do you advise to decrease his risk for stroke? A. No additional treatment is necessary. B. Start ASA 325 mg daily. C. Start ASA 81 mg daily and Plavix 75 mg daily. D. Begin warfarin. E. Jantoven, dabigatran or rivaroxaban should be started.

Low risk = ASAHigh Risk = AC

*Vascular disease = prior MI, aortic plaque or peripheral vascular disease * Anticoagulation for scores ≥ 2

 1° Endpoint: stroke, systemic embolization, myocardial infarction or vascular death

 Hypothesis: The addition of clopidogrel to ASA will reduce the risk of vascular events.  1° Endpoint: stroke, systemic embolization, myocardial infarction or vascular death

 7,554 patients, median follow-up 3.6 years  1° Endpoint: stroke, systemic embolization, myocardial infarction or vascular death

FDA NEWS RELEASE : 19 OCT 2010 FDA approves Pradaxa to prevent stroke in patients with ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

A 76 year old male with HTN and diabetes presents with the new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, discovered on a preoperative EKG for cataract surgery. He is active and asymptomatic. Medications include Toprol and Metformin. His resting heart rate is well controlled. What do you advise to decrease his risk for stroke? A. No additional treatment is necessary. B. Start ASA 325 mg daily. C. Start ASA 81 mg daily and Plavix 75 mg daily. D. Begin warfarin. E. Jantoven, dabigatran or rivaroxaban should be started.

A 76 year old male with HTN and diabetes presents with the new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, discovered on a preoperative EKG for cataract surgery. He is active and asymptomatic. Medications include Toprol and Metformin. His resting heart rate is well controlled. What do you advise to decrease his risk for stroke? A. No additional treatment is necessary. B. Start ASA 325 mg daily. C. Start ASA 81 mg daily and Plavix 75 mg daily. D. Begin warfarin. E. Jantoven, dabigatran or rivaroxaban should be started.

 18,113 patients randomized to twice daily dabigatran (110,150 mg) or warfarin.  Inclusion: over 75 years old and ≥1:  Prior CVA or TIA  EF <40%, h/o NYHA class II  years old with DM, HTN or ASCAD  1 ⁰ Endpoint: stroke or systemic embolization  Median follow-up = 2 years

 History of heart valve disorder  Need for anticoagulant treatment of disorders other than atrial fibrillation  Stroke in the previous 6 months  Severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 cc/min)  Reversible causes of atrial fibrillation (cardiac surgery, untreated hyperthyroidism)  Plan to perform pulmonary vein isolation

 Increased bleeding risk: -major surgery 3 months -history of intracranial, intraocular, spinal or retroperitoneal or atraumatic intra-articular bleeds -gastrointestinal hemorrhage <1 year; PUD < 1 month -hemorrhagic disorder -uncontrolled hypertension -malignancy or radiation therapy < 6 months; survival < 3 years

 Anemia (Hgb <10) or thrombocytopenia (<100)  Active endocarditis  Active liver disease  Pregnancy or not taking contraception

 For patients with CrCl >30 mL/min: 150 mg orally, twice daily.  For patients with CrCl mL/min: 75 mg orally, twice daily.  Missed doses should be skipped if it cannot be taken at least 6 hours before the next scheduled dose.

 From warfarin:  When converting patients from warfarin therapy to PRADAXA, discontinue warfarin and start PRADAXA when the international normalized ratio (INR) is below 2.0  From Parenteral Therapy:  start 0 to 2 hours before the time that the next dose of the parenteral drug was to have been administered

 Before initiating treatment with a parenteral anticoagulant:  Wait 12 hours for CrCl ≥30 mL/min  Wait 24 hours for CrCl <30 mL/min.

 For CrCl >50 mL/min, start warfarin 3 days before discontinuing PRADAXA.  For CrCl mL/min, start warfarin 2 days before discontinuing PRADAXA.  For CrCl mL/min, start warfarin 1 day before discontinuing PRADAXA.

 Discontinue PRADAXA 1 to 2 days (CrCl ≥50 mL/min) or 3 to 5 days (CrCl <50 mL/min) before invasive or surgical procedures.  Consider longer times for patients undergoing major surgery, spinal puncture, or placement of a spinal or epidural catheter.

 Most common adverse reactions (>15%) are gastritis-like symptoms and bleeding.  P-gp inducers and inhibitors: avoid coadministration of rifampin.

 Offering PRADAXA to all eligible new atrial fibrillation consultations  Prescribing PRADAXA to appropriate existing atrial fibrillation patients who request it  Screening existing atrial fibrillation patients and providing educational materials

limelightprsonar.files.wordpress.com

Wafarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban X X X XX

DabigatranRivaroxabanApixaban Pharmacology12-17 hrs (bid)7-11 hrs (daily)12 hrs (bid) CHADS2 Prior TIA/CVA Primary Outcome Bleeding Death Notes

DabigatranRivaroxabanApixaban Pharmacology12-17 hrs (bid)7-11 hrs (daily)12 hrs (bid) CHADS Prior TIA/CVA20%55%19% Primary Outcome Bleeding Death Notes

DabigatranRivaroxabanApixaban Pharmacology12-17 hrs (bid)7-11 hrs (daily)12 hrs (bid) CHADS Prior TIA/CVA20%55%19% Primary OutcomeSuperior (1.53%)Noninferior/ Superior? ( %) Superior (1.27%) Bleeding Death Notes

DabigatranRivaroxabanApixaban Pharmacology12-17 hrs (bid)7-11 hrs (daily)12 hrs (bid) CHADS Prior TIA/CVA20%55%19% Primary OutcomeSuperior (1.53%)Noninferior/ Superior? ( %) Superior (1.27%) BleedingNoninferior (3.11%)Noninferior (3.6%)Superior (2.1%) Death Notes

DabigatranRivaroxabanApixaban Pharmacology12-17 hrs (bid)7-11 hrs (daily)12 hrs (bid) CHADS Prior TIA/CVA20%55%19% Primary OutcomeSuperior (1.53%)Noninferior/ Superior? ( %) Superior (1.27%) BleedingNoninferior (3.11%)Noninferior (3.6%)Superior (2.1%) DeathNoninferior (p=0.051) NoninferiorSuperior Notes

DabigatranRivaroxabanApixaban Pharmacology12-17 hrs (bid)7-11 hrs (daily)12 hrs (bid) CHADS Prior TIA/CVA20%55%19% Primary OutcomeSuperior (1.53%)Noninferior/ Superior? ( %) Superior (1.27%) BleedingNoninferior (3.11%)Noninferior (3.6%)Superior (2.1%) DeathNoninferior (p=0.051) NoninferiorSuperior NotesGIB? MI?ACS, DVTNot FDA Approved

DabigatranRivaroxabanApixaban Pharmacology12-17 hrs (bid)7-11 hrs (daily)12 hrs (bid) CHADS Prior TIA/CVA20%55%19% Primary OutcomeSuperior (1.53%)Noninferior/ Superior? ( %) Superior (1.27%) BleedingNoninferior (3.11%)Noninferior (3.6%)Superior (2.1%) DeathNoninferior (p=0.051) NoninferiorSuperior NotesGIB? MI?ACS, DVTNot FDA Approved

I’m not dead yet! Bring out your dead-  45% of patients with atrial fibrillation appropriately anticoagulated.  Broad indications for use.  Safety with renal dysfunction.  $$$$$$$

 Strict rate control is not necessary in well compensated atrial fibrillation (III).  Dronedarone is an option to decrease cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (IIa).  Not with class IV CHF or recent decompensation (III).  Evidence is mounting for catheter ablation (I).  Dual anti-platelet therapy is an option in patients unsuitable to safely sustain AC or due to patient preference (IIb).  Oral alternatives to warfarin are available (I).